Ted Talk Reflection

Overall, I think my Ted Talk speech went well. I stayed within the time limit and did not forget anything I had wanted to say on the topic of the acceptance of transgender athletes throughout time. Feedback I received told me that I looked towards my slides too often, so in the future I need to focus my attention more on the audience. I also need to do better with slowing my speed of talking down. I knew the information I wanted to present and by slowing down, I can more clearly get my point across and it would be easier to follow. I think it would also be better if I added more slides as it would allow the audience to follow along with each new point, person, or idea added to the speech. I feel as if I got caught up in the ideas I wanted to share with everyone, and lost sight of my thesis and in order to avoid this, I know I need to consciously and verbally connect each additional idea or point back.

  • extension given for history of a controversy work plan until the Monday after Thanksgiving break

Evolving Ideas Sources

evolving ideas around the stigma of mental health

How America’s Mental Health System Evolved

  • 18th century up to 1900s, individuals with mental health issues were primarily turned towards insane asylums or overcrowded hospitals with overworked staff and terrible conditions
  • mental health issues = crazy ; it’s not a disease or treatable, it is detrimental

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3640229/#:~:text=Frontal%20lobotomy%20was%20developed%20in,of%20effective%20treatment%20were%20available

  • “Frontal lobotomy was developed in the 1930s for the treatment of mental illness and to solve the pressing problem of overcrowding in mental institutions in an era when no other forms of effective treatment were available.”
  • real research was not done, people just wanted it out of sight out of mind
  • its a physical problem with someone

https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/rural-schools-take-mental-health-crisis?utm_medium=paid-search&utm_source=google&utm_campaign=editoral_alwayson&utm_content=&ms=ads-octcoverstory-se&gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjw-eKpBhAbEiwAqFL0mmnmKKR9IWpy6y0xxaH8vPfgW-4SFVMHRI-CWPprIWPKIZTiwtb2eRoCssUQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds

  • 2023 – kids are to be taken seriously too
  • students spoke to the board, but decided there was no room in budget for mental health support and instead it puts more onto teachers

https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/nih-almanac/national-institute-mental-health-nimh#:~:text=1946%E2%80%94P.L.%2079%2D487%2C,and%20treatment%20of%20psychiatric%20disorders.

  • 1946 – the National Mental Health Act, authorized the Surgeon General to improve the mental health of U.S. citizens through research into the causes, diagnosis, and treatment of psychiatric disorder
  • 2019 – more FDA approval for drugs that can aid in stopping depression, anxiety, adhd, etc

https://mhanational.org/issues/current-mental-health-legislation

  • current mental health legislation
  • it is not only situational, but also potentially genetic
  • can affect all ages and people

 

TED Talk and Paradigm Shifts

My idea: Attitude shifts towards law enforcement from 9/11 to 2023

Personally, I really like this speech as a whole, not even because it relates to my topic, but because the speaker himself feels empowered and truly believes what he is saying. In order to talk about shifts and changes in law enforcement, he starts by introducing himself as a preacher and as an officer. He talks about where, as a whole, policing was at when he started, and when he was getting ready to retire, and now after he stayed and made changes. He doesn’t use a powerpoint for his speech, but instead uses notes on a piece of paper, and the space he is in. He commands control of the audience with his voice and movements, as he is able to talk about the evolution of policing. On top of talking about the changes, he also talks about why he thinks they happened. This part specifically really supports and adds structure to his argument because he is giving a basis for it. My research for this topic could come from many different places, but I would like to focus on two main sources. First, I could gather information from law enforcement officials and how their perspectives, ideas, jobs, and opinions have evolved with the time. I could also look at a societal standpoint and how citizen’s views on law enforcement, the system, and the people have changed. Would I be allowed to get first hand opinions via interviews from current officers on the topic? My argument is not about what should or should not be done with law enforcement or what view is right, but more of a general con census of how people feel. I could also narrow down citizens as a whole into smaller groups such as minorities, age groups, or even occupations.

Paradigm Shift Brainstorm

Attitude towards law enforcement since 9/11 to George Floyd and 2023

  • Why is it a paradigm shift?
    • the big change here is from a society that praised and accepted law enforcement for their bravery and providing a safe environment for people and families to live in to one that bashed law enforcement due to bad media and wanted to defund the agencies
  • What background knowledge will be most necessary and relevant to your audience about this idea and its history?
    • examples of society supporting law enforcement vs examples when they didn’t and what led to each
    • whether the shift was gradual or immediate
  • Who are the key players in shaping this idea over time? What are some key moments and texts that changed how people understood this idea?
    • social media and mass technology had a huge impact in shaping this idea over time
    • Since 9/11 terrorist attacks, the need for increased counterterrorism and homeland security efforts at the Federal, State, and local levels has taken the spotlight in public safety efforts
    • heroism
    • George Floyd – 2020
    • police brutality protests
  • What makes this idea complicated? What might people misunderstand about this idea if they do not dig deeply into its history, context, or multiple meanings?
    • it’s complicated because it’s seen as both a political and social issue
    • “blue lives matter” flag is often misunderstood
    • there is a difference between bad people and a bad system
  • What does your audience have to learn from your analysis?
    • why there was a shift in beliefs
    • how quickly American culture and beliefs as a whole can change
    • was the the shift warranted
  • Where might future conversations about this idea be headed?
    • should law enforcement agencies continue to be funded or supported
    • what changes can be made to lead to a safer society

Acceptance of Homosexuality from 1900s to 2023

  • Why is it a paradigm shift?
    • homosexuality was shunned and disallowed in most places and is now widely accepted, within reason, and not seen as wrong by most
  • What background knowledge will be most necessary and relevant to your audience about this idea and its history?
    • define homosexuality vs LGBTQ as a whole
    • whether the shift was gradual or immediate
  • Who are the key players in shaping this idea over time? What are some key moments and texts that changed how people understood this idea?
    • social media and mass technology had a huge impact in shaping this idea over time
    • legalization of homosexual marriage
    • acceptance in day to day life (flags, parades, etc)
    • more people willing to come out as non-heterosexual
  • What makes this idea complicated? What might people misunderstand about this idea if they do not dig deeply into its history, context, or multiple meanings?
    • there is a supposed separation between church and state but the lines are often blurred
    • who should have a say in another person’s life?
    • when does an individual’s rights infringe on another?
  • What does your audience have to learn from your analysis?
    • why there was a shift in beliefs
    • how quickly American culture and beliefs as a whole can change
    • was the the shift warranted
  • Where might future conversations about this idea be headed?
    • why is there still a divide in the support for homosexuality

Mental illness stigma

  • Why is it a paradigm shift?
    • the big change here is from a society that neglected and ignored mental health as a whole and now it is seen as real and an illness
  • What background knowledge will be most necessary and relevant to your audience about this idea and its history?
    • disease vs illness
    • what it takes to define a mental illness
  • Who are the key players in shaping this idea over time? What are some key moments and texts that changed how people understood this idea?
    • DSM
    • social media and the internet
    • location in the country compared to beliefs on mental health
    • Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act
    • Affordable Care act
  • What makes this idea complicated? What might people misunderstand about this idea if they do not dig deeply into its history, context, or multiple meanings?
    • confidentiality
    • how do you prove mental health
    • there is a difference between acceptance and too much support
  • What does your audience have to learn from your analysis?
    • why there was a shift in beliefs
    • how quickly American culture and beliefs as a whole can change
    • was the the shift warranted
  • Where might future conversations about this idea be headed?
    • is enough being done to support mental health
    • where is a line drawn between using mental health as a reason for something and it being an excuse

Speech Comments

Hannah – The thesis was how Homer wrote a hymn about the Gods to the Greek people in an effort to explain the reasons why the seasons change and weather occur, while staying within the culture. There were two main points with the first being about how Homer’s hymn was reenacted in plays in order to educate the children and unknowing about the Gods and their purposes. The second seemed to be about the background of Homer’s play and how he was able to come up with the story. I learned how before Homer’s writing, the story was only given verbally. The overall speech was slightly hard to follow and disjointed at some times, but Hannah did a great job at informing her audience about the importance of the Gods to the Greek and their connection to daily life.

