Monthly Archives: March 2014

The Butterfly that Caused a Tornado

In the 2008 American fantasy drama film The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, eponymous protagonist Benjamin Button, voiced by the ever suave Brad Pitt, describes how due to one tiny event that spurs a whole chain reaction of further relatively small events, a main character ends up getting hurt by an automobile.

Curious_case_of_benjamin_button_ver3

Exactly what the event was escapes my mind (I think said character forgot her wallet or something similar to that), but whatever the event was, it provides a perfect example of something I think we all have felt before. One tiny little event becomes a metaphorical first domino in a line of dominos and snowballs until eventually something much larger happens. Unfortunately, I cannot think of an example of this from my own life off the top of my head right now, but I do remember it happening before, and perhaps you have had this sort of chain reaction play out in your own life at some point in the past.

There is a mathematical term for this chain reaction caused by a single seemingly insignificant event: the butterfly effect. The name originates from the possibility that the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Texas could cause a tornado in Brazil. After all, who knows what effect the air molecules moved by a butterfly’s wings might have on the whole global weather system as a whole? You might think that such a tiny breeze causing a tornado in an entirely different hemisphere is absurd, but think again.

Have you ever noticed that the weather reports are never truly one hundred percent accurate? Have you ever wondered why this is the case? Well, it’s simply, really. Weather is a very complicated phenomenon. It is so complicated in fact that in order to truly predict it with guaranteed accuracy, we have to know the position, velocity, and acceleration of every single air molecule in the world, as well as everything influencing those air molecules. However, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle states that we can never truly know both the position and velocity of any object with one hundred percent accuracy. The amount of uncertainty is inversely proportional to the size of the object. For example, for a baseball, we can reasonably calculate its position and velocity at any given time with negligible percent error. However, for something incredibly small such as an electron, the margin of error is so massive that we simply cannot know both its position and velocity at the same time. If we know one of these values, we cannot know the other one. As such, we can only really guess at where electrons are located inside an atom. This is why electrons are always drawn in science textbooks orbiting an atom’s nucleus in large clouds and not as individual particles.

Air molecules may not be as small as electrons, but they are still relatively small and still under the effect of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle and as such are inherently unpredictable. Because being able to predict the weather requires knowing so much information regarding every single air molecule in the world, weather forecasts are inherently always going to be inaccurate to some degree. They simply rely on too many variables to be predictable. This principle is known as chaos theory and applies to a whole host of other events and phenomena, such as coin tosses, the stock market, traffic, and pretty much anything you can think of in your day to day life. (This is why random stuff happens and causes you to be late to class)

Earlier this month, a few very lucky men and women remarked on how they had bought a ticket for Malaysia Airlines flight 370 (which now sits somewhere in the Indian Ocean) but were late or had missed their flight for some other reason. Similar situations occurred on September 11th, 2001. By a tiny chance event, these men and women were spared being part of a catastrophic tragedy. Though their circumstances may seem miraculous, they are not alone. We are all citizens of a world where the butterfly effect and chaos theory can cause unbelievably impossible events to happen, such as an entire plane disappearing into thin air. However, rather than let this fact terrify us, we should be in awe of it, for it can lead to good things too. For example, in 1971, American ping pong player Glenn Cowan missed his team bus in Nagoya, Japan. A Chinese ping pong player took notice and invited Cowan onto his own team bus. While inside the bus, Cowan met Chinese ping pong champion Zhuang Zedong.

Zhuang_Zedong_(1436472690)

(Zhuang Zedong in 2007)

When the two got off the bus, they were swarmed with reporters (remember that is still 1971, during the Cold War). Later, the US ping pong team received an invitation to visit China. Slowly, US-China relations were being built, and in 1972, late US president Richard Nixon finally visited China himself, formally establishing US-China diplomatic relations.

Nixon_Mao_1972-02-29

 

(Richard Nixon in China in 1972)

It might be a tiny event, but thanks to the wonders of the butterfly effect and chaos theory, a single American ping pong player missing his bus in Japan in 1971 is precisely the reason why I am here today studying at Penn State and how you are able to read this blog right now.

Works in Progress- Persuasion and Advocacy

A long, long time ago, I asked Kyle King exactly what the civic issues blogs were supposed to be and be about. During his explanation, Kyle briefly mentioned that the civic issues blogs may tie in later to a persuasion and advocacy unit. At that time, I was still a bit in the dark and hazy about what to write about for my civic issues blogs. Since winter break had just recently come to an end and all three films that I had seen during that time (Frozen, The Wolf of Wall Street, and Fight Club) were controversial in one way or another, I had decided to focus on the portrayal of controversial content (especially violence) in the arts (usually films and video games). This past Wednesday though, when the persuasion and advocacy unit finally came around, I realized that it may be difficult to develop my initial ideas for this particular unit, since it focuses on policy. Fortunately, as Kyle has noticed many times, I have a knack for coming up with unusual connections between very unlike concepts, and this time, it was no different.

