Hosting Aliens: Xenomorph or ET?

The word host has many connotations. In the general context, it refers to an individual who invites guests to a welcoming event, typically as a sign of goodwill and camaraderie. In the biological world, a host is an organism that harbors another organism. Oman-Reagan, in a recent article, speculates what extraterrestrial hospitality would entail. The forms of extraterrestrial intelligence he conjures are fairly benign. He starts with a human example of horrible hospitality: a small enclosure with the bare necessities of oxygen and intravenous nutrients. While perhaps extreme, it brings focus to what properties make a good host. He makes the point that if communicating across cultures for humans is difficult, communicating across species would be worse. Is a good host someone who provides your necessities, however minimal those may be, or is it someone who does this while adapting to a guest’s preferences?

Figure 1: Behold, E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial! Seen here wearing human attire so as to fit in. E.T. is largely benign and may be one of the lifeforms amenable to the treatment presented by Oman-Reagan. Source: “E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial“, Universal Pictures

Oman-Reagan goes on to provide examples of the quirks aliens may show, albeit these largely drawn on human experiences. He states “[m]aybe [a guest] only feel comfortable when accompanied by a companion of another species, but instead of a dog or cat it’s something vastly different, like a mollusk that emits clouds of fragrant, multicolored gas on specific cycles” to show extraterrestrial intelligence with human traits in an otherwise alien situation. Other speculations include the impropriety of eating with others and the use of psychedelic drugs. Oman-Reagan argues that the immense differences in lifespan, metabolism, composition, and other factors, might suggest “a simple sentence takes a human lifetime to communicate”. He emphasizes it will require the use of human inventions, including physics, art, and biology, along with patience, generosity, and imagination to converse with extraterrestrials.

Figure 2: Another example of an alien embracing a facet of humanity. Here a good guest, as per Oman-Reagan, would provide more alcohol.  Source: “American Dad”

This blogger agrees with the need for plenty of imagination and notes the apparent lack of imagination in Oman-Reagan’s article. If we assume extraterrestrial intelligence, then why does it have to share so many human qualities. There are various movies and games (i.e. Halo, Metroid, anything in Kirby) where aliens are not the most welcoming. While Oman-Reagan crafts an extraterrestrial like ET (Figure 1) or Roger (Figure 2), one amenable and accepting of humanity, he appears to have never watch any horror film concerning aliens. One in particular, the Xenomorph (Figure 3), would love for humans to generously host them and would show their appreciation when emerging through said host’s chest. To consider extraterrestrial hospitality also requires one to think of extraterrestrial rudeness and potential danger to humanity. While it certainly is comforting to apply anthropology and our understanding of human communication to extraterrestrials, if this view is as myopic as the one presented by Oman-Reagan, we may be in for a surprise.

Figure 3: It wants a host and I am sure no human would offer to be said host. Oman-Reagan appears to have no knowledge of the horrors parasitic aliens, such as the Xenomorph above, can bring. Source: “Alien: Covenant” 20th Century Fox

Would you like some ETea?

How do you welcome a stranger into your home? It can be an awkward experience, and how you greet them depends wholly on the cultural assumptions you make about them. In this conceptually unique (as far as I am aware) column by Oman-Reagan, we are invited to think about how the inevitable cultural differences between ourselves and visiting ETI would complicate relations and communications.

This paper is not directly related to SETI, but a reminder of how our human customs flavor how we think about possible future interactions with ETI. There are many assumptions we might inadvertently make about our visitors and these are absolutely critical to how well we will be able to communicate.

The column proposes several example scenarios that would render casual communication basically impossible. There are already many many dissimilarities between human cultures and one can have a lot of fun thinking about possible differences. Maybe ET’s way of greeting new friends is offering them a piece of their own appendage to be consumed or blowing some nice gasses that its biology produces at you.

One limitation of the column is its assumption that aliens have similar senses to ours. It seems reasonable that at the minimum, ETI will be able to sense at least some of the EM spectrum, but who knows if or how they directly sense nearby molecules (smell) or if they will have specialized organs for interpreting pressure waves in their surrounding media (hearing).

What SETI at Home thinks of METI

A couple weeks ago, I asked a friend what the point of SETI was if we were not sending messages ourselves. How can we expect other civilizations to be sending things we can find if we aren’t willing to do it?

I think my initial conjecture has several reasonable responses that were not initially clear to me, including that if ETI does exist, I highly doubt they will have motivations we can sufficiently understand to reliably predict their behavior, especially based on our own.

In a Statement Regarding METI (Messaging Extra Terrestrial Intelligence),  scientists at Berkeley running the world’s leading SETI program declare a stern condemnation of METI efforts, mostly by employing logical arguments directly against several common METI sentiments. Sharing sentiments similar to other leading minds like Carl Sagan, Stephen Hawking, and Sean Carroll*, they argue that we cannot understand how ETI (who are statistically certain to be much more technologically advanced) will react to our message.

Apparently, a common argument for METI is that SETI obviously hasn’t found anything yet, so we need to try other methods. Maybe we are so used to seeing rapid (decade-timescale) progress in our scientific fields that it feels like SETI not finding anything means that they are doing something inherently wrong. SETI is peculiar as a field in that, at some level, no matter how many resources we throw at it (not that we have been throwing much at it), we could still find absolutely nothing. And that would be progress! It feels like a fundamental misunderstanding to say that we haven’t been listening well, so have to try talking.

Also, the argument that sufficiently advanced ETI would have already seen our early radio emissions, or atmospheric so METI wouldn’t make anything worse is a peculiar point to try to stand behind, considering it seems to invalidate the need for METI at all.

Interestingly their final argument is very political in that they do not want METI to cause dissension in the ranks of SETI leading to a future lack of funding. It is illustrative to see such a point spelled out so directly and publicly.

*Serious side note, no matter how many famous people believe something, that does not mean that you should blindly agree with them #bandwagon. It is important to remember that your thoughts and conclusions should be your own, especially when trying to convince others.