Pin your own topics, announcements, or questions. See what others have posted to the board.
Subscribe to email notifications, so you don’t miss a thing.
Celebrate Professional Teaching
Penn State English NTL Faculty
Pin your own topics, announcements, or questions. See what others have posted to the board.
Subscribe to email notifications, so you don’t miss a thing.
by Amanda Passmore-Ott
On the Trail
Trough Creek State Park, March 2016
Mid-morning sunlight filters through rhododendron and hemlock, setting Onoko’s coat into shades of wildfire. We’ve just dug our heels into the rock and moss of Ledges trail to come out at the junction of Copperas Rock. I’m reminded of an old Native American proverb about two wolves that battle inside our hearts. The wolves are always a dichotomy: love and hate, light and dark, life and work. They say the one we feed is the one who wins the battle. Today, life bites the belly of work and she wears the red-brown coat of a summer doe.
Overhead, a red-tailed hawk winds round thermals only she can see with the underside of wings. Sometimes, I wish I could also feel what she feels and pinch my shoulder blades together to feel the closeness of bone where wings might be. Today, we are grounded, feet pressed firmly to the earth and sometimes stubbing toes on the massive roots of trees that stood above this gorge for hundreds of years. I wonder if my Shawnee ancestors made it this far north, if they gazed out on these vistas and read the songs of the Great Spirit in the spine of mountains still a deep indigo this early in Spring. Up ahead, echoes of Abbot’s Run play their own kind of music over boulders rounded from incessant run-off and snow melt.
We rest here, at the cascade of falls into Trough Creek and tilt our heads back to the summit and Balance Rock; this rock has tilted in the balance for as long as anyone can remember, falling and not falling. And here is where I’ll be later this evening curled in my easy chair, my legs burning with muscle fatigue and satisfaction, and the mottled memory of light caught between the highest bough and mountain root. I’ll hold that boulder there, caught in the teeth of my two wolves, waiting for the tilt into the water below and knowing that I’ll rest there in that space behind open eye and eyelid until the next hike.
Author’s note:
Last spring I gave a PWR talk on the importance of maintaining work-life balance; as an EFT with a 5 course load per semester, I do what I must to keep my sanity for both me and my students. Most of my colleagues are already familiar with the main musical side of the scale I use to balance my sanity: fiddling in the Celtic rock band, Full Kilt (http://fullkilt.weebly.com). However, I perform enough shows each year that Full Kilt is also a time-consuming job (work, but fun work).
Ralph Waldo Emerson once wrote, “Nature always wears the colors of the spirit.” As a busy introvert, the only way I truly soothe my spirit is to get out onto the trail, often with my husband and husky, Onoko (you can follow her adventures at: https://www.facebook.com/AdventureswithOnoko/ and see more hiking photos by following me on Instagram @ huskymom7).
I contemplated for some time how I can also balance work and life outside of teaching. A friend and one-time professor, Steve Sherrill, told me upon graduating from Vermont College, “some recent grad students stay writers, but too many become teachers. Stay a poet above all else.” I never really understood what he meant until I became an EFT. I just don’t write my own stuff anymore. I write poetry in spurts, yes, but my manuscript, Human Wilderness, has definitely taken a back seat to just about everything. I need to write as much as I need music and the woods.
Sometimes, as a teacher, I just don’t have anything left to give to my own writing. I will use the trail to get back to my words (sometimes in the creation of a poem and sometimes in the murky waters of the brief essay), and to maybe share some inspiration to get out there and enjoy nature and seek balance in your own lives. As Muir put it so simply, “the mountains are calling, and I must go….”
Your students can write a couple of business emails – and win big. See details:
2016 ABC Student Writing Contest
The Association for Business Communication invites undergraduate students to enter the 2016 Student Writing Contest by responding to this year’s case. A panel of academic readers will review all qualifying entries, and using the criteria below select up to ten contest finalists. Then, a panel of business professionals will read the finalists’ entries and select the winning responses. At ABC’s October 2016 annual international conference in Albuquerque, winners will receive a plaque. In addition, the 1st place winner will receive $300, the 2nd place winner will receive $200, and the 3rd place winner will receive $100. Entries must be received by Saturday, April 30, 2016, to be considered, and the winners will be informed during summer 2016.
