Author Archives: jaw5962

Do Video Games Cause Violence?

As more and more cases of major acts of violence occur — first the shooting at Columbine High School, then at Virginia Tech, then Sandy Hook, and far more in between — I become more and more interested as to why this stuff is happening. Being an 18 year old male, I am well acquainted with violent video games such as Call of Duty, Halo, and Grand Theft Auto. People my age play these games hours on end, and for some, it consumes their lives. This makes me wonder if there is any sort of causal connection between playing these outrageously violent games and violence the real world. Do these games cause people to commit real-world violence, or at least cause them to be more susceptible to such actions?

vid game violence pic.jpg

One study, conducted by Ohio State University professor, Brad Bushman, took 70 French university students and sat them down in a room. It was a single blind study where the students were told they would be participating in a study to measure the effects of video game brightness on visual perception, and that they would each be paid 10 euros a day for their efforts. This method allows the study to be more unbiased because the students will simply go about the experiment like they normally would, not knowing that the researchers are actually measuring aggressive behavior.
 The students were split into two equal groups, with each group being randomly assigned to play either a violent or non-violent game for 20 minutes a day for three days. After each session, students were told to write the ending of a random story. For example, in one story a driver crashes into the main character’s car and basically destroys it. The student is then supposed to write what happens when the main character confronts the other driver. Additionally, each student was told to play a computer game in which they had to respond to a visual cue faster than their opponent. The loser would receive an awful sounding noise that combined scratching nails on a chalkboard, dentist drills, and ambulance sirens. The winner was able to choose the intensity and length of these sounds. The results found that the students who played the violent games were more likely to write violent-related stories and give out more intensified and longer unpleasant sounds. 
Bushman concludes that exposure to violent video games can be positively linked to aggressive effect and physiological arousal. However, this study only proves the link of short-term behavior. Longitudinal studies must be done to prove that there is a causal effect between violent video games and long-term aggressive behavior. 
Although this study appeared to be very well done and conclusive, I am not yet convinced that video games cause aggressive behavior. There are just too many third variables that can skew the research, such as the chance that kids who play violent video games also watch violent television and movies. Who’s to say that the violent television isn’t leading to violent real life behavior? Additionally, reverse causation definitely needs to be considered on this topic. It only makes sense that people who are already violent in real life have more of a desire to play video games that allow them to continue to be violent. As british psychologist Guy Cumberbatch says referenced by this article from Live Science, “Finding that people who enjoy violent media may also be aggressive is tantamount to observing that those who play football also enjoy watching it on television.” What he is saying is that football players watch football because they enjoy the game of football, just as people who commit violence in the real world like to play violent video games because they enjoy the nature of violence. The article goes on to make another good point: While video games have become more violent over the last 20 years, violent crime has decreased significantly, with gun violence such as assaults, robberies, and sex crimes dropping 75% lower in 2011 than in 1933. 

violence decline pic.jpg
After researching this topic thoroughly, I have concluded that there is no doubt a correlation between violent video games and real world violence. However, correlation does not imply causation. Until there is conclusive evidence that these video games cause short and long term aggressive behavior and violence (which is nearly impossible considering the points I have made about third variables and reverse causation), I will not be convinced. So for now, Science 200, I say keep playing GTA5. Just don’t kill anybody. 
But enough of my opinion, what do you guys think? Have you been playing violent video games all your life and now consider yourself a violent person? Or has it had no effect whatsoever? It would be interesting to here how this topic has impacted you guys personally. 

Does Social Media Make us Happy or Unhappy?

As I sat in my bed and browsed Facebook on the last day of break and felt a surge of unhappiness enter my body, I began to wonder why it was that I was feeling sad. It occurred to me that maybe it was because instead of doing something productive such as working out, doing schoolwork, or spending time with my family and friends, I was surfing the endless realms of Facebook. However, isn’t the point of social media to connect us to other people and ultimately to make our lives better? This makes me wonder… Does social media cause people to be happy, or does it alienate us to the point where we are more unhappy?

