Author Archives: Yeonju Lee

Motion Parallax from Childhood memory

I remember my family often drove to travel to small towns where the atmospheres were completely different from city area when I was young. My father was always driving and that enabled me to look the views over the car window. I remember that I was very excited whenever I saw the cows closed to the road because they were moving very fast.  They were moving even faster than the airplanes from my viewpoint. So I believed that cows are much faster than airplane and, thus, I thought it was way better idea to riding a cow to travel around.  My parents told me that it just “seemed” like cows are moving faster when I was in a riding car. It took little time to understand this logic and change my thought that cows are inadequate transportation that I could use for travel.

 

To understand me perfectly, my father drove little faster and suddenly slowed down. As he repeated, he told me to how cows are moving slower as he drove slower. But I still could not completely understand because the airplane in the sky was still moving slower than cows. For this question, my father told me that it was matter of distance. He told me that airplane would be so fast if I see that by the side. I did not fully understand with his explanation until I actually see the airplane really closed at the airport.

 

This childhood experience was the first thing came to my mind when we were covering the motion parallax in the lecture.  The motion parallax was a comprehensive term for my father’s explanation. Motion parallax, according to lecture, is a depth cues that objects closed to us move faster across the visual field than objects farther way. This was why airplane seemed move way slower than cows from my viewpoint when I was in a car driving.

Signal Detection Theory in Real Life

Everything we perceive and sense works based on logic of science. However, we often underestimate the science that applies to everyday of our lives. Among the scientific theory or law that are applied in our everyday lives, Signal Detection Theory (SDT) would be the most common scientific theory that we do not quiet recognize or even misunderstand as eccentric circumstance.

In the presence of loud music, you would still be able to hear phone ringing or vibrating. On the contrary, you would not be able to detect your phone ringing or vibrating in the presence of noise other than ringtone or vibration. This is the most common example of SDT we can find in our daily lives.  According to Wolfe et al., SDT is the matter of sensitivity that detecting stimulus in the presence of other noise (Wolfe, 2012). Then we now can ask what makes us detect the stimulus either correctly or incorrectly. It is determined by where we put the criterion. For example, I was in club with loud music that I barely heard others talking to me. But I did not miss any of phone calls (it was on vibration) because I had to pick up any phone calls from my mother. In this case, the criterion must be moved to left in the graph of SDT that expands the right side of criterion under the signal plus noise distribution (increases the possibility to “hit”). However, it all depends on your sensitivity. The criterion only moves in fixed sensitivity measures (d’). For example, in that club, my friend also had to answer the phone call from her mother. But she missed few phone calls (lucky she only missed phone calls from her friends). Thus, because my friend and I had different sensitivity, only I was able to answer all the phone calls.

SDT plays not only in auditory sense but also in vision. From the example from Sensation & Perception published by Wolfe et al., we still see something when we close our eyes in dark room. Throughout the course, I have learned how our sensitivity is interesting and used more than people can possibly think of in daily lives.

 

Reference

Wolfe, J. M. (2012). Sensation & perception (3rd ed.). Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer