Monthly Archives: September 2013

That’s $9 for a T-shirt… Or is there more?

On Sunday, September 22nd, I spent part of my afternoon at a field day event for Springfield, a THON organization. While there, two kids from one of the families we were raising money for came to visit us. One of them was a rather active little fellow who liked to cover his hands in paint and try to get paint all over our clothes. Some of us attempted to avoid this, while others simply accepted it and showed no attempted effort at evading him. I was one of the former but unfortunately did get paint on my T-shirt, which even worse was all white. Despite my desperate attempts at removing the stains, they did not come out, and I am currently left with a stained, mostly white T- shirt.

Due to the kid’s age, we avoided attempting to refrain him from attempting to dirty our clothing with paint. However, I thought more deeply about this and realized some startling truths. My T-shirt says on the inside back near the opening for the head and neck that it was made in Bangladesh. This reminded me of the devastating tragedy earlier this year on April 24th when a garment factory in Savar, Bangladesh collapsed and killed 1,129 people and injuring about 2,500. Many of the victims were young children struggling to earn a minuscule amount of money to help support themselves and their families, if they still had any. (If you’ve been living under a rock and have never heard about this, feel free to check out the Wikipedia article on the tragedy here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Savar_building_collapse.)

Obviously, little kids generally cannot grasp the huge implications regarding where the T-shirts that they stain fit within the global economy and community. They likely cannot fathom how kids just like them halfway across the world work in abysmal conditions every day of their lives to create a T-shirt that most Americans take for granted and do not think much about if they have to throw it away, It’s certainly a lot for a young kid to grasp all at once, and it most certainly is not comfortable material to think about. However, as adults, we can take the time to delve deeper into everyday incidents and explore the ever-abounding implications that they have that we ourselves likely could never have fathomed upon first examination. With this sort of mindset, we can become more globally aware of our surroundings and what tends to slip by in everyday life. Only then can we fully grasp the true magnitude and implications of what seems so mundane in our overly comfortable lives as middle class residents of the United States of America.

Unit #2 Rough Draft

On Monday, May 2nd, 2011, shortly after 1 am local time in Abbottabad, Pakistan, Al Qaeda leader and founder Osama bin Laden was killed by US Naval Special Warfare Development Group (also known as SEAL Team 6). The attack, codenamed “Operation Neptune Spear,” was coordinated by the CIA’s Special Activities Division and had an immediate international impact shortly after news of it promulgated. An overwhelming sense of patriotism swept over America, and closure arrived for those who had lost loved ones in the terrorist attacks on September 11th, 2001. The UN, NATO, EU, and numerous governments worldwide all held positive reception toward the event. Meanwhile, Al Qaeda pledged revenge against the US, and enemies of the US, such as Fidel Castro and head of Hamas Ismail Haniyeh, condemned the attack. Tensions rose in US relations with Pakistan since the SEALs was there without Pakistani authorization, and controversy arose over the fact that Osama was unarmed when he was killed. Also controversial was the lack of photographic or DNA evidence released to confirm Osama’s death, and many Pakistanis vehemently denied that the US had actually killed Osama.

At the center of all this, perhaps more so than ever, the man that everyone had questions for shortly after news of Osama’s death spread was Barack Obama. Obama knew that plenty of people would have questions for him after hearing of Osama’s death, and so he prepared a thoughtful speech to deliver on live TV for the American people, and to a lesser extent the rest of the world. He delivered this speech on Sunday, May 1st at 11:35 pm, about seven and a half hours after Osama died, in the East Room of the White House. His speech made effective use of ethos, pathos, and logos and helped him to make greater appeal to the American people and to the international community. Of course, Obama knew the importance of kairos very well upon delivering his speech, as he only waited a relatively short amount of time after Osama’s death before speaking about the event. This helped him to remain relevant and show shrewd acknowledgement of the importance of timing and opportunity in delivering a speech so that it would have maximum effect.

Obama starts off his speech with a very formal introduction that quickly helps to establish his ethos: “Good evening. Tonight, I can report to the American people and to the world, the United States has conducted an operation that killed Osama bin Laden, the leader of al Qaeda, and a terrorist who’s responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent men, women, and children.” While Obama had plenty of ethos to begin with since he was and still is President of the United States, even those of high status must take good care to present themselves in a way that does not tarnish their image, and Obama quick and concise introduction helps him to ensure such a thing.

Obama’s diction that includes the words “murder of thousands of innocent men, women, and children” shows that he is immediately ready to appeal to the audience through pathos. These words are meant to evoke a sense of sadness in listeners as they reflect upon the true scope and nature of what Osama caused while he was alive. He then goes on to gives descriptive and emotionally deep flashbacks of the events of 9-11 and even highlights the sadder implications of the attacks. He also makes good use of facts and figures here, helping to connect to the audience with logos, while simultaneously attempting to elicit emotions through pathos, perhaps a very tricky thing to do for inexperienced rhetors.

Obama next helps to establish a deeper connection with the American people by referring to himself and other Americans with the word “we” and describing in vivid detail how united we all were following 9-11. Obama follows this with a relatively lengthy description of the path that the US government took that eventually led to their success in killing Osama. While this part of the speech can be considered rather boring and dull, it does help him establish appeal through undeniable use of logos.

After some brief remarks on the impact of Osama’s death and how it by no means meant that the US’s war on terror was over, Obama then affirms his political correctness by pointing out the US’s innocuousness toward Muslims: “As we do, we must also reaffirm that the United States is not — and never will be — at war with Islam. I’ve made clear, just as President Bush did shortly after 9/11, that our war is not against Islam. Bin Laden was not a Muslim leader; he was a mass murderer of Muslims. Indeed, al Qaeda has slaughtered scores of Muslims in many countries, including our own. So his demise should be welcomed by all who believe in peace and human dignity.” He appeals to the international Muslim community here through logos by pointing out that Osama also was responsible for countless Muslim deaths, and as such, Muslims should feel a sense of relief from news of his death.

Obama then attempts to appeal to Pakistan through pathos by noting their mutual cooperation in the hunt for Osama and also pointing out that “Indeed, bin Laden had declared war against Pakistan as well, and ordered attacks against the Pakistani people.” He closes these remarks on Pakistan by describing his call to Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari and how it supposedly helped continue cordial relations between the US and Pakistan. All this also shows logos toward the American audience by showing that Obama thinks also of how others in the world, particularly those directly involved and/or impacted, might respond to the effects of his actions.

Obama next makes more attempts at connection through pathos with diction such as “senseless slaughter of our citizens” and “service, struggle, and sacrifice.” The alliteration in the latter example also shows his proficient knowledge and handling of the English language, further aiding his ethos. His pathos then takes the form of descriptions of the sadness he feels whenever he must interact with the family member of a 9-11 victim or a wounded soldier returning from active duty overseas in Iraq or Afghanistan.

After this, Obama helps reestablish a sense of unity among the American people with another set of “we” statements: “Yet as a country, we will never tolerate our security being threatened, nor stand idly by when our people have been killed. We will be relentless in defense of our citizens and our friends and allies. We will be true to the values that make us who we are. And on nights like this one, we can say to those families who have lost loved ones to al Qaeda’s terror: Justice has been done.” He then tries to connect through pathos to service members and all those who helped to make the mission success possible by giving them praise and reminding Americans to acknowledge their hard work and sacrifice.

Obama wraps up his speech with more pathos toward those deeply affected by 9-11 by remind them that the American people will always be standing right by their side and that we are all still one people here in the US. He ends on a positive note with a hopeful message about how much we can still achieve. His final words show attempt to connect to the deeply religious and/or patriotic: “Let us remember that we can do these things not just because of wealth or power, but because of who we are: one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

Thank you. May God bless you. And may God bless the United States of America.”

With much of the world’s attention suddenly shifted to the US and its role in the war on terror back on that fateful day in 2011, Obama had to carefully navigate through the dark waters of potentially devastating blunders when giving his speech that night. Fortunately, Obama is a skilled rhetor who knew what he was doing. The timeliness of his speech already showed his acumen in kairos and the particulars and implications of his speech showed his profound experience in making connections with his audience through ethos, pathos, and logos. While Osama’s death may now seem like a relatively distant memory that did not really have that much of a significant impact upon the world, Obama’s subsequent speech showed his great skill as a very capable rhetor and may live on to be as famous as speeches such as the Gettysburg Address or John F. Kennedy’s inauguration speech. Only time will tell how this well-planned and executed speech will be remembered, or forgotten, by this world.

 

My Bro T. rex

On Sunday, September 15th, at around 8 pm, I was chilling and eating dinner at Olive Garden with new friends whom I had just met earlier that very day. This was actually my very first time eating at Olive Garden, but that’s beside the point. While I was eating there, the Creedence Clearwater Revival song “Have You Ever Seen the Rain” (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xDGuyGPJ_JE) began playing over the PA system. This song brought back memories of summer for me, in this case one very particular memory. During the summer, I was working on a sketch of the large extinct dinosaur Yutyrannus huali (you can see my sketches here: http://sounder1995.blogspot.com/2013/08/yutyrannus-huali.htmlhttp://sounder1995.blogspot.com/2013/08/yutyrannus-huali_31.htmlhttp://sounder1995.blogspot.com/2013/08/yutyrannus-huali_3303.html), when out of nowhere the song popped into my head. When this happened, my mind had an unusual vision that featured me chilling in a cave with Yutyrannus 125 million years ago in a forest in late fall in China while the rain came down without end just outside the cave (hence the connection with the song).

While this vision might seem strange, it made me realize something: we are all so deeply connected in this world. While the tradition conservative model of us and non-avian dinosaurs is that we are separated by at least 65 million years of irreversible time, a newer vision has risen since the late 1960s. In reality, we are not as far from the non-avian dinosaurs as we once thought. If you travel back in time between 320 and 312 million years ago, our ancestors would have been exactly the same. As such, it comes to reason that the only thing separating us from the non-avian dinosaurs is 312 to 320 million years of REVERSIBLE changes to our DNA. While these changes are reversible, they are by no means easy to perform, even with all of our recent developments in genetic engineering. However, the point remains that we are far more closely tied to creatures like Tyrannosaurus rex than anyone could have imagined back in the day. In essence, we are merely distant cousins of magnificent extinct animals like Tyrannosaurus, and at least 312 million years ago, we would have all been siblings.

This realization gives you merely an inkling of an idea regarding how interconnected everything in the universe truly is. In addition to connections with the rest of life of Earth, we also share strong ties with the rest of the universe in both mundane and mind-blowing ways. For example, meteor impacts have sent small pieces of Moon debris into the Earth’s atmosphere for billions of years. Some of these small pieces of Moon debris might possibly have been inhaled at some point by organisms. As such, the next time you blow your nose, stop and wonder if maybe there’s a piece of the Moon in that tissue paper.

Possible Unit #2 Topics

Perhaps very cliche and expected in a rhetoric and civic life class, former US President John F. Kennedy’s inauguration address is a worthy speech is consider analyzing for rhetorical appeals. The speech’s most famous excerpt “Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country” has been forever burned into my mind due to the magic of 1961 color film and continuous references by those wishing to cite someone with ethos. The speech is directed to the American people in 1961, as evidenced by JFK’s direct reference to them in his speech. The speech appeals to the audience through ethos (JFK is President at the time after all), logos (Americans don’t want themselves to be blown up), and pathos (Americans fear nuclear war with the Soviet Union). Overall, it seems a very suitable choice for a rhetorical analysis essay. The exact words can be found in the link below;

http://www.bartleby.com/124/pres56.html

A speech significantly more recent, fresh, and relatable for us young college folks is incumbent President Barack Obama’s speech following the death of Osama bin Laden. I first heard small snippets of this speech while it was being delivered by Obama live on national television in May of 2011. The speech was directed to the American people in 2011, and to a lesser extent the rest of the world. The speech appeals to the audience to ethos (Obama is President after all), logos (Obama cites plenty of facts in this speech), and pathos (Obama’s diction shows that he’s trying to connect with Americans on a more personal and emotional level). Overall, it seems a very suitable choice for a rhetorical analysis essay. The exact words can be found in the link below:

