On June 5, 2013, the Guardian published the first of a series of stories that later became known as the NSA files. The stories revealed that the United States’ National Surveillance Agency has been intently monitoring the internet activity of foreigners, and even more surprisingly, its own citizens. Edward Snowden, an employee of the National Surveillance agency, announced himself as the source the information, and was quickly labeled as a traitor to the nation, getting his passport revoked, effectively stranding him in Russian customs.
However, Snowden is now in Russian Asylum, and though labelled by the United States government as a traitor, he is praised by many others as a hero, a protector of rights guaranteed by the United States constitution, such as protection from unwarranted search and seizure; rights that have been directly infringed upon by the National Surveillance
The scope of how much information the National Surveillance Agency collects about United States citizens is simply astounding. In the time it took me to research the information regarding this topic, the NSA gathered (according to Guardian) over 500 terabytes, or 500,000 gigabytes of data on users. To put that in perspective, that’s equivalent to the amount of space required to store 100,000 movies, which are data intensive files. With that amount of information being gathered in such a short period of time, it is quite obvious that the NSA is monitoring more then a select few “select persons of interest”.
Defenders of the NSA may counter this by saying that the NSA only follows individuals that may pose a threat to the United States. I counter this with the statements “Who determines what is categorized by a threat?”. We have a system of checks and balances in our government for a reason. The NSA on the other hand, is completely free to hyper-analyze anyone they deem “a possible threat”, with very little monitoring from other departments.
But if that wasn’t enough, the NSA’s method of gathering data is called the “Pattern of Life”, a detailed profile of the target and anyone associated with them. By associated, they mean “3 hops away”. In other words, if you have a friend who has a friend who has a friend that is a person of interest to the NSA, you are fair game to have your cell phone record, internet history, and emails recorded by the NSA. Considering that the average person has around 190 Facebook friends, three hops away means that one “person of interest” gives the NSA over a million individuals to probe for information.
The NSA attempts to underplay this massive intrusion into personal privacy with the stance “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear”. I counter this assertion with the following stance; Is it reasonable to search everyone, have access to extremely sensitive and personal data, just to make us a little safer?. How much freedom are we willing to give up to assure our safety?
I believe that is intrusion of privacy is a huge step out of the government’s jurisdiction. We already sacrifice enough of our freedom to assure our safety; “We are patted down and swiffed in airports across the country, an activity many an ordinary citizen finds humiliating. Why should we sacrifice our freedom of expression, speech, and thought, on a source of communication and information that is supposed to be unregulated and eye opening to all, all for this alleged protection we did not ask for?
I believe that if the National Surveillance Agency is allowed to continue with its current agenda, the internet as medium of expression, information, and free thought will be stifled. Individuals will think twice about going online to find a community they can relate to, knowing that a guy sitting behind a desk in the NSA headquarters can easily trace his online activity back to real life. Future whistleblowers that are crucial to keeping our government in line will think twice before posting their findings online, fearing it could be traced back to them and lead to an arduous life. Outlets like Tumblr and Reddit will become shadows of their current forms, their users terrified of expressing themselves in fear of it somehow being used against them. The NSA is essentially like Big Brother, always watching, causing you to act online a certain way, and as a result, think a certain way.
I value my nation. I appreciate the efforts our government, military troops stationed overseas, and National Guard go through to keep our nation safe from foreign harm. However, when you begin to violate the privacy of the very citizens you are supposed to protect, we have a problem. Our nation was founded on the ideas of free-thinkers, traitors, like Edward Snowden, who stepped up and challenged an oppressive government for the good of their people. Allowing the NSA to function at its current capacity would inhibit further free-thinkers from arising. We will no longer be a nation of innovation, but rather a nation of minds enslaved by the restrictions of the government. Who then will come when our government reaches the same state as the British government did centuries ago. As a result, I will not knowingly sacrifice my constitutional right of privacy and protection against unwarranted search and seizure. I will make whole hearted attempts to support anti-NSA legislation and whistleblowers like Edward Snowden, who take it upon themselves to assure government transparency. I urge you to consider doing the same.
Thank you for reading.
Sources:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/nov/01/snowden-nsa-files-surveillance-revelations-decoded#section/1
The Cool Gif up top: http://i.imgur.com/4BtLipY.gif