Dickinson Law – Lewis Katz Hall
Pennsylvania State University
150 S. College Street
Carlisle, PA 17013
Brief Biography (2022)
- Katherine C. Pearson is a Professor of Law and the Arthur L. and Sandra S. Piccone Faculty Scholar at Pennsylvania State Dickinson Law in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, where she regularly teaches courses on contract law, conflicts of law, elder law, nonprofit organizations law, and in recent years has also taught the survey course on wills, trusts and estates. Sometimes her research and writing combines multiple areas of her teaching expertise, such as a recent article she published (with Pennsylvania attorney Douglas Roeder) on “Putting the Charity Back in Purely Public Charities,” 93 Pa. B. Quarterly 101 (No. 3, July 2022) where she discusses challenges under state and federal laws for organizations, including senior care organizations, relying on service fees to qualify as tax-exempt charities.
- For more than twenty years, Professor Pearson’s academic focus in research and writing has been on laws and policies connected to aging. She served for more than ten years as director of Penn State’s Elder Protection Clinic (2001-2012), where students provided pro-bono representation of older adults on cutting edge legal issues. Although the Clinic has closed, Professor Pearson continues to use that important student-involved, practical experience to inform her writing and research. She is the author of articles and book chapters on long-term care, financing issues and filial obligations, and is the co-author of The Law of Financial Abuse and Exploitation (Bisel 2011), a book about protection of vulnerable persons from financial exploitation.
- Professor Pearson has served in positions on national and state organizations for attorneys specializing in elder law, including the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys, and she has chaired the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Elder Law Section.
- A former Fulbright Scholar (U.K., Queens University Belfast, 2010), Professor Katherine Pearson’s work includes international, comparative analysis of laws and policies affecting older persons, including work as an international research consultant in the U.K. and Northern Ireland to promote better systems for safeguarding and adult social care. President Pearson’s international work took her to Cuba with a group of students for an embedded course on Introduction to Cuban Legal Systems, in January 2016.
- In 2013-14, Professor Pearson served as a member of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Elder Law Task Force at the invitation of Justice Debra Todd, to examine issues of guardianships, abuse and neglect, and access to justice for older Pennsylvanians. The Task Force issued a report with 125 recommendations addressing guardianship and fiduciary duty issues in November 2014. The work to implement the recommendations and support older adults is ongoing. In 2022, Professor Pearson is part of a Pennsylvania Academic Elder Justice Consortium, which meets regularly to discuss future goals.
- In July 2016, the Pennsylvania Bar Association’s Elder Law Section honored Professor Pearson with an “Excellence in Elder Law” award, in “recognition and appreciation of her superior professional efforts in the field of elder law, significant contributions to the legal profession, and noteworthy service to the elderly.”
- Professor Katherine C. Pearson is a co-editor and a regular writer for the Elder Law Prof Blog, available at http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/elder_law/. By 2016, the Elder Law Prof Blog had over 1,000,000 views by readers.
For Students: What is Elder Law? What is Estate Planning? Are they the same or different? Here is my short introduction to the fields, dated Summer 2021
Recent “Hot” Cases or Statutes Discussed by Professor Pearson:
Robinson v. Carlsbad By The Sea Retirement Community, et al, Case No. 37-2016-00045688-CU-MC-NC, Superior Court of State of California, County of San Diego, (Verfied Complaint filed 12/28/2016.)
