Monthly Archives: November 2012

Lower the Drinking Age, Maybe?

By sheer luck, an impromptu pre-interview has already happened for our project. During my advising meeting with my honors advisor, Dr. Schaeffer, we just started shooting the breeze (who knew my nerdy Bio professor was so talkative?) Anyways, we’d realized that both he and my mother went to the same college: West Virginia Wesleyan.  And, most importantly, alcohol was legal for 18-year-olds in the 70’s in West Virginia.  And so, we proceeded to converse about his views about alcohol laws, and I found that Dr. Schaeffer has a strong belief, obtained from experience, about how the drinking age should in fact be lowered in order to eliminate the “forbidden fruit” phenomenon that causes so many college students to take it a bit too far.  He’d explained how his experiences with alcohol (even as a frat boy!) were nothing but positive; he described its use as “usually enjoying a few beers while hanging out–it was never a big deal”.  Hm. Interesting.

However, what was most interesting to me was how he’d explained that lowering the drinking age would involve some sacrifices.  We can’t have it all; that’s why we don’t have it all now.  At the end of the day, there must be  a greater/lesser “degree” question of balance between safety and personal freedom.  So, Schaeffer suggested that if the law was to allow 18-year-olds alcohol legally, that it would be wise for the campus to crack down on cars, ultimately so that they are prohibited.  I do personally think this makes sense–often people’s issues with alcohol and alcohol laws are directly tied to their views on the issue of drunk driving–however I do think students will not be too happy about this either, especially those who do not partake in underage drinking. However, it is this issue of sacrifice and degree that plays an especially important part of our public controversy topic, and it’ll certainly be interesting to expand on as our project progresses!

The video presents us with examples of different factors that play into whether or not copyright issues might become a problem (video length, type, etc.), yet it doesn’t offer us the actual rules–are they concrete?

Copyrighted material may be used for specific purposes as delineated in the video (critical comment, etc.), but who exactly draws the lines of what work qualifies as what category?

The American Public School System…

Alright, give me a minute to channel my inner optimist for this one.

Alright, okay.  Coming at the angle of personal experience, an optimistic view on the public school system is actually fairly effortless.  My high school was a great one–despite all the “I-hate-this-school-get-me-out” haters.  Then again, maybe I’m misled by my blind optimism in general.  But truly, just this past weekend, as our high school football team won the district title for the third year in a row, radio show hosts quipped about my high school, dubbing it “The University of North Allegheny.”  In more ways than one, they kind of have a point; we were fairly large with my graduating class nearing 700 students, we had fantastic sports and academic programs alike, and I don’t care about all the stressed-out students ranting via social media–we had, for the most part, fantastic teachers.

But, for the intents and purposes of this post, North Allegheny does not properly represent the entire American Public School System.  It certainly has flaws (funding issues [cough*Pennsylvania], over-standardization, test-centered teaching), yet I think we truly do not give our educational system enough credit.  I don’t know the statistics exactly; I don’t know the ins and outs of the administration and policy of the public school system either.  In fact, I feel a little under qualified for this post.  But, that doesn’t change the fact that there are areas of the world out there completely devoid of education, and also students who find their poorly-run and resource-deprived schools their most blessed chance at life. While I do believe we should make continually improving our public school systems a priority, we should never look at what we have with complete disapproval; we have absolutely no right to do this, given where we stand in the world.

Really, this is a get-out-of-it-what-you-put-in process.  While most notably shown in the pursuit of highest education (i.e. college, graduate school), the primary and secondary public school system ultimately provides students the opportunity to earn an education–but an education sustained by the effort of the student.  Inner city schools may have poor resources, yes; however, the problem of students’ failure with education in the inner city demographic sinks deeper: the home.  Often times, education is not valued and enforced in the student’s home life, yet this is a crucial aspect to a student’s success and academic development.  Ultimately, education holds a fundamental element of personal responsibility, and it is the responsibility of the student and also his or her family to nurture a respect for and desire for academics.

It’s not always as easy as pointing fingers at the system.

TED Talk Reflection

That was really strange watching myself speak as a viewer.  Seriously, I got nervous just viewing myself talk.  Still recovering.

That said, in many ways I’m pleasantly surprised.  Flashback thirty minutes before that speech, I was freaking out.  I was pacing my dorm room and then practically running across campus to the library – I defined hot mess.  However, for the most part, I think look very happy, engaging and at ease up there.  I can assure you, that totally was not the case!!!  Unless, possibly, I was just happy to finally get it over with.  And in all honesty, when I was sitting in my chair listening to the earlier talks, I did make a point to open up my body! Good to know for the future, for sure.

Sidenote: I totally talk with my hands.  A ton.  Did not realize the extent of this until now, but hey, whatever.  I think it looked pretty natural.

