Initial Report

Research began with a pool of data – simple enough. I pooled eight separate budgets posted by full time RV users ranging from 30 years old to 71.  All of the budgets were couples, not all were retired. The 30 year old couples were still employed, but mobile.  The years vary from 2009 to 2014, so there are variables that will change over time: inflation leads to varying prices in everything, gas prices seem to consistently go up whereas boondocking increases as campground prices vary leading to less spent on campground fees.

I used the same categories laid out by an initial finding on RV-dreams.com.  The couple blogging on this site had comprehensive data dating back to 2007, so the categories used ranging from RV payments and insurance to cell phone payments, laundry costs and emergency allotment.  There are 22 categories, and there is room for addition and removal of categories – three of the categories on RV-dreams provided total zeroes – so these are by no means finite.

After compiling the data, there were a few things that interested me and also provoked thought about what is important to different demographics of full timers.  The last two columns in the spreadsheet are couples in their late 20’s to early 30’s.  Campground Fees, Insurance, and Cell Phone expenditures are higher than average, and significantly higher than the other six couples.  Cell phones and food demand more financial consideration than other categories by older couples like maintenance and insurance.  This provides an interesting look into what is important to people on the road varying by age.

As a soon to be 22 year old, I would consider my cell phone a priority. As shallow as that is, it is a reality.  If a poll was taken in the Stuckeman Family Building alone, over 90% of the users of the building would have a cell phone, that is just how the world works in this day and age.  We are young, we have a demand for information as fast as humanly possible, whether it’s who changed their profile picture, stock prices, what Keith Olbermann said about Penn State, etc… And we thrive off of it.  I want to know what is happening as soon as it is happening, and I will pay for that.  The numbers back this up: older couples don’t pay for cable, internet, and cell phones.  The young couples pay up, and by almost 600 dollars above the averages.  Another thing that the younger generation pays up for is campground fees.  Oddly enough, I think I would attribute this to two things: lack of experience with cheap campgrounds or boondocking, and more respect/fear/attention to law enforcement.  The two couples I found paid a fair amount for campground fees – maybe it is because they are new to the road and these areas provide spaces to meet others of the same age.  I have to imagine that having an established area to set up camp is a good place to begin the grand journey of full time RV living.

The largest average spent is on Food, closely followed by Fuel.  The overall consensus is find the state that has the lowest prices, lowest taxes, largest chain of low end market places: Wal-Mart seems to be heaven for full time RV users. Not only is food, clothing, propane purchased there – people boondock there.  Online blogs speak highly of South Dakota, Florida and Texas as states that are supportive of people living full time on the road.  I think that to provide an optimal budget, or at least be able to find more cost effective areas to decrease spending on some of the categories listed earlier, that the states should play a part in where fuel/food is purchased.

I have compiled this data, and have also seen the averages for a wide array of categories.  I think that the next step is to not only find more budgets to refine the data further, also change some of the categories that I use for analyzing budgets, but to provide ways that couples taking the risk of moving out full time on to the open road can cut back on too much spending in an effort to encourage people to move on the road and see what the experience is all about.

But why…

CASEY RAIA

MEETING 3


 

But why…

The first portion of this week’s findings goes a step further into my survey. Why am I asking the questions that I have chosen and how will the information I receive help me/us? Here is the breakdown:

Questions 1-4 Demographic questions – Although I realized last meeting, maybe it doesn’t matter if you are a male or female or what your age is because after all were all just people right? Well… it quite possibly could. If after the surveys come back and the demographics are heavily skewed in one direction or the other, then the marketing process could be adjusted to fit the results. I agree that these questions should be moved to the end of the survey though to reduce subconscious error.

Questions 5-10 Travel questions – These start to get into the preferences of mobility for the people. This whole thing could go to shit if we find that no one wants to travel for more than a few weekends or weeks. What if the people of the younger generation hate the idea of traveling by boat or RV and staying in them? There goes my portion of the study… but at least we’ll know it doesn’t work.

