The amount of times I have heard, “Do not blame your partner for your past relationships” is so redundant. Yet it is only after we learned about exemplar theory that I found it worth repeating for the sake of questioning. Exemplar theory is the concept that we have stored examples of the category we have encountered. So, in regards to relationships the exemplar theory is all of our past romantic experiences placed into one general category. Should we be using exemplar theory with our relationships?
According to the book, Knowledge Structures in Close Relationships: A Social Psychological Approach, “Applying this distinction to general lay relationship theories, it is quite conceivable that people use exemplars that consist of specific past relationships or patterns they have observed, or been involved with, to compare and contrast with their ongoing relationships experiences.”
If we are in a new relationships and we happen to see ‘red flags’ or things that we know are not good for us, exemplar theory may be a handy tool to have. But what happens when we spend so much time comparing to the past that we fail to create the now? I have found in many that this creates an inability to create new experiences and therefore further adds to the narrative of exemplar theory and therefore, their ongoing relationship experiences remain the same and unchanging.
Though exemplar theory may be helpful in many areas and facets of our lives, I cannot help but wonder if it may cause unnecessary struggle with our personal relationships. When measuring our relationships with another human being, it is near impossible to compare one relationship to the other as each one has to some degree a unique and individual facet. We can say it is possible to have relationship patterns but it makes one wonder if those patterns stem from exemplar theory and if instead, we went into relationships with no point of reference we may be better off.
References:
Fletcher, G. J., & Fitness, J. (1996). Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.