Uighur Muslims Using Social Media to Spread Awareness

Though it looks very different from other social justice movements, The movement to free  Uighur Muslims living in China the current movement being joined and followed around the world. we mentioned this issue before but now let’s examine it with the context of social media and how that plays a role in the progress of the movement and also how the restrictions on social media hurt the movements potential of growth.

China Is Trying to Silence Uighurs in Europe - The Atlantic

it is well known that China is heavily regulated when it comes to social media, having their own forms of many of our social medias and monitoring content for things such as Winnie the Pooh another language that goes against what leaders in the country believe. as a result, the concentration camps that Uighur Muslims have been put into. Currently at least 1 million Uighurs live in at least 85 concentration camps throughout China. Here they are subject to physical labor, harsh conditions, and tactics to try and force them to switch from being Muslim. Beyond this, little is known about what latest like in the camps because of the lack of social media allowed there. many of our photos come from satellite images and not from people actually experiencing life in these concentration camps.

Xinjiang re-education camps - Wikipedia

Despite all these factors , there is still a social justice movement from younger populations 2 raise awareness within their own countries so that their political leaders will do something about China’s mistreatment of this population. For example, a woman named Samira Imin took to social media to raise awareness to free her father from one of these camps by filming a video and posting it everywhere. Whether social media activists have followed suit posting informational videos to spread awareness of the issue in the forms of tweets, Instagram stories, informational TikToks and beyond. Due to the trade agreements many countries have with China there is fear that no country will stand up to them and take action. In addition, this often raises concerns about how properly this information is being spread in mainstream media. This is why social media is key for spreading awareness towards the issue. Uighurs who are not in these camps but still live in China also try to promote awareness towards the issue and have dealt with censorship issues in the past as well as outspoken posters is being targeted. they’ve had to continually adjust to stay out of harm’s way, including changing the language used in their posts from traditional languages to Mandarin.

China is exporting surveillance tech like facial recognition globally

Butler, Brennan. “What Is Happening with the Uighurs in China?” PBS NewsHour, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/features/uighurs/. Accessed 20 Nov. 2020.
Clothey, Rebecca A., et al. “A Voice for the Voiceless: Online Social Activism in Uyghur Language Blogs and State Control of the Internet in China.” Information, Communication & Society, vol. 19, no. 6, Routledge, June 2016, pp. 858–74. Taylor and Francis+NEJM, doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1061577.
Uighur Woman Uses Social Media to Pressure China into Releasing Her Father | Voice of America – English. https://www.voanews.com/extremism-watch/uighur-woman-uses-social-media-pressure-china-releasing-her-father. Accessed 20 Nov. 2020.

WhatsApp and Brazilian Elections

Embassy of Brazil

As we learned before Brazil has taken advantage of the misinformation spread through mobile phones and other online services in order to affect the integrity of their elections. When we look at the election between Jair Bolsonaro, a significantly far right candidate and Fernando Haddad is significantly left candidate in 2018 we see an election that has been riddled with misinformation not only spread directly by the politicians themselves particularly Bolsonaro but general misinformation spread. WhatsApp, a popular texting app used by over 120 Brazilians contained many political messages that were misleading. In fact a study of 100,000 words as images shared in Brazil found that more than half of them contained misleading or flatly false information. As WhatsApp vouched to protect the truth and delete the spam accounts, they still face the roadblocks that are native to what the app does.

Unlike other social media sharing’s WhatsApp is a texting service, which means that the message is shared are fully encrypted and cannot be screened by WhatsApp or Facebook to see if the information is true. even when people come in and try and fact check , there is pushback due to the mistrust of large corporations. This is also aided by the fact that because it is more personal people tend to trust the information, they see on WhatsApp more than on Facebook or Instagram or another social media website. Bolsonaro ended up being victorious with a 55% swing of the vote. as protesters took to the streets to protest his misogynistic and racist views,  They kept in mind how lies spread through WhatsApp strongly affected the outcome of the election.

A woman holds a sign with an image of presidential candidate Jair Bolsonaro that reads "He lies in WhatsApp," during a protest against Bolsonaro in Sao Paulo, Brazil, October 20, 2018. Photo by REUTERS/Nacho Doce

It’s also important to note that as cell phone usage has completely increased in Brazil it is still not something universally owned. According to Pew Research about 60% of Brazilians have access to a smartphone which is certainly good compared to other emerging economies. for context a slightly over half of Mexicans have access to a smartphone. Regardless, the cell phone usage in Brazil played a key role in swing a lot of voters on Bolsonaro and he was and Haddad and who he was.

Sources:

Curtis, Jennifer. “On Digital Populism in Brazil.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 15 Apr. 2019, https://polarjournal.org/2019/04/15/on-jair-bolsonaros-digital-populism/.
Isaac, Mike, and Kevin Roose. “Disinformation Spreads on WhatsApp Ahead of Brazilian Election (Published 2018).” The New York Times, 19 Oct. 2018. NYTimes.com, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/19/technology/whatsapp-brazil-presidential-election.html.
“Opinion: WhatsApp Skewed Brazilian Election, Showing Social Media’s Danger to Democracy.” PBS NewsHour, 5 Dec. 2018, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/whatsapp-skewed-brazilian-election-showing-social-medias-danger-to-democracy.

John Oliver on Whitewashing: How is this still a thing?

http://https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XebG4TO_xss

This video is one of my favorite YouTube clips, because I think it perfectly Encapsulates the aspects of a meme that makes it effective and entertaining. This clip by John Oliver talks about whitewashing in the media, which has been a hot topic for the past few years especially in terms of award shows. it uses a variety of examples of why actor is being cast in non-white roles from both today and the past. Some examples include Emma Stone being cast as a half Asian character in Aloha and British and Scottish actors being cast in Egyptian movies.

John Oliver Last Week Tonight Hollywood Whitewashing Feb 22 2016 - YouTube

One aspect this video uses that’s really important in memes is humor. the monotone voice in addition to the cursing and funny examples throughout make the audience react positively. while whitewashing isn’t necessarily as contentious of a debate as other political issues, there definitely are people who believe it doesn’t exist. the narrative that this video stitches together by showing so many examples helps to deflate that argument. It also uses persuasion tools by making the opposition look unintelligent and making the actors who played these roles also look dumb by trying to play a race and identity that they are not. Because of the nature of the video he also doesn’t give his audience any room for rebuttal to his ideas which makes them seem more cohesive. the overall professionalism adds to his credibility, because even though he’s being funny he still presenting argument that has to be trusted.

HBO - Wikipedia

John Oliver whose show normally runs on HBO has capitalized on YouTube’s algorithm and gained extreme popularity on the website. his content is produced professionally but through its relevance on YouTube appears more laid back and real. this video alone has over 4 million views and some of his videos have well over 25 million, Like his video about Donald Trump. Because the video is short and easy to digest it’s able to maximize YouTube’s algorithm and increase its reach. Do not specifically to say this video was the sole reason, but a combined pressure from similar voices has made award show nominees much more diverse in the years since it was published, showing that it can still have a relevant voice even when combining with old media. The only thing to be cautious of with the video like this is potential rabbit hole leaning away from this point but with similar keywords that actually speaks against it and says that whitewashing isn’t an issue or that Hollywood’s forcing too many actors color into the spotlight. this is a greater issue that deals with YouTube’s algorithm and is currently a problem we don’t have a great solution for. However, this video still maximizes its humor and how its audience is receiving it to spread its message far and wide.

 

Citations

Burroughs, Benjamin. (2020). Fake Memetics: Political Rhetoric and Circulation in Political Campaigns.

 

The Necessity of Online and In-Person Action in Counter-Publics

About 93% of racial justice protests in the US have been peaceful, a new  report finds - CNN

How counter-publics enact change, when we consider history on a large scale, has stayed pretty similar, at its core. The counter public must become so visible that the main public sphere has to eventually pay attention, or the routine of the main public sphere becomes interrupted. In the past, women’s right to vote, workers union rights, have included taking to streets, boycotting and striking so that the lawmakers and business workers must pay attention. But the information revolution has changed how we communicate forever, and as a result counter-publics must rely on both digital and in-person actions and demonstrations to evoke change.

Ferguson demonstrators chanting 'killer cops' use mirrored coffin to make a  statement ahead of weekend of protests | Daily Mail Online

Let us examine the Black Lives Matter movement, which is currently (and in the past) successfully mobilizing its efforts in both contexts. When we look at the protests, demonstrations, such as carrying a casket covered in mirrors in response of the killing of Michael Brown in 2014, they have garnered media attention for the physical movements. The benefit of these movements is that when they reach the news, they can become seen by people not aware or particularly caring of the issue. The drawback to this, however, is the media bias that exists and can significantly alter the core message, as well as choosing to show the small percentage of violence as opposed to an overwhelming peaceful and empathy-invoking majority. This applies to the echo chambers we referenced in weeks past and show how these echo chambers can affect counter-publics and their ability to influence.

