Author Archive
The High School Musical franchise is perhaps the most successful product of Disney Channel ever. These movies went from being solely a DCOM to being shown in theaters because of how popular they were. The first movie focuses on Troy, a basketball star, and Gabriella, a math genius who is new to the school. They both secretly love to sing and like each other, but feel trapped by the status quo to stay in their respective social circles. The second movie shows them in the summer working at a golf resort, while Troy struggles to find the balance between his friends and his future. The third movie, shown in theaters, is their senior year, as they prepare to put on one last show and struggle to figure out their next steps in life.
The cultural impact of this movie is pretty extreme. People everywhere were shocked at the quality of these films considering that they came from Disney Channel. They have been referenced in other shows like Suite Life of Zack and Cody, mentioned in films like Percy Jackson and the Lightning Thief, and even given the spin-off style show High School Musical the Musical the Series that single-handedly launched Olivia Rodrigo’s career. She’s now won THREE Grammy’s. These movies also launched Zac Efron’s career, who later went to star in films like The Greatest Showman, 17 Again, Baywatch, and more alongside some of Hollywood’s biggest actors (Hugh Jackman, Matthew Perry, Dwayne Johnson, etc). Kenny Ortega, the choreographer, also went on to choreograph other hit DCOMs like Descendents.
There does not seem to be a clear reason why this film was created, but is pretty consistent with the genre of early 2000s coming of age films. Though the lesson of the film, about defying social norms and choosing friendship and passion over the status quo, is not super novel, the film does it in a way that is creative- through music. There is literally a song called Stick to the Status Quo where they dance around tables about how smart people can’t dance and skaters can’t play the cello. It’s nothing short of iconic. Plus the development of Troy and Gabriella’s relationship throughout the three movies is so representative of a first love, and it’s so cute to watch them as they fall in love through their shared passion.
I do want to take a moment to discuss the personal impact these films have had on me. The first movie came out in 2006, when I was one. My parents have told me that I was singing High School Musical songs before I could read. I had a High School Musical 2 poster hanging on my wall for years, it was the first thing I would see when I woke up for years. I went to a High School Musical on Ice show, and during the song Stick to the Status Quo there is a part where Sharpay yells “everybody, QUIET!!” and I SCREAMED it at the top of my lungs making everyone look at me (I was two so it was cute). I still have High School Musical trivia games that are played through DVD. High School Musical was the movie I watched on my first ever date with my (now ex lol) boyfriend. I dressed up as Gabriella for Halloween with the red dress she wore in All in This Together at the end of the first movie. I know all of the songs, and can basically quote the whole movie. Not only are these just excellent films, but I have so many personal memories of them that make them so special. And considering how popular they were/are, I don’t think I’m alone in this.
I also want to address what HSM did that MANY other franchises fail to do, especially on Disney Channel. They managed to make three movies that are all fantastic. Most franchises taper off after the first film and people just think “why did they have to ruin it by making a sequel?”. Disney is also known for milking franchises past their prime- why is there going to be a Zombies 4? Even Descendants 3 was a bit of a stretch. Not HSM, though. All three movies are masterpieces and I would even argue that the third is my favorite because Troy looks so good in it and the music is top tier. The music is actually top tier in all of the movies, and not just by Disney Channel standards. They are songs that if professional artists released them I wouldn’t question it. They advance the story and are WAY too catchy for their own good. I think about the scene in HSM 2 where Gabriella breaks up with Troy through song and he opens up his hand to reveal that she returned the T necklace he gave her at the beginning of the film at least twice a day. I also quote these movies way too much for my own good (T as in Troy??)
Throughout these passion blogs, I have often ended with how many of these films are worth a watch. But High School Musical (all three!!!) are a must-watch, not only to understand the profound cultural impact they have had, but because they are REALLY good movies. I could gush about them all day and mention at least 50 different scenes that I love, but unfortunately this blog would be wayyy too long. Watch High School Musical, you’ll love it, I’d bet on it 😉
Starstruck is an AMAZING movie. It focuses on Jessica, who’s sister Sarah is absolutely obsessed with teen star, Christopher Wilde, while Jessica herself hates him. When Christopher accidentally hits Jessica in the head with a door, the two become intertwined in each other’s lives. They go on some unplanned adventures around California, where Jessica is visiting her grandma, and reflect on how their lives differ with Jessica being a “normal girl” and Christopher being a celebrity. This lifestyle difference serves to be a challenge for the two as Christopher seems to prioritize his image as a celebrity over his personal feelings and the feelings of those around him.
