RSS Feed
  1. “we suck and we’re sorry”

    September 22, 2013 by Adam Haley

    Here’s another strong rebuttal to all the generational discourse swirling around the “Millennials”:


  2. digital dualism

    September 15, 2013 by Adam Haley

    Here’s the Nathan Jurgensen post I showed briefly in class on Friday, partly as a rebuttal to Sherry Turkle’s tech-phobic generalizations about kids these days and their iPhones, but especially to set the tone for how I envision the blogging component of this course interacting and intersecting with the in-class portions.  The opening paragraphs:

    The power of social media to burrow dramatically into our everyday lives as well as the near ubiquity of new technologies such as mobile phones has forced us all to conceptualize the digital and the physical; the on- and off-line.

    And some have a bias to see the digital and the physical as separate; what I am calling digital dualism. Digital dualists believe that the digital world is “virtual” and the physical world “real.” This bias motivates many of the critiques of sites like Facebook and the rest of the social web andI fundamentally think this digital dualism is a fallacy. Instead, I want to argue that the digital and physical are increasingly meshed, and want to call this opposite perspective that implodes atoms and bits rather than holding them conceptually separate augmented reality.

    In a 2009 post titled “Towards Theorizing An Augmented Reality,” I discussed geo-tagging (think Foursquare or Facebook Places), street view, face recognition, the Wii controller and the fact that sites like Facebook both impact and are impacted by the physical world to argue that “digital and material realities dialectically co-construct each other.” This is opposed to the notion that the Internet is like the Matrix, where there is a “real” (Zion) that you leave when you enter the virtual space (the Matrix) -an outdated perspective as Facebook is increasingly real and our physical world increasingly digital.


  3. civic engagement artifacts

    September 11, 2013 by Adam Haley

     

     

     

     

     

    Red Cross ad

     

     

    WPA-poster


  4. more on Lincoln

    September 9, 2013 by Adam Haley

     

    It is a well-known pastime of historians to quibble with Hollywood over details. Here, however, the issue is not factual accuracy but interpretive choice. A stronger African-American presence, even at the margins of Mr. Spielberg’s “Lincoln,” would have suggested that another dynamic of emancipation was occurring just outside the frame — a world of black political debate, of civic engagement and of monumental effort for the liberation of body and spirit.

     

     

    In that sense, Lincoln lets its audience off too easy. It’s comforting to feel that we can always find great wisdom in the middle. For the slight cost of waving away those who carry radicalism in their very blood, it reaffirms our great faith in democracy. It’s much more terrifying to consider how democratic compromise can be disastrous and how zealotry can be perceptive. Lincoln should have been harder on us.

     

     

    But beyond the historiography, there’s a larger cultural question: What is it about this country that makes any description of the moral cesspool of politics seem like the  revelation of a brave new truth?

     

     

    In short, the idea that the white north “gave” freedom to the slaves draws from and reinforces an attractively simple and flattering myth, one which formed around the old historiography of the period like a noose cutting off oxygen to the brain: the myth that black slaves were rendered passive by their condition, and that—absent an outside force interrupting their state of un-freedom—they would simply have continued, as slaves, indefinitely. It’s only in this narrative that freedom can be a thing which is given to them: because they are essentially passive and inert, they require someone else—say, a great emancipator—to step in and raise them up.


  5. Jon Stewart eviscerates Crossfire

    August 28, 2013 by Adam Haley

    In case you haven’t seen the Crossfire bit to which chapter 3 of RCL referred, here’s Jon Stewart’s 2004 appearance on the show, shortly before the 2004 election, and not long after which the show was canceled:


  6. Kant we all just get along?

    August 28, 2013 by Adam Haley

    Here’s Immanuel Kant writing about the way the realization of certain material facts about the world (i.e. that it is finite, not infinite) is what makes ethical, economic, and political thought both possible and necessary.  This is one way of understanding chapter 3’s point that disagreement and the possibility thereof is the situation that produces—necessitates, even—rhetoric, deliberation, and democracy more broadly.  By way of context, he’s talking just before this quote about hospitality, about “the right of a stranger not to be treated as an enemy when he arrives in the land of another,” as one of the tenets of his prescription for peaceful coexistence:

    [Man] may request the right to be a permanent visitor . . . but the right to visit, to associate, belongs to all men by virtue of their common ownership of the earth’s surface; for since the earth is a globe, they cannot scatter themselves infinitely, but must, finally, tolerate living in close proximity, because originally no one had a greater right to any region of the earth than anyone else. Uninhabitable parts of this surface—the sea and deserts—separate these communities, and yet ships and camels (the ship of the desert) make it possible to approach one another across these unowned regions, and the right to the earth’s surface that belongs in common to the totality of men makes commerce possible.

    If ever you’re interested in the whole thing (I know, I know), as it’s a pretty fascinating little document, it’s posted here in its entirety.


  7. rhetorical questions

    August 26, 2013 by Adam Haley

    Please respond to one of the first four “Rhetorical Activities” listed on page 41 of RCL. Just use the comment function on this post to record your response.  (You may have to log into sites.psu.edu with your PSU credentials first.)  While activity one and two would probably work best as analytical arguments with examples, questions three and four would probably work better as narratives, followed by reflection. Thinking about the form of the response is part of Aristotle’s invention.


  8. welcome to RCL!

    August 26, 2013 by Adam Haley

    Welcome to English 137H, section 22 for the 2013 fall semester.  Keep your hands and arms inside the carpet!


Skip to toolbar