Outline for “Sarah Palin Uses a Hand-O-Prompter” from The Colbert Report

1. Introduction
   1. Overview of the piece
   2. Rhetorical strategies
   3. Commonplaces
   4. Overall message
2. Logical Fallacies and Rhetorical Figures
   1. Twisting a cliché
   2. Reductio ad absurdum
   3. Inventing new words
   4. Taking a phrase literally
3. Explaining Satire Through Satire
   1. Details of the story
   2. Colbert’s use of wordplay
   3. Key rhetorical victory
4. Commonplaces and Aims
   1. Mainly Democratic audience
   2. Sarah Palin’s image against her
   3. Defends President Obama
5. Conclusion
   1. Restatement of thesis
   2. Viewer takeaway
   3. Colbert’s style and delivery
   4. Success of the piece

Evans 1

Lindsey Evans

English 015

Dr. Jessica O’Hara

3 March 3 2014

Portfolio 1 Letter of Introduction

For Paper 1, I wrote my rhetorical analysis about the United States Army Reserve commercial titled “Where Can…”  For this paper, I argued that the commercial combines aspects of patriotism with the American Dream to convince citizens that joining the Army Reserve benefits both their country and themselves.  To revise my draft, I focused mostly on wording.  After receiving comments on my first draft from the blog, I eliminated the repeat of the word “lastly” and separated the ideas of the image of war and the “Army Strong” phrase into two different paragraphs.  Then, in the new fifth paragraph, I talked more about how the commercial draws upon several ideologies at once to capture the reader.  Finally, in the second paragraph, I included a more detailed analysis of the commercial’s choice of title.

For Paper 2, I analyzed two different newscasts about Shaun White’s performance during the Sochi Olympics (one from USA Today and one from Daily Mail).  USA Today viewed White’s Olympics with utter disappointment, blaming White himself for the failure while Daily Mail blamed White’s performance on the poor conditions of the half pipe.  To revise this paper, I corrected the misspelling of the word “shear” to the proper “sheer” twice.  I made the ending of the first paragraph more specific to the news articles being discussed rather than a broad overview of media.  In both the second and fourth paragraphs, I made the introductions more concise and eliminated the popular “A picture is worth a thousand words” phrase in the latter.  Also in the second paragraph, I focused more on the newscast’s personal blame of Shaun White.

Evans 2

Finally, I changed the last paragraph to focus more on loss than victory to mirror the true result of White’s Olympic Games.

Overall, I do feel as though I am growing as a writer.  The revisions have helped me to become more concise with my language, and I have learned a great deal through the passion blog postings about how to appeal to your audience.  Also, Thank You for Arguing has taught me an incredible amount about rhetoric, making me a better thinker.  I had never thought about the differences between fights and arguments before or even realized how to use tools such as ethos, pathos, and logos to win your opponent over.  English 15 has indeed helped me to become a better student on all levels of writing, grammar, and philosophy as a whole.

Evans 1

Lindsey Evans

English 015

Dr. Jessica O’Hara

21 February 2014

Is Fourth in the World Really That Bad?

In today’s world the pressures placed on Olympic athletes are tremendous.  With the invention of television and the expansion of media came an exponential growth in both the athletes’ audiences as well as burdens.  From basketball to bobsledding, citizens of a country take a vested interest in the games and see it as a sense of national pride to perform well.  Unfortunately, though, this sense of patriotism often clouds the minds of viewers, making the games more about medal counts than shear respect for talent.  Even more unfortunately is that this attitude often leaks into the media.  One of such instances occurred very recently in the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympic Games in Russia after snowboarder Shaun White’s unexpected performance; though White finished fourth overall, his reputation for being an Olympic star made fans feel disappointed in his failure to make the medal stands.  Some news sources say White’s performance was an utter disappointment after the hype leading up to Sochi.  Others defend White, blaming his mistakes on the poor conditions of the half pipe on the day of the competition.  Two of these articles respectively are the article titled “No medal for Shaun White in Olympic men’s half pipe” from USA Today and “Team America crashes out on ‘c**p’ snow: Shaun White loses out on third half pipe gold after every U.S. snowboarder falls following concerns about course conditions” by Daily Mail.  Regardless of the stories behind an article or newscast, however, presentation is key; audiences can only interpret what editors desire them to see in their mind’s eye.

Evans 2

In media as in life, words can be powerful tools.  Wars can be avoided with them, they can land you your dream job in an interview, and just four can convince a partner to say “I do.”  Words are intended to make an audience form an opinion about a topic, and news stories, no matter how factual they appear, are no exception.  In the newscast titled “No medal for Shaun White in Olympic men’s half pipe” from USA Today, the newscaster’s language depicts Shaun White’s Olympic performance as a disaster.  Even the title displays this opinion.  For example, though half of the newscast is dedicated to White’s apparent failure, the other half recaps the highlights of the day for women’s skiing and luge without any recognition in the story’s title.  Although the newscast covers more than just Shaun White, the headline only displays White’s standings to draw attention to his fall from grace.  Continuing into the story, the narrator’s specific use of words remains a prominent form of persuasion.  Though in written form the article appears as nonbiased, (using less intense verbs and adjectives such as “faltered” and “uncharacteristic mistakes”) the inflections in the newscaster’s voice convey an overall negative connotation to the viewer.  Though “faltered” appears to be a somewhat subdued word on the surface, the narrator puts great emphasis on it, making it stand out to the audience as something very important.  This happens several other times throughout the newscast, twice when describing White’s specific mistakes (“falling twice and had two bobbles in his second run”) and his late drop of the slope-style event.  In the latter, it was too late for another athlete to take White’s place, and the narrator’s tone seems to make White out to be the bad guy, as though he wanted to take the position away from another Olympian.  Similarly, though the commentator could have just said that Shaun White finished in fourth place overall- an outstanding achievement for any athlete- he quickly throws in the comment “and without a medal.”  By simply adding the conjunction “and” to the statement, the newscaster immediately wipes away the positive feelings associated with such an exceptional performance by one man facing the best

Evans 3

in the world and replaces them with feelings of contempt.  One final act of persuasion in the newscast occurs at the very end of White’s coverage.  As the story switches from Shaun White’s performance to those of Devin Logan and Erin Hamlin (both medal winners in the 2014 Sochi Olympics), the commentator leads with “but there was good news for Team U.S.A” (No medal for Shaun White).  This sharp dismissal of Shaun White from the news story provides a deep contrast for the intended emotions of viewers and blatantly portrays the news story’s opinion that fourth place just was not good enough.

The second article by Daily Mail takes a different approach.  In the wordy title “Team America crashes out on ‘c**p’ snow: Shaun White loses out on third half pipe gold after every U.S. snowboarder falls following concerns about course conditions” White’s name appears at the end, almost as an afterthought to belittle the importance of the statement in the overall scheme of the piece.  The article is displaying the message that, although White is included, he is not the key emphasis of the text.  Instead, the story takes the blame from Shaun White himself (as was the case in the USA Today newscast) for the mistakes and instead places the blame on the article’s main topic: poor conditions on the half pipe.  While USA Today only briefly touched on the poor conditions of the half pipe, Daily Mail makes it the main news story.  Though Daily Mail makes several comments about White’s disappointing performance, the source ultimately defends the athlete by stating throughout the article that both American and foreign snowboarders had been commenting on the slushiness of the half pipe in advance of the event.  The article has facts spread throughout commenting on the high temperatures, the concerns of athletes, and even the steps being taken to improve the conditions.  The inclusion of such specifics is intended to make the audience more susceptible to persuasion, as they make the source seem more credible.  This is supported through various quotations from the Americans, who referred to the half pipe as “crappy,” “garbage,” and, as White said himself, “pretty hard to

