Speaking Beyond America:
The Reason Behind the Need for a National World Language Policy in the United States and Elimination of English-Only Policies
Unlike many countries, the United States does not have a national foreign language education policy in place. The lack of a policy is largely due to the fact that not everyone holds the belief that learning a second language language is necessary, especially with the rise of political conflict with immigration and the idea of patriotism.1 However, it has been proven that learning a second language is beneficial in many different aspects. Cognitively, being bilingual creates positive changes in neurological processes and structures. Being able to speak more than one language activates different parts of the brain and increases functionality of those areas. Knowing a second language also improves one’s ability to learn as they are able to process information at a quicker and easier rate. Lastly, knowing a second language can protect someone from age related disease, keeping their brain functioning at a high level longer than someone who is monolingual.2 In addition to the cognitive benefits, there are also the obvious social benefits of being able to communicate with more people, experience more cultures, and have more job and travel opportunities.3
The traditional discourse on the United States language policy has been framed in a way to give a either-or-choice to schools between English and world languages. With this way of framing the education, students and schools with a high minority population suffered. This way of teaching language in the United States goes back to the Native American boarding schools where English was the forced language of education. Throughout World War 1 and the early 1920s, English-Only policies were implemented for German students. During the 60s and 70s, there was support for world languages in schools; but since the 90s English-only policies reversed the progress made and now 28 states have an English-only policy. Only teaching English not only ignores linguistic resources in minority communities, but also negatively effects the education students receive and their sense of identity. 4
Learning a second language has many benefits and opens up many potential future opportunities for students. The decline in language education and lack of a national policy in the United States will only harm students and the education they will receive. The United States needs to create a national world language policy for K-12, promoting the idea of being bilingual because world languages are just as important as other key curricula that already have national policies implemented.
1“U.S. Educational Language Policy.” CAL, www.cal.org/areas-of-impact/language-planning-policy/u.s.-educational-language-policy#:~:text=Unlike%20many%20other%20countries%2C%20the,an%20official%20national%20language%20policy.&text=Foreign%20language%20teaching%20has%20generally,heritage%20language%20resources%20in%20communities.
2Administrator, Internal. “The Cognitive Benefits of Being Bilingual.” Dana Foundation, Dana Foundation, 11 Sept. 2019, dana.org/article/the-cognitive-benefits-of-being-bilingual/.
3“10 Benefits of Learning a Second Language.” Lead with Languages, 16 Jan. 2020, www.leadwithlanguages.org/why-learn-languages/top-ten-reasons-to-learn-languages/.
4 “U.S. Educational Language Policy.”
QUESTIONS:
- Is my thesis strong? Does it set up the argument well?
- Do you think I need to focus in on a topic more? Is my Intro all over the place?
- What do you think is the most interesting thing I discussed in my intro?
- Is my writing clear or does it just drag on and never get to a point?
- Does my title make sense? Thoughts on the title?