study from the University of Michigan psychologist, Ethan Kross, argues the latter. Kross did his study through the process of experience-sampling — he texted his subjects five times a day for two week to measure the two components of subjective well-being: how people feel moment to moment, and how satisfied they are with their lives. The results showed negative outcomes on both spectrums. The more the subjects used Facebook the worse they felt the next time being texted. Similarly, the more they used Facebook over the whole two weeks the more dissatisfied they were with their lives over time. These results show, according to Kross, that although Facebook is supposed to fulfill our human need for social connection, instead it has negative impacts on our well-being. However, this study did have limitations such as the number of people (82 doesn’t quite represent a whole nation), and the time-length of the study being only two weeks. Had there been more participants and if the study was done for a longer period of time, it would be much more compelling. 
Another study lead by Hanna Krusnova, a researcher at the Humboldt University of Berlin, suggests that Facebook use increases jealousy in users. That is, the more time people spend browsing the site as opposed to posting content and interacting with other people, the more envious they felt. The study was broken down into two parts as responses of 584 Facebook users. Study one aimed at finding out the scale, scope, and nature of incidents involving envy in users while study two examined how passive browsing on Facebook (no interaction) leads to envious feelings which decrease life-satisfaction. Although this connection seems logical and the study covers a broad range of people, the details of how the study was completed are not stated (did they use a questionnaire, anecdotal reports, etc?). So it is hard to say if the study is 100 percent credible. 
On the other hand, a 2009 study by Sebastian Valenzuela and his colleagues suggests that Facebook makes us happier. After surveying 2,603 students across Texas, data showed a relationship between Facebook and increases in life satisfaction, social trust, and political participation. However, Valenzuela admits that the increases were small, indicating that the results may have not been all that significant. 
An experiment from the University of Missouri also connects Facebook with happiness. The study used a procedure called facial electromyography where 36 participants each had four electrodes attached to their face to record their responses while using Facebook. The results showed again that when the users were actively engaged, they were happy. But when they were just browsing the site, the positive effects diminished. Although this study matches well with the other studies I have mentioned, it is still hard to tell how credible it is. After all, the study only accounts for 36 people and doesn’t mention third variables such as the age and ethnicity of each participant. This information is important because different people think in different ways — a 13 year old may be completely satisfied with mindlessly browsing Facebook, while a 55 year old may find it very tedious.
Fb pic.jpg
So overall, it is very hard to prove that social media makes people happy or unhappy. Rather, it can be said that there is a positive correlation between the engagement one has with Facebook and being happy while on it. Vise versa, little interaction can be related to a rather unhappy effect from being on Facebook. I know at least for me this is true. When I get on Facebook for a reason (actually needing to contact someone, or posting something that means something to me) I find myself more happy. But when I just get on and refresh the feed over and over, or start creeping on other people’s photos, I find myself unhappy with what I’m doing and always wish I was somewhere else actually doing something productive. 
I’m sure the majority of you guys have Facebook and use it almost everyday. So, what do you guys think? Do you find yourself less happy when simply scrolling through the entire feed as opposed to continuously talking to people and making posts? 

Does Technology Make Us Lazy?

As I hopped on the Red Link to head back to East after class today, I realized how ridiculous it was that I was taking the bus rather than simply walking a couple blocks back to my room. Maybe it would have been justifiable if my destination was all the way across campus, or if it had been raining or chilly. But no, it was the picture perfect day – sun shining, not too hot and not too cold – and I was taking the damn bus (which honestly probably wasn’t even a quicker route to the dorm). At that moment, it came to my attention that what our parents and grandparents are telling us may just be true: Technology is making us lazy.

Whether it’s taking a bus instead of running or walking, using the remote control to switch the channel instead of doing it manually, playing the latest version of Madden instead of backyard football, or texting the comment wall rather than raising our hand to ask a question, technology may be causing our society to become lazy in all aspects of life. Now it’s all well and good to take advantage of opportunities, but when it begins to affect our health and mental well-being, it might be safe to say we have a problem. 

In a BBC News Article, Dr. Richard Weiler and Dr. Emmanuel Stamatakis argue that technology, such as energy-saving devices like remote controls, has lead humanity to an inactive lifestyle which poses risks to our health. The article goes on to quote the doctors saying, “Sedentary living is the most prevalent disease, biggest silent killer and greatest health threat facing developed countries.” Since we are spending more than three hours watching TV a day instead of doing something active in that timespan, humans are living very unhealthily, which is ultimately leading to shortened lives. This Review claims that in the last fifty years, up to 100,000 Americans lost their lives due to inactivity leading to some sort of condition such as heart disease, diabetes, colon cancer, etc. 

Based on the observation that inactivity has increased over the last 50 years, along with technology, I think there is definitely a correlation between the two. Although I do not have all the facts to make it a strong correlation, I think a rational person would concur that as technology increases, so does inactivity in people. It just makes sense that since most of us can agree we spend a good deal of time behind a computer or TV screen during our day, we are naturally more inactive than if we didn’t have this technology, or at least didn’t use it so often.

