Case 4: Ed Kemper, the “Co-Ed Killer”

CASE 4: EDMUND KEMPER

AKA The Co-Ed Killer

Going back to a true crime focus for this week, I wanted to talk about Ed Kemper. Throughout this quarantine madness I’ve been watching a lot of true crime shows, documentaries, etc. and one of my favorites is Mindhunter, which is a really amazing show on Netflix. Based on a real-life story, it includes lots of dramatized interviews with infamous serial killers and other violent criminals, focusing on how criminal profiling was designed as an investigative resource and practice as well as analyzing the psychology of these twisted individuals. It’s a fun mix of true crime, mystery, and drama. I would totally check it out if you’re into that sort of thing.

But, let’s talk specifically about Ed Kemper. He’s a pretty well-known serial killer, both because of the abhorrent nature of his crimes and also because of his larger-than-life persona; I mean that quite literally. The guy is 6’9″, and he boasts an IQ of around 145, making him extremely intelligent (for reference, the average IQ is only 100, and 160 is supposedly the mark of a “genius”). He’s a textbook psychopath, even during his childhood where he’d torture and murder animals (a common trend among serial killers). In his interviews and testimonies, he shows a jarring lack of emotional empathy. He’s very aware of how he is perceived by others, and able to use his wits to manipulate and use others to his advantage. He doesn’t always come across as cold and calculating when you watch videos of him – it’s just kind of disturbing. He discusses extremely disturbing and graphic details with a straight face and an unnaturally cool demeanor. It’s enough to give anyone the creeps.

Ed grew up in an incredibly abusive household, especially when it came to his relationship with his mother. He was physically, emotionally, and mentally abused, often discussing his mother’s strong hatred and disgust with him for merely existing. It’s easy to understand how abuse can twist an individual’s perception, morals, and mentality, but in Ed’s case it only seemed to ignite a flame that was already threatening to burn. His anger toward his home life and family led him to shooting both his grandmother and grandfather when he was just 15. He first shot his grandmother, allegedly to “know what it felt like,” before repeating the same aggression toward his grandfather. He was confined in a mental institution for just five years before being released into his mother’s care once again.

It’s clear that the obvious target of the aggression and violence Kemper felt the urge to carry out stemmed back to his terrible relationship with his mother. However, he committed a series of murders against innocent young women during the time period following his release up until his eventual incarceration. He would pick up hitchhiking female students, take them to remote and rural areas, kill them, and oftentimes decapitate and practice necrophilic acts with their corpses. I won’t go into explicit detail, because it’s pretty disturbing, but if you want to find out more, a quick Google search will suffice. Kemper finally murdered his mother before strangling her best friend in 1973. Soon after, he confessed to his crimes and turned himself in.

Part of the reason I find this man to be so horrifying, yet morbidly interesting, is because he could easily pass as a normal guy. When you know to be looking for signs of off behavior, it’s obvious. But part of the terrifying thing about psychopathic and sociopathic killers and criminals is that they’re so good at manipulating people and hiding behind a mask of charm and normality. Kemper held down jobs and casual friendships with others. By all accounts, he was a normal, albeit perhaps socially awkward, guy. No one seemed to know what was lurking beneath the surface until it was too late.

Case 3: The Truth and the Legend of Bloody Mary

CASE 3: BLOODY MARY

This stern looking woman is Mary I, the first regnant queen of England

Hi all. Long time no see. I hope that everyone is doing well this week and continues to do well as time goes on — I’m sure our current situation will get worse before it gets better, and things seem to be changing drastically from a week to week, even day to day, basis. Hang in there, stay safe, and take care of yourself and those you love.

This is a post I thought about using around Halloween, but decided against it. It’s not quite as spooky as it may seem on the surface, but it is rooted in some interesting historical fact. Everyone has heard of Bloody Mary as a cultural phenomenon – there’s even an alcoholic drink named after her – but not many people know who the woman herself actually was. She was no saint, to be clear, but she also isn’t a spirit lurking in your bathroom mirror waiting to be summoned and to terrorize you.

Mary didn’t have such an easy life. As the only child of King Henry VIII (you know, the man who had multiple wives and tragic ends to his marriages, got mad at the Catholic church for not allowing him to annul his marriage to his first wife when she could not bore a son, kind of crazy — that Henry VIII) and his first wife, her path to the throne was not a clear one. You know, because of her father’s many wives and consistent failure to produce a male heir. Nonetheless, Mary did rise to the throne in her late 30’s and was said to be wracked with problems regarding her emotional and mental health. She struggled to produce an heir herself, which would lead to the throne eventually being passed on to her younger half-sister Elizabeth.

Mary I is not remembered for her unstable childhood or her struggles to acquire and maintain her status as queen – there’s nothing really bloody about that, is there? The nickname “Bloody Mary” comes from a time of divide in England between the Protestants and the Catholics, mainly spurred by the shift in religion inspired by Mary’s father, Henry VIII (who broke off from the Catholic Church during his reign). Mary, a devout Catholic, viewed Protestantism and its followers in a highly negative light. So negative, in fact, that she was directly responsible for ordering the execution of hundreds of “convicted” Protestants. They were burned at the stake in what would later become known as the Marian Persecutions.

So how does this example of historical persecution and misfortune translate into chanting Bloody Mary’s name into a mirror in the dark to attempt to summon spirits, demons, or other supernatural forces/phenomenon? I honestly am a bit unsure. I tried to do some digging, but am unable to fully understand why Mary specifically was chosen to be a legendary figure of horrific folklore. Historically, women were encouraged to summon Bloody Mary in a mirror – if they could see their husband’s faces in the mirror, they were to be married soon. But, if they saw a skull, they were to die before they had the chance to marry. But why Mary I? Could it be her unyielding cruelty? Could it have been rooted anti-Catholic sentiment and fear? Let me know what you think if you have any ideas.

Case 2: Cities Lost to Time

CASE 2: CITIES LOST TO TIME

I love some good ol’ fashioned (pun slightly intended) ancient history, and I often focus on man-to-man interactions rather than their more natural, less violent or suspicious counterparts. There are all kinds of abandoned or “lost” cities, civilizations, etc. all over the world of varying ages; way too many to talk about in a single post. But some are more intriguing than others to me, mainly because of the level of preservation they’ve managed to attain, their age, or simply their complexity. What’s even more fascinating is exactly what happened to them. In many cases, people just seem to have literally vanished into thin air, or simply just up and left. It leaves the end, challenges, or other circumstances of their way of life up in the air, like looking at a clue to a case you know you’ll never solve but still want to anyway. So I decided to pick a couple of “lost” cities/civilizations and provide a brief summary of what they are, where they are, what happened, and why. It really makes you consider the temporary nature of humanity. Even the most successful and progressive of efforts can fall flat against the cruel reality of time, nature, and circumstance.

~~~

1. Tikal, Guatemala

 

Tikal, Guatemala is a former Mayan town surrounded by forests and wildlife. Aside from its incredible architectural ruins and remains, the city also boasts an incredibly knowledgeable former population. The people of Tikal had created a 365 day calendar and a lunar cycle only a few minutes off of modern standards and calculations by the time they abandoned their city. Its temples still stand proud and tall as they did way back at the beginning of the common era, a look into past homes to former religious or otherwise cultural rituals and celebrations. What makes Tikal unique not just as a Mayan city-state but also as a historical site is the amazing condition of its ruins; unlike many other similar sites, many of its buildings still remain at the same height and same level of grandeur that they did upon their original construction. For reasons unclear, the city was abandoned around the 10th century, possible due to climate change, droughts, or other natural causes – but its sudden abandonment luckily did nothing to taint the magnificence of the accomplishments done here.

Outside Source: https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/tikal-guatemala/index.html 

2. Pompeii, Italy

I have the unique privilege to say that I’ve actually been to Pompeii. It’s as haunting as it is spectacular. Pompeii is a pretty significant and popular cultural icon, especially due to the casts of human and other remains that are displayed alongside the ruins. Pompeii was once a prosperous ancient Roman city full of the cultural and social developments the rest of the empire had to offer. The entire city was suddenly destroyed when a local volcano, Mount Vesuvius, erupted at such a scale that the entirety of the grounds and buildings, including all of the civilians within, were covered by thick layers of smoke and ash, basically petrifying all the buildings and figures where they stood. This means that a lot of the ruins are incredibly well preserved; the buildings, roads, and city layout are still very comprehensible, and some original artwork still remains on some of the walls. But, as mentioned previously, the seemingly frozen-in-time corpses (which are actually casts of actual human remains rather than the literal remains themselves, at least those on display for the general public) are what seem to attract a lot more attention. It’s a place that simultaneously reminds you of the fleetingness of mortality but also the complexity of human society – truly a unique experience, and such an extensive city that it’s impossible to explore it all at once.

This picture I took while visiting shows a penis (yes, really) engraved into street pavement. The head of it points in the direction of the nearest brothel (yes, really really) for anyone who may be seeking it out.

Case 1: Bigfoot

BIGFOOT

Heritage, history, and evidence… or lack thereof.

Oh lord, he’s comin’

 

Hello ladies, gents, everyone in between ~ as I’m continuing the same focus and site as my first semester passion blog, I decided to title the posts from this semester slightly differently than those in the past to clarify which belong where. Is Bigfoot really some sort of case-study? No, absolutely not. But he’s both historical and mysterious, the titular characteristics of this blog, and I thought it would be a fun place to start out rather than grisly murder-mysteries or disappearing children.

So, Bigfoot. Is he real? No. Well, I don’t think so. You can disagree with me, and I’m sure even if you won’t openly you might have a slight, albeit deeply suppressed and shamefully hidden, suspicion or belief or even curiosity regarding this godforsaken Sasquatch. And you know what? That’s fair. There’s been a lot of speculation, false information, hoaxes, and all sorts of anecdotal evidence surrounding Bigfoot or other similar creatures for decades. Way, way too much for me to cover in a blog post, much less an actually entertaining blog post. So, for your sake and mine, I thought I would just break down the history, as well as some of the “best,” or most compelling, popular, unexplainable, etc. etc. pieces of evidence in favor of our boy here.

As a brief disclaimer, a lot of this information or these theories come straight from internet searching, and it’s a bit hard to find reputable sources for Bigfoot theories (shocker) but I tried my best to keep them within reason.

1. Where did Bigfoot come from?

While folklore and urban legends surrounding large, hairy creatures of various sorts have floated around human civilization for centuries, Bigfoot as we know him today (big, tall, often primate or ape-like, covered in hair, big feet) made his public debut in the late 1950’s when a small Californian community ran a news story on massive, 16-inch footprints left around and in a construction site. Headlines reported the footprints “puzzled residents,” as strange massive footprints rightfully ought to do, and said paper, the Humboldt Times, gave the culprit of the mysteriously large prints an ever-so creative name: Bigfoot. And he’s been wreaking havoc in the depths of American forests and leaving other weird footprints in the hearts of conspiracy theorists ever since.

2. The Patterson Footage / Images

The image at the top of this post, perhaps the most well-known and widely circulated image of Bigfoot to ever exist, actually comes from a real video. It’s pretty short, but it shows an unknown creature stalking across some sort of forest or clearing – it doesn’t seem to resemble anything else, like a bear, and appears to be way too tall and large to be a man in a suit. Or so people claim. This is really the only footage of Bigfoot that hasn’t been proven to be a hoax or replicated in some way to expose its ingenuity, in part because the footage is on the older side (1967). Many researchers believe it to be nothing more than a dude in a suit, but no one has ever stepped forward to admit this (except a select group of people trying to get famous off of Bigfoot clout – all debunked). The filmmaker responsible for shooting this footage, Bob Gimlin, claims he believes he knows what he saw and that it couldn’t have been a man in a suit… but, again, has no professional opinion to back him up. Watch and see for yourself, I suppose.

 

3. Reality TV

For a long time, the only “evidence” of Bigfoot was purely anecdotal – he said, she said, he saw, she saw. And, aside from videos and photos like those above, most things were easily able to be debunked or explained away through much more likely and plausible scenarios. Still, Bigfoot stomped on in the minds of many Americans, and as technology evolved, so too did the lengths people are willing to go to in order to PROVE that he exists. Enter Finding Bigfoot, or Expedition Bigfoot, or Chasing Bigfoot, or Mountain Monsters, or any other reality tv or documentary program based SOLELY. On finding. Bigfoot. Finding Bigfoot has been running since 2011, folks. And they have yet to find Bigfoot. Or maybe they think they have – but the proof isn’t in the pudding, guys. Because there is no proof. There is no pudding.

So why do people still want to believe in Bigfoot so badly? Your guess is as good as mine. Until someone finally tackles him down, I will remain a staunch skeptic.

Chapter Eight: The Voynich Manuscript

Chapter Eight: The Mysterious Voynich Manuscript

 

For my final post, I wanted to explore a topic that (hopefully) most people haven’t heard of; I know I hadn’t until very recently. The image above is a page from a document known as the Voynich Manuscript, a medieval text written in an unknown language that has yet to be decoded or understood. It contains lots of puzzling, strange images alongside its undecipherable text, leading to centuries of fruitless attempts at understanding its message and lots of very frustrated historians and scholars.

There are a couple of things we do know about this strange document. It carbon-dates back to around the 1300-1400’s, and is believed to have been produced in Italy or somewhere else in the Mediterranean region. It passed through the hands of a couple of owners in centuries past, then seemingly disappeared from historical records for about 250 years until 1912 when a man named Wilfred Voyich (thus the name of the document) purchased it, allegedly from a Jesuit outside Rome. The documents strange contents were released to the public in 1915, and it’s been confounding all sorts of intellectuals ever since.

A couple of bizarre images from the manuscript, seemingly depicting women – though it’s unclear what they’re doing or why, and, again, what the symbols or text surrounding them is trying to say. This illustrates the genuinely mind-boggling nature of the document; the pictures do little to clarify the meaning of the text. If anything, they add to the confusion.

There have been several hypotheses regarding the meaning and origin of the document, as well as several individuals claiming to have cracked its code, but there are no definitive answers that explain anything, really. The most sound argument, in my opinion, is that this language is simply extinct – that’s easy to believe since it doesn’t match any other recorded language in human history, but it does raise the question of why this is the only document ever written in it (at least that we know of). And why is it not written in Latin, or some other prominent historical language? Is it meant to be a language of symbols, like hieroglyphs, or is it an actual alphabet?

A lot of leading theories about the purpose of the document suggest that it’s some sort of women’s health manual, demonstrating different Pagan health or spiritual rituals and written in a relatively unknown dialect even for the time. Again, this makes logical sense, but there really is no evidence to support it other than the fact that the images kind of look that way, and other similar arguments. The document also contains what appear to be astrological symbols and celestial charts, and lots and lots and lots of naked women performing various tasks. Weird.

Some scholars and people claim that the entire document may be an elaborate hoax orchestrated by Voynich himself. I find this hard to believe; after all, the document was carbon-dated using scientific methods back several centuries, and there are historical records of other owners possessing it in the past. Also, the document is so extensive and detailed that it seems unlikely that an old man would take the time to sit down and draft it up – and for what purpose? I suppose it can’t be out-ruled as a possibility, but there are other explanations that I think make more sense and I can logically settle on as the most likely sort of answer.

Still, though, no one really knows what any of those words, symbols, or whatever they may be are trying to say – or why. Will it ever be deciphered? Is there a missing link somewhere else out there that will suddenly make everything clear? Was Voynich just a crazy and extremely dedicated old man? We probably won’t know for a really, really long time, if ever.

Chapter Seven: D. B. Cooper

Chapter Seven: The Mysterious D. B. Cooper

This one’s a weird one. Like, a really, really, really weird one.

Sorry for the slightly late post, fellow spook-sleuths; in the stress and chaos of the past week, updating you on the weird tomfoolery that went down in the past totally slipped my mind. But I am here now, and I would kick myself if I let this whole semester go by without discussing one of my favorite historical mysteries: the strange hijacking and disappearance of the great mystery man D. B. Cooper.

As I’ve said in the past, you might have heard of this story before. It’s been popular for decades, but a lot of different true-crime documentaries, videos, and series have covered this event; I know that because I’ve watched several, hoping some new details or insight might be provided. But it really is a dead end.

On November 24, 1971, a nondescript man boarded a normal, routine flight from Portland, Oregon bound toward Seattle, Washington. The man appeared to be in his 40’s, wearing a white shirt and a black tie, and carrying a briefcase. The man purchased his plane ticket using all cash under the name Dan Cooper. As he waited for the flight to take off, he ordered a drink: bourbon and soda. A while later, just after 3 pm, the man passed a stewardess who had been walking by a note directing her to sit next to him. After she complied, the man opened his briefcase to reveal to the stewardess what looked to be a bomb – red sticks and colored wires.

In order to avoid detonating the bomb, according to the man, the stewardess was to take note of his demands, take them to the captain of the plane, and follow the instructions. He requested four parachutes, and, most notably, $200,000 in cash. In 20 dollar bills.

The flight eventually landed in Seattle, though delayed (the original and normal flight would have only taken about 30 minutes, but did not arrive until around 5:30) due to the amount of time it took to acquire the money Cooper demanded. When the flight landed, Cooper exchanging the 30 or so passengers on board for the money and the parachutes. Then, he directed the pilot to fly south toward Mexico. A few hours later, around 8 pm, he did the seemingly unthinkable: he parachuted from the moving plane with the ransom money. The pilots and the plane were able to safely land afterwards, but with no other details or contact, the man who called himself Dan Cooper was seemingly lost forever.

There’s a lot of things that are unclear in this case: who is Dan Cooper (which is, shockingly, not this man’s real name)? What was his motivation? Where did he land? Did he survive his jump? If he did, how did he manage to use or spend the money without detection? How has he managed to escape undetected, despite massive amounts of investigation, to this very day?

Basically the only physical evidence left behind was Dan Cooper’s black clip-on tie, which he removed before parachuting from the plane for unknown reasons. The tie was able to eventually provide a DNA sample, but it matched nothing in existing databases and no identified suspects. With no other leads to go off of, this evidence is basically useless; without something or someone to compare it to, it remains another element of confusion.

A leading theory is that D.B. Cooper (a name given to him by press and media coverage) did not survive his fall from the plane. The parachutes he used were not steerable, and he jumped into a very wooded area at night time. Seemingly adding to this theory was a 1980 discovery by a young boy of a washed-up, rotting paper bag filled with about 5k in dollar bills with serial numbers that matched those that had been acquired by Cooper. The rest of the bills, as well as any remains or other items of Cooper, have not been found.

There are some suspects in the case, but only about less than 2 dozen were actually seriously investigated. There have also been numerous confessions from members of the public claiming to be Cooper, but none of them have led to any serious conclusion or produced reliable evidence to suggest the validity of the claims. So, with nothing more to go off of than the eyewitness reports and descriptions of those on the flight that day, as well as the rotting money and the somewhat useless DNA evidence, it’s no wonder this case has gone cold. And, as the years go on, it seems to become more and more unlikely that we ever will truly know who D.B. Cooper was.

 

Chapter Six: The Black Dahlia

Chapter Six: The Black Dahlia

Los Angeles, 1947

 

This story is a little more grisly than the others I’ve written about in the past. It’s a fairly graphic and disturbing crime, but I will do my best to keep it as readable as possible – that means not including any of the gruesome images found at the crime scene. But if you’re curious, you can find them all (and no judgement from me, because I’ve done the same) with a quick Google search. But, as you’ll see, it’s intense stuff. Just a disclaimer.

The murder-mystery of the Black Dahlia is one of the most famous in recent history, mostly because of the horrendous state her remains were discovered in and the media sensation surrounding her death as a result. To this day, who the culprit is remains a mystery. The FBI even has a whole page dedicated to this case; you’ve probably at least heard the phrase “black dahlia” at some point.

The woman pictured above is Elizabeth Short, – also known as the Black Dahlia – age twenty-two at the time of her death. Elizabeth, an aspiring actress, lived with and did some housework for a French family in Los Angeles at the time of her death. She had ended up there after years of struggling to find work, partying, and trying to find a husband in a couple of men – all of which ended in heartbreak. Her beauty was, to many, striking; she lived a life like many other young women looking to make a name for themselves. The last person to see her alive was a man named Robert Manley, whom she had been having a brief love affair with – after a night spent together in a hotel, Manley left for an appointment. He later dropped her off at a different hotel, where she was to meet her sister, but did not stay to wait for the sister to show up. The last thing he saw of Elizabeth was her making phone calls in the hotel lobby.

She was then missing for six days.

On the morning of January 15, a housewife named Betty Bersinger was out for a walk to a shoe repair shop with her three-year-old daughter. The pair passed many vacant lots, and Bersinger noticed something white amongst the weeds and grass in one of them. Initially dismissing it as litter, upon closer inspection she believed it to be a mannequin that someone had tossed out. It struck her as strange, as the mannequin had apparently been severed in half. Bersinger began to walk away, but was drawn back to the mannequin – which she quickly discovered was not a mannequin at all, but instead the mutilated body of a young woman. She fled the scene with her daughter to a nearby house, where she immediately called the police.

Officers arrived on the scene within a few minutes. The state that the body was in was abysmal. Elizabeth had indeed been severed in half cleanly at the waist (perhaps suggesting a killer with medical knowledge), and her limbs had been apparently posed – arms raised over her shoulders with her legs spread – to make her appear seductive. She was naked with several cuts and abrasions across her body, including cuts from the corners of her mouth that extended to each of her ears, almost like a sick and crude smile. She had rope marks on her wrists, ankles, and neck that suggested that she had been tied up for an extended period of time. Notably, there was no blood on her body or on the ground underneath her, like she had been cleaned and killed elsewhere, then dropped in the vacant lot to be discovered. Her cause of death was determined to be due to brain damage and lacerations to her face, leading to hemorrhage and shock. Most of her other injuries, including the severing, were thus concluded to have occurred postmortem.

News spread of the discovery fairly quickly, and the crime scene was quickly contaminated and disrupted by dozens of civilians and reporters. Elizabeth was able to be identified from fingerprints lifted from her remains at the scene. Though it was clear who the victim was, what wasn’t was who was responsible for such a horrific and merciless crime.

Investigators believed that the killer had been someone close to Elizabeth, due to the extremely brutal way she was killed and the fact that her body was left to be discovered and gawked at by the public. Several men in Elizabeth’s life were suspects, most of them ruled out due to strong alibis, including Robert Manley (the last man to see her alive). Elizabeth’s shoe and bag were found in a trash can not far from the lot her body had been discovered, leading investigators to believe that the killer was within walking distance of the place her remains were found. Much like the Jack the Ripper case, letters that were apparently from the killer were sent to the LAPD, as well as important documents (like Elizabeth’s security card), but they had all been rinsed with gasoline to prevent the lifting of any fingerprints. Since there were a lot of false leads and hoaxes, both from letters and calls, police were often led down meaningless roads that led to little to no real evidence or progress in the case. Without any real leads or physical evidence, the case went cold. It still is to this day.

There are some popular suspects, though. If you want to read a bit about them, click here for a nice summary of each. But as for who actually did it? We don’t know. And we probably never will.

Chapter Four: Hatshepsut – Egypt’s Female King

Chapter Four: The Story of Hatshepsut

15th Century B.C.E.

Hatshepsut was one badass pharaoh.

Note the use of the word “pharaoh,” not “queen” – Hatshepsut was the first female ruler of Egypt to ever rule as a king. That is, she was the one in charge. Head honcho. The (wo)man wearing the gold-lined pants, if you will. This is just to say that she was not seen as a secondary ruler, rather as the true, honest-to-gods pharaoh, and that’s a really big deal (if you couldn’t tell by now).

She wasn’t just a lady wearing a man’s wig, though. She was an extremely successful leader who brought great success and prosperity to Egypt during her reign. Not only did she bring wealth to the kingdom – she was a prolific builder and skilled trader/negotiator. She knew a thing or two about a thing or two.