Gutowitz v. Transamerica, USDC-Central District of CA (August 14, 2015), discussed on Elder Law Prof Blog at http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/elder_law/2015/08/federal-court-applies-doctrine-of-reasonable-expectations-to-long-term-care-insurance-policy.html
Zahner v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Human Services, Third Circuit, September 2, 2015, discussed at http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/elder_law/2015/09/third-circuit-rules-medicaid-applicants-short-term-annuities-are-not-resources-preventing-eligibilit.html
“Hot Topics” in Professor Katherine Pearson’s Research Agenda:
1. Examination of legal and financial implications of “senior living” options, including “Continuing Care Retirement Communities,” also known as “CCRCs” or “Life Plan Communities”
One form of retirement living offers a centralized location for a range of care options, from supported “independent” living to full-scale skilled nursing care. Such facilities are often called “Continuing Care Retirement Communities” or “CCRCs,” or similar names such as “Life Care Communities” or “LCCs.” In 2015, the industry adopted a new appellation, “Life Plan Communities,” to shift the focus away from negative public perceptions associated with “retirement” or “care.” The amenities and services provided by the facilities are usually the subject of a contract, with different types of contracts tied to different pricing structures. For example, the CCRC may promise specific, full services for a large up-front admission fee (sometimes ranging from $100,000 to $500,000) plus smaller monthly service fees. Other CCRCs may have a “fee for service” structure, with lower entrance costs but higher monthly fees. Because of the fees associated with these attractive models for long-term care, many states have adopted regulations that mandate certain disclosures or protections for residents. Professor Pearson’s research in this area focuses on regulatory models and how to protect the interests of current and future residents.
Examples of Professor Pearson’s Articles and Materials on Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRCs) or Life Plan Communities:
- Presentation on CCRCs & Other Senior Living Options for the 19th Annual Elder Law Institute, July 2016, Lancaster PA, together with Stephen J. Maag, J.D., Director of Residential Communities, LeadingAge and Brad C. Breeding, President of My LifeSite.
- Testimony: “Resident Rights and Responsibilities in Virginia’s Continuing Care Retirement Communities: building Trust and Stronger Communities,” before Commonwealth of Virginia Housing Commission Working Group on Continuing Care Retirement Communities, November 30, 2012. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2184011
- Outline: “The Legal Framework Affecting Resident Rights & Responsibilities in Continuing Care Communities in Connecticut,” Educational presentation to Connecticut Continuing Care Residents Association, October 12, 2012.
- Op-Ed: “Modern Face of Senior Living: Residents with a Cause,” Medford (Oregon) Mail Tribune, September 30, 2012.
- “Will Continuing Care Retirement Communities Continue?” 82 Pa. B. Quarterly 69 (April 2011) (with Joshua Wilkins).
- “The Right Time for a Resident Bill of Rights,” from September/October 2010 issue of NACCRA LIFELINE (Vol. 15, No. 5), the newsletter of the National Continuing Care Residents Association, included here with permission of NaCCRA.
- Best Practices Q & A on CCRCs, September 2010 (published on this website with permission from the publishers of Senior Living Business at www.seniorlivingbusiness.com)
- Written Testimony to Senate Special Comittee on Aging regarding CCRCs, July 21, 2010.
- Will Oregon’s recent amendments to CCRC law help Residents?, Oregon Bar Association Elder Law Section Newsletter, April 2010
- Continuing Care Retirement Communities, State Regulation and the Growing Importance of Counsel for Residents and their Families, 77 Pa. Bar Q. 172 (No. 4, 2006)
- “Continuing Care and Life Care Communities,” Presentation to “Housing for the Aged”
Course (DHE-434) on October 28, 2009 at Oregon State University
2. Analysis of how and why Governments (state and national governments) use “filial support” laws in an attempt to mandate that family members care for or financially support elders.
The word “filial” means “of, relating to or benefitting a son or daughter,” as in “filial respect” or “filial duty.” Since colonial times in America, states have struggled with how to provide for older adults who are unable to finance their elder years. One approach of lawmakers was to mandate that adult children (or other family members) provide care or maintenance to their parents. In the 21st Century, more than 20 states still have civil laws that mandate some form of financial obligation between parents and adult children. To distinguish them from “child support” or “spousal support” laws, academics have given such laws the label of “filial support” laws, although legislators may attempt to characterize them as “family responsibility” laws or use other titles suggesting routine familial obligations. Professor Pearson’s research has used Pennsylvania’s experience with filial support laws as a type of “ground zero” laboratory for analysis, and she compares filial support enforcement practices throughout the United States and other countries.