Questions 11-13 Job questions – This will gather information on how people take to being shuffled around for their job. I also ask a fill in the blank question asking for companies with known rotational programs. If I get a significant list (as of right now I have Unilever, J&J, and Pepsi) I can dive into where their main offices/plants are and if the infrastructure of those settings can even withstand a mobile architecture market of any sort.

Questions 14-20 Opinion questions – Let me hear what you think. Is this survey so clouded with my ideas of what could be a fun and functional infrastructure that I have lost sight of what the average 20-something year old actually wants? I am sure I will find out here…

“The percentage of people that actually want to live in shipping containers is about 3%. And of that 3%, 90% of them are architects or architecture students, the other 10% are all people who went to school for architecture and then dropped and switched majors to business.” – Loose quote by one of our professors. Although this was said as a joke and everyone knew it, what are the chances that something like this holds true to mobile architecture for the young generation? I seem to hear much more about retirees on the open road over the adventurous bacherlor(ette) trying to make money and memories in a new city.


 

Aesthetic – Relating the exterior of RVs and trailers to a building’s façade –

RVs and Trailers –

Somewhere between when wagons first appeared to travel out west and now, some mindless person decided that putting flying swooshes, tribal prints, racing stripes, and depictions of animals on the sides of mobile architecture was the right thing to do. It’s not. It’s hard to see exactly when this horrible phenomenon started but it seems like not too long ago. A few decades ago companies went with a two-tone paint job, or just a few 3-inch thick lines running the length of the RV, those are much quieter design elements than today’s options and personally they look a lot better. Airstream, one of the most credible and beautiful companies of the RV and trailer world, remains out of this debate/assault. Airstream takes its material, aluminum, and put its on the big stage as if to say “HEY! This is aluminum and you should know it!” In architecture we also celebrate materials, so why do companies need to clad their RVs in ridiculous patterns? I understand the long side of an RV/bus may not be the most interesting thing to look at but there must be other options. Take cars for instance, they are most of the time a single color but the materials change as well as sculpted body panels for added aerodynamics and function. There is no reason why this cant be true for their larger family members. Boats can be of equal size or much greater than RVs/trailers and they normally have a much subtler color palette. Below are some examples.

What is going on...
What is going on…

 

Heavy boat reference with color choices, simple color change corresponding with functions of exterior. Very nice.
Heavy boat reference with color choices, simple color change corresponding with functions of exterior. Very nice.
Clean, simple, honest. It is everything you need and nothing more.
Clean, simple, honest. It is everything you need and nothing more.

Energy Efficiency Exploration

To begin an exploration of energy efficiencies, first two categories will be examined.
1. Water consumption
Water consumption consists of several factors including water heater, faucet usage, drinking water, etc.

Standard water heaters in most RV’s hold 6 gallons which is fine for weekends but not for much longer [1]. 10-gallon water heaters are better for longer distances, but the tankless water heater has several benefits that many are unaware of. Tankless water heaters use propane burners and sensors to power it, and they consume less fossil fuels. [1]
A typical home uses 40-100 gallon water heaters, and an average residence uses 110 gallons of water per day [2]. In my own calculation of my personal water consumption that I had to record for another science course, my daily consumption is 193 gallons. This was measured through calculating the flow rate of faucets, timing my water usage, and looking up manufacturers information for toilet, dishwasher, washer, etc.

A study was conducted in 2010 by Linda Powers Tomasso anaylzing sustainability at RV Parks [6]. Only 10% of RV owners use it as their primary residence, while 90% have fixed residences but use RV for other recreational excursions. RVer’s use 27 gallons of water per day, while a home uses 150 gallons per day [6].

2. Fuel Consumption
Fuel consumption consists of several factors including gas to power the vehicle, power for all appliances, etc.

Often times people discuss whether gas or diesel is more efficient for the use of RV’s. Gas-run engines are in the front of the vehicle and the maintenance is cheaper yet it is less fuel efficient for distances. Diesel-run engines are located in the rear and are quieter. The initial cost is more but this engine will last longer and is more efficient [3].