Evans 4

ride.”  Also, unlike USA Today, Daily Mail chooses to focus on the performances of all of the competitors in the event (specifically the Americans) rather than solely Shaun White.  For example, the article has a small section dedicated to the event’s winner, Switzerland’s Iouri Podladtchikov, and also states that “It is the first time an American has not won a medal since the sport was introduced to the Olympics in 1998.”  This fact is quickly followed with a quote from snowboarder Danny Davis- not Shaun White- that they “let America down.”  Daily Mail is trying to convey the message that, although snowboarding is an individual event, Team U.S.A. failed as just that: a team.  Furthermore, because this is a written article, the author also incorporates the use of strategic punctuation within the piece.  In the article’s very first sentence, “Shaun White has failed to defend his title in the men’s snowboard half pipe at Sochi- after he and his teammates crashed out of a course they called ‘crappy’ and ‘garbage’,” the author chose to place dashes between two very distinct ideas (No medal for Shaun White).  The first half of the sentence sounds as though the article takes a negative approach, but the dashes are followed by a different reasoning for White’s mishap.  As author Heather Holleman refers to in her book, How to Write with Flair, dashes are equivalent to “shouts.”  To her, dashes “[stop] the reader and [make] him see something important…that makes a big difference to the meaning of the sentence” (Holleman 42).  With the addition of dashes to this sentence, the author changes the audience’s perception of the events that occurred.  The author says that Shaun White did fail to defend his title, but only because the half pipe’s conditions were not up to their usual standards.  By drawing attention to the second statement, the article manages to persuade readers that the results of Shaun White’s Olympic performance were something beyond his control.

Another key tool of persuasion in the news is imagery.  As the common phrase goes, “A picture is worth a thousand words.”  This means that an audience is impacted much more emotionally by a picture than any other form of communication.  USA Today takes advantage of

Evans 5

this human trait and plays to it with a photograph montage during the newscast about Shaun White’s standings.  Instead of showing the newscaster, as many news reports these days are prone to do, this story displays only images of White.  Though there are several generic photographs of White in the air on his snowboard, slightly more than half of the images depict either White’s mistakes during his half pipe runs or his agony afterward.  Three of the pictures (including the very first image of the newscast) show White looking down at the ground.  The most prominent of these is an image of White holding his head in his hands after a run.  To the reader, this simple glance and the body language from White convey a negative message of defeat, a message which the commenter bolsters with his narration.  Furthermore, after the series of sorrowful images, the story’s pictures take a turn just as the mood does.  When discussing the medal wins by Devin Logan and Erin Hamlin, the pictures are noticeably much cheerier.  Snapshots of fumbles and frustration are replaced by images of successes and celebrations, thus solidifying the audience’s perceived views of victory and defeat, winners and losers (No medal for Shaun White).

Yet again, however, Daily Mail prefers to show the images from a different angle.  Although the same exact photograph of White holding his head in his hands is displayed in this article, the image is joined by images of both Danny Davis and Gregory Bretz, two other American snowboarders, frustrated by falls during their runs.  By including these two other images and by displaying White’s image only afterwards, Daily Mail plays on the idea that we are only human.  This technique is also used earlier in the piece where a picture of White’s fall is followed immediately by those of his teammates.  Daily Mail then continues its happier approach to the events at Sochi by showing pictures of sportsmanship as Shaun White embraces gold medal winner Iourdi Podladtschikov after the scores are announced.  These images, in combination with photographs of Podladtschikov celebrating with his family, leave the reader

Evans 6

feeling a great deal more positive about the events at Sochi as the article approaches its conclusion (Warren).

What is it that defines a winner?  Though this seems like a relatively straightforward question, take a moment to think about the many different definitions for this word.  Some people take a dictionary approach and base it solely off of an athlete’s records.  Some people see it as sportsmanship.  And still, some people describe it as shear effort and determination.  In short, victory has many meanings for different people, making two newscasts about a single event appear very distinct from one another.  Shaun White’s Sochi Olympics are a perfect example of one of such cases.  From USA Today’s point of view White’s performance at the games is something to be forgotten.  On the other hand, Daily Mail defines the moment as a learning experience.  Though both newscasts discuss the same exact event, the emotions and conclusions drawn from the audiences could not have been more different.  USA Today’s article leaves readers feeling angry with Shaun White for letting down his country while Daily Mail allows readers to sympathize with his mistakes under the circumstances.  In the end, however, it is up to the audience to use its own personal values and beliefs to decipher the facts and decide for itself which article’s judgment is right and which is wrong.

Evans 7

Works Cited

Holleman, Ph.D., Heather. How to Write with Flair. Charleston: 2011. 42. Print.