Ian – The thesis was that throughout the Great Depression, the ad for cigarettes acted as an escape for everyday life and allowed people to dream about their futures to come through a connection with those in the ad. The main points were analyzing text on the ad, looking at the imagery on the ad with the people and colors, and the overall message. I learned what a huge past time baseball was in the 30s and how it grew due to the culture at the time. He did well with his delivery of the speech and explanation of each main point, as well as keeping the audience engaged throughout.

Tan – The thesis was how King used logos, pathos and ethos alongside close textual analysis to fight structural and social inequalities. The three main points were pathos and the universal belief in justice, ethos and credibility with a call for change, and logos as King imagines a better future. I learned how King’s speech was more directed at the activist’s themselves than the surrounding population that did not support the movement. I liked her confidence when speaking as she seemed well informed and prepared on her topic.

Rhetorical Analysis Essay Draft

Introduction

The Lorax, written in 1971 and made into a film in 2005, is one of a child’s first exposures to environmentalism and the impacts of humans. It acts as a cautionary tale to warn others what is to come if changes are not to be made. Before Dr. Seuss wrote the Lorax, he wrote Horton Hears a Who in 1954 in an attempt to teach children that no matter what you look like, how big or small you are, or where you’re from, you have a say in your own life. The two are connected as they are both works by Dr. Seuss that address topics which he believes are overlooked. On one hand you have a book about a political issue such as global warming and deforestation, and on the other you have a societal issue such as hatred and discrimination. Both texts are two forms of advertisement meant to introduce humans to the issues being ignored, while also spreading the conversation about unconventional ways to inform people. Proceeding will be a deep dive into the rhetorical situation surrounding each artifact including the exigence, audience and constraints as well as an analysis of each and how they intend to get their main points across to said audience.

 

Historical Context of The Lorax

Following the deforestation of the Pacific Northwest in the 1960s, there was a wide variety of responses in an effort to enact change. The Forest Management branch of the US Department of Agriculture Forest Service passed an act increasing the annual allowable cut in natural forests which meant harvests reached an all time high and conservation reached an all time low. This, alongside raising global temperatures, meant species habitats and eventually their reproduction were harmed. One of the responses to this was Dr. Seuss with the book The Lorax. Here, a family friendly approach was taken in order to blatantly point out that in response to receiving oxygen, water, habitat and food from the earth, humanity is consumed with greed and acts only to improve their lifestyle instead of continuing a symbiotic relationship. To address this issue, Seuss directed his book not only towards the parents reading to their kids, but also the kids themselves. Children are naturally curious individuals who thrive off of questioning why or why not and by asking questions pertaining to the book’s topic. When questions arise, it is parents who have to think about them and the answers, which entails them thinking about deforestation. Constraints for Seuss’ writing were having to approach climate change and pollution, a current political issue, while being gentle as the audience are children. He also had to find a creative way to introduce the topic as previous approaches to deforestation such as ads, graphics and statements were not working.

 

Analytical Framework of The Lorax

The topic is brought up in a comfortable way by a credible other who previously wrote about current issues in the world in order to build ethos. Horton Hears a Who written in 1954 about the powerless after World War II was one of the first signs of Seuss wanting to spark change in not only himself, but the human race. Then in the book The Lorax, Seuss states, “I will call you by Whisper-rna-Phone, for the secrets I tell are for your ears alone.” Here the author creates a sense of welcome to children where they can feel as if they’re learning a big secret that is purely between them. This scene builds trust to where a child as a listener, or parent as a reader, has their attention grabbed and curiosity peaked. From here, he can fabricate a story that has truth underlined. Then with pathos, through the emotion of seeing loss and devastation, Seuss attempts to build on that trust with feeling. The Onceler depicts a scene of lucious, green grass and ever growing forests, as seen in the illustrations and then describes a world overrun by greed, smog, and pollution “Now all that was left ‘neath the bad-smelling sky was my big empty factory… the Lorax… and I.” Suess created a storyline of how humans overran a functioning, healthy ecosystem, and if they allow their greed to take over, the only thing left will be themselves swallowed in sadness. Finally he depends on logos, but more specifically, the factual realization that the loss of the environment is happening in our world currently, to enact change in the present. One seed, one person, one stride can build to change the entire world at present. “UNLESS someone like you cares a whole lot, nothing is going to get better. It’s not.” This specific part of the text is supposed to be a realization to both children and their parents where they almost have an epiphany that action is needed now. The human race is on a path of extreme consumerism and advancement, but does not realize to what a heavy extent there is a negative impact being left behind. (carbon footprints, waste, pollution, factory emissions, etc).

