Civic Artifact Speech Reflection and Review

Usually, I have a pretty good grasp of how I did on an assignment before the grade comes back, but for this speech, I’m not too sure. I feel like I structured my analysis pretty nicely, as I went through them chronologically to establish a nice flow, and I went into detail about each component of my artifact and how it affected it rhetorically After listening to others’ speeches and comparing them to my own, I feel like my delivery could’ve been way better. I know that my delivery wasn’t that strong, as there were several awkward pauses, I used minimal hand gestures, and I could’ve used more eye contact. I feel like my speech also sounded slightly rushed and monotone throughout. If I could go back and change one thing about my entire speech, it would absolutely be my delivery. 

After listening to other speeches from my peers in the class, I found Benjamin’s speech “Bert The Turtle: The Illusion of Safety in the Nuclear Age” to be really well done. His introduction was extremely strong, as he used a very engaging voice, effective hand gestures and eye contact, which set a good tone for the rest of his speech. He was able to catch my attention from the very beginning, and hold it until the very end. He added lots of background information so that it was easier for the viewer to understand and follow along. His speech was articulated very well and structured in a way that made the entire thing flow with ease. I also really liked the visuals that he chose because it also aided the audience with staying engaged and it added to the overall performance of his entire speech.  

3 thoughts on “Civic Artifact Speech Reflection and Review

  1. Hamna Ahmad says:

    Sometimes we notice more things about ourselves than other people catch! I thought your delivery was great from my another viewer’s perspective. I also wrote about how Benjamin’s speech was effective too. You brought up a good point about how he added visuals for us to stay engaged.

  2. Karis Blagden says:

    I definitely relate to second-guessing your delivery, as I had the same issue while watching other speeches. I similarly think that more hand gestures would have enhanced my delivery and flow. Ben’s speech was amazing- I agree with your comment that he had an engaging voice and used visual aids well to add to his overall delivery.

  3. Madi Bowden says:

    I think we’re in the same boat. Delivery is a practice of speech that is severely underrated in terms of how difficult it is to construct a certain impact, if that makes sense. Hopefully with practice we’ll both be able to improve our delivery cannons of rhetoric for our upcoming TED Talks! I think a lot of it comes from confidence. Maybe we could “fake it till you make it”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *