Coelacanth

This blog will feature an especially interesting species of ancient fish, the coelacanth. These are among the most primitive fish, originating hundreds of millions of years before the dinosaurs.

Coelacanth Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Coelacanth

Coelacanth are what is known as lobe-finned fish, which is a reference to their fins being attached to fleshy limbs each articulated using a single bone. It is almost like having an arm upon which the fins are then formed. This is most obvious in the tail and front/pectoral fins of the fish pictured above. That fat, wide structure that ends in a thin row of fins was a staple characteristic of ancient fish. It is believed that lobe-finned fish such as these eventually evolved into amphibians, reptiles, and eventually fully terrestrial quadrupeds. In essence, fish like this are the ancestor to all life on land.

Debatably the most incredible feature of the Coelacanth in particular is that it is still alive today.

Coelacanths | National Geographic
Coelacanth photographed off the coast of Africa

Fossil evidence suggested that this animal had gone extinct 80 million years ago, until 1938 when a Museum Curator in South Africa found a dead Coelacanth in a pile of by-catch from local fishing boats. Following this first sighting, more specimens were seen in outdoor fish markets, and between 1938 and the early 2,000s several populations of coelacanth were identified in the West Indian Ocean, along the Eastern and Southern coasts of Africa as well as in Indonesia.

Coelacanth | Smithsonian Ocean
ANother shot of the Coelacanth

Coelacanths live in underwater caverns, between 100 and 500 meters deep,typically near areas of volcanic activity. Areas such as this attract many other fish, cephalopods, and other aquatic animals which the coelacanth feeds on. It is an extremely primitive fish, so it relies on a form of feeding called passive drifting. This boils down to the fish swimming aimlessly and eating whatever it happens upon. More complex hunting behaviors are not likely due to the extremely small brain of the Coelacanth, which occupies only 1.5% of its brain cavity, the rest of which is filled with fat. It seems as though its only instincts as far as hunting are to identify what in its environment is edible, through smell or sight, and then to consume it.

Two species of Coelacanth have been identified so far, the Comoros Coelacanth and the Sulawesi Coelacanth, each named for the islands near which they have been found. The total population of Coelacanths remaining in the world is unknown, though it is estimated to be in the ballpark of 10,000, though the Comoros Coelacanths found near Africa are significantly more vulnerable, with an estimated remaining population of 500 or less. However, Coelacanths are more or less safe from fishing by humans, as their scales and flesh produce large amounts of oil and urea which give them a poor flavor and can cause sickness. They are still accidentally caught in nets, though this is infrequent due to their cave-dwelling behavior, and they will never be intentionally hunted.

ChinleaThese ancient fish are representative of a once incredibly diverse clade that was the dominant form of fish on the planet at one point, and can be considered living fossils. This is one of few animals I can think of that provides us living proof as to what animals looked like hundreds of millions of years ago, and is certainly the oldest example of this.

 

Sources:

https://www.britannica.com/animal/coelacanth

https://australian.museum/learn/animals/fishes/coelacanth-latimeria-chalumnae-smith-1939/

https://animals.net/coelacanth/

 

Issue brief first paragraph: reducing vegetable oils

As society evolves, we are constantly seeking improvements to the systems we have in place, and especially when it comes to our food. Making food healthier, cheaper, and able to sustain our constantly growing population is becoming a priority now more than ever, and one of the major crops people have begun to rely on for this is soy. On the surface, soy appears to be a miracle cure: it can be used for meat and dairy substitutes, animal feed, oil, and many other common products. Despite this, low crop yields and heavy reliance worldwide have made this crop a top agricultural contributor to deforestation, right behind palm oil and beef production. In our quest to make food cheap and scalable, we have neglected to make it sustainable.

While it may yet be impossible to shift entirely away from soy and other seed oils, due to the dependence of the animal agriculture industry on soy and other similar crops, there are ways that the impact of these crops can be slowed and mitigated for the future. On a more realistic individual level, reading ingredients in food and selectively avoiding those produced with certain seed oils and vegetable oils, especially soy and palm, can reduce the demand for these crops. On a larger, more impactful scale, modern food can be made more sustainable by implementing restrictions on the amounts of some ingredients in food, and the outright banning of others. A perfect place to start is with soy, the most space-inefficient and among the most widespread of modern mass-produced crops.

 

Sources:

https://www.epa.gov/emergency-response/vegetable-oils-and-animal-fats#:~:text=Destroy%20future%20and%20existing%20food,the%20environment%20for%20many%20years.

https://www.jeffnobbs.com/posts/the-environmental-impact-of-vegetable-oils

Vegetable oil spills hurt environment, too

 

Purussaurus

In this blog I will be highlighting debatably the largest and most impressive of the ancient crocodilians, the Purussaurus.

Purussaurus, The Prehistoric Predator More Powerful Than T.Rex

Purussaurus is actually a giant species of Caiman, which are crocodilians in the same family as alligators. Many species of caiman still exist today, but none that resemble this massive animal. The normal length for this species was likely around 35 feet long, with some specimens being estimated to be over 40 feet long and 18,000 pounds, making Purussaurus twice the length and weight of the largest modern crocodiles.

Comparison of the body size of a human with that of a Nile crocodile... |  Download Scientific Diagram
Size comparison between Purussaurus and Nile Crocodile
Purussaurus brasiliensis - ZooChat
Purussaurus Skull

The skull of this animal could be around 5 feet long on its own, and was also one of the most distinctive features of this animal when compared to similar species due to its shape.  The blocky, rounded skull and perfectly flat top of the head is not a feature seen in any modern crocodilians, though its vaguely similar to the rounded tips of alligator snouts.

 

This animal lived during the Miocene period, going extinct only 5 million years ago, in central South America, where most caiman still reside today. It was doubtlessly the top predator of its wetland ecosystem, preying on anything smaller than itself, including other crocodilians as well as the giant sloths which inhabited the same area. It had the strongest bite force of any four-legged animal so far known, able to produce over 15,000 pounds of force, which is about twice the bite force of a great white shark. It is also believed to be able to swim at the same speed as modern crocodiles, which is about 16 mph at full speed.

As is the case with any massive animal species, Purussaurus likely went extinct due to climate change. When the environment changes in a given ecosystem, smaller animals are able to move or adapt more easily if necessary, whereas larger animals such as this are immobile and much less adaptable to change as a result. This is probably why smaller crocodile species have survived since the age of the dinosaurs, while massive species such as Purussaurus are only around for relatively short periods of time. Larger animals also have much smaller population densities, so individual deaths have a much greater impact on the welfare of the entire species. This is why elephants are in such danger of extinction, because individual deaths can lead to an exponential decline in population.

How accurate is this. Not the size numbers. The sizes themselves. Was  purussaurus truly bigger than deinosuchus : r/Paleontology
A comparison of a few of the world’s ancient crocodilian species

One of the things I find most interesting about this species is that it was not especially unique, as there were many species in other time periods that closely rivaled its size. Crocodyliforms such as this have existed in an incredible range of variety throughout the history of the Earth, and modern alligators, caimans, gharials, and crocodiles represent a very narrow view of what once lived here. Purussaurus is merely the one I find most interesting, but there are have been many that walked on long legs like horses, ate only plants, or had whale-like mouths, and it is fascinating to me to think that if evolution had been slightly shifted in one way or the other, we could be coexisting with any one of them. It almost makes the crocodyliforms we know today seem boring by comparison.

 

Sources:

https://allthatsinteresting.com/purussaurus

Purussaurus

http://www.prehistoric-wildlife.com/species/p/purussaurus.html

 

 

Air Pollution

In my eyes, air pollution is a complicated issue to discuss. It is without a doubt the most substantial result of human activity, and perhaps the most difficult to reverse. However, there are several views one can assume concerning this issue. First is the idea that it is a real problem that can be realistically fixed. Second is the opposite, that this is hopeless and there is no point in trying to reverse it. Among others, there is also the view that human activity resulting in massive air pollution is simply another driver of the natural ways in which the world is always changing. Before exploring the moral discussion, I will lay out some background information on the problem itself.

Air pollution is mostly caused by the emission of carbon dioxide from machines and vehicles that burn fossil fuels, generating excess carbon in the atmosphere. Most obviously, this causes a reduction in air quality for people and animals, which is often toxic to breathe. Another major effect this has is forming greenhouse gases, which insulate the Earth’s atmosphere and cause the ambient temperature to rise as a result. This causes well-known events such as reduction of polar ice caps and rising sea levels, but the temperature rise can also disrupt weather patterns which result in more severe storms, drought, and other weather concerns. This in turn disrupts farming and the global supply chain, leading to poverty and hunger in many less developed countries.

An additional, though much less commonly known problem with increased carbon in the atmosphere, is the acidification of the ocean. Carbon dioxide in the air dissolves into the ocean which lowers the pH of the water, making it more acidic, and this is problematic to many smaller marine organisms which are very sensitive to chemical changes in their environment. This causes a domino effect up the food chain, harming every organism which relies on these micro organism, and the organisms that depend on those organisms, and so on. This decreasing health of the ocean affects people too, as we depend on the ocean for food and manufacturing materials.

Warming the oceans also makes it easier for algae to grow, which can then form massive blooms which can be toxic and release toxic gases into the air when washed up on land. These blooms floating on the surface themselves cause water to warm as well, promoting the growth of more algae in a sort of feedback loop.

The obvious remedy to this course of events is to substantially reduce carbon-emitting practices, but this solution is anything but simple. Transport of people and goods is entirely dependent upon burning gasoline, from airplanes to boats to the 1.5 billion cars in the world. Machines used in manufacturing also operate by burning fossil fuels. For electrical appliances and machines, electricity is most often derived from burning coal to power electrical generators, since this is cheaper than greener sources of energy.

Even in products designed to be “green,” such as lithium batteries in electric cars or wind turbines, generate massive carbon emissions while sourcing their materials and manufacturing them. Windmills, for example, require invasive and destructive mining to acquire the necessary metals, and those materials are then formed through the use of coal-burning blast furnaces. Though these are all still greener options than relying on fossil fuels for power, most countries lack the energy infrastructure to rely on them for more than a small portion of their power.

All of this discussion is disrupted by an odd moral dilemma: as humans, are we obligated to care at all?

For clarity’s sake, I am of the opinion that yes, it is our responsibility to reverse the damage we have caused to the best of our abilities. But arguments can be made to the contrary.

One misleading aspect of this issue is that it is so frequently called “climate change.” The changing of the climate is not in itself the problem, as the Earth’s climate is supposed to change and would be doing so without human interference. The problem lies within the rate at which the climate is currently changing. Human activities have caused global environmental conditions to change faster than life can adapt to it, which is leading to the current extinction rate being hypothesized to be 100-1,000 times higher than before human activity. It is being called a new mass extinction by many scientists.

However, this itself is also not necessarily unnatural. Mass extinctions have happened several times in the past, three of which happened within 200 million years of each other and the most recent of which occurred 65 million years ago. All of these occurred due to natural events. The Ordovician and Devonian mass extinctions were both due to the rapid cooling of the planet, the exact opposite of the problem that air pollution is causing today. It could be argued that as animals, human activity in generating air pollution is a natural factor causing this change and disrupting the natural way of things is useless.

In favor of a solution, however, one could argue that it is only reasonable to act in the best interest of the world upon which our species depends, and by doing this we would be acting in the best interest of our species. After all, humans are affected by air pollution and climate change just as the rest of the world is, the difference being that we have the tools to cope with it. The fact is, we recognize the harm we are causing, and although it will take a long time to do so, we have the intelligence and tools capable of reducing it, so there is no reason we shouldn’t. Maybe, the fact that something is natural or isn’t doesn’t matter, and what matters is that it could be better, both for us and for the rest of the planet. The knowledge that it is within our power to improve the quality of life across the globe is powerful, though we have yet to take full advantage of it.