Information for Students
Case Response: Read the 2016 contest case and compose two email messages, according to the case assignment. Here are the case and the information needed to complete the response.
Entry: Your instructor will submit the entry here.
For additional information, please contact:
Kelly Grant
A.B. Freeman School of Business
Tulane University
ABC Student Awards Committee
Phone: 504.865.5484
Email: kgrant@tulane.edu
Information for Instructors
The 2016 Student Writing Contest is open to undergraduate students enrolled in a business communication course during Fall 2015 or Spring 2016. Instructors must be an active member of ABC and are welcome to enter two students in this annual contest. Students must work independently to prepare responses; team entries will not be considered. Please remember that the response must be submitted to the Association for Business Communication website by midnight, April 30, 2016, to be considered for the contest.
Criteria
The winning entry will:
http://www.businesscommunication.org/page/2016-student-writing-contest?source=5
Robert Alderman and Alison Jaenicke were awarded top honors for the 2016 Center for American Literary Studies “Secret Writing Contest.”
This year’s contest was inspired by author Karen Abbott’s Liar, Temptress, Soldier, Spy, a work of historical nonfiction recounting the Civil War through the eyes of four different women whose intrepidity leads to smuggling secrets across enemy lines.
Robert won for his poem, “Watch for the Patterns, Watch for the Wires.” Alison won for her non-fiction, “Sisterhood of Spies.”
All the contest award winners were congratulated at “An Evening with Karen Abbott,” on March 16 at 7PM at the John Bill Freeman Auditorium, Penn State HUB-Robeson Center.
Find PWR lecture materials, town hall minutes, professional organizations, committees, awards, announcements and even a theory on a possible new approach to reading low SRTEs.
We’ve added a lot – but we are still building this page.
Check out what’s there, and send us your ideas for resources.
2FA is an added security measure similar to how you protect your bank account with a pin number (something you know) and debit card (something you have) when you withdraw money from an ATM. The University’s 2FA provider is a company named Duo Security (Duo for short).
After you enroll in 2FA, when you log in to WebAccess—Penn State’s online authentication system that protects WebMail, ANGEL, Canvas, the Employee Self-Service Information Center (ESSIC), and more—you will enter your Penn State user ID (i.e., xyz5000) and password (something you know) as usual, and then use your smartphone or another device (something you have) to verify your identity.
Sign up here: http://get2fa.psu.edu/
Scott Building Memories
Paul Kellermann
“I look like Scott, so you do not be a little bit jumpy.”
—Jeff Bridges (John Carpenter’s Starman, 1984)—
If you walk down the 100-block of West College Avenue—past Indigo, the dance club that used to be called Players (and before that, Gatsby’s,and who knows what before then); past Jack Harper’s Young Mens Shop, with its missing apostrophe; past the CVS, which once was McLanahan’s; just before you get to the shady walkway alley leading to the sunny environs of Calder Way—you may notice an inconspicuous door on your left. Today, that door says PHEAA and it leads to an office housing the agency charged with inventing inexorable hassles for students seeking financial aid. But once upon a time, that door led to a place called the Scott Building, where the English Department warehoused its lecturers and graduate students who had outlived their Burrowes welcome. The Scott Building was also a place where lecturers (non-tenure-line, fixed-termers, indentured savants) bonded into a close-knit community.
That inconspicuous door opened into a stairway that led to a cathedral full of cubicles, decades-old uncirculated air, and an oddly comforting assortment of stenches that told the story of the building’s history (if only the scents could be deciphered). At the fore of the cubicle village sat Judy, the den mother to the Scott denizens. A longtime English employee, Judy had been deployed (banished?) to Scott to look after the department’s flotsam in her final years before retiring. And look after us, she did: fetching our mail from Burrowes, ruling over the office supplies, unjamming the copy machine, and maintaining the antique transparency burner (perhaps the only thing in Scott that was older than Judy).
But mostly, Judy’s job entailed dispensing good vibes, pleasant thoughts, and much-appreciated smiles. Her mere presence made it nearly impossible to sustain a bad mood—even for those of us preternaturally inclined to grumpiness. And so, Judy’s desk evolved into a town square of sorts—a confluence where we all gathered to chit-chat, to kibitz, and to discourse on pedagogy, epistemology, and recipes.
Across from Judy, you’d find the mail slots and the bathrooms—two of Scott’s more necessary features. Just beyond the men’s room along the western wall, Jay and Mary lived. I say lived rather than worked, because I don’t recall ever being in Scott—day or night—when Jay and Mary weren’t there. In fact, the only time I remember seeing them leave was when one of them had to teach or they had a play to rehearse or when they slipped out the back door to conduct business at Webster’s rather than Scott.
To me, Jay and Mary were the King and Queen of Scott, as they embodied the spirit of the building. Mary sat at the desk, looking not at the computer, which was rarely on, but at the jumble of papers strewn across her work space. Jay sat behind her, his chair spilling out of the cubicle into the aisle. From their cubicle, Jay and Mary ran their theater group. It took me a while to determine whether Jay and Mary actually taught classes or if they directed their theater group fulltime. But one thing I knew for sure: you never mentioned one without mentioning the other—not so much Jay and Mary as it was JayandMary (but rarely MaryandJay, which didn’t slip off the tongue as easily).
Before moving to Scott, most of what I’d heard about it involved gossip—who was sleeping with whom, who wasn’t speaking to whom, who had freaked out on whom, who didn’t know the difference between who and whom—the sort of informationless drivel I typically go out of my way to avoid. Moreover, the layout of the room, a remnant of a corporate ethos determined to construct solid organizational citizens, left me cold. And so, I kept my distance. For the first year I was there, I never met the person with whom I shared a cubicle. But I appreciated his sense of style, as the cube was decorated with flyers and posters from theatrical productions he had clearly been involved with. Still, I felt like an interloper in my own workstation—especially when students complimented the decorations and I had to explain that they belonged to some guy named Jason whom I had never met.
The following summer, I met Jason at a party. The fact that I was at a party with colleagues speaks volumes about how the Scott environment had grown on me. But it wasn’t necessarily the environment that had grown on me; it was people—a group of likeminded outcasts with a penchant for the offbeat and a passion for teaching. Back then, lecturers had more opportunity to teach creative writing, literature, and cultural studies. Back then, the department offered more classes in creative writing, literature, and cultural studies. Back then, more students majored in English. And I shared many students in common with my Scott compadres. English majors visiting Scott would jaunt from cubicle to cubicle to talk to instructors—not because they were required to, but because they wanted to. And when students weren’t visiting, colleagues were.
Eventually, I earned a cubicle in the balcony. The balcony wasn’t really a balcony; it was more a pulpit two steps above the rest of the room. From there, I could look down at the maze of cubicles and imagine hiding pieces of cheese to watch the test subjects scurry about. Judy claimed that she reserved the balcony cubicles for people she liked—not that she didn’t like everyone, but she wasn’t above playing favorites. Places in the balcony only came available when someone left to take a better job. I gained mine when Lorena moved to Burrowes to work in the comp office.
When Lorena returned to Scott a couple of years later, I stayed in the balcony and she was assigned a place in cubicle valley. Since my space was just above the copy machine, I felt as if I were a sort of ombudsman. Everyone took a minute to stop by and kvetch as they made their copies. But I never really minded, nor did I feel burdened. Usually, the complaints weren’t complaints at all—more like minor annoyances of the sort that bring people together rather than driving them apart. And I certainly wasn’t immune to griping myself. And that’s the thing that made Scott special. We shared. We listened. We engaged each other every day. We interacted in ways that involved more than clicking a button that says LIKE.
And sometimes, we sat back in our chairs and stared at the ceiling. As much as I miss the Scott Building’s camaraderie and sense of community, I may miss the ceiling most. Oddly, I can’t recall details about the ceiling; all I remember is a rococo mural on a dome several stories above the cubicles. That’s enough. When the stresses of the job and the load of papers to grade weighed me down, I sat back, stared at the ceiling, and lost myself in thought.
Returning to Burrowes this semester, I feel some of the esprit de Scott returning to the corridors. As nice as it was to spend the last two years doing office hours in coffee shops, it’s even nicer to see my colleagues regularly. I may not have an Art Deco ceiling to attract my gaze, but I’ve got a door and a window—and little pillowed nook where I can hide and read. I also have a cadre of comrades within calling distance.And that’s enough for me.
Paul Kellermann introduces himself to his online students this way: “I’m Paul. To quote a well-known Frank Sinatra song: ‘I’ve been a puppet, a pauper, a pirate, a poet—a pawn and a king.’ Now, I am a teacher and a writer. ” See Paul’s English Department profile.
Presented by Judy McKelvey on Wednesday, April 6, 2016 from 4:00-5:00 p.m. in Grucci (102 Burrows).
Come join us for a game designed to help students understand why it is important to know how to use evaluation criteria well. Some of you will play match-seekers; some will be matchmakers; and then there will be the roving disruptors. By the end of the exercise, no one will have found true love, but students will have a concrete strategy for thinking about and applying criteria in an evaluation context.
By Patrick Allen
Patrick Allen is a doctoral student in American literature. His areas of research concern intersections of race, medicine, and human rights. Allen teaches first-year composition including courses with focuses on education and bioethics. He is serving as a Program in Writing and Rhetoric Assistant for the 2015-2016 academic year.
As of last month, I’ve been teaching for five years. I’ve loved the job, and I’ve hated it. I’ve been convinced that this is my calling, and I’ve considered quitting (and actually did once, in a way). To be utterly cliché, I have a love-hate relationship with the profession. And, as I always remember from my early days of education training, I’m not alone.
I can’t now find the article I was shown when I started my courses toward my master’s in education, but it was something like an article from The Atlantic, titled “Why Do Teachers Quit?: And Why Do They Stay?” I think about the title’s questions all the time, so I thought I might use this opportunity to share some considerations.
Why I Did “Quit”
As I said, I did sort of quit teaching once. That is, two years into my career as a high school Spanish and English teacher, I decided secondary education was not for me. And I made that decision for a lot of the same reasons cited in articles like the one from The Atlantic: low pay, high stress, lots of frustration, and the like. One year I had five preps for six classes, and I just couldn’t manage that workload, especially not on top of my graduate work. At 24, I was already feeling burnt out. For someone with a family (i.e., most of my colleagues), I imagine the burden of the job was even weightier.
But, a lot of what frustrated me about teaching at the high school level had nothing to do with the actual “teaching” of the two subjects I love. I learned daily from my students, I delighted in teaching them the difference between el pretérito y el imperfecto, and I loved learning about their values as they crafted their own versions of Achilles’ shield. With some more freedom and opportunity to explore my own interests in the classroom and in my spare time (at that point nonexistent), I knew I could love teaching.
Teaching Now
So, I applied to the graduate program at Penn State, relishing the prospect of teaching at the college level. My teaching experiences here have been varied thus far, and they’ve already given me huge opportunities for growth as an educator. Besides teaching in the classroom, I’ve also “taught” English 005, I’ve subbed for some colleagues, and this year I’m serving as a PWR assistant. Each position has helped me learn more about the work of the professional educator.
As an English 005 tutor, I’ve discovered the immense richness of our program’s lecturer faculty and graduate student instructors. I can’t tell you how many compliments I’ve heard (directly or in overhearing other sessions) about our department’s teachers. Our students recognize our work and our passion for the material—often citing unique activities and great conversations—whether they ever make that clear to us directly or not. These sessions also show me just how creative my colleagues are. Students are creating blogs, writing about current events, and preparing for their careers (with their English instructors’ encouragement) even in the “gen ed” classroom. If strong written communication skills mark the difference between landing a job and getting promoted at that job, what I’ve learned as a tutor is that our students are in good hands.