However, the one thing I really am disappointed with was the fluency.  Although my intonation was pretty conversational and easy, I did stutter a lot, which totally disrupted the flow of some of the ideas I was trying to present.  This especially became an issue towards the conclusion of the speech, which is definitely not ideal because the end is for driving home my ideas, points, and potential solutions, all the while leaving the audience with thoughts to further ponder.  So, my fluency is definitely my greatest disappointment, especially because it probably could have been fixed with just a couple more run-throughs.

In all, I definitely like that I had this experience.  Being able to watch my speech after the fact is a huge learning tool; our experience in the spotlight giving a talk is totally different from the experience of watching and listening to the same talk.  I wish I could watch all my speeches afterwards, actually (even if they do make me nervous all over again!).  But, that said, I really am glad it’s all over.

What is a Public Issue, Anyway?

For all of you who did their homework…the chapter in the ARCS book about stasis proves to be really interesting.  It presents a very prominent “public controversy”, abortion, in relation to its issues with stasis.  In short, the dilemma has become one in which the two sides (for our intents and purposes, we can label them conservative vs. liberal views) fail to argue on the same ground.  This has become the problem with the two sides utterly failing to meet in the middle or compromise–while the liberal side’s argument is based on how women have the right to determine what is best for their own bodies, the conservative side takes an entirely different approach that instead deals with the definition of abortion, equating it to murder of unborn children.

The two groups, ultimately, do not have stasis. This seems to be a recurring trend within other public controversies: the two opposing sides argue completely different grounds, often times ignoring and not even addressing (or refuting) the argument provided by the opposition.  Therefore, it becomes extremely difficult to reconcile the opposing sides, allowing it to remained an unresolved conflict among the public–so much so that it does, usually, in fact have an extensive history.  Reproductive/women’s rights, marriage rights, immigration, illegal vs. legal substances.  All hotly debated among our public, yet often featuring two sides that view the issue from completely different ideas of relevance.  In order for these to ever be resolved or compromised, debaters must find the very point–the very heart of the issue–in which they decide to disagree.  And if they don’t disagree when they find their stasis point? When a conservative is unwilling to say the words “women should not have the right to govern their own bodies” or a liberal cannot claim with conviction that an abortion is not stopping life in its very tracks?  That is when the two sides gain insight into the other, and maybe even a bit more respect.  That is when they realize they both need to re-evaluate their views, and ideally open up to each other’s ideas and arguments, rather than putting up a wall of ignorance.

Quite simply, the lack of stasis like the one explained above is responsible for the existence of so many super-polarized public controversies–so much so that I believe a public controversy can even be defined as a recurring issue due to this lack of stasis.

It Would’ve Been Fine if We Just Went to Sydney.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I am by no means complaining about this:

Nor am I complaining about this:

And of course I’m not complaining about this:

(the Ghiradelli store–in case you can’t tell)

BUT.

I am completely and 100% complaining about the fact that I am STILL sitting in the JFK airport at 3:35 pm, when my flight out of San Francisco last night was the red-eye with a departure time of 9:30 pm YESTERDAY.  I’m complaining that because of this, I am missing my Chem test (okay, I’m really okay with that), but yet I am frustrated with the fact that the make-up isn’t for a couple weeks (so long, fresh chemistry knowledge) AND is comprised of material from all three exams (hello, unforeseen-mini-final).  Not to mention, the only reason why my mother and I saw a night of sleeping on a plane as our best option was for the sake of this god-awful chemistry exam that I won’t even end up taking.

Shannon is not optimistic today.  No, I’m switching it up (although, does a pissed-off rant necessarily count as cynical, or just a part of life?).

But then, I know I really don’t have room to talk.  I just spent three days in one of the liveliest, loveliest cities in America: San Francisco. No, I didn’t just up and decide that hey, this weekend doesn’t have much going on–let’s leave State College and fly across the country (although what a life that would be!!).  Nah.  My cousin had her beautiful wedding this weekend overlooking the Golden Gate, and it was fabulous, wonderful, delicious, and well worth the far travel.  However, how could we have known that a little fog in NYC at 6 am this morning would completely shut down JFK-one of America’s biggest hubs? That was a nice little surprise to wake us up from our struggled-slumber snuggling with our red Delta blankets: a PA system announcing to us with its deepest apologies that we are not landing in JFK after all, but rather the exciting destination of Albany for the time being.  But after that? We don’t even know, but we’re far down on the waiting list for available runways. Hope you’re not missing anything important, but you will most likely miss your connections.  Suckas.

So, here I am. And I’m not even quite sure what insightful things I have to say about the matter.  It just seems like the entire airway system is so fragile and so susceptible to getting completely and utterly screwed up, and therefore flyers’ plans become susceptible to getting completely and utterly screwed up.  Often times, it is beyond the airlines’ control; after all, safety takes precedence in the air. But, when it all comes down to it, someone gets screwed.  Flights can’t wait for you, or else many others get screwed.  It’s just an all-around stressful sometimes-you-just-can’t-win situation.  Even now, sitting on the carpeted floor with my laptop, I hear announcement after announcement about delayed flights as a repercussion of this morning’s fog. Fog. The fog was ten hours ago! Who knew it could do so much damage to so many schedules?

Well, my gate moved again (literally, third time), so I should go.

But, I’ll leave you with this: next time you travel by air, make sure you pack your patience.

 

P.S. In reference to the title: my newlywed cousin Sarah and her husband Dave left San Francisco not long after our own departure for their looong trip to Sydney, Australia. They will have made it to their destination halfway around the world before my mom and I make it home. What’s wrong with this picture?!

Alright. I’m done.

A Day of Thanksgiving

Hey kids, raise your hands.

Who’s dying for Thanksgiving break??

With the never-ending build-up of exams, projects, canning weekends, and just maybe a social life thrown in the mix, a week of blissed-out nothing–save for turkey and pie, of course–sounds like the greatest remedy to the stressed-out-freshman syndrome.  What’s more is the fact that without a fall break, we Freshmen especially are yearning to return home for more than just a weekend.  We need to regroup, recharge, and reload. Truth is, we’re exhausted from all the adjusting and adapting the past couple months has required of us; each day, the idea of returning home to just be sounds more and more appealing.

Or maybe, that’s just me. (But I doubt it).

But, taking center stage in the upcoming weeks is many Americans’ favorite holiday of the year: Thanksgiving.  Established in 1863 by President Lincoln amidst the chaos of The Civil War, Thanksgiving has historically taken place every fourth Thursday of November, in commemoration of The First Thanksgiving involving the Plymouth pilgrims and Wampanoag Native Americans.  Upon encountering suffering, hunger, and illness, the pilgrims who arrived on American shores in 1620 probably wouldn’t have survived had they not managed to forge a friendship with these local Native Americans who had taught them how to grow corn, harvest sap from trees, and much more. Tragically, the friendship enjoyed between these early settlers and the Wampanoags–an alliance that continued to last for the next 50 some years–remains one of the few examples of harmony between the European colonists and the Native Americans.

Today, Thanksgiving exists not only in commemoration of our country’s early history, but also as a time to enjoy good food and good family–without the threat of overbearing commercialism that the Holiday Season tends to carry.  Rather, that Thursday evening offers us a time to celebrate that which we are thankful for with those we are most thankful for.  From the wafting scent of fresh-baked pie lingering throughout the house, to the all-day turkey roast that takes place in my kitchen over, to my brothers and Dad playing football in the backyard…..I. Can’t. Wait.

Questions for the Masses…For Real This Time

A Preface: I posted this last week accidentally as my RCL.  After realizing that this was definitely not what we were supposed to be doing (*cough TED talks), I removed the tag for week 8. So…here it is guys. And I’m still serious about the responses!!

 

Alright, all.  I really need your feedback on this one.  Or rather, I’m just really intrigued.

So today…something strange happened.

The conversation started out innocently enough.  After all, I was only relaying how I had an English paper to finish, couldn’t find any damn computers in the library open for printing, blah blah blah. Harmless texting with my boyfriend on a Wednesday morning.  But somewhere along the way, I entered into an explanation about this course, its ideas, and the premises of rhetoric andeffective argumentation.

Boom.  Full-blown outside-of-class discussion about rhetoric and the ancients; culture and even its paradigms.  I don’t know yet whether I should be embarrassed or proud of myself…you may put in your input on that, too.

Quite frankly, I think he was being thick.  But then again, he hasn’t gained the same insights from this class, now has he?

However, some of his points seemed fair.  For instance, he argued that people are always going to fight about who’s right and who’s wrong, regardless of whichever culture serves as context.  True, this has an element of human nature.  However, my main frustrations today (especially with the realm of politics) is that our culture–especially the media aspect–enjoys a good battle a little too much, and seemingly only for the theatrics.  No one wants to collaborate, and rarely do the problems actually get solved.  And that very frustration caused me to ponder whether it’s always been like this.  Or did the ancients have it better? Were they all-around more effective communicators because rhetoric was viewed as a skill, an art form?  Does our culture’s problems with stubbornness of opinion exist today as merely a cultural trend, or is this a cross-cultural human nature issue?

Tons of questions, but I’m not done.

Furthermore, “how can you compare anything in present day to centuries ago” became his next point.  Simply, he could not see the relevance between the lives of the ancients with ours, especially when ours is considered so much more advanced.  Back then, according to him, “there was nothing to argue about besides land”.  No, sweetheart, YOU’RE WRONG.

Sure, it was centuries ago.  But were the ancients exactly primitive?  They weren’t as advanced in science, sure, but what about this ability to communicate well–this ability to value people’s opinions?  Decades or maybe even centuries from now, after our culture is over this whole “Technology Era” thing, will we return to valuation of philosophy, the humanities, and thought above all else?

So, the ancients. The fact alone that we still learn their names and philosophies must account for something…they must have been on to something that we as a culture have fundamentally lost.  So when will it become mainstream again?  I don’t know.  But when it does, I’m sure they too will boast this “new, advanced thinking.”  But no, sweethearts, you’re wrong.

 

So many question marks. I’m cutting myself off.

But give me answers.

Power Pose

My paradigm shift paper was about women in the work force, and so for my TED talk, I plan to zero in on the issues that have arisen from this shift failing to be completed.  By that I mean that I am going to address how while women have entered the work force, they residual values undervaluing women still exist and pose issues and stressors on the total modern-day family.  I hope to find a way to be able to keep this fresh enough, as well as entertaining.  If nothing else, I hope to keep it interestingly informative.

Now, for Amy Cuddy’s TED talk, she offers practical and helpful advice to those in situations much like we will be in in the upcoming weeks.  Amy makes the case for Power Poses, and I do love this presentation of psychosomatic phenomenons; they fascinate me.  I truly do believe that you can fake it ’til you make it, but I like even better how she highlighted that it should be more “fake it til you become it.”

I hope to really take this to heart before my TED talk, as well as test out her claims.  Yes, I will be in the library bathroom before my presentation in full-on Wonder Woman stance, cause why not? What could it hurt?  However, for me in the past, I have found that what seems to effect me most in terms of confidence is my mood.  Get me on a day when I’m exhausted, stressed, and grouchy, and my confidence level seems to instantly plummet along with it.  However, on days when I’m feeling good, I really do sometimes feel like I can take on the world.  So for me, not only will my TED delivery fare best due to my power poses, but I plan to make a specific effort to get enough rest and avoid getting too frazzled about anything come Tuesday.  When at ease with the world, we often become at ease with ourselves. And that’s the goal.

Sandy’s Vote > The People’s Vote

We all thought Sandy was just a little innocent squirrel from Texas who lived in a bubble under the sea.

WE WERE WRONG.

Instead, this past week, Sandy was ravaging through the northeast with a vengeance.  Power was cut, homes and stores were flattened, and roads were flooded.  But we all know this—this is old news.  Plus, I think more people were seemingly concerned with whether or not our classes would be cancelled.

So how do we be optimistic about this?

Honestly, this is tough.  You can’t really spin a natural disaster as a good thing, but for a second, let me delve into the mind-blowing yet head-scratching complex “Butterfly Effect” it could have. For those of you unfamiliar with this theory/effect/whatever you want to call it, applying it to Hurricane Sandy would mean claiming that however horrible it is, the storm could have some random, unforeseen, totally unexpected and seemingly unrelated–and possibly beneficial–effect.

For those of you familiar with the ideas and correlations in Freakonomics: sort of like that.

So let’s take the most obvious and convenient example: The upcoming election.

Now, I know that there already exists some established correlation between bad weather and elections, and that is that bad weather has historically negatively affected the Democratic Party.  While seemingly unrelated at first, this actually makes sense; city populations tend to lean more to the left, and city populations often rely on public transportation.  Public transportation and horrific weather? Bad mix. Bad enough to deter half-hearted people from the polls.

But let me be clear: this is not a political statement against the Democratic Party and Barack Obama.

However, if history and a couple headlines that I’ve seen are correct, then Hurricane Sandy has the potential to change America by swaying the election either further left or further right.

As frustrated as we may be about election (or maybe that’s just me), the outcome’s effect on our lives is undeniable, and potentially huge.  We don’t know what the next four years are going to hold, but we cannot deny that what happens in the next four years will define our country, the future, and our direct lives in some way, however drastically that may be.

So, while we cannot peer into a looking glass and compare what America after four years of Romney or four more years of Obama looks like, there would inarguably be a difference.  They may look immensely different, or they may not look much different at all.  For the love of God, disregard political parties for a second when you consider this: Have you ever thought about what The Civil War, or any other major historical event for that matter, would have looked like with a different president heading our country? What major decisions would have changed?  World War II?  The Cuban Missile Crisis?  What would America and our history even be today had it not been Lincoln, FDR, or Kennedy?

This may be pushing it, but

Hurricane Sandy may have decided our country’s fate in some way. And, perhaps, for the better.

 

That’s quite possibly the only positive spin I can put on utter destruction.