Welcome back to the blog! This is part three of my extra series and, by extension, part six of the overarching series I guess, so at this point, my extra series is now the same length as my “original” series! Anyway, today I will be exclusively discussing perhaps one of the most interesting topic relating to chickens – their hierarchal system. Believe it or not, yes, chickens are social creatures! Interacting with (mostly) other chickens helps them to develop into healthier adults, but it is also important to understand the power dynamic between them, especially if the flock is large or has at least one rooster in it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a310d/a310dfa1276ea72c3024b4dca57e20c5cb50d91a" alt=""
We all remember back in high school how students would naturally split into different social groups to fit in with varying levels of popularity; for example, the stereotypical: sports kids, music kids, “smart” kids, “those” kids, etc.. The unspoken chicken hierarchy formally known as the “pecking order” (sometimes also heard in the world of business) is similar but less complex, more societal, less political, and more practical. Now, as one may expect, the pecking order is actually quite simple. After all, they are just a bunch of chickens. It conceptually exists, at face value, in a realm very much like other natural animal hierarchies, including lions and perhaps even humans in traditional scenes. How does it work? As long as there is more than one chicken, theoretically, a pecking order should always exist. Generally speaking, roosters will battle it out to see which will stay on top while the rest (hens and chicks) are grouped, ranked, and ordered by seniority (size and age). Insect hierarchy diverges from this model, but that is a story for another day. Note – there is no chicken that will “rank” the other chickens. It is through interaction that the hierarchy will be established. Additionally, roosters will rarely fight claw to claw. Instead, other means of showing off exist. Essentially, it is the equivalent of a gym – a lot of people literally flexing on each other and grunting in public.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdbc3/fdbc3b49430989dbe785a8208abe62dc5c03f6ed" alt=""
Your chickens will also see you as a part of your flock. If you raised them, it should be no big deal as you are likely recognized as a natural leader already, so do not worry, but if you introduce a new rooster to your flock, you may have a more difficult time managing. If the rooster acts up, give ’em the ol’ one-two and beat the ever-living crap out of them while yelling things like “you are weak, ten-piece”, “I’m the captain now”, or even “KFC” if you are really feeling it. Does that sound brutal and like abuse? If you answered “yes”, congratulations, you are correct! I was just kidding about throwing hands, but in all seriousness, if a rooster offensively charges you, it is best to hold it down to the ground (ethically, of course) until it finally shuts up. It may take some physical strength to calmly pin a rooster down in a vulnerable yet safe position, but there is no need to be forceful at all. If you find yourself pulling a maneuver akin to the one that Gordon Ramsay used on Sasuke Uchiha at the end of Shrek V for forgetting the lamb sauce (shown left), you are doing it wrong. By repeating, you will be able to assert dominance. Yeah, that will go to show him who’s the real alpha boss around here. It may take a while for chickens to find their place in the order. This is why it is usually a bad idea to unexpectedly introduce new chickens of any qualification(s) to a flock without any previous exposure or warning whatsoever.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7af53/7af534316d9c32e433dc9a1e23e81884549c362c" alt=""
Logically, the role of the dominant rooster is to protect the flock. As such, a perk of being the dominant chicken is usually having ease of access for food (whether desired or not). Even other roosters will be forced to give respect, for confrontation is not common and many underlings will simply step aside in the face of a mammoth. Does this mean that the dominant chicken controls all? No, the notion that a chicken Napoleon will arise from the backyard is rather silly, but if necessary, aggression is an option – like the manner in which mother canines will discipline their young pups. Such social/physical aggression is rare in creatures like chickens, but it has the potential to become more and more varied as the species of organism becomes more and more intelligent – case in point, the human society.
Thanks for reading this post! Alas, I shall continue this series! Looking forward to the comments! I hope to see you next time.
Recent Comments