No medal for Shaun White in Olympic men’s halfpipe. USA Today, 2014. Web. 19 Feb 2014.

<http://www.usatoday.com>.

Warren, Lydia. “Team America crashes out on ‘c**p’ snow: Shaun White loses out on third half

pipe gold after every US snowboarder falls following concerns about course conditions.’

Daily Mail. Associated Newspapers, 11 Feb 2014. Web. 19 Feb 2014. <http://www.dailymail.co.uk>.

Evans 1

Lindsey Evans

English 015

Dr. Jessica O’Hara

21 February 2014

Where Can…

“Ask not what your country can do for you…ask what you can do for your country.”  These were the words spoken by President John F. Kennedy on September 5, 1960 during a speech in Detroit, Michigan.  Though, at the time, the President was referring to the “New Frontier” of space, this popular phrase has been applied to nearly all aspects of patriotism (“Kennedy’s New Frontier”).  From paying taxes to starting a business, the betterment of the United States has always been a deep-seeded value of Americans.  Unfortunately though, this goal has sometimes clashed with a separate value geared toward self-improvement: the American Dream.  In a recent United States Army Reserve commercial titled “Where Can…,” writers play on these aspects of American culture, showing that the two values can sometimes be one in the same.  By winning over the hearts and minds of the audience, wiping away negative connotations, and playing to the American sense of pride in one’s country and honor for self-sacrifice, “Where Can…” shows civilians that they can heroically serve their country without the sacrifice of a successful life.

The first challenge of “Where Can…” was to show civilians that a career in the United States Army Reserve would not have to mean putting their lives on hold.  In the commercial, both a marketing administrator and a doctor are shown trading in their work clothes for the uniform of a soldier.  During the transition, the commercial asks the audience “Where can a marketing administrator be a watercraft engineer?” and “Where can a doctor serve his community while also treating patients around the world?” (U.S. Army).  Each of these questions

Evans 2

shows the audience that the man and woman supposedly switching careers are actually performing the same tasks they would during their current jobs.  Neither had to give up doing what he or she loved, nor do the positions appear any less rewarding than the originals.  The commercial continues by showing a student placing a helmet on his head while asking “Where can a student stay in school while expanding his education beyond the classroom?” (U.S. Army).  This statement continues to bolster the idea that the Army Reserve is not the end of a journey, but the beginning.  As the commercial draws to a close, the narrator finalizes the capturing of the audiences mind with the statement that “In the U.S. Army Reserve you’ll find the strength to develop new skills and gain an edge to get ahead” (U.S. Army).  Overall, the words of the commercial are a key rhetorical tool for the writers.  By appealing to the logos of the audience, the U.S. Army Reserve shows that it can open doors to new possibilities and give recruits an advantage over competitors in any career field.  This idea coincides with the American Dream by making the audience feel as though they themselves would greatly benefit from a career in the military while still contributing to the betterment of the United States by making a difference as a soldier.

The U.S. Army Reserve, however, could not simply state these facts to the audience and gain the same level of success.  Instead, the writers had to elicit trust from the audience.  This is done in several different, yet very subtle ways contributing to the ethos displayed in the advertisement.  First, the characters chosen for the commercial were not selected at random.  A marketing administrator- a highly elite member of the business class- and a doctor- an extremely prestigious member of society- both embody people of stature in the community.  The characters remain relatable to the audience, for they exist as hard-working everyday Americans, but they also convey a sense of authority in their respective fields.  The commercial essentially tries to show that if civilians with careers as prestigious as these are willing to make the switch to a

Evans 3

uniform, why would anyone, regardless of their own career, say no?   The characters are also made to be diverse (a Caucasian female marketing administrator and an African American male doctor) to broaden the scope of the commercial’s audience, making it relevant to any American regardless of gender, skin color, or ethnic background.  The next appeal to the audience is done so using a celebrity endorsement.  The narrator of the commercial, Gary Sinese, holds an incredible ethos.  With roles in Apollo 13 and CSI: New York, Sinese has shown affluence in film and television for years.  However, for this particular commercial, Sinese’s role as Lieutenant Dan Taylor in the famous film Forrest Gump makes the audience more inclined to listen (“Forrest Gump (1994) Full Cast and Crew”).  Though Sinese was never a solder in Vietnam and could never relate to veterans on the subject of true battle, Sinese’s role as a soldier gives viewers an unconscious trust towards his words.  Despite the fact that Gary Sinese has never been and never will be a member of the United States Army Reserve, his mere endorsement of their cause is enough to grab the attention of viewers and hear out just what the commercial is trying to say.

