Category Archives: PSU Web Conference

Reflection 6/3/13-6/7/13


Accomplishments:

    • Personal Security MOOC
      • MOOC progress
    • IST 220
      • 2 notes from Nick G about items that he’d like to see done to improve the course
        • One is about a screen cast that shows how to do a screen cap in VHOL
        • One is about creating a better survey in ANGEL for team creation
      • Met on 5/2 from 11:00-12:00 to discuss
        • He would like OIDI to create a virtual Finite State Machine
        • He included a powerpoint with examples of what he would like
        • Need to assemble a team to get this rolling
        • Spoke with Allison and Ranjani about possible participation in this project
        • Emailed Marc on 5/31 about getting together to discuss the project
        • Meeting planned for 6/5 concerning project
    • IST 230 (Newcomer)
      • The truth tables are completed
        • Feedback from Kent about video on the page (& in the rest of the course)
          • Would be nice to point students more clearly on where to start the tables – Done
          • Can make the video accessible by ios devices. Here is an evernote on how.
      • Email sent to Larry on 4/9
        • Reply from Toni D; positive about the final product
      • Amy G pointed me to some resources that were available from the past.
        • I plan to take a closer look and share with Larry for possible inclusion in later semesters
      • Note from Larry on 5/9 that there is something that needs to be fixed
        • Emailed Greg for help
        • This should have been done earlier but it’s another reason we need professional ed tech
        • Texted Greg on 5/31 and worked with Ranjani to fix the issue
    • IST 240 (Fonseca)
      • Talked to Lisa and she was going to touchbase with Mary Beth about reforming committee
      • Meeting on 5/1 about the course with Fred rescheduled for 5/8 b/c of grading needs
        • Meeting again rescheduled for 5/15 b/c of being behind
      • Received note on 5/20 that Fred could make meeting this week, so I shared my feelings about the project getting behind.
        • He sent me materials and nice note.
      • Moved Hal’s materials into an Archive folder in the dev section and deleted gradebook
      • Updated the course and made a few more adjustments based upon the file sent and a google+ hangout session on 5/23 & 24
      • Received an email on 5/29 that Fred changed his mind and is revamping the course
      • Looked more closely over the edits and plan to make adjustements next week when I have time
    • IST 250 (Bixler)
      • Met with Brett on 1/30 to discuss adjustments
        • Mostly items that Brett will fix
        • He will send me changes to the curriculum as Word docs for me to update
    • IST 302 (Clark)
      • Sent note to Shawn about new text
        • He replied that if the book changed significantly we would have to do a revision
          • I sent a reply back to let him know that it didn’t change much and to see if he needed a copy
          • He said yes, and I sent a request to Kathy W on 4/8
          • Checked in with Amy S about the possibility of revision
          • I don’t think it’s necessary
            • Talked briefly with Shawn on 5/21 that I didn’t think the course needed a revision
            • Received the book and clarified with James C on 5/31 that we were going with the 7th edition

  • Summer ’13 Courses
    • IST 210
      • All Sec
        • Note from Fred about # of new-to-online students
        • Gary provided a nice email that he sends out to proactively address this
    • IST 220
      • Sec 002 (Mike)
        • Had a new room created
          • I think he was under the impression that they stood forever instead of just for the semester
    • IST 230
      • Sec 001 (Larry)
        • Graded 20 quizzes from Quiz 2 on 6/3 and 6/4
        • Some real issues with students and how to best address their needs for me to address
        • Finished reviewing material for Lesson 3 on 6/5
    • IST 331
      • Sec 001 (Cantor)
        • Received an email on 6/3 about adjustments that were and needed to be made
          • He updated a video
    • IST 420
      • Merged (Rosalie)
        • Received audio pptx for Lesson 4 and added to drupal site on 6/5
        • Added a link in ANGEL on 6/5
        • Followed up with an email on 6/5
  • Fall ’13 Courses
    • IST 110
      • Sec 001 (Garbrick)
        • Ok from Amy G to copy last version into the space
        • Export/Import done on 6/4
        • Let Amy that it was done and ready for her to set up
      • Sec 002 (M. Lipton)
        • Checked in about copying in last version of the course into her space on 5/31
    • IST 402
      • Sec 001 (Jansen)
        • Received a note that he wants the section populated
        • Didn’t find this on my profile, so asked him to add me if he sees it on his
        • They added Melissa instead of me, so Jim added me.
        • Set up the section and sent him an email on 6/5

Ongoing Projects:

    • Updated google spreadsheet for Fall ’13 google schreadsheet 

Immediate Decisions / Issues:

    • Need LMS that better integrates and includes tools that we use in our classes.