A recent comparison of Mercedes I-4 Turbodiesel engine to a V-6 explores the differences. Mercedes claims that their engine gets 18% better mileage than V-6 after 200 miles, but the results prove else wise [5]

I-4 V-6
Displacement: 2.1 L
Horsepower: 161
Torque: 266
Gears: 7
3.0 L
188
325
5
After about 200 miles = 17.4 MPG 16.5 MPG

Brian Brawdy is an advocate for the Green RV and in 2009 appeared on local news. It is stated that 25% of manufactured RVs have solar panels on them. Brawdy’s green RV is 91 square feet of living, has around $3000-worth of solar panels which is almost 500 watts of power, and also has a wind turbine and rainwater collector. Biofuel is using cooking oil/grease to power a vehicle, but some motor companies state in their Owner’s Manuel that you cannot put vegetable oil or else it will violate the warranty [4]. From this interview, Brawdy’s enthusiasm for green RV-ing is shown, which leads to further questions of how many RV-ers WANT to have a green RV? What population of residential vehicle owners care enough to want green technologies implemented? And why are motor companies hindering new green technology advancements?

Power of appliances used can be found here and here.

 Sources:

[1] http://rv-roadtrips.thefuntimesguide.com/2010/11/rv_tankless_water_heaters.php

[2] http://www.fmca.com/polks-top-7/3586-environmentally-friendly-rving-seven-ways-to-reduce-rv-fuel-consumption.html

[3] http://www.gonewiththewynns.com/rv-diesel-or-gas

[4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KqBvaVck8bc

[5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZbsrarewaI

[6] http://www.eplerwood.com/beta/images/Tomasso%20Grad%20Project_RV%20park%20sustainability_2010_XII.pdf

A Sense of Community

“Many RVers – I daresay most – are members of consumption communities. They don’t think of themselves this way, and certainly this is not what we usually think of as community but it is. In many ways an RV affiliation group is both more modern and more ancient than what most of us think of as a community.”

-Twitchell, Winnebago Nation, pg. 61

As previously stated, people have participated in micromobile lifestyles for different reasons throughout history. Some participated out of necessity, some as a form of elitist vacationing, and some simply as an activity of leisure.

But what of the permanent micromobile settlers? The ones who gather, who live alongside each other in their dwellings, who delegatepractical day-to-day policies together, all the while in some form of a micromobile establishment or another. These people have not assimilated by random- they are all seeking the same thing; a sense of community.

When we hear the word community, or at least when I do, we often think of it in the context of a town. One bounded by defined boundaries, perhaps focused around local government(s), where people live along side each other forming relationships and contributing to society.

Now it may be difficult at first to pair the idea of community with the idea of micromobility. When attempting to do this, stereotypical thoughts of a trailer park and the types of things and people associated with trailer parks may come to mind. But micromobile communities are so much more than the false notions society has of them. Micromobile communities are founded around the same principles that static communities are founded.

A community is defined by a group of people living in the same place, having characteristics in common, and a relationship to others formed by sharing goals and interests. The parameters of a community are not strictly defined by static bounds-in a sense they can be placeless.

There are many different types of micromobile communities, some of which are actually placeless.

This type of community comes in the form of a gathering, a temporary one bringing a wide spanning network, (a community of sorts), together in one place to celebrate, and well, gather. These rallies such as the Newmar Kountry Klub in Essex Junction or those of the Escapees organization are a point and place for the similar micromobile users annually. Many make the pilgrimage to these temporary establishments because they contain groups of people having characteristics in common, share interests, and have formed relationships based off of their similar lifestyles.

It is interesting to see how these micromobile communities are formed, static, temporary, or placeless. Some are formed by similarities of religion like the Jews on Wheels, Yehudim Al Galgalim. Some formed through sexual identity or gender like gay and lesbian club, Rainbow RV. And some are even formed solely off of the type of dwelling that you own, brand, make, model, or living preference.

Many of these communities are founded on certain principles and as they grow and flourish they proceed to change over time. A peculiarly interesting example of a flourishing micromobile community is found in the likes of Lazydays in Tampa Florida. At first glance the establishment seems comparable to that of the Stepford Wives of RV campgrounds. In fact, the tag line on their website reads, “You’ve got to see this place to believe it”, with large text boasting of how they are the World’s Largest RV Dealership with the Nation’s Largest Selection of RV brands. They are so confident in what they are selling that they offer a promotion where they fly patrons down to their Florida location and they drive their new rig home.

Now this seems odd to mention in a post concerning community but that is also what Lazydays is; a structured community offering incentives for change and growth, luxury to those who want it, and space for people to live. Within the community, there is an obscure system set in place that both divides the patrons into two types of customers, to put it simply; customers that want to have it all and customers that are happy with just enough. To become a customer that wants to have it all you must be willing to participate in a system of exchanges and upgrades of units to maintain a spot along the uppers. The uppers get a nicer clubhouse with a nicer bar with nicer free drinks and tend to have nicer units. Now this is the most simply stated way of describing Lazydays. They are not just selling their products, they are selling themselves.

The Lazydays model is one being replicated throughout the country. Twichell refers to the establishment as an RV Mecca and a Magic Kingdom of sorts. What is to draw from these varying types of micromobile community establishments is that they do not fall under the lens of the preconceived stereotypical trailer park. These communities mean something to people, they chose this lifestyle for a reason, they chose to affiliate in some way or another with a particular community, and they make these choices consciously.

This preliminary investigation gained insight into a reason people choose a micromobile lifestyle- for a sense of community. This does not however; answer the entire question of why micromobility?

Westward Ho the Wagon

Micromobility is a strange concept on the outside. It is a peculiar idea to be traveling with your possessions, essentials, family, and friends surrounding you at all times. Many see it is a casual weekend escape, one to just grab the kids and go. Many however; fulfill a full time micromobile lifestyle. From the outside, coming from a static and grounded lifestyle, this does not seem like a societal norm, but after a brief exploration into the roots of micromobile living this concept begins to become more clear.

James B. Twitchell explored the roots of micromobility among other related topics in his boo, Winnebago Nation, the RV in American Culture. Twitchell claims that there are a few reasons why this notion of movement and living started:

  1. It all started with the covered wagon, the idea of moving the American settlement westward, towards the frontier.
  2. It was a wistful idea, developed first by poets of the English Romantic. “wealthy Victorians refashioned the decorated wagon as a moveable bedroom.” Idea’s of camping for fun and caravanning spawned from the English elite.
  3. “The Spirit that set easterners casting off to the west has not been quenched in their western descendants”
  4. Movement is nature and staying one place is not.

It is interesting these thoughts because they relate to different people at different times in history. At first the original mobile vehicle, the covered wagon, was necessary to transport lives across the country.

Then this notion became widely popular with the upper class. Once lower classes moved from the suburb countryside into the city the wealthy began to find escaping to the country side with all of their comforts of home to be a romantic idea.

For a long time this concept of temporary micromobile living, with all of the amenities while vacationing stuck within the upper classes.

Many products, modifications, and reinvented ideas altered how various members of society were able to view and partake in instances of micromobility over the course of the last century.

This page will attempt to divulge exemplary moments in the history of micromobility and to gain an understanding as to how and why people choose a life of micromobility today.

Entering the Yachtstar Lifestyle

The first two weeks of this independent study were pretty much split between research on RV culture and beginning the first draft of my survey.

I skimmed through 3 books, focusing on what pertains to my topics (mobile architecture, marine architecture, and the aesthetics of modern day RVs), I found a great deal helpful for myself as well as the other information that will hopefully benefit the other members of the group. Continue reading Entering the Yachtstar Lifestyle