The final challenge of “Where Can…” was to win over the hearts of the audience.  To do this, the U.S. Army Reserve drew on several different American ideologies and utilized the rhetorical strategy of pathos.  To explain, it is very common in today’s society to find opposition to the idea of a military.  Though great respect is shown for soldiers and veterans, the idea of war often turns people’s eyes and hearts away from the idea of service.  “Where Can…” plays on this not only American, but universal detest for war by eliminating it from the advertisement completely.  There is no display of a bullet-ridden war zone, no scene of the horrible injuries sustained by a soldier after an attack, and no use of weaponry at all.  In fact, graphic scenery of any kind is simply avoided, replaced by acts of science and diplomacy.  The engineer is a creator, fixing and inspecting her ship.  The doctor is a healer, providing care for the sick no

Evans 4

matter the patient.  Lastly, the student is a diplomatist, engaging in what seems to be peaceful talks with locals.  Instead of focusing on the public’s negative connotation with military action the commercial highlights acts of heroism, calling on the American values of patriotism and honor.  This emotional appeal is further emphasized by the inspirational background music for the commercial, giving viewers chills as they hear the familiar regal tune associated with a world power for good.

In one final act of persuasion, the U.S. Army Reserve pulls out its most powerful phrase, the famous ending to any Army commercial that “There’s strong, and then there’s Army strong” (U.S. Army).  These seven words have a profound impact on viewers.  The phrase acts as a bridge between the symbolic heroism of the uniform of a soldier and the aspect of the American Dream valuing the feats of strength and power.  By separating the United States Army from the adjective “strong,” the commercial conveys the message that the Army transcends bravery to the point of something superhuman.  This not only plays to the idea that soldiers are heroes, but it also gives viewers the sense that by joining, they too can reach another level of superiority, an essential aspiration of the American Dream.  With one simple sentence, the Army solidifies its place in the hearts of its audience, raising within them a call to act.

It has long been an American belief that the greatest honor of all is to serve your country.  Countless books, films, songs, and even video games have been created depicting the valor of soldiers and, at times, even glorifying the idea of war.  However, these are merely dramatizations for viewers.  Things in the real world are very different; it therefore makes sense that the U.S. Army Reserve’s advertising methods must also be different.  Commercials for the Army- or any military branch for that matter- are not trying to get customers to buy their product or purchase a service.  They are asking viewers to make a life choice, something most people are not comfortable making.  The U.S. Army Reserve commercial had to prove to Americans that by

Evans 5

becoming soldiers, they could make a difference within their own lives as well as for the United States.  Only by winning the audience’s minds, trust, and admiration could it show viewers that joining would be the logical and patriotic choice.  In my opinion, the Army Reserve commercial is an excellent example of the powers of rhetorical persuasion.  Through logos, ethos, pathos, and the use of American ideologies, the Army Reserve shows civilians that they can heroically serve their country without the sacrifice of their careers.  In just 29 short seconds, “Where Can…” not only captures the ideals of a nation, but also the desires of its people.

Evans 6

Works Cited

 “Forrest Gump (1994) Full Cast and Crew.” Internet Movie Database. Internet Movie Database.

Web. 8 Feb 2014. <http://www.imdb.com>.

“Kennedy’s New Frontier.” U.S. History Pre-Columbian to the New Millenium. Independence

Hall Association. Web. 8 Feb 2014. <http://www.ushistory>.

U.S. Army, prod. U.S. Army TV Spot For Where Can…. iSpot.tv, Inc., 2013. Web. 8 Feb 2014.

<http://www.ispot.tv/ad/7kEn/us-army-where-can>.

“Synopsis for Forrest Gump (1994).” Internet Movie Database. Internet Movie Database. Web. 8

Feb 2014. <http://www.imdb.com>.