As a PWR assistant, I’ve finally gotten to do something I’ve been missing for a couple years—meet the other cohort of instructors who take on the job of teaching all of PSU’s undergrads: our lecturer faculty. While our program takes some measures to provide mentorship for instructors new to PSU, (The Atlantic article notes that teachers who stay often cite good mentors as the reason), I still rarely see our teachers breaking the grad student/lecturer divide. This is nowhere more apparent than in 602. With my eyes closed, I can point out where the BAMAs will be seated, where the lecturers have found their space, and where the grad students have marked out their own. While I sometimes stand at the head of the “class” for 602, I’m not unaware of the great wealth of knowledge and experience—in many cases much, much more than my own—in the group.
Some of our instructors have created curricula for whole departments and for whole school districts. Others have taught the equivalent of English 015 at other universities. Some even took English 015 and other PWR courses at Penn State. Still others have non-academic professional experience that certainly informs their own teaching, and that, likely, ought to inform ours—newbies and pros alike. In the coming weeks, I hope our experienced instructors in 602 will share their experiences and ideas about lesson, unit, and syllabus planning. I hope our new grad students will find in our lecturers the great resources I’m seeing from my end. I hope informal mentorships will begin (both in the 602 for the new grad students and between advanced graduate students and our experienced lecturers). I hope (hopefully not naively) that our return to Burrowes might make these relationships possible. If I miss anything about the institutional structure of the high school, it’s the ease with which the teachers collaborated, shared their ideas, and formed informal mentoring relationships. I wonder if there are ways we might try that here.
Why (Today) I’m Staying
It’s hard to say why those who stay in education do so, though I imagine lots of their reasons are the same. The Atlantic found that instructors credit strong mentorship with their ability to adapt to the demands of teaching. I think that could be a start, especially for those like me who, even after the five-year mark, wonder if this is the lifestyle for them.
For me, these are a few elements of the job that so far keep me teaching:
• Students sometimes light up.
• They sometimes have breakthroughs that solidify their beliefs or that prompt them to probe their as-yet unquestioned opinions.
• They sometimes grow as writers and thinkers in unexpected ways.
• Colleagues sometimes surprise you with kindness.
• They sometimes blow you away with their innovation.
• They sometimes remind you why you went into teaching in the first place—invariably something about helping students develop holistically.
• Sometimes, when grading, or when leading class discussion, you think, “Hot damn, I’ve done it!” (Sometimes, you just think, “Damn.” But, then you revise the plan for the next time—or you steal something better from a kind colleague who’s already learned how to do it right.)
• Sometimes you learn even more than your students, and your love of knowledge is rekindled.
And, while all of that happens sometimes, there are still other (rarer) times when a former student lets you know you were an inspiration, and you realize that there’s always that—the chance to be there for a student and to motivate her or his success.
My time in this department thus far has shown me our instructors are exactly that: dedicated educators with a desire to teach our students much more than writing. Cheers to that!
Patrick Allen is a doctoral student in American literature. His areas of research concern intersections of race, medicine, and human rights. Allen teaches first-year composition including courses with focuses on education and bioethics. He is serving as a Program in Writing and Rhetoric Assistant for the 2015-2016 academic year. See Patrick’s English Department Profile.
“My professor is so old, he thinks GroupMe is Tinder for multiples.”
“You think that’s bad, mine is so old she thinks YikYak is a travel blog from Nepal.”
“I can Trump all of you: my teacher is so old, he thinks Kik Messenger is a self-help app for alcoholics who want to kick the habit.”
“Yeah, man, you win: like, alcoholics don’t even exist anymore.”
“So did you study for this test?”
(laughs) “Naw, I was up all night Twitching.”
Professor, alarmed: “You really should see a doctor about that.”
“Dude, you have no idea what you’re saying.”
Professor, hovering by the classroom door as the students leave: “O.k. but…Uber is a phone-in service for philosophers who want to urgently discuss their inherent superiority, right?”
You must be logged in to post a comment.