 

Historical Context of Horton Hears a Who

In 1954, when Horton Hears a Who was written, Dr. Seuss formally dedicated the book to Mitsugi Nakamura. Nakamura was a Japanese educator who informed Seuss on the lasting effects of World War II, specifically those on Japanese children. It also demonstrated a change in heart by Seuss himself, as previously cartoons drawn by him were seen to be anti-Japanese and he wanted to represent that he was wrong. In order to do so, Horton Hears a Who was meant to demonstrate that every person should be viewed the same, and no one looked down upon or disadvantaged because of their differences. His goal was to send an overarching message of equality and acceptance. Seuss wrote his book mainly with the audience of young children in mind. Prejudice and discrimination are taught and manifested, not born, and in order to negate this, Suess writes directly at young kids to halt the problem before it can start. He hopes to implement the ideas that anyone can be anything and differences are not wrong. Some constraints to approaching this topic are obviously because of the timing and second audience of parents. This was written right after World War II when America had just put Japanese in internment camps as they were seen as a threat, and that idea of a race being a problem or threatening, took a while to disband. The people, and more specifically parents, who support discrimination either consciously or not, would censor what their children see which means the points may never get across. Instead, an approach where the real message was hidden had to be taken. 

 

Analytical Framework of Horton Hears a Who

In the same lens of textual and visual analysis, Seuss entrances readers with his views through his words and graphics. For ethos, he depicts a world where an elephant is enjoying life in his pond and then meets a small person, smaller than any he’d seen at all. Here Horton builds a relationship with the people of Whoville as he says, “ ‘You’re safe now. Don’t worry. I won’t let you down.’ ” These words don’t only build a relationship in the story, but also between the reader and author. A child can feel welcomed into the book and like that are also taken care of. Then Seuss utilizes pathos by describing the elephant’s relationship with those around him as rocky as no one believes him that these people exist on a tiny speck. “ ‘For almost two days you’ve run wild and insisted on chatting with persons who’ve never existed.” Seuss is able to create a world where just because a species may not look like the others at hand, it is disregarded and treated unfairly. The emotion Seuss hopes to bring out are both those for Horton, as he’s being seen as crazy, and the Who’s, who are seen as invisible and can be boiled. With logos, Seuss adds to the story by saying “A person’s a person, no matter how small” meaning that humans are humans and deserve to be treated well even if you see them as different or make assumptions about their overall population.

 

Discussion

While the main ideas of these artifacts are vastly different, the two are still comparable because they overlap in their delivery and audience. Seuss continuously uses children as his audience in order to channel his messages via them and the adults. While there could be belief that Seuss’ message is received in each of his books, there is still doubt as no remarkable change has been made. Most of the time, the deeper meaning behind his children’s books are overlooked or disregarded as they are purely seen as a source of entertainment or knowledge on the literary standpoint. 

Conclusion

Action still needs to be taken in regards to both topics about deforestation and environmentalism, as well as equality and fighting discrimination. Everywhere people turn, as one solution is found, a new problem is created. There may be solutions, or improvements, such as reusing materials via recycling, or solar energy, but bigger issues such as overconsumption and greed still exist and overpower any good. With discrimination, there are strides taken towards equality based on gender in the workforce and social media, but then it still exists when talking about sexual orientation or race.