 

News Regarding Shaun White’s Sochi Olympics

1. Introduction
   1. Pressures placed on Olympic athletes
   2. Bias of media
   3. Shaun White’s official  standings in Sochi
2. Word Choice
   1. Titles of the news stories
   2. Video announcer’s inflections
   3. Diction and Syntax
3. Imagery
   1. Picture choices
   2. Feelings conveyed to the audience
   3. Comparison within video to other athletes’ performances
4. Conclusion
   1. Reflection on news story differences
   2. Impacts of differences for audience
   3. Restatement of thesis

II will most likely be split up into more than one body paragraph depending on the amount of information available.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2557024/Team-America-crashes-c-snow-Shaun-White-loses-half-pipe-gold-US-snowboarder-falls-following-concerns-course-conditions.html

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/sochi/2014/02/11/snowboarding-halfpipe-shaun-white-ayumu-hirano/5385567/

“Ask not what your country can do for you…ask what you can do for your country.”  These were the words spoken by President John F. Kennedy on September 5, 1960 during a speech in Detroit, Michigan.  Though, at the time, the President was referring to the “New Frontier” of space, this popular phrase has been applied to nearly all aspects of patriotism (“Kennedy’s New Frontier”).  From paying taxes to starting a business, the betterment of the United States has always been a deep-seeded value of Americans.  Unfortunately though, this goal has sometimes clashed with a separate value geared toward self-improvement: the American Dream.  In a recent United States Army Reserve commercial titled “Where Can…,” writers play on these aspects of American culture, showing that the two values can sometimes be one in the same.  By winning over the hearts and minds of the audience, wiping away negative connotations, and playing to the American sense of pride in one’s country and honor for self-sacrifice, “Where Can…” shows civilians that they can heroically serve their country without the sacrifice of a successful life.

The first challenge of “Where Can…” was to show civilians that a career in the United States Army Reserve would not have to mean putting their lives on hold.  In the commercial, both a marketing administrator and a doctor are shown trading in their work clothes for the uniform of a soldier.  During the transition, the commercial asks the audience “Where can a marketing administrator be a watercraft engineer?” and “Where can a doctor serve his community while also treating patients around the world?” (U.S. Army).  Each of these questions shows the audience that the man and woman supposedly switching careers are actually performing the same tasks they would during their current jobs.  Neither had to give up doing what he or she loved, nor do the positions appear any less rewarding than the originals.  The commercial continues by showing a student placing a helmet on his head while asking “Where can a student stay in school while expanding his education beyond the classroom?” (U.S. Army).  This statement continues to bolster the idea that the Army Reserve is not the end of a journey, but the beginning.  As the commercial draws to a close, the narrator finalizes the capturing of the audiences mind with the statement that “In the U.S. Army Reserve you’ll find the strength to develop new skills and gain an edge to get ahead” (U.S. Army).  Overall, the words of the commercial are a key rhetorical tool for the writers.  By appealing to the logos of the audience, the U.S. Army Reserve shows that it can open doors to new possibilities and give recruits an advantage over competitors in any career field.  This idea coincides with the American Dream by making the audience feel as though they themselves would greatly benefit from a career in the military while still contributing to the betterment of the United States by making a difference as a soldier.

The U.S. Army Reserve, however, could not simply state these facts to the audience and gain the same level of success.  Instead, the writers had to elicit trust from the audience.  This is done in several different, yet very subtle ways contributing to the ethos displayed in the advertisement.  First, the characters chosen for the commercial were not selected at random.  A marketing administrator- a highly elite member of the business class- and a doctor- an extremely prestigious member of society- both embody people of stature in the community.  The characters remain relatable to the audience, for they exist as hard-working everyday Americans, but they also convey a sense of authority in their respective fields.  The commercial essentially tries to show that if civilians with careers as prestigious as these are willing to make the switch to a uniform, why would anyone, regardless of their own career, say no?   The characters are also made to be diverse (a Caucasian female marketing administrator and an African American male doctor) to broaden the scope of the commercial’s audience, making it relevant to any American regardless of gender, skin color, or ethnic background.  The next appeal to the audience is done so using a celebrity endorsement.  The narrator of the commercial, Gary Sinese, holds an incredible ethos.  With roles in Apollo 13 and CSI: New York, Sinese has shown affluence in film and television for years.  However, for this particular commercial, Sinese’s role as Lieutenant Dan Taylor in the famous film Forrest Gump makes the audience more inclined to listen (“Forrest Gump (1994) Full Cast and Crew”).  Though Sinese was never a solder in Vietnam and could never relate to veterans on the subject of true battle, Sinese’s role as a soldier gives viewers an unconscious trust towards his words.  Despite the fact that Gary Sinese has never been and never will be a member of the United States Army Reserve, his mere endorsement of their cause is enough to grab the attention of viewers and hear out just what the commercial is trying to say.