Examples of Professor Pearson’s Articles and Materials on Filial Responsibility and Support Laws:
- Presentation to 14th Annual Bench Bar Conference, Gettysburg, PA, October 2015 on Filial Support Laws A Festering Hot Topic in Pa October 9 2015 PDF Final
- Presentation to Mid-Atlantic Law & Society Association, October 2012, on “Older Adults’ Access to Legal Advice and Effective Justice”
- “Filial Support Laws in the Modern Era: Domestic and International Comparison of Enforcement Practices for Laws Requiring Adult Children to Support Indigent Parents,” Elder Law Journal, published Fall 2012. Available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2079753.
- “Filial Support Laws in the United States and Ukraine: A Modern Comparison of Laws Requiring Adult Children to Support Indigent Parents,” published in Ukrainian language in Spring 2012..
- “Will Continuing Care Retirement Communities Continue?” 82 Pa. B. Quarterly 69 (April 2011) (with Joshua Wilkins).
- The Lesson of the Irish Family Pub: The Elder Law Clinic Path to a More Thoughtful Practice, 40 Stetson L. Rev. 237 (Fall 2010, Symposium Issue).
- “Pennsylvania’s Filial Support Law: Dysfunctional Law or Dysfunctional Families?,” presentation on March 28, 2011
- Invited article: A Midnight Tale of Filial Support, from the Pennsylvania Family Lawyer, Volume 26, Issue No. 4, December 2007 at pages 146-7.
- Invited essay: Finances, Families and Filial Laws, From the NCFR Report, December 2006, Volume 51:4, Copyright 2006; National Council on Family Relations. Used by permission.
- Re-Thinking Filial Support Laws in a Time of Medicaid Cutbacks — Effect of Pennsylvania’s Recodification of Colonial-Era Poor Laws, 76 Pa. Bar Q. 162 (No. 4, 2005)
- Pennsylvania’s Filial Support Law, Adopted by Pennsylvania Legislature in July 2005
- Filial Responsibility and Support Statutes and Cases in the U.S.
Media on Filial Support Laws
- Professor Pearson discusses filial support laws on WITF Radio’s Smart Talk (June 2012)
- Professor Pearson discusses filial support laws on Australian national radio (April 2012)
3. Analysis of Legal Issues Arising from Arising in Caregiver Relationships:
- “Legal Implications of Ambivalence in Caregiver Relationships,” presentation for symposium on “Stretching the Boundaries of the Ambivalence Framework: New Arenas for Research,” at the 63rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), November 20, 2010, New Orleans.
- The Responsible Thing to do About “Responsible Party” Provisions in Nursing Home Agreements: A Proposal for Change on Three Fronts, 37 U. Mich. J. Law Reform 757 (No. 3, 2004)
4. Analysis by Professor Pearson of other Law and Aging Policy Issues:
- Co-Author of “Implications of Divergences in Adult Protection Legislation,” for the U.K. Journal of Adult Protection (Vol. 18, No. 3, 2016), examining similarities and differences in legal responses to older adults who may be at risk of harm or abuse in the UK, Ireland, Australia, and the US, with L. Montgomery; J. Anand, K. Mackay, B. Taylor, and C. Harper.
- Presentation to the Pennsylvania State Bar Association Elder Law Section, November 2012, on “What Prospective Clients Don’t Know About Elder Law.”
- Presentation to Mid-Atlantic Law & Society Association, October 2012, on “Older Adults’ Access to Legal Advice and Effective Justice”
- “Older People and Legal Advice: The Need for Joined Up and Creative Approaches,” Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law (with J. Duffy & S. Basu), Vol. 34, No. 1 (2012), pp. 31-47.
- The Lesson of the Irish Family Pub: The Elder Law Clinic Path to a More Thoughtful Practice, 40 Stetson L. Rev. 237 (Fall 2010, Symposium Issue).