But we’re not here right now to talk about Hatshepsut and her awesome achievements and yay, girl power! For a long time, the world did not know Hatshepsut’s name. In fact, a lot of people today still don’t. As far as really famous Egyptian pharaohs go, to be fair, there are only a couple that I think consistently pop into people’s minds: King Tut, Cleopatra, perhaps Ramses the Great? Maybe if you’re really historically savvy, you’ll remember Akhenaten or Khufu. But I think it’s safe to say most people do not. There’s not even really anything wrong with that – I can’t list every Roman emperor off the top of my head. But I do want more people to know about Hatshepsut and how time and history did her dirty for so, so long, because I think she deserves better.

So, Hatshepsut wasn’t really meant to take the throne. That is, it wasn’t like she was first in line for inheriting the throne from her father; Ancient Egypt didn’t suddenly become #woke in the 15th century (B.C.E.). This is all very incest-y and kind of confusing, but it went down like this: Hatshepsut was daughter to Thutmose I, a pharaoh, and his first wife (the queen). She married her brother, Thutmose II, who assumed the throne following their father’s death. This made Hatshepsut the queen. They had one daughter together, but no sons. Thutmose II bites the bullet at a pretty young age, and since Hatshepsut doesn’t have any sons, the throne goes to an infant son Thutmose II had fathered with a secondary wife (which feels icky to write, but whatever. It was Ancient Egypt). But, you know, infants can’t exactly run a prosperous empire. So, as was traditional, Hatshepsut took over as the future pharaoh’s regent. Kind of like a substitute teacher or something if the substitute was filling in for the teacher because the teacher was born three days ago.

Seven years into the whole ruler thing, I guess Hatshepsut decided it was pretty neat, because she took over. As a pharaoh. Co-pharaoh, to be fair – she never claimed the throne as her own and still recognized Thutmose III’s claim to it. What a nice woman.

Despite this, though, Thutmose III made a grand attempt to erase his stepmother from history after she died. Perhaps he felt threatened by her legacy, since she was successful – maybe he was bitter she made herself a co-pharaoh. Maybe he just hated the rest of the world and history knowing a woman had been in power, especially because said woman shared his own throne. Maybe it was just a matter of keeping the patriarchal flow of power in the kingdom alive. Whatever the reason, or perhaps a combination of them all, he embarked on what I feel is kind of a hissy fit: trying to erase or destroy hieroglyphic messages and inscriptions of all kinds that mentioned her name, destroying statues, buildings, structures, or any physical/tangible evidence that this woman existed. Even her sarcophagus was empty (although that isn’t necessarily a result of these actions, I am still highly sus). And, by golly, it worked. No one even knew she existed until about 100 years ago.

This post is already getting lengthy, so I will leave the further analysis and reflection up to you. I think the takeaway here is pretty clear: an incredibly successful and prosperous ruler, directly linked to the royal family in a number of ways, who did a number of great things for her kingdom, completely scrapped from history. Because she was a woman who got a little too ambitious.

Joke’s on you, Thutmose III. Through his attempt to erase her, he arguably brought her even more fame and admiration than if he had just allowed history to do its thing.

 

Chapter Three: The Dancing Plague

Chapter 3: The So-Called “Dancing Plague” of 1518


July, 1518 ~ Strasbourg, Holy Roman Empire

To take a slightly less serious, albeit still bizarre and admittedly quite entertaining, approach, I thought it appropriate to discuss what’s been dubbed as the “dancing plague” that struck the city of Strasbourg (a city in what was the Holy Roman Empire), in the summer of 1518. The events that took place throughout the summer are still relatively unexplained.

It sounds funny on paper: a woman starts dancing silently on the street one day with no explanation. A week or so later, others have joined her. Soon, hundreds of people dance, twirl, and spin on the streets without any rhyme or reason – seemingly just the unexplainable and intense urge to flail their bodies around aimlessly to the point of exhaustion. And such a fate awaited many of the participants: some collapsed due to exhaustion and overexertion(understandable) while others actually suffered more serious, fatal consequences like strokes or heart attacks.

So, people are wiggling and bopping around town, then dropping dead like flies. It’s madness, right? Imagine being, by modern standards, an extremely uneducated devout Catholic in the 16th century. As discussed before, unexplainable and bizarre behavior really only had a few potential causes: witchcraft, demonic influence, divine punishment, or some combination of the three. Naturally, this phenomenon was quite alarming to those not afflicted by the extreme urge to shake what their mothers gave them.

The cause was chalked up to “hot blood,” and, surprise, victims were whisked away to pray the dance fever away. Eventually, the hysteria died down, and life went on. Most modern explanations of this bizarre event is just that: hysteria. It really is, at least by definition, a case of hundreds of people entering some sort of strange hysterical fit, but what caused the hysteria? No one really knows. Some theorize that moldy bread was the culprit; others claim the dancers might have been part of a religious cult, or otherwise involved themselves with religious motivation while they shook their groove things. It’s not really clear, and it probably never will be until a town of people decides to start dancing in the streets sometime in the modern era so that we can study it better.

