For nearly 16 years after the initial breakup of The Stone Roses, all of the band’s former members denied any rumors of a reformation. In 2009, John Squire famously released a new piece of artwork which had been inscribed with the text: “I have no desire whatsoever to desecrate the grave of seminal Manchester pop group The Stone Roses.” All four of the ex-Madchester rockers were proven to be liars at a 2011 press conference in which they announced that the long awaited resurrection of The Stone Roses had come.
One of the Roses’ first concerts back was a massive Manchester homecoming gig played at Heaton Park. Over 70 thousand fans were in attendance and the Heaton Park shows became the fastest selling rock gigs in British history. They subsequently embarked on a world tour that lasted from 2012 to 2013. Near the end of the tour, Ian Brown announced that the Roses had finally started writing new material and that a third album should be expected within the next five years.
Roses fans would not have to wait the whole five years for new material, though. In May 2016, the Roses released their first single in over 21 years: “Beautiful Thing”. Like “Love Spreads” in 1994, “Beautiful Thing” left most listeners massively disappointed. It’s clear why people felt this way. The lyrics are very subpar when compared to the Roses’ earlier releases. The refrain, “All for one, one for all, if we all join hands we’ll make a wall”, sounds like it could have been written by a four-year-old. The instrumental is somewhat interesting, but the melody sounds like an uninspired protest chant that really dulls the whole song. Brown’s voice is also completely shot at this point. His vocals are lacking in any inflection and are straight out of auto-tune hell.
The Roses’ follow up single, “Beautiful Thing”, performed far better than “All for One”. “Beautiful Thing” wasn’t a masterpiece, but it was just baggy enough to satiate the long starved club rats of the Second Summer of Love. The song brought back the Roses classic dance inspired drum beats and featured some cool guitar work from Squire.
Also, in 2016, the Roses would embark on a second world tour. In 2017, at the conclusion of what would be their last show, Brown said to a Glasgow crowd, “Don’t cry because it’s over, smile because it happened.” Two years after this, John Squire would confirm in an interview that the Roses had broken up again without ever releasing a new album.
Unfortunately, I would have to say that looking at the reunion in retrospect, it seems to me that it was mostly just a cash grab. The Roses themselves never really seemed that happy to be performing alongside each other again. Early in their initial tour, Reni even stormed off the stage before the encore at a show in Lyon, France after an argument with the band’s other members. Putting this alongside the facts that they only did two tours over the course of six years and they only released two new singles leads me to believe that money was the overwhelming motivation for the reunion. Mani even said himself that he went from having £1000 in his bank account before the reunion to £1 million afterwards.
The Roses will likely never reform again, which means that unfortunately I’ll never get to see them play live as I only became a fan of theirs a couple years ago. Regardless of whether or not they ever reform, though, The Stone Roses will be remembered for a longtime and have already gone down in musical history as rock legends.