Unit 2 Assignment

Shannon Greenbaum

137H

Unit 2 Assignment

11 October 2013

Red White and Blue HOPE

Copyright infringements aside, the iconic “HOPE” poster of Barak Obama became an overnight sensation hours after its first printing. The image, which every politically interested person has seen, quickly morphed from a simple sketch, to a viral sensation and one of the Obama 2008 campaign’s most popular propaganda. How was a poster with only the emblazoned head of Obama thoughtfully looking off into the distance and one word emblazoned at the bottom able to create such a stir in a society that is known for its appreciation of details and that is constantly bombarded with political campaign slogans? Simple. The posters color scheme,  use of certain styling techniques, a simple one word logo was able to convey the rhetorical appeal President Obama to a skeptical audience.

The style of Obama’s “HOPE” poster is a peek into modern culture that artists have been trying to emulate for years. In todays fast pace society, simplicity is ingenuity. The particular style of the “HOPE” poster encompasses everything from color scheme to facial expression and posture. A good advertisement is one that conveys an entire message in one glance. In the “skater” image of Obama, he is printed only in red, white and blue, almost color scheme and block shadowing meant for a comic strip. Fairley’s three color scheme used in the poster, manage to draw the attention of the audience as well as convey a form of bipartisan government with only a single glace at the poster. By mixing red (the color traditionally used to represent the Republican Party) and blue (the color traditionally used to represent the Democratic party) Fairley manages to allude to a president that will be willing to overcome stereotypes and cross party divides.  The white in the poster also gives it the traditional “American” appeal by using the nation’s colors of red, white and blue.  After the Obama campaign faced harsh criticism for Obama appearing “un-American” by the initial absence of an American flag on his lapel, and his supposed falsified birth certificate, the poster seemed to be a depiction of “100 percent Americanism.”

With racial profiling also proving to be a hot topic in the 2008 election, the color scheme of the “HOPE” poster, also seems shifts the focus away from skin color and back to real American values. The color of skin should not be playing a huge part of any election as long as American ideals, represented by the red, white and blue are displayed in both candidates.

Along with the poster’s color scheme, the stance and facial expression of Obama also was used to persuade the audience of his leadership and comically take a swipe at some of his critics. Seemingly modeled after a poster of Lenin, the poster takes a comical jab at critics who suggested that Obama was a socialist intent on pushing socialist policies through the US government. Although playful and clever, this subtle hint at opponents was overlooked and was part of an ineffective rhetoric as it only was overlooked and seen not as a joke but as a representation of a socialist Obama.

The three quarter head shot of Obama is similar to that seen with Lincoln on the five dollar bill and with another similar poster that was made for the Kennedy presidential campaign. Also similar, is Fairely’s use of hatching. Hatching, a technique which is basically composed of tiny lines that are used to add detail, is used in the “HOPE” poster to dispel Obama’s inexperience. By using the hatching on the outer border of the face, Fairley adds depth to the image with also seem to depict a depth in Obama’s experience with politics. No more is he a fresh faced newbie but an experienced and somewhat aged politician.

Although Fairley’s artistic devises are important in delivering the rhetoric associated with the “HOPE” poster, Obama’s posture and facial expression also factor in.  With Obama’s posture mirroring famous and popular politicians and presidents, the message is that Obama will only continue to achieve what those two great men did. Obama’s uplifted expression pensively gazing off into the distance seems to exclude leadership and a strength that would be necessary to lead the United States.

Although not an original design, Obama’s sunset pin logo that was incorporated into the poster, is also used to convince the audience of Obama’s electability. A sunset is a symbol typically viewed with a new beginning or a new start. After a turbulent and unpopular end to the Bush administration, both candidates in the 2008 election sought to be recognized as bringing a breath of fresh air into the government. Obama’s campaign effectively communicated that message with the slogan “Change You Can Believe In” as well as the use of the sunset symbol. In the shape of a circle, or an “O”, the symbol ads more Obama appeal to the already overflowing poster.

Finally, once again drawing on the idea that simplicity is ingenuity, Fairley was able to channel the entire meaning of the Obama campaign behind one word, “HOPE.” Of course, by using only one word, Fairley also leaves a little of the rhetorical interpretation up to his intended audience. Is the audience supposed to believe that Obama is the hope that we have been waiting for or that the audience is supposed to be hoping for something in particular. By making the audience think about the meaning of the one word logo, Fairley effectively made his advertisement stay in the mind of its’ audience. By using once word easily emblazoned across the bottom of the poster, HOPE also became interchangeable with words like “PROGESS” and “CHANGE” that was also expected to influence voters.

