In today’s global corporate landscape, outsourcing has become an increasingly popular cost saving measure. It has become a fundamental method of assessing a more varied and diverse talent pool, all while spending less than it would take to hire someone locally. This method does have its drawbacks, however. Leaders must be knowledgeable about the potential downsides of outsourcing before they choose to enact this cost-saving measure. These include the possibility of employees being located in widely different time zones, having poorer communication skills due to a language barrier. Or having a different culture which could affect necessary days off or even performance. By analyzing the positive and negative effects of these various dimensions of cultural diversity due to outsourcing, this post will offer some feedback and suggestions on how to work smoothly with global employees.
Outsourcing can be incredibly cost effective, particularly if employees are hired from countries paid much less than in the leader’s own country. This allows the same work to be completed at a fraction of the cost, assuming the skill level of employees in both locations are comparable. This does, however, introduce a number of possible negatives to overall team cohesion. This is especially evident if the international employees are located in a different timezone. This could necessitate team members working different hours, making scheduling meetings and check-ins difficult. It could further slow critical communication, delaying time-sensitive tasks if not managed properly. Finally, it can often be easier to communicate with different time zones using primarily written communication methods such as email or messaging platforms. This can in turn lead to miscommunication due to recipients not being incredibly proficient in the language and misunderstanding the task. Written communication further lacks facial ques and such nonverbal communications which would have otherwise helped the employee understand the situation.
Diversity in the workplace goes beyond simply filling a quota or adhering to the latest social rules. The core value is truly about appreciating what everyone, as individuals, has to offer (Northouse, 2022). It is the leader’s responsibility to support this kind of diversity and set the right example. This could include understanding and respecting the different holidays and customs that are important to people of varying communities. When showing care and consideration for individuals and their cultural identity, leaders are showing their employees that they are respected. On a more negative note, having a diverse workplace can prove to be more difficult, especially when being considerate about negative stereotypes or unfair ways of thinking. As an example, if the leader is a woman leader, she may be subjected to less respect just because of her gender (Northouse, 2022). It is important to emphasize that this way of thinking would not be acceptable from any party. To discover if this may be an issue, it may be prudent to have employees take a Gender-Leader Bias Questionnaire which allows people to become aware of their own implicit biases so they may overcome them (Northouse, 2022). Leadership must take a strong stand on treating everyone fairly and ensuring the workplace enforces rules that respect each individual. They must strive to make a space where everyone feels heard and important, no matter their gender, race, religion, or where they come from.
Managing a team that works around the globe necessarily means dealing with different time zones. To do this well, managers should use online calendars that can be set to show everyone’s schedule in their own time zone. This allows for the ability to plan meetings so that they occur when everyone is available, no matter their time zone. Leaders should also communicate with their team often, maybe even every day for a quick meeting. In these short chats, often called “stand-ups,” everyone can share what they plan to work on and if there’s anything that might impede their productivity. In this way, managers can ensure that all team members understand their responsibilities. On a similar note, it may be beneficial for leaders to consider training their teams to communicate better. When everyone feels like they can share their ideas clearly, the entire team can improve due to the increase in ideas. This could certainly prove to be impractical, however. Saving money by hiring people from different locations should not leave the team in a place where they are unable to communicate or understand each other easily. If a certain individual does not speak the language the company uses well, they might need to take some language classes before they join the team. This could cost a bit of money, but if it would lead to everyone understanding each other, it would be worth it. On a final note, not hiring someone just because they do not speak the language can seem unfair, but if it means the team is unable to work together, it is a tough choice that has to be made.
To summarize, outsourcing can greatly assist in cutting down costs, but only if leaders are ready to handle the possibly difficult communication aspects that come with it. For businesses today, using outsourcing and valuing diversity are key. Good communication helps teams work across time zones, and tools that help everyone stay on the same page are really available. Training to improve how we speak and write to each other can mitigate confusion. Workshops on how to communicate with people from different cultures can help too, and video calls can make talking online feel more like talking in person. Leaders should not only accept diversity, but also embrace it. They should teach their teams to understand and respect each other’s backgrounds, which includes respecting different traditions and holidays. Leaders should show respect and deal quickly with any unfair treatment. When leaders act this way, they make a workplace that is both smart about outsourcing and inclusive of everyone. This is how to make the most of a global workspace.
Citations
Northouse, P. G. (2022). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). SAGE Publishing.
Hi Madeline!
You offer insightful information about the drawbacks and advantages of using outsourcing to leverage a diverse workforce in your blog post on striking a balance between global outsourcing and team cohesion. The positive aspects of cost-effectiveness and having access to a diverse talent pool are well-discussed, and they are balanced against potential drawbacks like cultural differences, language barriers, and time zones. Your focus on the value of understanding cultural diversity and having effective communication fits in with the concepts we’ve covered in our leadership course. The issues brought up regarding how time zone variations affect team cohesiveness are relevant to the difficulties encountered by many multinational teams. Your recommendations to establish daily stand-up meetings and use online calendars for scheduling are sensible and consistent with the value of consistent communication in leadership techniques. Furthermore, your explanation of the possible drawbacks of depending solely on written communication in a multicultural team environment where language skills may differ emphasizes the necessity for leaders to be aware of the communication strategies they use. It’s important to note the link you make between leaders’ duties to promote inclusivity and workplace diversity. Everyone feels more valued at work when their cultural backgrounds, holidays, and customs are acknowledged and respected. A proactive strategy for advancing justice and equality is your recommendation to identify and address implicit biases using instruments such as the Gender-Leader Bias Questionnaire. In addition to being realistic, your suggestions for leading international teams, like using internet resources and encouraging open communication, also line up with the leadership theories our class has covered. To overcome potential obstacles in a globalized work environment, a commitment to communication skills training for teams and language classes for team members who might experience language barriers is evident. To sum up, your blog post deftly examines the challenges of striking a balance between team cohesion and global outsourcing while offering considerate recommendations and solutions. The incorporation of leadership theories and concepts augments the profundity of your analysis, resulting in a thorough and perceptive composition on the obstacles and tactics related to spearheading a heterogeneous, international team.
References:
Northouse, P.G. (2021). Leadership Theory and Practice (9th ed). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
The Pennsylvania State University. (2023). Leadership and Diversity [Lecture notes]. Canvas @ PSU. https://psu.instructure.com/courses/2283258/modules/items/38927271