As far as analysis goes, I’d like to consider how a community reacts to some sort of conflict or issue, and what that can say about the rest of society around them. Obviously, things were much different in the 16th century than they are today; the lack of technology, medical knowledge, and seemingly overall common sense led people to very different conclusions than what we would experience in the modern world. But, regardless, the desire to stamp out the unknown – via prayers, or whatever the case may be – rather than trying to fully understand it is interesting to me. It seems that, as a society, as time has gone on we’ve become more eager to truthfully and genuinely be able to wrap our minds around the things that confuse us rather than dismiss or attempt to eradicate them. After all, isn’t that what 99.9% of social issues are really about: people not understanding one another?

Additionally, regardless of what truly caused the hysteria, the fact that it happened is, itself, quite a thinker. It’s bizarre, especially when you look at other instances of people being weirdos throughout history, that the first woman to start dancing wasn’t apprehended. People just let her dance on for a week. Why? Such behavior would have certainly stuck out, even by today’s standards (and people are really wack now, truly). And when dozens more joined her, they too danced their hearts out. Does this comment on earlier societies’ tendency to isolate and ignore those who stuck out rather than trying to understand their condition or actions? Am I reading way, way, WAY too much into what’s generally just a kind of weird thing that happened one summer in Europe? Potentially. But we’ll never know if no one asks.

Chapter Two: The Salem Witch Trials

 The Salem Witch Trials

Salem, Massachusetts ~ Summer of 1692

Basically everyone in the Western world is familiar with the infamy and the horror of the Salem witch trials and the mass hysteria that consumed the area during the late 17th century. It’s easy to want to pretend it didn’t happen, or to downplay its cultural and societal significance as just an example of religious fanaticism at its worst. Religion does indeed play a large role in this phenomenon, and understanding this role in early American society is crucial when trying to understand why the fear of witchcraft, as silly as it may seem now, was so deeply embedded in the minds of many colonial Puritans. I don’t, however, think it was the only thing at play. I want to make the argument that the horrific and tragic events that took place in Salem during this time were a product of misogyny just as much as they were a product of a misguided religious frenzy.

I don’t think that this is a bold claim to make, either. Nearly everyone involved in these trials (aside from those who tried and sentenced them) were women. The entire series of event started with two young girls, Elizabeth Parris and Abigail Williams, who began acting strangely (violent fits, outbursts, contortions, and a variety of other seemingly unexplainable and alarming behaviors). As other girls in the community began to exhibit similar symptoms, doctors and townsfolk alike cried bewitchment. Arrest warrants were promptly issued to a collection of alleged witches thought to be responsible; this is where I think the prejudiced undertones become undeniably clear. Starting from the beginning and continuing on throughout many of the other instances of accused witchcraft, the supposed “witches” were often poor, old, widowed, or otherwise “rejected” women. They were easy targets, truly, and how can one prove innocence when accused of witchcraft?

A lack of medical knowledge and what I’m sure was a genuine fear and desire to put an end to these scary occurrences led the village of Salem to use the lower end of their society, specifically their women, as scapegoats. Whether or not there was tangible evidence of these women’s wrongdoings was not important not relevant. Just existing as a woman in the wrong place at the wrong time was damning enough to get you hanged. Several accused died in jail, but nearly all the convicted were sentenced to death by hanging as opposed to the general misconception that witches were burned at the stake.

There are a lot of factors to consider. One is Puritan society itself. Puritans were infamous for their strict, rigid, and intense interpretations of a just and biblical lifestyle, often at the expense of community members themselves. Their way of life was often unforgiving (think The Scarlet Letter). Another is the inevitable lack of understanding about physical and mental health that was widespread during this era. What was believed to be symptoms of bewitchment could be understood under a modern lens as symptoms of various psychological or mental disorders – not a sign of the devil, just a sign of humanity. But just as important, and often glossed over, is the way these older societies viewed women. Had women not been seen as generally inferior and often prone to temptation or unsavory activity (consider various examples of tempting, immoral women in the Bible, for example – even Eve herself), would they be the obvious and immediate culprits? Had women had the resources, the rights, and the confidence to adequately defend themselves, would they still be targets? Would they still have met the same horrid fate? I think the answers are obvious. How else have women throughout history been victims of a system that sought to oppress them at every turn?