LGBTQ Community in Church

For my paradigm shift essay, I plan on writing about how millennial’s perspectives on church have changed. More specifically, for this blog post I will focus on the LGBTQ community, how it has changed within the church, and how churches have changed in order to welcome a group that has largely been excluded from god’s kingdom. To start, it is important to understand that Christian churches across America often use parts of the bible such as Leviticus to condemn homosexuality. The bible reads, “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination,” (Chapter 18 verse 22) and “If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them,” (Chapter 20 verse 13). Clearly, there is some proclaimed negativity towards those who are gay within the contents of the bible. However, it is up to a church and its people to decide whether this scripture is truly the word of God, and to what extent it should be followed. For all of history, there have been countless accounts of people taking particular parts of the bible and using it for their own purpose or needs. With that being said, each church can create their own ideology surrounding the word of God, as evidenced in the many different forms of church and religious practice.

 

Photo by Angela Jimenez

A pastor of a Lutheran church in Denver, Colorado, Nadia Bolz-Weber, has seen and experienced LGBTQ discrimination within churches all across the world. In response she has been working on a book which will be released in January of 2019, calling for a revolution in the church to longer treat LGBTQ community members with “harmful and antiquated ideas,” (Bolz-Weber). However, while movements like this are occurring all over the world, they are met with conservative ideologies in places like the evangelical church. In short, more conservative people use out-of-context bible passages to back their argument while the LGBTQ+ community use a Christ-like ideology to support them. Stagnation arises in the fact that both arguments are supposedly backed by God, however more liberal minded people would say an old bible passage does not necessarily represent what God would want. Without a progressive stance on social issues, people often leave the church. A historian at Messiah College claims that young people will leave the church if their denomination has a conservative view on something like gay marriage (Ladika). Along with this, abuse scandals within churches, most often catholic churches, frequently feature gay priests sexually abusing youth members of the church. Sexual abuse scandals, while slightly off topic, remain a large issue leading to the decrease in church participation for millennials.

 

Image

Commonplaces Formed within the Opposition

Across many groups like Proud Boys there seems to be a general trend of taking passionate or angry people and sending them in a direction with an undeniable claim. At the root of this passion is a feeling of being persecuted or made out to be the “bad guy.” While Proud Boys stands for policies that are not hand in hand with that of Nazis, their policies  do represent a far-right ideology. Proud Boys want to “close the borders” however, closing the borders is just obscure enough of an idea that it does not inherently support white supremacy or xenophobia, even though many of us immediately think so. As such, they take advantage of a commonplace amongst liberals and anyone who skip a couple steps and denounce them as Nazis or white supremacists. In creating this hostility, they can emerge as a more intelligent group, navigating through false assumptions to support their own agenda.  

Proud Boys member Tattoo

At the same time, Proud Boys relish in this space between a far-right group and a white supremacist group because they draw in a wide range of people. Those who take to this commonplace, this somewhat radical space, can easily join and uptake the ideology of the group. Regardless of the debate as to whether they are a radical group, some people may be drawn to a group that is being dissented by those “crazy liberals.” In a time period where more and more white people are feeling discriminated against, individuals may spring to join a union of people who feels marginalized in the way that they do. In some sense, Donald Trump has continued a trend of white Americans fighting to hold power that is being usurped by new laws and policies. Groups like Proud Boys relish in this fight, this response to national change, and manifest their struggle in the form of a far-right ideology. 

Additionally, people can join who first and foremost want to support the agenda of Proud Boys. Some people may feel like “giving everyone a gun” is extremely important to them and as a result, Proud Boys serves as a perfect place for them to participate in politics. America is full of people who love their guns and want to keep their guns. In developing an ideology that fits a more conservative opinion, Proud Boys draws in a wide range of passionate, right-leaning people. The same thing could be said for their stance on prisons and drugs. By creating general stances, the radicalness of the stance itself becomes less of an issue because more people can tap into the basics of what they are aiming to do. 

Proud Boys creates a space for people who at the very least feel they are political victims of the United States Government and allows them to speak out. In speaking out, they are unified through radical, yet abstract policies that give them an undeniable passion. They may come off as Nazis or white supremacists, but because there is no clear sign of such qualities, they consequently grow from a commonplace of liberal hate and intolerance.