Full Speech Outline

  1. Introduction
    1. I’m willing to bet that most people in this room, and even our generation, have read the book the Lorax, or seen the film adaptation, but have you ever looked at it for what it is past the cute characters and catchy lines or songs? 
    2. The book, the Lorax, written by Dr. Seuss in 1971 following the deforestation of the Pacific Northwest in the 60’s. Forest Management increased the annual allowable cut in natural forests which led to harvests reaching an all time high, and negative environmental impacts reaching a new high. The audience of this was of course the children reading it, but also the parents introducing it to their kids or previewing it. Constraints to Seuss were to create a kid friendly form of entertainment that still introduces the major issues ahead of us. It had to be filtered and modified, but still held true.
    3. Commonplaces: family, community, consumerism, pollution, deforestation
    4. The lens I will be using to analyze this book are logos, pathos and ethos through close text and visual analysis, and how each is employed or achieved.
    5. Seuss relies on the visual and written aspects of his text in order to bring awareness and warning to the generations to come by relying on ethos, pathos, and logos.
  2. Body 
    1. The topic is brought up in a comfortable way by a credible other who previously wrote about current issues in the world in order to build ethos.
      1. Horton Hears a Who – written in 1954 about the powerless after World War II
      2. “I will call you by Whisper-rna-Phone, for the secrets I tell are for your ears alone.”
        1. Here Seuss creates a sense of welcome to children where they can feel as if they’re learning a big secret that is purely between them. This scene builds trust to where a child as a listener, or parent as a reader, has their attention grabbed and curiosity peaked. From here, he can fabricate a story that has truth underlined.

 

  1. Pathos, through the emotion of seeing loss and devastation
    1. The Onceler depicts a scene of lucious, green grass and ever growing forests, as seen in the illustrations and then describes a world overrun by greed, smog, and pollution
    2. “Now all that was left ‘neath the bad-smelling sky was my big empty factory… the Lorax… and I.”
      1. Suess created a storyline of how humans overran a functioning, healthy ecosystem, and if they allow their greed to take over, the only thing left will be themselves swallowed in sadness

 

  1. Logos, the factual realization that the loss of the environment is happening in our world currently, to enact change in the present
    1. One seed, one person, one stride can build to change the entire world at present
    2. “UNLESS someone like you cares a whole lot, nothing is going to get better. It’s not”
      1. This specific part of the text is supposed to be a realization to both children and their parents where they almost have an epiphany that action is needed now. The human race is on a path of extreme consumerism and advancement, but does not realize to what a heavy extent there is a negative impact being left behind. (carbon footprints, waste, pollution, factory emissions, etc)
  1. Conclusion
    1. By drawing on the classic faults of humans by building their trust and getting their guard lowered, playing on emotions, and then hitting readers with a realization brings together a story that forces people to think about what they have read.
    2. The rhyming throughout and the idea of a little boy bringing big change can be cute and empowering, but when taken seriously, it shows an action plan we should look into seriously following. One step, one change, one move and everything could be different.

Rhetorical Analysis Essay Intro

The Lorax, written in 1971 and made into a film in 2005, is one of a child’s first exposures to environmentalism and the impacts of humans. It acts as a cautionary tale to warn others what is to come if change is not to be made. At the same time, another approach was taken to introducing humanity to the idea of pollution and aiding the ecosystem as it has aided us. The environment supplies humans with water, clean air, food, and raw materials, but in response, there is overconsumption and harm. This other approach is a deforestation ad put out in the 2000s in an attempt to force people to see the real issues of humanities development. The two are connected because they show the two sides taken to spread awareness. On one end you have a family friendly film meant to show everyone that there is an issue, and on the other end you have a poster that demonstrates, point blank, what is being ignored. The animals being harmed, the habitats being cut down, and the ozone layer deteriorating. Both the ad, and the film, are two forms of advertisement meant to introduce humans to the issues being ignored, while also spreading the conversation about unconventional ways to inform people. Proceeding will be a deep dive into the rhetorical situation surrounding each artifact including the exigence, audience and constraints as well as an analysis of each and how they intend to get their main points across to said audience.



