I believe that the RCL Civic Engagement speeches are going well thus far. The topics are greatly varying and that keeps things interesting. I believe that the broad range of topics really gives some insight as to who each speaker is and what their interests are as a person.
I feel as though all of the speakers definitely have some general background in public speaking, whether that was in front of a class or in front of a rally. You can tell this for a few different reasons. First, all of the speakers seemed to be fairly calm, cool, and collected when they approached the podium. Second, everyone who spoke had good basic speaking skills. By this I mean that everyone who has gone thus far had good eye contact, they varied where they looked, they fluctuated their voices, and they occasionally incorporated their hands in a no so distracting manner.
So far, all of the topics have most definitely had an obvious call not only to just be civically engaged, but also how to be a good citizen in general. In spite of having such a variance in regards to topics, each of the speeches truly conveyed the messages that they were trying to get across.
The one thing that I did not like were the signs. I think that the signs tended to be very distracting with whatever was written on them. I think that if all of the signs that were present were good color scheme-wise. That being said, if the signs did have different things on them (ie. Three, four, and STOP) written on them I do believe that they would in fact be more helpful as opposed to the sort of distracting manner that they have right now.
I am very excited to see the rest of the speeches on Monday!