Premier League: Matchday 9/38

This style of blog post is fairly new, so I’ll make sure to give context where it’s needed. For example, today’s blog post features the phrase “Matchday 9/38”. Premier League games are typically played on weekends (Saturday and Sunday) and occasionally during the week, so even though the phrase Matchday seems to indicate one day, the games are played over a series of days. The best similarity might be the NFL’s Week X. That statement is a bit more explicit since all the games are played within the same week, but the idea still holds.

Premier League - Wikipedia

Now with that out of the way, there were ten matches played on Matchday 9, but I’d like to highlight on big match Manchester United v. Liverpool.

Manchester United v. Liverpool

If you haven’t already seen it on social media, Manchester United suffered an embarrassing loss to Liverpool. The score was 5-0, which is unheard of when you’re talking about two teams who have historically been strong competitors.

Going into the game, Manchester United was 7th and Liverpool was placed 2nd in the league rankings. Having purchased one of soccer’s biggest superstars, Cristiano Ronaldo, United was/is expected to have a stellar season. Moreover, United’s new manager (onboarded sometime within the last few months) has been on a thin line with fans, players, and staff, as would be expected with a new hire in a volatile environment such as sports.

United’s downfall started quickly with Liverpool netting a quick goal within the first five minutes. After that, United continued to slip with multiple mistakes from all those involved from coaching staff to players.

Harry Maguire apologised for the dreadful performance - individually and as a team

 

Following the match, United’s captain Harry Maguire said the following:

“We apologize to the fans; it was nowhere near good enough for this club. They stuck with us right to the end and we appreciate that but as a club we have to do better. I am so disappointed; we gave them so many chances.”

“They were so clinical, we had a lot of chances ourselves, but I am a defender and to concede four in the first half especially at Old Trafford is nowhere near good enough. As a player I know myself. I’ll be looking at myself and my individual performance. We have to stick together, there is no point blaming each other but look at ourselves.”

Maguire’s statements do a good job of representing the scale of United’s defeat. Moreover, critics are indicating that Maguire is at risk of losing his captainship over his role in United’s loss. As a captain and center back (the “main” defender), much of the responsibility lies on him, so it’s a tough situation to be in.

More next week.

Passion Expanded

So I’ve decided to spin the interpretation of the “self-help” that I referenced at the beginning of the blog. For context, here’s what I said in the first blog post:

“However, quarantine offered the opportunity to do some reading, and I really got into “self-help” books. Ideally, that translates to reading a chapter from a “self-help” book and analyzing it through the lens of my personal life, social expectations and current events.”

With that said, this week I’ve decided to focus on another aspect of self-help: extracurriculars. As someone who follows sports, I’ve found that following sports is an avenue for self-development. I could be stretching it a bit, but I believe that following things that you’re passionate helps inspire development. As a result, I’ll be giving a rundown of this week in sports.

 

Manchester NewsMan Utd team news: Paul Pogba, Jadon Sancho, Nemanja Matic benched for  Atalanta - The Athletic

Manager Ole Gunnar Solskjaer celebrated the 300th goal scored under his leadership on Wednesday after Marcus Rashford netted for Manchester United against Atalanta in the Champions League. It took 163 games for the milestone to be reached, and it only took one game for the number to surpass 300.

 

Chelsea NewsWe Ain't Got No History, a Chelsea community

Romelu Lukaku and Timo Werner both suffered injuries during Chelsea’s match against Malmo. Despite being clearly injured, Chelsea’s manager Thomas Tuchel refused to take Lukaku out.

“It was necessary that Romelu was on the pitch, he started very strong. I spoke with him about the situation, that I think he carries a bit of a mental fatigue around with him, and that I think it’s also normal, but he’s our number nine, he’s our reference up front and the best thing against mental fatigue is a goal and we knew that we could be the dominant team.”

“We knew today we built a fast attack with Mason and Timo around him, and him as the reference point up front in the middle, and I had a strong belief that he could in a Champions League match turn things around in terms of scoring and being decisive, which he actually did because he was super strong in our start and he took the foul, so maybe without him it’s not 2-0.”

“’I don’t regret it because it’s not a muscle injury and not from physical fatigue, he is more a little bit overplayed. That is just my opinion, maybe I’m not even right, and it was the moment to give him confidence and let him play. I don’t regret it because he was decisive and things like this can happen, it’s just bad luck.”

More to come next week.