3 Reasons You Should Add Vlogging to Your Marketing Strategy | Inc.com

Additionally, we can also dive into the online influence that exists. When we think about accessibility to knowledge, we are atop a rising curve. Never before has information be easier to find. But when we consider the online media and how it helps to amplify counter-publics, it’s important to recognize the co-mingling of both commercial voices and individuals. As stated in the paper by Zizi Papacharissi, we understand that “Bloggers blog simply because they want to”. While commercial voices are first looking at themselves as a business, individuals have a deep connection to their material and that connection can allow for better reception of material. Blogging also comes in many forms, from posting opinions on Facebook and Instagram, vlogging on YouTube, or even running an opinion column in a prominent news source. The variety allows a wide audience to be reached, especially on a global scale. The personalization also allows members of counter-publics who are isolated geographically from other members to feel connected.

 

Without both these tools for counter-publics, they would not be able to accomplish their goals nearly as quickly. Today, both methods are vital for enacting real change, the goal of most counter-publics.

 

Works Cited:

 

Information Revolution. www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/information-revolution.

Papacharissi , Zizi. “The Virtual Sphere 2.0 : The Internet, the Public Sphere and Beyond.” Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics, by Andrew Chadwick and Philip N. Howard, Routledge, 2010.

Yoganathan PhD candidate in Communication Studies, Nimalan. “Black Lives Matter Movement Uses Creative Tactics to Confront Systemic Racism.” The Conversation, 12 Aug. 2020, theconversation.com/black-lives-matter-movement-uses-creative-tactics-to-confront-systemic-racism-143273.

 

 

 

TikTok: Filter Bubbles and the “Algorithm”

TikTok Glitch Mistaken for a Ban in the United States

Regardless of how involved in social media you are, there’s no denying the growing impact TikTok is having. Since its merge with Musical.ly in August 2018, it has become a worldwide phenomenon with over 800 million active users worldwide. With the creative freedom the app gives users, the content has no limits, from music and dancing to cooking, comedy videos, artsy montages, and of course, political content. And the impact that TikTok is having on politics is significant. Take, for example, how a few viral TikToks telling viewers to register for a Trump Rally and not show up resulted in large unfilled seats in the amphitheater and made national news.

 

http://https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wy1i2LXuraU

 

However, thanks to TikTok’s algorithm, there’s a good chance you’d have no idea this movement was even happening, even if you spend hours every day on the app. The TikTok algorithm is quite mysterious- no one knows exactly how it works- but it general it takes into account the videos you watch, interact with, the hashtags on those videos, your location, in addition to other factors. We see this reoccurring idea of filter bubbles, where different factors, controllable and uncontrollable, play a role in what content we see. But because TikTok so heavily relies on its “For You Page” or FYP, it allows what you see to be solely based on these filter bubbles, not people you follow. So, unlike Facebook, Instagram, or other social media channels, the majority of what content you see isn’t from people you know, but instead handpicked by the algorithm. Beyond this, the filter bubbles TikTok creates has led to some pretty alarming allegations- click here to read more.

Young people are talking politics on TikTok. Is this a good thing? - News @  Northeastern

From my own personal experience, I can see just how differently the TikTok FYP can be based on these filter bubbles. When talking to my very conservative friend and his girlfriend about what kind of politics that showed up on their TikToks, we all had vastly different answers. His TikTok’s were filled with very conservative creators and other creators making fun of Biden and liberals as a whole. His girlfriends feed was more mixed, with mostly conservative views but not exclusively, and often included conservatives “duetting” or essentially posting reactions to liberal posts. My posts definitely were more left focused, but still has a  mix of all political views. Even though we might see the same comedy vids, our political videos are vastly different, which speaks to just how receptive the algorithm is.

The Best Ways You Can Fight Teen Cell Phone Addiction

We already understand the dangers that filter bubbles possess; they allow us to not see balanced arguments, not fully understand certain situations, and mostly feed and foster our personal biases. But what does this mean for TikTok? The biggest thing to note is the demographic of TikTok users is much younger than other social media platforms. Young minds who are still figuring out their own political beliefs can be heavily swayed by content created on TikTok and create filter bubbles towards biases that they don’t even know they have. The content is also being created by kids who look like them, not politicians or parents, so kids and teens may be more apt to listen to political content on their FYP. It’s a risk TikTok is clearly willing to take but may give this one app huge political sway. Until the political filter bubbles TikTok creates are addressed by the company, we all must to our part to recognize them in our TikTok usage and understand just how they got there.

 

For more info check out these links:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/28/style/tiktok-teen-politics-gen-z.html

https://www.ft.com/content/c4c09793-993e-4ffd-9e46-2c609f98b79d