Well we are back for a second part to the passion blog. To be perfectly honest I had not thought forward in the design for a second partition. This feels like a TV series that got green lit for a second season; however, season one pretty much carried the audience through a complete story. I deliberated a great deal in my own mind as to how I would venture forward. Do I flow with the same story arc, as most sequels do? Or do I throw a curve ball at the audience and take them down a different path of passion? Perhaps a bit of both…
A common theme to starting a season two is with a recap.
I have been obsessed with the human mind for as long as I can remember. Particularly the actions we make while in a group environment. Social psychology is of my most favored subjects as we are a social species who change our identity so many times throughout a single day to adhere to or lead our various groups. Some of these groups we choose entirely, some we choose out of need, and some are chosen for us. In the first couple weeks I broke down basic structure of self versus society. From there I delved further into specific constructs of social psychology, some of which are widely misused in society today due to connotation, bias, and context. I attempted to make my audience think. At first, I had not understood that only one or two people were going to be reading these, and it would be a different people from week to week, so my sequential process was a bit moot. Though I had a great deal of fun comprising it in a particular order. Perhaps that would be the definition of passion? I closed up last semester with expressing my main focus of influence, balance. Shown throughout my entire body of work in the first semester of this class.
I would like to play a game.
Intelligence is not measured from the variable of knowledge. If you were to ask a nuclear scientist how a submarine works, the answer would most likely be profound to you, though that same scientist may not know how to prepare chili. This is just obtained knowledge. Intelligence is the brain’s function of analytical and critical thinking. Both of these measures are different. How one can process and respond while at rest and how one performs while stressed are two very different measures. Some people thrive in pressure situations while others, who possess some of the quickest minds, fold under the lightest amount of stress. The cognition to distinguish patterns and decipher correctly is the truest measure of intelligence. “When you can keep your head while all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you” (Kipling)
I am not pretending to be an authority on measuring intelligence. I am of no authority and in no position to assume such. It’s just nice to keep thinking.
Today we have a simple math problem…. Divide 40 by a half and add ten. What is your answer?