Important Dates:

  • June 3 Vacation Time – 4h AM
  • June 10 Vacation Time – 4h AM
  • June 14 Vacation Day – 8h
  • June 20 Vacation Day – 8h
  • July 2 Sick Day – Family 4h, Self 4h
  • July 4 Holiday
  • July 5 Vacation Day – 8h
  • July 11 Vacation Day – 8h
  • July 12 Vacation Day – 8h
  • August 19 Vacation Day – 8h
  • August 20 Vacation Day – 8h

Web Conference at Penn State Day 2

The second day of the conference was very good. Definitely a shout out to the planning committee who did a fabulous job of bringing in great speakers. Both days were great!

The keynote was a good reminder of how easily, we may be left behind if we don’t understand how important disruptive technologies can be. Karen McGrane spoke about a company called DEC that went from being at or near the top of selling computer systems to being taken over by Compaq. This after several decades of being at or near the top. How did this happen? They miscalculated the impact of a less sophisticated technology (personal computing). I thought an important point is that quality usually means little when this type of disruptive market takes over. Usually, the technology brings users into the market that haven’t been around before. After time, the technology improves and replaces the original. I couldn’t help but think of higher ed as Karen made her points. Hopefully, we can make the necessary adjustment. I think that accessibility (disabilities, mobile) will play an important role.

There were several other sessions that I really enjoyed. One was by Eric Kim on Mobile Context. I really loved his analogy of food with mobile computing. He talked about power bars as an example of how mobile is to the desktop. Important point made by Eric based upon research is that mobile is morphing into the preferred method to do computing (not just when you’re on the go). I find that myself. I always have my phone with me. Laptops/desktops are becoming less and less my preferred method.

The rest of the day revolved around social media. Matt Hames talked about how facebook needs to be used carefully. Personally, I don’t understand how facebook is still so ubiquitous. I think that it has alot to do with the difficulty of leaving the environment.

Donna Talarico from my alma mater Elizabethtown College did an awesome session on the use of social media to improve engagement. I was so impressed that I like the fb page and followed on twitter. Definitely good to see Elizabethtown making the move.

Web Conference at Penn State 2013 Day 1

Great first day of the Web Conference at Penn State 2013.

After b-fast at the Penn Stater, we moved to the day 1 keynote by Cindy Li from Flickr on Inclusive Design. Cindy started by mentioning that her mother has macular degeneration. This brought a personal element to her talk. She went on to talk about sites that needed work and how they could be improved. During this part of the talk she highlighted tools that helped in testing sites, like Xscope, Nocturne, Braille Institute, and Color Contrast Analyzer to name a few. 
One of the most memorable parts of her talk were a few exercises where she asked us to close our eyes and hear how a screen reader worked on a few sites. Then we were asked to watch the experience. It was amazing how poorly the sites had been set for accessibility. Just a reminder of how so many individuals are affected by items that many take for granted. 
She also highlighted a few sights that were well done. She mentioned that we should make our designs welcoming. Users remember when it makes them uncomfortable.

Went to several sessions in the AM and PM that I really enjoyed. 
My favorite of the day was by Kris Rockwell from Impact Games on Play the Election. Kris talked about how there were three parts to the experience of Play the Election. 
  1. Electoral map that allowed students to go back to 1960
  2. Election games – 11 games & a way for teachers to create their own games. Impact Games made the interface while the 11 games were created by those at Rand McNally
  3. Community – which needed special consideration because of the audience, high school students. Classes had the opportunity to wall of their classes from the public. 
Kris made some important points about game creation and gamification and differentiating between the two. He also mentioned how competition increases engagement at least in the short term. 
Kris went on to talk about things that went wrong:
  1. Short development time (only 3 months)
  2. Abbreviated marketing research
On the positive side:
  1. The game was a solid platform on several devices that included the transition from flash to html5
  2. Tools in the game were easy to use with little need for support
  3. 2400 classrooms created – 20,000 to 25,000 Individual users, a lot of positive feedback
Another session that I liked was about our users. The speakers highlighted Millennials. I felt like much of what they highlighted could be good for all users. We spend so much time thinking about making everything so useful for a large group when we need to think about personalizing the experience. We really need to do little with our systems. We need to think about how our systems are accessed and integrate with one another.
The last session that I’ll comment on was about leveraging social media for maximizing student engagement by Andrew Smyk. Andrew handled technical difficulties very well. He made some solid points about being strategic with the use of mobile. He also mentioned that accessibility of content via mobile is much more important than the attractiveness of materials and content. 
Nice conversation at lunch with people from outside and inside Penn State. Great day and looking forward to more tomorrow.