Elevator Pitch Response

Paige’s elevator pitch about the Ford for men ad really intrigued me. She showed both a graphic and commercial that Ford Motors put out on international women’s day in order to talk about the commonplace of manliness and the misrepresentation of women in not only our society, but also specific workforces such as the motor force. The arrangement of the speech was done well as she introduced the artifact in an engaging way, explained when it was put out and then why, while also examining the intended audience. Specifically though, in my opinion, the best part of her pitch was not anything she said but what came out of it. Her speech excerpt led to a class discussion in which people argued about the commonplaces and lens used, and while parts of it did focus on the changes needed to be made on the pitch, it also showed exactly what the artifact was intended to do. Without realizing it, we as a group of people examined an artifact and one person’s opinion on it and then created our own and discussed the differences in how we interpreted the commonplaces, lens, audience and exigence. Overall, I think Paige did an amazing job with the criticism and pitch. The only thing I would change about the conversation would really be to delve into the commonplaces of manliness and safety in order to explain the points better and also further explain women’s representation. A lot of the conversation that was sparked was out of confusion and to avoid that, the best thing to do would be to add deeper analysis with better explanations. I would add saying that the artifact was not able to do what it was meant to. It did draw attention to the fact that women are underrepresented and under credited, but it did so without bringing any specific praise to women or gearing towards a specific change. Because of this, I would say the ad did not lead to an increase in women’s representation like it was meant to, but instead made Ford look good for a minute and then was overlooked.

Elevator Pitch – The Lorax

I would be willing to bet that most people in this room and our generation have seen the movie “the Lorax”, but have you ever looked at it for what it is past a cute movie with fun characters and catchy songs?

                          

  • Dr. Seuss was clever, but also blatantly obvious in his focus on the issues of deforestation and environmentalism when writing this story
  • Written in 1971, Seuss attempted to inform people about what happens if humans keep harming the environment (deforestation of the Pacific Northwest in the 60s) (can also be related to carbon footprint, pollution, consumerism, extinction)
  • Why would he put such a big idea in a kids movie? parents are the ones who watch the movies with their children and are able to read into the meaning and talk about it – implements the idea into kids minds so they will think about it later on
  • rainforest action network and Greenpeace looking to spread awareness and raise money towards environmental redevelopment
  • extinction of animal species and habitats specifically due to the fast paced effect of human life
  • imagine a world with no trees outside and green grass or flowing water
    • it is hard to imagine but it is the future and while it may not have a noticeable affect where you live now, it will eventually and human life will be inhabitable
    • “unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, nothing is going to get better. it’s not”
    • says a lot about our society and what it takes to get people’s attention when generic routes have failed

The Irony in “Get to the Point”

You hear it all the time whether it is in a conversation with friends or a debate situation or someone trying to influence others: “get to the point.” The more time moves on, the quicker we pace our lives, the less and less time it seems people have to spend on the things that matter. We were taught in the RCL class that in order to convince people to listen or meet others on their level or spread information, you have to talk to them. You have to preface the issue, address emotions and read the room. But, if your audience isn’t already interested, no one wants to hear your “persuading thoughts.” The irony in all of this though, people do get to the point and say what they mean, and yet still no one listens. Penn State, alongside the United Nations has 17 sustainability goals and one of them is quality education. When talking about quality education, it is more than just access to the internet and updated textbooks, but also about providing a place where a student can sit down to learn and be able to focus without fear. In America you have issues of gun violence and threats. In Afghanistan, girls are still prohibited to receive a higher education without retaliation. Worldwide, teachers are not treated equally nor are they cared for as they should be. In every single one of these instances, you have people get right to the point and speak up about what is happening. The response? There is still no change. After the Douglas High School shooting, the poster saying “protect lives not guns” held by young kids spread rapidly through rallies, social media and word of mouth. It became a focal point of the March for Lives movement in order to remind people that these victims were someone’s kid and loved one who had so much of a life left to live. This poster was able to not only get right to the point, but also draw attention to the issue with emotional connections. Millions of people are persuaded everyday by commonplaces and by others, yet there is still not much change. There is still not quality education worldwide. It seems as if when it comes to important issues, no one wants to step on each others toes or risk going against a precedent.