My persuasion and advocacy project is likely going to focus on the protection of our first amendment rights, in particular both literal and metaphorical free speech. As I noted in my civic issues blog this week, such violations against free expression are common in other parts of the world. However, I am going to focus on violations right here in America, where unfortunately they go more unnoticed. Some examples include the following:

In the aftermath of 9-11, Americans were very galvanized for some form of revenge, even if they were not entirely sure where to vent their frustrations. George W. Bush decided to use Iraq as a target for this frustration, claiming that Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein had close ties and that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction even though the latter was not true, and Osama and Saddam hated each other. Journalists who tried to argue against possible action in Iraq were immediately fired, blackballed, and out of a job for prolonged periods of time. While I know that 9-11 can be touchy subject for many, I firmly denounce our actions in Iraq and believe that targeting those who argue against our unnecessary brutality in that country is simply wrong.

Voter ID laws that would require all voters to show photo identification is legislation strongly proposed by Republicans, who claim that they want to stop vote fraud. However, a lot of Democrats argue that this is a political move to limit Democrat power since minorities and the less wealthy tend to support Democrats but sometimes lack the resources for proper photo ID. Without photo ID, some of this nation’s poor and minorities will never have their voices heard.

As noted by Tupac Shakur, Jay-Z, Kanye West, and Quentin Tarantino, the modern drug laws in America, started by none other than Richard Nixon, focus more on putting African Americans behind bars rather than attempting to destroy the drug economy. In fact, more African American adults are currently behind bars than were enslaved in 1850 (The Civil War started in 1861. Source: http://rapgenius.com/Kanye-west-new-slaves-lyrics). When African Americans are behind bars, they lose not only their freedom but also their metaphorical voice.

Please let me know what you all think! Thanks! If anyone wants to work with me together on this (I will switch over to your topic if I can connect with it), please let me know.

First Amendment Rights Are for Losers

In light of the introduction of our persuasion and advocacy unit and its possible tie-ins with our civic issues blogs, I thought to myself, “How could I branch off from my civic issues blogs and use them as the springboard for persuasion and advocacy?” Of course, I had the choice of starting my project from scratch, but having already made some headway into the civic issues blogs and seeing some of my classmates rather passionate about expanding upon their civic issues blogs through persuasion and advocacy, I thought to myself, “There must be some way to tie this into my civic issues topic!” Unfortunately, as I read through the driving questions featured in my very first civic issues blog, I realized that a direct tie-in might be difficult. The persuasion and advocacy unit focuses on attempting to influence policy change, and that is not necessary for the US in regards to portrayal of controversial subject matter, since the US is one of the most liberal states in this field. However, there are plenty of other states that are far more restrictive on free expression in the arts, often to humorous and sometimes disturbing degrees. By looking at where first amendment rights in regards to free artistic expression have fallen elsewhere in the world, we can gain a better sense of how privileged we all are to live in the US and what dangers threatening our rights we should all be wary of.

 

One of the more egregious places where free expression is suppressed is China. Despite China being my birthplace, I find the country a rather despicable place to be in. The government has not loosened up that much since the days of Mao Zedong’s harsh rule. Restrictions on first amendment rights are rampant throughout the country. Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Blogspot, Change.org, and plenty of other such sites are all blocked. Artistic expression is also under tight control. In 2002, the computer strategy game Hearts of Iron (set in WWII), was banned since it depicted Tibet, Manchuria, and Sinkiang (all nowadays part of China) as independent states and depicted Taiwan under Japanese control (which is ironic since the island was under Japanese rule during WWII).

HeartsOfIronBox

In 2005, the absurdity of China’s censorship became even clearer when it banned a soccer computer game (Football Manager 2005) simply because it featured Tibet as a free country.

football manager 2005

That same year, China banned the American crime film The Departed simply because in the film, actor Jack Nicholson remarks (somewhat sarcastically) on the Chinese potentially nuking Taiwan.

Departed234

Jack_Nicholson.0920

(Jack Nicholson)

More recently, China just lifted a 14 year ban on all video game consoles, believing them to be deleterious to the country’s people. This is ironic considering that China helps build a lot of video game consoles, though this comes at quite a cost. In 2013, workers at a factory building Xboxes threatened protest via mass suicide if they were not given better working conditions (The factory already had suicide nets in place at the time. I unfortunately lost the link to this news story.).

 

The Middle East is another place of harsh censorship of free expression in the arts. Anything related to Pokemon at all was banned in Saudi Arabia 2001 due to “promoting Zionism and gambling.” The 2013 fighting video game Injustice: Gods Among Us was banned in the UAE simply due to having the word “god” in its title.

injustice

In both the UAE and Saudi Arabia, the 2007 shooter video game Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare was banned for depicting violence against Islamic soldiers.

Call_of_Duty_4_Modern_Warfare

Even more surprisingly, the UAE banned the 2012 shooter video game Spec Ops: The Line simply for depicting a post-catastrophe envisioning of Dubai.

Spec_Ops_The_Line_cover

In Iran, the 2011 shooter video game Battlefield 3 was banned for depicting violence against Iranian soldiers, and the 2007 American action film 300 was banned for negative depiction of the ancient Persian people (I will admit though that I found the film to be rather racist, especially given actual historical facts and circumstances regarding ancient Greece and Persia.).

Battlefield_3_Game_Cover

 

300poster

Perhaps most astoundingly of all, a multiplayer map (Favela) in the 2009 shooter video game Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 was temporarily removed and edited simply because it featured a picture frame with the words “Allah is beautiful and He loves beauty” in Arabic.

Modern_Warfare_2_cover

The picture frame is located in a bathroom, and in Islam, saying anything about the faith in a bathroom is forbidden. Ironically, in a game where you can freely massacre innocent civilians in an airport, what raises controversy is Islamic praise on a picture frame in a bathroom. Also, in Modern Warfare 2, the player is given evil American enemies to kill. Strangely though, no one in the US ever got riled up over depiction of violence against American soldiers. Overall, it appears that Western depictions of Islam and anything negative and/or violent regarding the Middle East are highly frowned upon in the region.

 

Around the world, similar restrictions on free expression in the arts have always been occurring, especially recently. The 2009 American science fiction film District 9 was banned in Nigeria for supposedly being xenophobic and racist toward Nigerians.

DIST9_TSR_1SHT_3

Although Nigerian gangsters are common antagonists in the film, I personally hardly felt it was meant to disparage all Nigerians. The 2001 American comedy film Zoolander was banned in Malaysia due to its depictions of the country’s poverty and sweatshops.

zoolander

In Indonesia, the 1993 American historical drama film Schindler’s List is banned simply for being sympathetic toward Jews.

Schindler's_List_movie

The 2008 American action film Rambo is banned in Myanmar due to negative portrayal of Burmese soldiers.

Rambowallpaperkr8

Ironically, the film is praised by those in opposition to Myanmar’s oppressive military, a fact that director and lead actor Sylvester Stallone personally remarked upon positively.

Sylvester_Stallone_2012

 

(Sylvester Stallone)

In Russia, the 2006 American comedy film Borat is banned simply for being “offensive,” and the 2007 American biography film Charlie Wilson’s War is also banned for depicting Soviet brutality during the Soviet Union’s occupation of Afghanistan.

Borat_ver2

 

Charliewilsonwarposter

In Samoa, the 2008 American biography film Milk, which depicts the life and assassination of gays rights advocate Harvey Milk, is banned due to the country’s homophobia.

Milkposter08

In Ukraine, the 2005 American horror film Hostel is banned for depicting Eastern Europe as a hotspot for abductions and subsequent financially inspired torture and murder.

Hostel_poster

The 2009 British comedy film Bruno is also banned there for homosexual themes.

BRU_Teaser1-Sheet_14F (Page 1)

In Kenya, playwright Ngugi wa Thiong’o was imprisoned for over a year due to his plays addressing the dark side of the Kenyan regime.

Ngugi

 

(Ngugi wa Thiong’o)

Finally, on a slightly more frivolous note, the 2012 American adventure film The Hunger Games is banned in Vietnam for “excessive violence.”

HungerGamesPoster

 

 

Every once in a while, some form of free expression in the arts arouses controversy here in the US. While some Americans, including myself, may find it a bit ridiculous at times how sensitive people can be, it is important to remember that we live in a very free and liberal country when it comes to our first amendment rights. In a lot of other countries, the government controls all, and anything that it does not like will be banned, even for the most seemingly stupid and pathetic of reasons. This censorship highlights the excessive nationalism, homophobia, religious intolerance, and paranoia that plague too many world leaders. While some may claim that such extreme governance is limited to dictatorships, I warn against such dismissal of the threat. Here in the US, the government has done plenty of controversial things in the past and will likely continue to do so as long as the US is a functioning state. While it has so far done little to repress first amendment rights, we must always be wary of the possibility of further censorship while reminding ourselves how blessed we all truly are to live in a country where free expression can be a real thing.

Sources:

http://www.smosh.com/smosh-pit/articles/weird-reasons-video-games-were-banned-around-world

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearts_of_Iron

http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/Call_of_Duty_4:_Modern_Warfare#Trivia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spec_Ops:_The_Line#Regional_ban

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_surrounding_Call_of_Duty:_Modern_Warfare_2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_banned_films

Theatre in Your Life: Second Edition – Robert Barton and Annie McGregor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ng%C5%A9g%C4%A9_wa_Thiong’o