The final challenge of “Where Can…” was to win over the hearts of the audience.  To do this, the U.S. Army Reserve drew on several different American ideologies and utilized the rhetorical strategy of pathos.  To explain, it is very common in today’s society to find opposition to the idea of a military.  Though great respect is shown for soldiers and veterans, the idea of war often turns people’s eyes and hearts away from the idea of service.  “Where Can…” plays on this not only American, but universal detest for war by eliminating it from the advertisement completely.  There is no display of a bullet-ridden war zone, no scene of the horrible injuries sustained by a soldier after an attack, and no use of weaponry at all.  In fact, graphic scenery of any kind is simply avoided, replaced by acts of science and diplomacy.  The engineer is a creator, fixing and inspecting her ship.  The doctor is a healer, providing care for the sick no matter the patient.  Lastly, the student is a diplomatist, engaging in what seems to be peaceful talks with locals.  Instead of focusing on the public’s negative connotation with military action the commercial highlights acts of heroism, calling on the American values of patriotism and honor.  This emotional appeal is further emphasized by the inspirational background music for the commercial, giving viewers chills as they hear the familiar regal tune associated with a world power for good.  Lastly, in one final act of persuasion, the U.S. Army Reserve pulls out its most powerful phrase, the famous ending to any Army commercial that “There’s strong, and then there’s Army strong” (U.S. Army).  These seven words have a profound impact on viewers.  The phrase acts as a bridge between the symbolic heroism of the uniform of a soldier and the aspect of the American Dream valuing the feats of strength and power.  By separating the United States Army from the adjective “strong,” the commercial conveys the message that the Army transcends bravery to the point of something superhuman.  This not only plays to the idea that soldiers are heroes, but it also gives viewers the sense that by joining, they too can reach another level of superiority, an essential aspiration of the American Dream.  With one simple sentence, the Army solidifies its place in the hearts of its audience, raising within them a call to act.

It has long been an American belief that the greatest honor of all is to serve your country.  Countless books, films, songs, and even video games have been created depicting the valor of soldiers and, at times, even glorifying the idea of war.  However, these are merely dramatizations for viewers.  Things in the real world are very different; it therefore makes sense that the U.S. Army Reserve’s advertising methods must also be different.  Commercials for the Army- or any military branch for that matter- are not trying to get customers to buy their product or purchase a service.  They are asking viewers to make a life choice, something most people are not comfortable making.  The U.S. Army Reserve commercial had to prove to Americans that by becoming soldiers, they could make a difference within their own lives as well as for the United States.  Only by winning the audience’s minds, trust, and admiration could it show viewers that joining would be the logical and patriotic choice.  In my opinion, the Army Reserve commercial is an excellent example of the powers of rhetorical persuasion.  Through logos, ethos, pathos, and the use of American ideologies, the Army Reserve shows civilians that they can heroically serve their country without the sacrifice of their careers.  In just 29 short seconds, “Where Can…” not only captures the ideals of a nation, but also the desires of its people.

Works Cited

 “Forrest Gump (1994) Full Cast and Crew.” Internet Movie Database. Internet Movie Database. Web. 8 Feb 2014. <http://www.imdb.com>.

“Kennedy’s New Frontier.” U.S. History Pre-Columbian to the New Millenium. Independence Hall Association. Web. 8 Feb 2014. <http://www.ushistory>.

U.S. Army, prod. U.S. Army TV Spot For Where Can…. iSpot.tv, Inc., 2013. Web. 8 Feb 2014. <http://www.ispot.tv/ad/7kEn/us-army-where-can>.