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/asiapcf/05/02/bin.laden.announcement/index.html

Unit #1 Speech Outline (1st Draft)

http://securenation.wordpress.com/2010/06/08/military-ad-campaigns-why-the-marines-still-rule-madison-ave/

I. Intro- My credentials as a Scholar & why you should care (or choose not to), Ad-spamming.

II. Brief Description of Civic Engagement, Goals

III. How It Appeals

A. Ad spamming

B. Delivery (ethos)

C. SSDD… 40+ yrs later (ethos)

D. VIP

E. Sense of mystery (the man shown)

F. Simple

G. Appeal to young African American males

i. My own personal exp. with these ads

ii. racial issues highlighted

1. Tupac quote

H. You have a shot at greatness (commonplace)

IV. Likelihood of Success of Civic Engagement

A. Target audience probably not in SHC

i. Effect on less intellectually profound

1. Appeal to African Americans (pathos)

ii. Effect on more intellectual profound (Harvard)

B. Patriots and those influenced by war, 9-11, etc.

V. Effects of Civic Engagement

A. Stats (http://military.answers.com/military-recruiting/enlistment-statistics-for-the-five-branches-of-military)

B. Est. ethos

VI. Conclusion

A. Know your target audience

B. Est. your ethos

C. Marketing/PR/Propaganda/BS is everything

Trolling on Death Row

Hello, world! Does the world seem boring to you? Well, now’s the time to rethink that viewpoint. Way back in 2005, the late David Foster Wallace gave the commencement speech at Kenyon College. His speech starts off like this: “There are these two young fish swimming along, and they happen to meet an older fish swimming the other way, who nods at them and says, ‘Morning, boys! How’s the water?’ And the two young fish swim on for a bit, and then eventually one of them looks over at the other and goes, ‘What the hell is water?'” (Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CrOL-ydFMI) Sometimes, an interesting world lies all around you, but you’ve probably simply shoved your nose far too deep into Facebook (or at least gotten too used to everything around you) to notice. So why not take time out of your day to explore the more interesting aspects of this world?

For example, in September of 2011, Texas inmate on death row Lawrence Russell Brewer requested a gigantic last meal that consisted of two chicken fried steaks with gravy and sliced onions, a triple patty bacon cheeseburger, a cheese omelette with ground beef, tomatoes, onions, bell peppers, and jalapenos, a bowl of fried okra with ketchup, one pound of barbecued meat with half a loaf of white bread, three fajitas, a meat-lover’s pizza, one pint of bluebell ice cream, a slab of peanut butter fudge with crushed peanuts, and three root beers. When given all the food though, Brewer refused to eat any of it, claiming that he wasn’t hungry. Now Texas no longer offers those on death row a final meal. (Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jl-Va_R5vj4)

Did that story offer you even the slightest of entertainment (and hopefully some humor)? If so, you have just tasted an inkling of all the awesomeness that our wonderful universe has to offer. Finding this awesomeness while you’re on Facebook is going to be difficult, but thankfully, you live in the US (or at least I’m assuming the majority of my audience does), and as such can freely explore the awesomeness however you wish… unless of course you decide that you want to take a trip to Cuba. I suppose you can never have everything you want in this world. [SIGH.] By the time you die, we will still have never uncovered all the awesomeness that the universe has to offer us. However, on the bright side, that means that wonderful new surprises await humans for millennia, possibly even millions or billions of years, to come. Instead of feeling sad that you’ll never experience all of the awesome, go explore as much of it now while you still can (if you can somehow find a way to do so when you’re dead, I suggest you actuate your idea in the hopes of gaining a Nobel prize of some sort). If you’re looking for a place to start, this blog may be a suitable choice. Remember, kids: Don’t troll on social media; troll on death row!