P1
President Bill Clinton’s speech after the events of 9/11 was something all of America heard that day. In the aftermath of a huge tragedy, people often look towards the people in power, especially their president, to guide them on how to pick up the pieces and move forward. In Bush’s speech, he urges the ideals of being united as a country, as the intentions of the attacks were to disrupt the foundation of our nation. Eleven years later, President Barack Obama had to give a similar speech in the wake of the Sandy Hook Shooting. In this speech, Obama honors the victims and addresses the families of those who lost people, as well as families whose children were forever altered by this event. While these speeches address two different types of tragedies, both presidents are making statements on two disasters known nationwide. Both speeches also deal with the topic of unity, with Bush urging for unity as a country and Obama urging for unity supporting the community of Newton, Connecticut. Comparing these two civic artifacts will show how the ideals expressed in the speech are similar, as well as analyze how the two different presidents responded to a tragedy.
Outline:
P2-Discuss Bush’s speech
- Exigence- the September 11th terrorist attacks
- Audience- Grieving families, survivors, the attackers, American citizens
- Constraints- tragedy and turning it into opportunity, addressing the attackers without causing more retaliation, having to address all the different groups of people at once, making it personal
- Commonplaces- freedom, resilience, unity
P3-4- I will analyze Bush’s speech through a social movement lens
- How Bush’s speech helped unite the country to rebuild after 9/11
P5- Discuss Obama’s speech
- Exigence- the Sandy Hook Shooting
- Audience- grieving families, survivors and their families, American citizens
- Commonplaces- unity, grief, support
P6-7- I will analyze Obama’s speech through a social movement lens
- How Obama’s speech helped rally people to help victims’ families
P8-9- Discuss how both speeches are different
- The different approaches used and the different commonplaces