By using styling techniques such as color scheme, hatching and body positioning, Fairley was able to effectively able to downplay most criticism to Obama’s campaign and market Obama as a seasoned leader whose American values made him ready to be the next President of the United States. By using a simple, interchangeable one word logo, Fairley also was able to make the audience think about the Obama campaign’s message and make it more marketable. By combining all of these techniques in one modern day poster, the “HOPE” poster became one of the greatest rhetorical campaign advertisement to date.

 

2 thoughts on “Unit 2 Assignment

  1. Draft Workshop Questions for Paper 1
    Reader: Be sure to keep the guidelines for successful analysis sentences
    1. Identify the writer’s main claim about the rhetoric, ideology or and subtext of the piece.
    The writer’s main claim is that the poster that uses stylistic techniques to convince the audience of the rhetorical appeal of Obama.
    2. Identify and comment on the writer’s introduction of a context (rhetorical situation) for this piece of rhetoric (think of the Starbucks and Cheetos paper) Name one thing that might be added, deleted, changed, or moved.
    The introduction of the context was interesting and informative. I liked the fact that you used questions to make the audience think about the ad and analyze it themselves before you went into depth of the analysis. However, maybe you could have been a little more specific about the styling techniques? Styling techniques is a broad topic and can be interpreted many different ways. And also you could specific a little more about the rhetorical appeal like what type of rhetorical appeal. There just needs to be maybe a brief overview like a sentence or two that aids your thesis.
    3. Warning flags: check any of the following predominant themes this paper contains that might suggest a weak introduction or thesis:
    Advertising is everywhere___
    Ads try to persuade us___
    Life really isn’t like what the ad proclaims__
    Ads have many components__
    Ads are deceptive__ T
    The ad did a great job__
    The ad catches your eye__
    3. Find a strong analytical topic sentence and a weak one. Explain why you have identified them as such.
    “The style of Obama’s “HOPE” poster is a peek into modern culture that artists have been trying to emulate for years” is a great topic sentence. It gives the reader an overview of the topics you will be discussing in an informative and creative way, which i thought was really interesting. “The three quarter head shot of Obama is similar to that seen with Lincoln on the five dollar bill and with another similar poster that was made for the Kennedy presidential campaign” is a weaker topic sentence. It seems a little more direct, almost kind of like stating the obvious, but if you maybe somehow compared or contrasted the two, the sentence may be stronger.
    4. Comment on the organization of the piece. What other possible arrangement strategies might make more of the material and develop arguments more fully?
    The overall organization of the paper was easy to follow and flowed smoothly as you moved from one paragraph to the next. But it may be better to include a little more of a closing to your body paragraphs and maybe hint or refer to possible topic that you will be discussing next. I’m not sure if this works as well because the ideas may be too different to connect but it may help!
    5. You wanted to read more about….

    I wanted to read more about other artistic techniques that may have influenced the analysis of the ad. I think I was awesome that you did such an in-depth analysis of the colors of the ad, but maybe you could also talk about the size of the word “Hope” and its position on the paper or anything that may lend itself in the analysis of the ad. And also, your paragraph on racial profiling was very brief so maybe you could expand on that as well? Bu overall, it was definitely informative and nicely written!

  2. 1. The poster is appealing to the skeptical audience of Barak Obama

    2. The rhetorical situation is during Obama’s 2008 Presidential campaigns. Perhaps it would be effective to state that he is running for reelection, so he has already been under criticism for four years before this poster was released. This makes the poster seem even more powerful and meaningful.

    3. No red flags.

    4. “With racial profiling also proving to be a hot topic in the 2008 election, the color scheme of the “HOPE” poster, also seems shifts the focus away from skin color and back to real American values.” This is a great topic sentence because it discusses the importance of color in the poster, which was alluded to in the introduction.

    “The three quarter head shot of Obama is similar to that seen with Lincoln on the five dollar bill and with another similar poster that was made for the Kennedy presidential campaign” This topic sentence is weak because the significance of the similarity between the images is not articulated through the paragraph. Perhaps if you linked Lincoln’s image toward Obama’s development of depth in experience, it would fit better in the context.

    5. The piece is organized very well in a way that brings about fresh ideas frequently which keeps the reader interested throughout the duration of the work. It was effective comparing the art to what is considered an effective advertisement at first, and then delving into the specifics of the image. The interpretations become progressively more in-depth as the essay progresses, so it does not overwhelm the reader at first glance. Coming back to the power of simplicity was effective, although it might work better if you just have a larger section concerning simplicity, or wait until the final paragraph to come back to it.

    6. I want to read more about the rhetorical situation. Why exactly was this advertisement made and what impact did it have on society?

Leave a Reply