So, Science200, do you use a lot of technology? And if so, do you consider yourself inactive or lazy?

Tech&lazy.jpg

Why Do Humans Have to Sleep?

Upon collapsing on my bed after my first class today and realizing how tired I was – but knowing I still had two readings to do before my next class – I wondered why it felt SO necessary for me to sleep at that very moment. My agenda was packed of important things to do, and the only thing my mind was focused on was sleep. I questioned to myself: Why do our bodies insist we sleep when we constantly have more important things to do? In the crazy and busy world we live in, shouldn’t our bodies have adapted by now to require less or no sleep so we can be more productive citizens?
One of the earliest theories of why we sleep, according to This Harvard Article, suggests the opposite. Early on in the evolutionary period, humans adapted to be inactive during the night in order to protect ourselves from harm since without light and adequate shelter, we were much more vulnerable. This behavioral strategy eventually lead to what we now know as sleep. However, it has been thousands of years since this adaptation originated. Aren’t our bodies supposed to gradually adapt to the current conditions we live in? We live in an age where nearly every person lives in a somewhat protective shelter, and we all have access to light at any time. In addition, most of us have some sort of job – whether it be going to school, teaching a subject, trying to cure cancer, or selling weed – we all have shit we need to do everyday. Yet, time and time again we find our “to do list” cut short because we simply do not have enough time in the day to complete all of it. This probably correlates to the fact that 1/4 of our life is spent SLEEPING. Imagine how productive we could be if all this time we spend essentially doing nothing was eliminated. We would be the smartest generation ever, the cure to cancer would be discovered in no time, and every high school student would be satisfied with their necessary pot supply. 
However, according to NBC News, this notion of no sleep making us more productive is most likely incorrect as our body needs to rest in order to sustain our body’s energy supply. A good analogy I found the comparison of our body to a car: A car cannot run smoothly forever. Eventually something will need to be fixed or it will need its oil changed. If you just let it go naturally, while it still may run, it will be very choppy and less smooth. Our body works the same way. If we go too long without sleep, eventually it will catch up and we will simply not function to our best ability. So even though we may be getting more work done by powering through with no rest, in the end it will be much less productive as the quality of our work will turn out very poorly. Therefore, sleep is necessary for humans to be productive citizens. 
broken down car.jpg
 
Finally, the Science Channel explains that our minds are still processing information as we sleep. A good tip I have learned through a little bit of research is that studying before going to sleep is very productive, as our brain will review and reinforce the information as we’re sleeping. Remember this for the night of September 15th and you should be golden!

Why I Came Here

Ayy, Science 200.

My name is Jonny Wise. I’m from Lock Haven, a small town just 30 minutes from State College. I remember attending my first Penn State football game when I was just a little kid, probably around seven years old. It couldn’t have been a better game to see for my first time, as we were hosting arguably our biggest rival, Ohio State. I remember being very upset because I couldn’t see over all the taller people in front of me. Seeing my frustration, my dad lifted me up to see the rest of the stadium. It was like nothing I had ever seen. More than 100,000 people dressed in all white, rooting for their beloved team. All the sudden, I heard a mighty roar from the other side, “WE ARE!” I was very confused as to what this meant, but not for long… “PENN STATE!” My dad belted, along with 50,000 others from my side of the stands. I watched bewilderedly as the crowd continued to chant. Eventually the noise of these two sayings had overtaken me, and soon enough I had become part of it. 
We Are.jpg
This experience has stayed with me all this time, and definitely had a huge impact on my decision coming to Penn State. But other than the amazing football games, I have also realized all the other opportunities that this University has to offer, such as ThonAwesome ProfessorsGreat Networking Opportunities, etc. These opportunities and the overwhelming pride this school has is what ultimately lead me to come here. Although I could have went to my hometown college for free with a decent education, I chose Penn State because I wanted to expand my experiences. And with all these great opportunities and the diversity here, I knew PSU was the right choice. 
This class is the perfect example of what I wanted to get out of coming here. It offers a class I hate in a unique way – something I’ve never experienced before. Andrew has already made me realize that I don’t hate science, I just despise all the math and science-related work it takes to solve technical problems. This is why I could never be a science major. Luckily for me, however, Science 200 will not require me to do all the math and science work I dread, but rather it will require me to think critically about topics that I find very interesting. This is perfectly fine with me!