Though I am in favor of the latter mindset, I do not want to persuade you in either direction. I find this to be a deeply layered and confusing, yet intriguing debate and only aim to provoke deeper consideration of it.

 

Sources:

https://www.epa.gov/nutrientpollution/climate-change-and-harmful-algal-blooms#:~:text=Warmer%20temperatures%20prevent%20water%20from,warmer%20and%20promoting%20more%20blooms.

https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/causes-effects-climate-change

https://www.forbes.com/sites/christopherhelman/2021/04/28/how-green-is-wind-power-really-a-new-report-tallies-up-the-carbon-cost-of-renewables/?sh=43516673cd9c

Species going extinct 1,000 times faster than in pre-human times, study finds

Late Devonian Extinctions

 

Livyatan Melvillei

For this blog I wanted to discuss an often overlooked variety of prehistoric animals, the whales. In my opinion, the most impressive animal of this group was Livyatan Melvillei, a toothed whale that rivaled sperm whales in size and appearance.

Freddy.Have.Faith on Twitter: "Livyatan melvillei #livyatan #livyatanmelvillei https://t.co/wIZqb6yhGe" / Twitter
lower size estimate of Livyatan Melvillei

Livyatan lived between 5 and 10 million years ago during the Miocene era. Remains have only been found in Peru near the Southern Pacific, but like most whales, these animals likely had a much wider range.

Gigantic Macroraptorial Sperm Whale Tooth (cf. Livyatan) from the Miocene of Orange County, California | bioRxiv
Far right tooth belongs to an orca, followed by a sperm whale tooth, and the last 4 belong to Livyatan

As said earlier, these whales strongly resembles sperm whales given their toothed jaws and bulbous head, but unlike their more gentle relatives, Livyatan was an apex predator of its time. Sperm whales have a thin and weak lower jaw, and no teeth on the upper jaw, limiting their diets to soft-bodied animals like squid. In contrast, Livyatan had a wider, robust mouth with massive teeth on the upper and lower jaws. Its relative jaw muscle size was comparable to that of killer whales of today, and had the largest teeth of any carnivore in history, at about the size of a two liter soda bottle. Their teeth were also densely packed and curved outwards to provide extra grip on struggling prey. They likely used these capabilities to feed on baleen whales.

Livyatan melvillei – biblical Leviathan? | DinoAnimals.com
Skull recreation displaying the curved teeth and depression which held the spermaceti and melon organs.

Given their predatory adaptations and their inherent intelligence as mammals, it is possible that Livyatan used hunting strategies similar to that of killer whales, such as tiring their prey out via direct pursuit and then drowning them once they were exhausted. With orcas, this is usually done in groups, but Livyatan’s size suggest it was possibly a solitary animal. It is also possible that they used their large melon (the big round part of their head) to ram prey, or struck from below to capture prey as great white sharks do. Livyatan also had a bulbous forehead, as mentioned and pictured before, which is a trait shared by sperm whales. Beluga whales look most similar to livyatan in this regard. This structure is made up of the melon and the spermaceti organs, which are used in echolocation, which was et another tool Livyatan had at its disposal while hunting.

Oftentimes, people draw comparisons between Livyatan and Megalodon (a giant shark) due to their similar size and predatory nature. There was a period of time in which both of these animals would have existed simultaneously, and it is therefore possible that they were in direct competition with one another. Megalodon would have possessed a stronger bite and was maybe 5 feet longer, but livyatan would have possessed superior speed and intelligence, so it is hard to say which of these animals would have been apex.

Megalodon and Livyatan size by SameerPrehistorica on DeviantArt
Megalodon and Livyatan size comparison

Overall, Livyatan Melvillei would have been an incredible animal to see alive, and comparing them with sperm whales, serve as an impressive example of how the food chain shifts over time.

Sources:

http://www.prehistoric-wildlife.com/species/l/livyatan.html

https://www.nyit.edu/medicine/livyatan_melvillei

https://carnivora.net/livyatan-melvillei-v-sperm-whale-t8891.html

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/behold-leviathan-the-sperm-whale-that-killed-other-whales