Ted Talk + Brainstorming

*For some reason, the video embed code messed up the paragraph spacing*
I really liked this TED talk because it highlighted an aspect of our daily lives that we don’t often explicitly talk about. In Malcolm Gladwell’s book, Talking to Strangers, he discusses the dynamic between individuals, and how many aspects of that dynamic are based on false conceptions.
For example, many people think that they can identify liars. However, when put to the test, I believe the study concluded that less than 30% of people were able to successfully identify a liar. This TED talk went into depth about the widespread nature of our misperceptions regarding our ability to spot liars, provided relevant, famous examples to analyze, and methods (that may or may not work) of actually spotting a liar.
Brainstorming
 – Diversity in STEM 

How Schools and Organizations Can Foster Diversity in STEM - TryEngineering.org Powered by IEEE

    The past few years have demonstrated different universities’       ability to create spaces in STEM that are more representative of the world that we live in. It’d be interesting to see what contributed to that gradual shift, and there’s a lot of data/programs available to demonstrate the shift: PSU’s Millennium Scholars Program, UMBC Meyerhoff Scholars, etc.
– Social Media in Daily Life 7 New Social Media Marketing Opportunities on Facebook & More
The role that social media plays in our daily lives has undoubtedly increased exponentially in the past few years. Twenty years ago, it would have been crazy to think that people would be able to communicate so easily and frequently. Moreover, it would’ve been crazy to consider the impact that those communications could have on politics, economics, etc. There’s a decent amount of research that’s been done on this topic, so I’d start there with research.

Speech Reflections

Firstly, I loved this project as it allowed me to explore different methods of speech giving. As someone who did public speaking in high school, I felt confident going into the project, but it was really interesting getting to perfect my craft and experiment with different speech giving tactics

In terms of strengths, I liked how I was able to utilize an introduction that presented a deeper level of communication between me and listeners. During my elevator pitch, my introduction seemed to be Something that my peers liked, and it was nice to be able to implement that in my speech. In terms of weaknesses, I don’t believe I had a strong understanding of how to use the voice thread technology, which made it difficult to effectively combine the video of my speech with some of my supporting pieces. For example, I had a lot of difficulties getting the slides to auto-advance which detracted from the message of my speech.

One of the best parts of this project was getting to hear how other people went about finishing it. As a rule of thumb for the future, I might try to use more “meaningful” pieces in my projects because that aspect of the project appeared to be the deciding factor in how effective a speech was.

 

 

 

 

 

 

It’s Not All About You!

The last time I posted in this series was September 23rd, so it’s been a minute. Again, I don’t think the book needs much of an introduction given how interesting I hope I’ve made it sound, but if not, here’s a recap of both the book and the previously discussed lessons derived from the book.

“As that student seeks out different methods of improving himself, he comes across a “self-help” book titled, How to Win Friends and Influence People. At first glance, the book seems like it’s not something you want to be seen reading, but upon further research, the student discovers how critically acclaimed it is… The entirety of the book is very structured in the sense that each chapter (If I remember correctly) is a different method of influencing people, so I’ll emulate this post after that and potentially split the blog into parts.”

Amazon.com: How to Win Friends & Influence People (Audible Audio Edition):  Dale Carnegie, Andrew MacMillan, Simon & Schuster Audio: Books

Up to this point, we’ve covered five lessons:

  1. Don’t Criticize or Complain
  2. Give Honest Sincere Appreciation
  3. Remember Their Name
  4. Be Genuinely Interested in Other People
  5. Know the Value of Charm

If you want to review those lessons, feel free to read about lessons 1-2 here and 3-5 here. Now that the formalities are out of the way, let’s move on to this week’s lessons. Before we start, I’d like to preface this by saying I really resonated with this week’s lessons because they tackle instances that I face in my daily life. That statement might’ve been unnecessarily ambiguous, but I hope for two things: a.) that what I’ve said will make sense at the end of this post and b.) that you’ll also be able to resonate with the lessons from the book.

With that said, let’s begin our discussion of this week’s lessons.

  1. Be Quick to Acknowledge Your Own Mistakes

Accountability in the Contact Center | Contact Center Pipeline BlogOne of the biggest points of contention between people is birthed from our tendency as individuals to not humble ourselves. We often let our pride get the best of us, which inadvertently creates divisions within our relationships. If we want to make others less defensive and more agreeable, we must admit our mistakes and be humble.

  1. Don’t Attempt to Win an Argument

I love this lesson because of how well Carnegie describes it in the book. He writes about an experience he had while at an important dinner party with a mentor. During the dinner, Carnegie got the opportunity to talk with an important donor, which led to further discussion about a topic that Carnegie was knowledgeable about.

Argument Papers: Do They Facilitate Research Advancement? - Enago Academy

As the donor was talking about the topic, Carnegie noticed that he was incorrect in some of the things he mentioned and tried to correct him. One thing turned to another, and the correction quickly became an argument that Carnegie won. After leaving the venue, Carnegie’s mentor expressed how disappointed he was in Carnegie for trying to argue with the important donor. Why? Well as Carnegie writes, “A man convinced against his will/Is of the same opinion still.”

More to come next week.

Hello, my name is ________

Welcome back to my miniseries about Malcolm Gladwell’s Talking to Strangers. If you don’t remember anything from the previous post in the series, here’s an excerpt describing what the book is about.

“Talking to Strangers highlights the different aspects of our relationships and how many of those aspects often lead to misunderstandings. While the book does reference different situations, its main objective is to provide some level of understanding as to what occurred in the death of Sandra Bland.”

This book followed an interesting structure where stories were used to illustrates different lessons and ideas. As Gladwell talks about the different factors that contribute to our ability or inability to understand strangers, he relays different stories that highlight the presence of those factors in our daily lives.

With that said, I figured the best way to convey the findings from this book would be to discuss them in the context of examples given in the book as well as daily life. If you’re still reading this, and you’re not too impressed with the book, that is ok. I was in your shoes when I first decided to read this book. I also could be doing a terrible job of explaining the book. Either way, I ask that you continue to read through at least this blog post. I hope you find the material as interesting as I did. Here we go.

Lesson 1:  Interacting with strangers is a part of living in society.

This lesson may seem intuitive, however, it’s important to remember the concept of this book. This book highlights the nuances of social interaction, particularly through negative lenses. I’ll go into more depth in a later post but hearing about how inaccurate our perceptions are of truth-telling, another fundamental aspect of social interactions, forced me to reconsider my relationships with others. The next lesson illustrates what I’m referring to.

Lesson 2: We have to trust people we interact with.

Trust is a spectrum. On one extreme, you can choose to trust everyone, and the opposite end is it complete lack of trust. As spectrums go, there’s space in the middle, which calls on individuals to use their discretion with regards to being trusting v. not trusting.

Again, this lesson is based on the fundamental understanding that was not as good at understanding strangers as we think we are. To use the example that I referenced earlier, individuals often believe that they are able to determine when another individual is lying. However, as studies have shown, our “skills” are not as good as we make them out to be.

More next week.

Updated Speech Outline*

Intro:

There are 86400 seconds, 1440 minutes, and 24 hours in a day. Time is a commodity, and we have the ability to dictate what that time is spent doing, so why wait? Just do it. The phrase “just do it” was coined in 1988 as a part of Nike’s ad campaigning. The phrase singlehandedly contributed to a 21% increase in Nike’s share of the North American domestic sports shoe business from 1988 – 1998. The goal of the campaign was simple: appeal to every single American (and later on, human around the world).

The phrase knows no gender, sexuality, race, or ethnicity. Whoever you are, the phrase still has potential applications in your life. In their first-ever marketing advert, Nike uses pathetic appeals as calls to action, commonplaces such as The American Dream, and takes advantage of the kairotic opportunity presented by the passing by of time as means to empower viewers.

 

Outline:

Speech Title: “Nike: Just Do It”

  1. Intro 
    1. Time Statement
    2. Share
    3. Gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity
    4. Thesis
  2. Pathos 
  3. Commonplaces 
  4. Kairotic Opportunity 

* Based on the feedback given on the original outline post, the outline was adjusted.

The Secret Plan Continued

It’s been a few weeks, but the secret plan to take over the world is back. I don’t think the plan needs any introduction after the first post, but I’ll briefly recap.

From the blog post on 9/9:

“As that student seeks out different methods of improving himself, he comes across a “self-help” book titled, How to Win Friends and Influence People. At first glance, the book seems like it’s not something you want to be seen reading, but upon further research, the student discovers how critically acclaimed it is… The entirety of the book is very structured in the sense that each chapter (If I remember correctly) is a different method of influencing people, so I’ll emulate this post after that and potentially split the blog into parts.”

Now that that’s done, we’ll continue with lesson 3.

  1. Remember Their Name

We all know how difficult it is to remember someone’s name after first meeting them. Now, picture a time when someone remembered your name after you first met them

(especially those of you with “difficult” names. How did that person remembering your name make you feel? For most people, someone remembering their name makes them feel special and important. In the book, Carnegie writes, “ Remember that a person’s name is to that person the sweetest and most important sound in any language.”

 

  1. Be Genuinely Interested in Other People

I found this one interesting because it highlighted a nuance of conversation that I didn’t really notice much: soliloquies. I’m not necessarily using that word because it fits the context, but I felt it was the best word to describe the situation. While we may not admit it, we love to talk about ourselves. Consequently, people believe you like them when you ask questions about themselves.

Carnegie writes, “You make more friends in two months by becoming genuinely interested in other people than you can in two years by trying to get other people interested in you.” If you break it down, you should listen 75% and only speak 25% of the time.”

 

  1. Know the Value Of Charm

As college freshmen, we’ve been through numerous experiences that called on our use of charm. I’m sure you charmed your way to a few bonus points back in high school or charmed a parent for some new technology. Either way, we’ve subconsciously recognized the value of charm in all our lives.

With that said, the biggest takeaway from this aspect of the book was that people would rather spend time with someone they want to be around. That takeaway seems incredibly intuitive, but it serves as a constant reminder, especially considering the applications that such a realization has. Take jobs for example, studies show that recruiters would rather hire individuals they like being around and have mediocre skills over individuals they don’t like being around and have superb skills.

Rhetorical Analysis

Intro:

There are 86400 seconds, 1440 minutes, and 24 hours in a day. Time is a commodity, and we have the ability to dictate what that time is spent doing, so why wait? Just do it. The phrase “just do it” was coined in 1988 as a part of Nike’s ad campaigning. The phrase singlehandedly contributed to a 21% increase in Nike’s share of the North American domestic sports shoe business from 1988 – 1998. The goal of the campaign was simple: appeal to every single American (and later on, human around the world).

The phrase knows no gender, sexuality, race, or ethnicity. Whoever you are, the phrase still has potential applications in your life. In their first-ever marketing advert, Nike uses pathetic appeals as calls to action, commonplaces such as The American Dream, and takes advantage of the kairotic opportunity presented by the passing by of time as means to empower viewers.

 

Outline:

Speech Title: “Nike: Just Do It”

  1. Intro 
    1. Time Statement
    2. Share
    3. Gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity
    4. Thesis
  2. Pathos 
  3. Commonplaces 
  4. Kairotic Opportunity 

Talking to Strangers

On the afternoon of July 10, 2015, Sandra Bland was pulled over on the suspicion that she was involved in criminal activity. A traffic stop became an arrest, and three days later, she was found hanged in a jail cell.

I know I said more to come at the end of the last blog post, but I lied. There is more to come, but not this week. I figured that it’d get boring if I talked about the same book week after week, so I’m switching my focus to Malcolm Gladwell’s Talking to Strangers.

Talking to Strangers highlights the different aspects of our relationships and how many of those aspects often lead to misunderstandings. While the book does reference different situations, its main objective is to provide some level of understanding as to what occurred in the death of Sandra Bland.

The officer that pulled Sandra Bland over, Brian Encinia, was known for performing pretextual traffic stops*. On that fateful day, Encinia began following Sandra, accelerating on her rear at one point, causing her to change lanes. Gratuitously, Encinia pulled Sandra over for a failure to signal while changing lanes. In the series of events that followed, the interaction between the two became heated and Sandra was arrested. That was on July 10.

On July 13th, Sandra was found “in a semi-standing position” hanging in her cell.

The summary I’ve given of the story is very curt, but I believe I’ve provided the main aspects: Sandra, a Black woman, was pulled over, the interaction between herself and the officer became heated, and Sandra died while in prison. There are a myriad of lenses to analyze this series of events through, namely racism and bad policing, but Malcolm opts to analyze these situations through our inability, as a society, to understand strangers.

Why did Officer Encinia create unsafe driving conditions? Why didn’t Officer Encinia use his training to analyze the situation at hand? The list of questions that this sickening situation produces is endless, but in the coming blogs, I’ll focus on the questions that Malcolm covers in his book.

See you next post.

 

* When an officer pulls over a motorist for a minor traffic or equipment violation and then uses the stop to investigate a more serious crime. (Pewtrusts.org)