Multicultural Experience – A Class Divided (1985)

For my multicultural experience, I decided to watch the FRONTLINE documentary A Class Divided (1985).

Like my last multicultural experience, I never heard of this documentary before reading the lessons multicultural recommendations.  After watching the trailer, I was extremely interested because of the quote from teacher Jane Elliott, “I watched wonderful, thoughtful children, turn into nasty, vicious, discriminating little third graders” (A Class Divided, 1985).  In addition, I picked this documentary due to the subjects of discrimination and racism to better understand them and to benefit my own self, due to my innate bias scoring from earlier in the semester.

To provide a very brief summary of the FRONTLINE documentary, it highlights a class reunion in 1984 comprised of eleven of Jane Elliott’s former students.  Jane Elliott was their 3rd-grade teacher in Riceville, Iowa, and her exercise “blue/eyes, brown/eyes” forever changed their way of looking at people for who they are on the inside, not the outside.  Her exercise was influenced by a Sioux Indian prayer that says, “oh great spirit, keep me from ever judging a man until I have walked in his moccasins” (A Class Divided, 1985). Elliott, who always discussed racism and discrimination with her young students knows something extra must be done about the subjects in wake of the Martin Luther King assassination.  Even though she had always discussed race issues in her almost all white classroom, (Riceville, Iowa had a population of about 98% white), however, her messages fell flat.  Martin Luther King’s assassination in 1968, a student asking Mrs. Elliott, “why they killed a King last night”, along with the media coverage of the assassination motivated her to put an exercise into action.  She explains in the documentary by saying, “It was time to deal with this (racism/discrimination) in a concrete way, not just talk about it, because we had talked about racism since the first day of school but the shooting of Martin Luther King, who had been one of our heroes of in the month of February could not just be talked about and explained away” (A Class Divided, 1985).  In addition, “there was no way to explain this to little third graders in Riceville, Iowa, and as I listened to the white male commentators on TV the night before I was hearing things like, Who’s going to hold your people together?, as they interviewed black leaders, as if they were subhuman and someone was going to have to step in there and control them” (A Class Divided, 1985).  As stated above, her exercise was called, “blue eyes/brown eyes”, and its main objective was to create an unfair and divided classroom based on eye color, where the blue-eyed students would be superior for a day, and then the roles would be reversed the following day or so.  To easily distinguish the groups from each other, she had a different color eye group wear a collar.  After the groups were created, she would then train the groups.  Her exercise would then be featured in “The Eye of the Storm”, which aired in 1970, and was used in adult training sessions across all industries.  Featured in the documentary was the exercise in the Green Haven Correctional Facility, a maximum-security prison in Stormville, New York. I’ll explain the documentary in more detail as I discuss what I learned from it throughout the rest of the post.

 

Jane Elliott, from the documentary, A Class Divided, retrieved from FRONTLINE article, “An Unfinished Crusade: An Interview with Jane Elliott”

 

To explain the exercise and reactions in more detail, Jane Elliott would divide the class into groups based on eye color, and name an eye color, typically blue first, as the superior group.  She would then prime the students with messaging of why this group is better. For example, she would explain to the class how and why the blue-eyed individuals are smarter, more disciplined, and better behaved.  In addition, she allowed them to have privileges such as longer recess and second portions at lunchtime, all while the brown-eyed students were unable to play, sit, or associate with the blue-eyes.  In an extremely short time, the blue-eyed students would begin performing better in the classroom, while also treating the non-blue-eyed students differently.  In addition, the non-blue-eyed students, who the day before performed well, began performing poorly.  Once the roles were reversed, the brown-eyed students began performing exceptionally well, and the non-brown-eyed students performed poorly.  This response led to Elliott’s quote, “, “I watched wonderful, thoughtful children, turn into nasty, vicious, discriminating little third graders in 15 minutes” (A Class Divided, 1985).

 

She had assessments that she would track and year after year the results would be the same.  The students were tested on spelling, reading, and math, and as Elliott explains in the documentary, “Scores go up when the students are on top, down when they are on the bottom and then maintain a higher level for the rest of the year after the exercise.”  She then sent these results out to Stanford University for further study, which their analysis stated, “Children’s academic ability is being changed for the better in a 24 hour period that it isn’t possible, but it is happening, something very strange is happening to the children because suddenly they are finding out how really great they are and they are responding to what they know now they’re able to do, results consistent among 3rd graders” (A Class Divided, 1985).  In the end, the children learned that you cannot be prejudice against someone just for being different and that the actions of discrimination hurt individuals and create hostility.

Photo of Jane Elliott’s 3rd-grade class, retrieved from the documentary, “A Class Divided”

Also, this same exercise was put into action at the Green Haven Correctional Facility in Stormville, New York, which “minority groups account for more than 20%to help staff with their minority population” (A Class Divided, 1985). Elliott again segregated groups, this time with adults, by their eye color.  She gave brown-eyed individuals the advantages, throughout the exercise (chairs, paper, pencils, etc.), while forcing the blue-eyed individuals to wait outside while the meeting started, and often had the staff tell them to be quiet as they were interrupting the meeting.  Finally, Elliott allowed the blue-eyed individuals into the room, after training the brown-eyed individuals of all the negative characteristics blue-eyed people have.  She would consistently berate the blue-eyed people for chewing gum, being unprepared, being late, (even though she didn’t let them into the meeting until later).  This created hostility among the two groups, with one adult, in particular, getting into an argument with Elliott.  After the 1 hour and 30-minute session and a lunch break, everyone returned to discuss the exercise.  Many blue-eyed people agreed that they were frustrated, and felt hopeless, because “even when they tried to argue, the fact they were even arguing was used against them” (A Class Divide, 1985). In my opinion, the overall message showed the adults the dangers of both prejudice and abuse of power.

Key Takeaways:

The main takeaways from the documentary are how dangerous discrimination is and how it can be passed down generationally.  Also, I took away how impressionable children are when they are around a person they trust or look at as an authoritative figure.  During, the reunion parents were interviewed, and they discussed the impact of the exercise and how they carried that with them the rest of their lives and have passed the learning down to their children.  Just because their children are exposed to a world that treats non-white people as lesser beings, doesn’t mean that the children will continue the dysfunction.  On the flip side, people who were raised in an environment that enables discrimination and racism will be more likely to accept it as normal behavior and pass down discriminatory habits to their children.

In addition, the children trusted their teacher and looked up to her, so when she told them all the nasty things about brown-eyed people, they quickly believed it.  This caused blue-eyed children to become confident and feel secure while pushing the brown-eyed students down and make them feel worthless and hopeless.  Once Elliott explained that no matter what differences we have we are to be judged by who we are on the inside, not by an exterior color or trait.  The students responded extremely well which led to better test scores, and more importantly better human interaction skills in a time when discrimination was a cultural norm.

Hope you enjoyed reading, as much as I enjoyed watching the documentary and taking part in this experience!

 

Please feel free to comment and add to the discussion!

Sincerely,

Stephen Watts

@jaylee4515

#COMM837S19

 

6 thoughts on “Multicultural Experience – A Class Divided (1985)

  1. It is always shocking to see how much one person can negatively influence so many people, even if there is an understanding that these behaviors are wrong. In addition, this study shows how much surroundings and attitudes affect an individual’s actions. If there is negativity around us, we will become more negative.

    It’s surprising to see that the children did not carry on with these actions for the remainder of the school year. Seems that everything went back to normal without those collars, which is odd to me. It’s like the collars did more than the actual eye-color of the person.

    • Thank you for the comment! That was interesting to see those behaviors develop in such a short amount of time and then disappear in a short amount of time. You could tell that some of the children were extremely uncomfortable treating people the wrong way, but other’s that took it as an opportunity to get back at anyone who mistreated them in the past. It was a fascinating documentary because it also showed hostility in adults as well. People reacted differently based on their own personality, some becoming very argumentative. I don’t blame some for fighting back and resisting the bombardment of insults from the “superior” group, but collectively, not enough people rallied behind the few and the “inferior” group remained suppressed.
      Great point about the collars. They absolutely made people stand out and made them the specified target.

      Thank you again for the comment and added discussion!

      Sincerely,

      Stephen Watts

  2. I watched this one too and really thought the experiment was great. I wonder if you could ever get away with that in today’s over-regulated school system. It was a great reminder of how impressionable children are and how powerful our words are. What we say and do as adults, so heavily influences the next generation. I thought the test grades and the influence of how they were treated socially impacted their academics was also so important. This was a great reminder to me, to always tell my kids they are the wonderful, kind people you want them to become. They will live up to it!

    • Thank you for the comment! I’m glad we watched the same documentary.
      Great takeaway about the power of words and how things both negative and positive are passed to us and by us onto others as well.
      You bring up an excellent idea about incorporating this in schools. Maybe piggybacked on an anti-bullying initiative?

      Great discussion!

      Sincerely,

      Stephen Watts

  3. Stephen- Great in-depth analysis of the documentary and the studies. I watched this documentary multiple times during my undergraduate courses and experiences. Every time I watched, I couldn’t help but feel angry and upset for everyone involved. However, as you mentioned, the studies and findings the exercise provided were so valuable. How environment influences academic performance, how different groups react to certain treatments, how different people’s roles influence other’s actions, etc. It’s an interesting exercise and provides a great look at multi-cultural interactions and the importance of understanding other people’s experiences.

    • Thank you for your reply! I am happy you shared your thoughts as someone who has watched the documentary more than once. The environment in which someone is exposed too is so critical, like you said, especially to children. If they are given an opportunity to feel safe, protected, and empowered they excel. This study proves that children who are talked down too, bullied, and made to feel inferior really struggle. I appreciate your comment and insight!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *