Topic: How advertisements use rhetorical strategies to educate the public and dissuade them from drunk driving.
Purpose: To save lives and prevent injuries that are caused within drunk driving accidents.
Thesis Statement: The two advertisements use the rhetorical triangle of ethos, pathos, and logos, whilst also invoking both intrinsic and extrinsic proofs to draw out compassion from the audience to come together and completely eradicate drunk driving.
Introduction:
Attention Strategy: Start off giving statistics and an empathetical introduction line that makes the audience interested and concerned, whilst also making readers feel as though they can make a difference about the tragedy presented (number of deaths and injuries in Amerca caused by drunk driving each year)-NHTSA
Orienting Material: Introduce both artifacts and describe them so that the audience may visualize them. Explain blandly where they are from, the message they try to convey, and how they contribute to the topic and purpose.
Preview: Talk about the two artifacts whilst bringing up that they invoke ethos, pathos, and logos, Without explaining thoroughly, allow the audience to piece together some of the essay prior to reading it, whilst also lacking basic information so that they would like to read more. For example, talking about the statistics (logos) of the number of people dead, injured, and victimized (pathos) and how companies such as BMW make advertisements about it, and big social media platforms contain thousands of posts demoting drunk driving (ethos)
Body
(A)Main Idea: The presence of Ethos within the artifacts, creating a credible source of information to be displayed
(A) Support 1- BMW uses Ethos as a big brand name (multi-billion dollar car company) within the first artifact
(A) Specific Support 1a- BMW wouldn’t mislead the audience, because they would lose credibility and sales, so we can trust BMW knowing that their word is with truth or belief of the truth
(A) Specific Support 1b- When BMW focuses its time and money on an advertisement regarding an issue, we know it is a serious problem that needs attention immediately
(A)Support 2- The second artifact has no name to it, but the credibility is found through proven statistics
(A) Specific Support 2a-we can prove that over 800 people (NHTSA) are handicapped due to drunk driving every day, through math, we can figure out that the artifact is telling the truth
(A) Specific Support 2b- The public is not being misled, this artifact is trying to genuinely do good, and by telling the truth, we can listen to what it has to say and know they are in the right set of mind
(B)Main Idea: The presence of Pathos within the artifacts, displaying passion and empathy towards the audience, encouraging them to support the advertisements
(B) Support 1- The first artifact utilizes intrinsic proofs to establish pathos in its advertisement
(B) Specific Support 1a- The image of the organic leg next to the artificial prosthetic (BMW) shows the difference between the two and the oddness between living with a new difficulty in your life, that could’ve been prevented
(B) Specific Support 1b- No stats or specifics were detailed, allowing the audience to visualize the terrible actions the victim went through, evoking pain and empathy form whatever story they made up. (For example, and for whatever reason, I imagined a young girl hit at night by a drunk man driving, and now at a young age, will never be able to grow up with the same capabilities as she would have with the two legs she was born with)
(B)Support 2-The second artifact uses extrinsic proofs to establish pathos in its advertisement
(B) Specific Support 2a- Casualties/Fatalities seen as a number is now seen as an effect on people’s lives.
(B) Specific Support 2b- As a bland source of statistics, this artifact may even intrigue the viewers to investigate farther, looking at more statistics, using the same tactic I used in the introduction to invoke people’s emotions and learn more about how these “numbers” are ruining lives, and change needs to occur to decrease them
(C)Main Idea: The presence of Logos within the artifacts, displaying logic and reason to believe and support the common cause addressed by the artifacts
(C) Support 1- The first artifact uses rhetorical speech to induce logos into their artifact’s message
(C) Specific Support 1a- BMW is saying that cars can break down and be replaced some odd years with no second thought, but the human body has more value than that, and cannot be switched around, with parts given and taken as easily as the car is without invoking trauma and physical pain.
(C) Specific Support 1b- Disabilities are not the worst-case scenario (death is arguably the worst) but preventable disabilities that hinder somebody’s life, more often not a civilian who wasn’t the one DUI, can be prevented, which in turn allow people to live the life they want to live.
(C)Support 2- The second artifact uses extrinsic and intrinsic proofs to provide logistical reasoning and logos in the artifact’s message
(C) Specific Support 2a- The advertisement shows statistics, which can be proven or disproven (I used CDC and NHTSA) to show continuity of the destruction of human lives and welfare brought about by drunk driving
(C) Specific Support 2b- Creators of the artifact did not just throw out statistics, the intention was to draw in public concern and relay the message about the awfulness of drunk driving and the accidents they cause
Conclusion
Summary Statement – By proving the presence of ethos, pathos, and logos within the artifacts, the essay fulfilled the thesis that the advertisements are trying to do good as well as address the whole public with the truth and credibility. It is now up to the people to make the right choice with that information.
Concluding Remark – The general public now has a decision whether to be informed by these artifacts and to be a part of the movement that saves lives from drunk driving accidents, as these advertisements try to set in motion.
Reference Page(s)
BMW. “BMW Artifact Post (For Essay Works Cited).” Edited by Kevin Murray, Kevin Murray RCL, Penn State Blogs, 7 Oct. 2020, sites.psu.edu/kevinmrcl/2020/10/07/bmw-artifact-post-for-essay-works-cited/.
Cantor, DM. “10 Most Effective Anti-Drunk Driving Advertisements.” David Cantor DUI Defense Lawyers, 19 Dec. 2019, cantorduilawyers.com/10-effective-anti-drunk-driving-advertisements.
CDC. “Impaired Driving: Get the Facts.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 24 Aug. 2020, www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/impaired_driving/impaired-drv_factsheet.html.
Nathan Law, Geoffrey G. “National Drunk Driving Facts & Statistics .” Geoffrey G Nathan Law Offices, 2019, www.geoffreygnathanlaw.com/topics/national-drunk-driving-statistics/.
NHTSA. “Traffic Safety Facts 2018 Data.” CrashStats , National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2018, (crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812864#:~:text=In%202018%20there%20were%2010%2C511%20people%20killed%20in%20alcohol%2Dimpaired,the%20United%20States%20in%202018.) .