This movie highlights a lot of the negative aspects of child stardom, which is appropriate for the time period of the early 2010s when many child stars were struggling mentally, including Lindsay Lohan and Britney Spears. Christopher is just a teenager and yet is constantly berated by paparazzi. The movie also emphasizes how the media twists stories to fit a certain headline and prioritizes sales over honesty or authenticity. This is an issue that is rarely addressed so transparently in movies, and it was very important to get an honest reflection of how Hollywood media is so fake. Jessica goes on a very meaningful tangent about how the media will take any good, genuine person and turn them into a monster for a headline. Her tear-filled statement is immediately followed by the reporter going “did you get that?!”, showing how they will never change, both in the movie and in real life. It also helps viewers to realize that the glamorous life of child stardom is not all it pans out to be. Personally, I had always wanted to be on Disney Channel as a little kid, but this movie made me realize that I actually do not want paparazzi all over my lawn.
Because of these circumstances, a large lesson of the movie is to prioritize personal relationships over one’s image or the opinions of others. Christopher consistently was unhappy because he placed himself in activities and relationships that he did not like, but that looked good for his celebrity image. He did not even like his girlfriend or the movie he was supposed to do but felt he did not have a choice. I really like that Christopher’s best friend holds him accountable and points out that Christopher’s life is his and that he needs to make his own decisions instead of lying to the media about knowing Jessica and doing things he hates. Jessica also hold him accountable throughout the movie, highlighting how the celebrity treatment- skipping lines, having your friends on your payroll, etc- are not normal. Jessica is a very grounded character in general, which helps viewers better grasp their own personal normals. Christopher, by the end of the movie, learns to be his authentic self, quitting his movie, firing his parents as his managers so they can just be his parents, and uniting with Jessica no matter who sees.
This movie was also the OG enemies-to-lovers storyline, a trope that has become extremely popular. Jessica starts out by hating Christopher, then tolerating him, then liking him, then hating him, then liking him. This movie is really an emotional rollercoaster and feels as though whenever they start to like each other, Christopher says something dumb that starts them back from square 1 again. I mean, telling her that he needs to go back to his real life and that he needs to take her camera so the images do not leak after their fun day together? Bad move, Christopher. However, the up and down keeps the movie very engaging. And though I do wish there was a kiss at some point, I do also understand that the actor for Christoper was 21 and Jessica was 16.
Something that often goes unnoticed by viewers is the sister relationship between Sarah and Jessica. They do not seem particularly close in this movie, as they often look down upon each others hobbies. Yet, upon closer inspection, they really are there for each other. Jessica sacrifices her night just so Sarah can go to a club and see Christopher, Jessica makes sure Sarah has a ride home when she leaves with Christopher at the beach, and Sarah disses her best friend after she makes a rude comment about Jessica. As someone who used to fight with her sister a lot growing up, it was really nice to see a sister dynamic that was like ours, and that even if we don’t always like each other, we always love each other. My sister is my best friend now, though.
Just on a surface level, this movie continues to be really good. It’s incredibly funny, and I say this with all the DCOMs, but it is insanely quotable- including the weird voices they use. The songs, of course, are so good and really encapsulate what’s going on in the movie. In My Shades perfectly shows what it’s like to live in that fantasy celebrity bubble, Hero is emotion-filled and raw, and Something About the Sunshine is exactly how I would feel on my tour around California. This movie is just a Disney classic, and many cite Starstruck as one of the most underrated DCOMs of all time. It deserves all the love, or at least a watch.
Issue Brief- Rachel Malone – Google Docs
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ytk96ADaG5WgOPpb7N_ahql0Omg606_MdW7fSZ1ghNw/edit
This is still a work in progress and I intend to really solidify it tomorrow and Friday, like connect all the pieces and do my endnotes and things.
(I have sources that I’m going to continue to integrate and pictures as well).
Need Title Ideas
Imagine this. You wake up at the crack of dawn, log onto four separate devices, wait in an endless queue, and still get completely barred from tickets. Many Penn State football fans do not have to imagine this. Penn State is known for it’s passionate football fans and incomparable student section. Every year, thousands of Penn State students compete at seven in the morning to get their hands on season tickets, and not all are lucky. The current system of all-or-nothing luck allows for some students to get completely denied from obtaining student tickets and forces them to search third party websites and spend hundreds more dollars to get access to this opportunity. In order to solve the problem of student ticket sales barring certain students entirely, Penn State should adopt a lottery ticket system for their football games. Having a lottery for each game would allow students to only compete for games they want to attend, and would allow for a more fair distribution of tickets instead of completely shutting out certain students. To show that this policy should be adopted, I will first emphasize the causes of these ticket inequalities, then the effects it can have on barred students, and finally discussing how a new policy would benefit all stakeholders.
As it stands, ticket sales are divided by grade, with a certain allocation of tickets to seniors, then juniors, etc. These ticket sales happen at 7am during the summer, where students eagerly join the Ticketmaster queue just to be told they are in spot 2000+ in line. If their Wi-Fi glitches for a second, they are out of luck. After 20 minutes, it is all done and they either have tickets to the entire season of football games, or have nothing.Â
Causes of the problem
Technology Access
Being able to buy student tickets is reliant on students to have access to electronic devices at home. Many people have discovered that having multiple devices enter the queue at the same time increases the chance that they will obtain tickets, but this creates an inequality for students who cannot afford these additional devices. Likewise, good connection is necessary for this ordeal as any glitch, slow internet, or required reload will put someone back at the end of the queue, no matter how far up they made it. There are many areas in the United States that do not have adequate internet access, and this inequality then makes it more difficult for them to get football tickets.
All or Nothing
As previously stated, the current system allows students to get all or nothing, no matter how many games they are planning to attend or want to attend. Many students who get season tickets only intend to go to bigger games like the season opener, White Out, and games against Ohio State or Michigan, and end up not using the others. Others do not get student tickets despite wanting to attend every game. Others do not have any interest in going to the football games and are lucky enough to get season tickets only to resell them for profit. Tickets are also available to graduate students and branch campuses, and while this is an excellent way to connect the community, it does not make sense for those students to have tickets when they likely will not be traveling several hours to see the game every Saturday.
Effects
Wasted tickets
Those who purchase tickets without the intent of going to every game often waste tickets that could have gone to other students. It is unfair that some students who actually want to go to the games cannot, while students who have the tickets do not go to the games. While it is unrealistic to require those with student tickets to go to all games, attending less than half of the games leaves the majority of one’s tickets to waste and is a punch in the face to those who would have attended. Even when people cannot go to the games, they refuse to give them away and insist on reselling them.
Ridiculous Resale
The resale market for football tickets is ridiculous. Getting the season tickets only costs $246, but people will resell their tickets for that price or more for a single game. Despite season tickets being sold for about $35 a game, even the least popular games have tickets sold that are $50+. Some students will purposely buy the cheaper resale tickets just to resell them themselves and make a profit. These steep prices make student tickets inaccessible to students who do not have the funds to pay, even if they may have been able to afford the season ticket package. There are also plenty of scams that occur involving resale, as people prey on students simply trying to gain a positive experience. Massive amounts of students rely on resold tickets because of the flawed ticket system and yet Penn State has not acknowledged this problem at all, continuing to allow their students to get scammed and gouged.Â
Lost Experiences
Being in the Penn State student section is one of the most unique experiences that the university has to offer, and yet their ticket sales system prohibits some students from it. Those who are not able to obtain tickets are constantly left out and have to witness their friends and peers have fun without them. Because of the all or nothing format, they have to experience this for the entire season; three straight months of having to leave after the tailgates while their friends make their way to Gate A. Though they can attempt to get tickets, the steep prices and chance of scam makes it unreliable. No student should have to face this frustration, and the school needs to do a better job prioritizing its students.Â
Solution
Ticket Lottery
The system that Penn State should adopt is a ticket lottery, in which students, ten days prior to each home game, have 24 hours to enter in a lottery to win tickets for each individual game. They will be entered into a pool based on their grade where they will be randomly selected. The grade pooling allows a certain amount of tickets to go to seniors, juniors, etc similar to what we have now. This way, with more seats still available to seniors, for example, they have a higher chance of getting tickets.The next day, they will be informed if they have tickets or not and will be sent them with a charge to their Bursar account. There will also be a list of backups picked in case students forfeit their tickets last minute. Every student’s name will be entered only once, so it is still based on luck and is fair for everyone. The distribution of ticket sales will represent the demand for them, and students will be almost guaranteed to be able to attend at least one game. Though they may continue to be barred from popular games like White Out due to high demand, they will have a much higher chance of being able to go to several games a season as opposed to none. Because the lottery will take place at school over a full 24 hours, internet and technology access is no longer a barrier to students who cannot afford it. Having the lottery take place close to each game allows for students to better know their availability on that day, while still giving them a full ten days in advance to know if they got tickets or not. This also makes more sense for people on branch campuses, who can enter for tickets based on when they plan to travel. Each game will only cost $35 dollars, and will only need to be paid if the student is selected for that game. This allows for more students to be included in the football experience that they deserve.
Diminishing Resale
Tickets obtained from the lottery would not have the ability to be transferred, and students could only enter once. As previously explained, students can forfeit their tickets at the last minute for a refund of the $35, but will not be able to directly send tickets to someone else. This diminishes the possibility that students will buy tickets just to sell them again for profit and ensures that tickets continue to be affordable and equal for everyone.
Outside Success
Lottery systems have worked for major college sports teams all around the country, including at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and BIG 10 schools like Purdue and Notre Dame. Sports are popular at many of these universities, and the policy that they have adopted has clearly been successful for them. Other schools like UNC have even extended this policy to involve loyalty points that give certain students an advantage in the lottery, but it is seemingly more effective to have the only difference be based on grade level.Â
Conclusion
To conclude, football is an integral part of the Penn State experience and the all-or-nothing current system prevents students from having this opportunity. Depending on fast internet and basic luck to get either all or nothing creates inequalities among students, amplified by the ridiculous resale prices and wasted tickets. In order to give all Penn State students the experience they deserve, Penn State should adopt a ticket lottery system, a system change, that promotes a more convenient method of buying tickets, a more equal distribution of tickets, and the prevention of stealing opportunities from others for profit. It is time for Penn State to make a change to this issue and allow the number one student section in the nation thrive.
Cloud 9 is one of the best Disney movies and one of my childhood favorites. Kayla loves snowboarding and is on the elite Swift snowboarding team with her boyfriend, Nick, who’s dad is the coach. But what she does not realize is that she isn’t that good at snowboarding and only made the team because her rich dad, the owner of the ski resort, funds the team. When Kayla is framed for misconduct that destroys both resort property and the property of resort employee, Will, she gets kicked off the team, broken up with, and is forced to work for Will at his dog kennel. Will also gives her a reality check that she is untalented and benefits from nepotism and rigged competitions. Kayla discovers that Will is an exceptional former snowboarder who faced a fatal accident years prior and enlists Will to help her become the best snowboarder and win in the Fire and Ice competition against her former team.
This movie was released in January of 2014, right around the time of the Winter Olympics. A lot of people were very excited to watch these winter events so having a movie with a similar theme was popular. It also stars Dove Cameron who had just launched into stardom on her hit Disney show, Liv and Maddie, and this movie helped showcase her acting abilities. Will is played by Luke Benward, who was also in the DCOM Girl vs Monster which came out in 2012. These actors have exceptional chemistry and are both very talented, especially with the wide range of emotions featured in this film. Crying scenes, near death for both characters, love, anger. They ace it all. Though the love story is not the main part of this movie as much as overcoming adversity is, you can’t help but kick your feet and giggle when Kayla’s ex gets jealous at her holding Will’s hand or when Will storms back up the mountain to kiss Kayla.
The obvious message of this movie is that anything is possible with hard work- the phrase “nothing is impossible” is actually repeated multiple times. But there are actually several others. First is the very cliche lesson to follow your own dreams, not your parents’, which is shown by Nick revealing at the end that his dad forced him to frame Kayla and break up with her, and that he was sick of never being good enough for his dad. There also is the lesson to not underestimate people, as everyone assumed that Kayla could not be a good snowboarder because her dad is rich and she is a girly girl. But she proves them wrong, and one of my favorite scenes is when all-star snowboarder Skye Sailor, who served as Kayla’s replacement on the Swift team, stands up to Nick’s dad. Nick’s dad snaps at Skye saying, “You said you could beat her”, with Skye responding, “and you said she was a pampered princess with no talent. But you were wrong. That girl can ride”. Though it’s subtle, this scene of women supporting women is very impactful on viewers. Plus, it’s great to see two women being girlbosses and dominating their sport.
The perseverance shown by many characters is admirable. Obviously, Kayla has to work extremely hard to get to the snowboarding level she wants to be at. There are montages of her continuously falling and trudging back up the mountain over and over. This shows the reality of hard work- its a process not just an outcome. Kayla has to leave her comfort zone throughout the movie, especially working at the dog kennel. But she makes the best of it and turns it into a great experience. After Will’s snowboarding injury in which he collapsed his lung and broke his back, among other things, he also has to overcome adversity and that mental block from his injury. He, too, must go out of his comfort zone.
Though Kayla’s family is extremely rich, this movie does show some struggles with money through Will’s mom who is struggling to pay rent. Though it’s not a main plot point, it is interesting to see this sort of representation for working class families.
I know I say this for every DCOM, but this movie is seriously so quotable and so funny. And despite not being a musical, the one song within the movie that plays over one of the snowboarding montages is one of the best Disney Channel songs to exist. It is so catchy and both characters are exceptional singers. This overall is such a feel good movie and despite being a little predictable, it is definitely worth the watch.
Geek Charming is one of my favorite DCOMs while simultaneously being one of the most underrated. The story follows Dylan, a girl who’s dream it is to win Blossom Queen (essentially Prom queen), which would allow her to become the most popular girl. Dylan already has the most popular friends and boyfriend, and despite being secretly very smart, she cares much more about her popularity. Josh is a film geek, and needs to make a film to submit to represent the school in a contest and win a spot at a Hollywood film camp. Josh chooses to make his movie about popularity, starring Dylan, while Dylan sees this opportunity as the perfect campaign for Blossom Queen. In working together, the two form an unlikely pair that eventually end up together (spoiler, sorry).
This movie was actually created based on a book, which is something I did not know. Disney probably adopted it because the success of the High School Musical franchise had a similar plotline with people from opposing social groups falling for each other. However, I feel like it was done differently as it is not a musical and HSM focuses on a common passion while in Geek Charming, they only originally worked together for personal gain. Sarah Hyland starring as Dylan was perfect publicity because she was also in Modern Family at the time, as well as Sasha Pieterse with Pretty Little Liars (real ones know her from Sharkboy and Lavagirl, though). Vanessa Morgan, from Riverdale and My Babysitter’s a Vampire, as well as Matt Prokop, from HSM3, were also in this movie. While the acting on Disney Channel can be -questionable- sometimes, this movie had some actually great actors that brought this movie to life.
This movie had a lot of creative aspects to it. One of the coolest parts of it is the side interviews that take place throughout the movie, similar to confessionals on reality TV. I believe this was due to the success of reality TV shows in the early 2010s when this movie came out, but it really adds another layer to the characters. They feel more real to the camera and you get a sort of side commentary of the movie that other DCOMs don’t have.
There are some really great lessons in this movie. It is one of the only DCOMs to deal with parent loss, at least as a main subplot. I think they perfectly incorporated the trauma of Dylan’s mom passing and did a great job of slowly revealing that her desire to win Blossom Queen was not actually rooted in a selfish need for popularity, but to feel close to her mom. Dylan also has to deal with the idea of a stepmom, and we see her gradually opening up to the idea of her stepmom while continuing to grieve over the loss of her mother, which is very deep for a DCOM. It can provide comfort to kids who have faced similar things with parent loss or hesitation to accept a step parent. Josh’s father is less of a plot point, but it is mentioned that his father is absent, likely due to divorce. This is something that is also pretty adult for Disney, but allows kids who are in that situation to feel seen.
Though the message of this film is still pretty cliche, mainly about being true to yourself and how true friendship matters more than popularity, it’s almost refreshing. Most movies of this nature with the people from opposing social groups falling in love center the message around that connection. They are mainly love stories. This movie, while incorporating the love story, also really highlights the importance of good friendships. Dylan is ditched from her “friends” the second that she becomes less popular, but is able to confide in one of her old best friends. She discovers that happiness and being with the right group of people is better than being with “cool” kids. This is especially an important message for preteens who may start to feel the pressure to fit in or peer pressure. Plus, I really like how, by the end, Dylan is not afraid to show off her intelligence. It really proves that girls can be both popular, pretty, nice, and smart all in one. It’s also an ironic contrast to her character, Haley, in Modern Family.
Overall, I think this is such a comfort movie for me, despite the later rumors of Matt Prokop’s abuse toward Sarah Hyland. Aside from that, this movie has SO MANY one liners that I’m constantly quoting with my sister. Like, I could name at least ten off the top of my head. It is underrated, and definitely worth a watch for DCOM lovers!
Pete Davidson is a well known comedian. He’s had his fair share of SNL skits and surprising relationships, but his transparency with his mental health have been monumental. Davidson has been speaking out publicly for years about his diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder as well as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder after his father was killed in 9/11.
Firstly, the conversational forum allows for Davidson’s message to be heard by a variety of audiences and helps them gain a new perspective. SNL has a large age range of viewers, and as a Gen Z, Davidson appeals a lot to Gen Z, who often struggle with mental health. As Davidson himself highlighted, 16 million people struggle with depression, and there is a cure unless one seeks help (Self). Since this is such a widespread public issue, it clearly exists in the civic and needs a public response. Davidson takes initiative and gives a voice to the millions of people like him who face mental hardships on a daily basis. On top of that, SNL is obviously a comedy show, where it seems uncommon for people to come on doing skits about serious topics like mental illness. However, Davidson using humor can allow for people to not be so uncomfortable listening to these topics, while also giving people who do struggle a chance to cope with laughter. Davidson is incredibly relatable, and even on SNL does an excellent job highlighting ways that people struggling can seek help, including in the workplace.
While the topic of mental health as a whole has become increasingly talked about in recent years, there are still many aspects that are stigmatized. For example, many people still look down upon rehab. Davidson, however, has been very open in his experiences with going to therapy and rehab when he is at a low point. He sets an example not only through his words, but through his actions. He does not just preach that therapy will fix everything and once you feel better you are better. Davidson humanizes mental illness in the sense that feeling better doesn’t mean you are better, and that some days will be better than others. He also opens up about some of the uglier sides of mental illness, including self harm. When many public figures speak out about mental illness, they hesitate to go too far into detail in fear of making people uncomfortable. Not Davidson, though. He shows the reality of what so many people go through while also giving advice as to what helps with stopping those destructive behaviors, coming from someone who knows what it is like to be in that mindset.
In terms of treatments, in addition to things like therapy and rehab, Davidson is an advocate for medication for those who need it. In one of my favorite monologues of his, Davidson calls out his girlfriend at the time’s ex, Kanye West, for his erratic behavior. West, as someone who struggles with mental disorders like Bipolar Disorder, shows some of the negative sides of mental illness because he refuses to seek help. In response, Davidson jokes, “Kanye, I know you’re like, ‘Yo, this is the real me, I’m off the meds’, “Take ‘em! There’s no shame in the medicine game! I’m on ‘em — take ‘em!” (Variety). This hilarious interaction is actually very humanizing as many other celebrities do not speak about things like the medications that they are on. Davidson calling West out is also interesting because of the idea that many people with mental illness will use their illness as an excuse for any negative behavior as a way to avoid accountability. This is very harmful and contributes to the stigma around mental illness, which Davidson acknowledges. In his words, “Being mentally ill is not an excuse to act like a jackass” (Variety). This statement is so positive because it adds a more complex level to advocacy than just seeking help; also accepting accountability. Something I have definitely learned is that mental illness may be an explanation for a behavior, but it is not an excuse. Everyone should be held to the same standard of accountability, and those who have a mental illness should strive for a certain level of personal growth.
For people who are still skeptical about their diagnosis, Davidson offers some much needed reassurance. A lot of times when people talk about mental health, there are many conversations about the more common illnesses like depression and anxiety. Yet, there is still a lot of stigma surrounding less common disorders like BPD or schizophrenia. Davidson has turned his diagnosis into a positive thing, attesting that getting a correct diagnosis can be so important in making sure that one is getting the help that they need. He details how he “…was always just so confused all the time, and just thought something was wrong, and didn’t know how to deal with it…then, when somebody finally tells you, the weight of the world feels lifted off your shoulders. You feel so much better” (Self). It is not looked down upon to go to the doctor when you feel under the weather physically, and Davidson emphasizes that mental health is no different. Seeking help when you feel that something is wrong is a very brave decision and the best thing you can do for yourself. It can actually lead to you getting help, and Davidson encourages taking that first step toward treatment.
Pete Davidson has even used his platform to disprove certain myths about people with mental disorders, such as that they cannot be in healthy relationships. Especially with an illness like Davidson’s, Borderline Personality Disorder, many are wary that these people are manipulative or unstable. Davidson challenges that narrative, saying that “Just because someone has a mental illness does not mean they can’t be happy and in a relationship…It also doesn’t mean that person makes the relationship toxic” (Upworthy). Having a mental illness does not inherently determine someone’s ability to be a good partner, and they, too, are deserving of a fulfilling relationship. Davidson works really hard to undo the stigma that people with a mental illness cannot do certain things. His success despite these deep rooted challenges is inspiring to people like him who may end up questioning their self worth due to outside noise.
Overall, Davidson has contributed so much to the conversation of mental health and has changed the game in the way he is vulnerable about his diagnosis, treatments, and accountability. As a young man, he is inspiring so many other young people, old people, men, and everyone else to follow his advice through the unique method of comedy. It is so easy to look at his work and take it at surface level, as a skit or news headline. But Pete Davidson really is an asset to the mental health conversation and I hope he continues to use his platform for good.
Sources:
https://www.self.com/story/pete-davidson-joked-about-his-mental-illness-on-snl
https://www.healthline.com/health-news/pete-davidson-checks-into-rehab-for-ptsd-other-mental-health-issues#What-are-the-treatments-for-mental-health
https://www.hola.com/us/celebrities/20230331344286/pete-davidson-opens-up-about-his-mental-health-journy-with-therapy/?viewas=amp
https://www.upworthy.com/amp/pete-davidson-nailed-why-you-can-be-mentally-ill-and-in-a-healthy-relationship-hw-2637232247
https://www.self.com/story/pete-davidson-bpd-diagnosis-relief
https://variety.com/2018/music/news/pete-davidson-begs-kanye-west-back-on-meds-saturday-night-live-snl-watch-1202971433/amp/
Camp Rock 1 and 2 are Disney Channel classics, and for good reason. The first movie follows Mitchie, a middle-class girl who loves to sing and who’s dream it is to go to Camp Rock- THE camp to be if you want to become someone. However, she can’t afford it…that is, until her mom gets a catering job there. When Mitchie gets there and realizes that the popular girls will only like her if she’s rich, she gets caught up in a web of lies that hurts a lot of people. Meanwhile, bad boy star Shane Grey hears Mitchie singing, not knowing it’s her, and spends the whole summer looking for “the girl with the voice”. In the end, Shane finds Mitchie, and Mitchie finds her true friends. Camp Rock 2 follows the same characters, except a rival camp, Camp Star, has opened up across the lake and is trying to steal their employees and campers. Impulsively, Mitchie suggests a competition where Camp Rock will compete against Camp Star in a performance and whoever loses has to shut down their camp.
First off, lets acknowledge this cast and how these are arguably some of the best singers Disney has ever had. Demi Lovato has PIPES and she absolutely obliterated every song they gave her. These songs are all bangers, with classics like This is Me basically inventing the Disney knees, and one of my all-time favorite DCOM songs, Wouldn’t Change a Thing. Like, seriously, that song is life changing and only Demi could have sang that song. I also appreciate how iconic the forest stomping is and the way we all thought they looked so cool back then.
I also very much appreciate how the entire franchise is good. I absolutely hate when there’s a great movie and the filmmakers go and ruin it by making a sequel, which happens far too often, especially on Disney Channel (I still love you Teen Beach Movie…). The fact that the second movie so nicely enhances the first is amazing, reincorporating all of our favorite characters while adding new, complex storylines.
I will say, I am not sure how plausible it is that this giant musical equipment would make sense to have in the woods, next to a lake. I also do not really understand how Camp Star just showed up one day and nobody knew it was being built, despite the giant buildings that would have taken years to construct. But, alas, it’s a kids movie so I won’t be too critical.
Now I’ll kind of go into what the cultural messages of each movie was separately. At first glance, the message of the first movie is just “don’t lie” or “just be yourself!” but it’s so much more than that. The fact that Mitchie was ashamed to be middle class and felt the only way she could fit in is by pretending to be upper class is very symbolic of class disparities in the US. Many kids can resonate with this feeling of being out of place, especially money-wise, and struggle with their sense of identity. Feeling like they want to be someone else and changing themselves to fit the mold of what they feel like they should be like is very harmful but much too common. Seeing how Mitchie overcame this and found true friends who don’t care about her parents status is inspiring for kids who have ever felt this way, or even adults. I think it is very relatable to a lot of kids to have a dream or something they really want, but it not being attainable because they don’t have the money for it. This movie allows them to keep dreaming.
I also think the first movie does a subtle nod to child stardom and paparazzi through Shane Grey. They try to make him seem like the bad guy for being all moody and noncooperative when really he’s just a teenager in the spotlight. Speaking of spotlight, I think the redemption arc for Tess is very well done. Seeing the pride she has for her mother’s success at the beginning of the movie to her just crumbling backstage when her mom prioritizes work over her performance is heartbreaking. I think it teaches watchers a good lesson about how sometimes the meanest people are the most broken and how you really don’t know what others are going through.
The second movie also has these very impactful messages, as Camp Star was basically a symbol of large corporations in America. They stole all of Camp Rock’s employees simply because they could pay them more, even though they had only opened up that summer. During the final jam, Camp Rock finds out that Camp Star has been sending advertisements and texts all across America to vote for their performance. A classic line is “I don’t need to be impressed to know to vote Camp Star”. This is super impactful because it kind of shows kids the brutal truth that heart and friendship doesn’t always win, it’s money and power. Don’t even get me started on the scene where Camp Rock loses. The silence. Watching their faces drop as Camp Star erupts in victory. We were all GAGGED as kids. Like I was so heavily impacted by that, it was genuinely a cultural reset. We had NEVER seen the good guys lose before. We had never seen a bad ending like this, and here Camp Rock 2 was, crushing our dreams on Disney Channel. Though, in the end, they kind of all come together and sing around the campfire about how their connection and authenticity is more important than winning, it doesn’t undermine the shock. The lesson that you can’t always win and to make the best of your situation despite drawbacks is honestly the best lesson they could have given to kids, and I really do applaud them from straying from a cliche end where Camp Rock wins and it’s just happily ever after because that’s not realistic.
Basically, to sum it up, Camp Rock 1 and 2 are absolute masterpieces and are a must watch for all ages.
I honestly felt that our deliberation went very well overall. We had clearly put a lot of effort into our project and the transitions between the video and the slideshow for analyzing our approaches went smoothly. I do not think that one member dominated the conversation more than the other members, as we were all able to answer various questions and ask others. I do think Maddy and Zoe did a better job than I did of asking prompting questions based on the ones we formulated beforehand, and I did a better job of coming up with follow up inquiries in response to a classmate’s comments. I think our video was engaging, and everyone participated in our deliberation, mostly giving very positive feedback. One classmate even specifically asked who edited the video because it was really well done, but at the end of class Johan commented that overall, he prefers real footage instead of the stock image/ public domain videos that we, and all the other groups, used.
My group had also specifically done research, one of us assigned to each approach, right before the deliberation to make sure we could answer any questions with a knowledgeable answer, and I think it was to our benefit. There were several times where I was able to cite a specific policy from the Penn State website from memory. I also think all of my group members and I did a good job of using anecdotes without personalizing the issue too much.
In terms of what we could improve upon, we did not exactly go over who would be saying what, so there were some instances where we would talk over each other for like a second or look at each other to prompt someone to answer. Our second and third approach got a little muddled together as well, and we would have benefitted from drawing a more distinct line there so it was obvious that it was two different approaches. I think if we were to do this project again it would be cool to mention chronic illnesses, as they are physically disabling. it was brought up during our deliberation (by me) but was not technically in our video, so it could be cool to include that. Lastly, our intro was just slightly too long. I think we did a good job of introducing the issue with historical context, stakeholders, and causes and effects, but maybe would have been better if we shortened it by about 30 seconds-1 minute.
Overall, I felt we had very positive feedback and I am very proud of myself and my group!