- Hot Topic: Combating Elder Exploitation
- The Lawyer’s Ethical Considerations in Medicaid Planning for the Elderly: Representing Smith and Jones, 76 Pa. Bar Q. 1 (No. 1, 2005)
- Traps for the Unwary in Nursing Home Admission Agreements — Guarantor, Agent or Separate Promisor? 74 Pa. Bar Q. 139 (No. 4, 2003)
- “An Internationally Relevant Question: ‘Who is My Client?,’” presentation at the 8th Annual International Journal of Clinical Legal Education Conference, July 7-9, 2010 in England
- Risk Factors and Legal Principles in Abuse Cases: A Comparative Perspective, presentation to COGWORKS Conference on “Cognitive Health and Wellbeing Across the Life Span” on February 25, 2010 at Queen’s University Belfast
- “Family Banking: The Perils of Powers of Attorney and Joint Accounts,” Presentation as Visiting Petersen Scholar in Gerontology and Family Studies at Oregon State University, October 22, 2009
- NAELA Honors Law Professors and Elder Law Clinics, NAELA News, Volume 20, Issue 6, 2008.
- Over, Under or Inconclusive? Using Filial and Family Support Laws to Combat Elder Exploitation — presentation at the 32nd Annual Gerontology Conference hosted by Oregon State University on April 3-4, 2008.
- Lessons Learned about the Future of Elder Law from Teaching in Law School Elder Law Clinics (2006)
Co-presenter to the National Conference on Aging and the Law, Washington, DC - Presentation for WITF-Public Television Series on Points of Law: Living Wills (2006)
- Professor Katherine Pearson’s Remarks to Medical Assistance Listening Tour (October 2005)
- Have I Got A Deal for You! Predatory Lending Practices and the Elderly Borrower
Presentation to the Pennsylvania Bar Institute (Fall 2004) - A Mid-Term Report Card on Long Term Care Insurance in Pennsylvania
Presentation to the Pennsylvania Bar Institute (Winter 2004)
Elder Protection Clinic Materials (from 2005-2012)
- Adventures in Law and Aging — Fall 2011
- Adventures in Law and Aging — Winter 2010
- Adventures in Law and Aging — Fall 2009
- Adventures in Law and Aging — Summer 2009
- Adventures in Law and Aging — Spring 2009
- Adventures in Law and Aging — Fall 2008
- Adventures in Law and Aging — Summer 2008
- Adventures in Law and Aging — Fall 2007
- Adventures in Law and Aging — Spring 2006
- A Week in the Life of the Elder Law Clinic
- Penn State Dickinson Clinical Students Expand Outreach through “Senior Law Day”
- Can You Hear Us Now? Consumer Protection in Hearing Aid Sales (2007)
- Nursing Home Collections and the Doctrine of Necessaries (2006)
Project to Define Third-Party Liability for Long-Term Care Costs
- Penn State Dickinson School of Law students instrumental in drafting proposed “third-party signer” legislation (2005)
- House Bill 1554 (2005)
- Video of Press Conference to Announce Introduction of Third-Party Liability Clarification Law, May 2005
Conflict of Laws Articles by Professor Pearson
- “Departing from the Routine: Application of Indian Tribal Law Under the Federal Tort Claims Act,” 32 Ariz. St. L. J . 695 (Summer 2000).
- “Common Law Preclusion, Full Faith and Credit and Consent Judgments: The Analytical Challenge,” 48 Catholic L. Rev. 419 (Winter 1999).
Other Articles or Materials by Professor Pearson
- Partners in Outreach and Advocacy: Interdisciplinary Opportunities in University-Based Legal Clinics, 11 Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement (No. 4) at 163 (2006) (with Lucy Johnston-Walsh).
- Why Mexico? Why Mexican Law? Why Now? (2006)
Co-authored with James Smith and Michael Rustad - “Cooperate or We’ll Take Your Child: The Parents’ Fictional Voluntary Separation Decision and a Proposal for Change,” 65 Tenn. L. Rev. 835 (Summer 1998).