Throughout the past decade with regard to television and film, diversity has become a key factor in a show’s success rate; across all platforms, diversity determines whether a show sinks or sails.
In this day and age, most of America is of mixed decent, that is, they are ethnically, religiously, politically varied. That being a common day truth, television today is very relateable. It’s very appealing when you are able to connect with the characters on screen and realize that what you once thought to be different has in fact become mainstream. This is exactly why, it very important to incorporate diverse casts. Studies show that “…more viewers were drawn to shows with ethnically diverse lead cast members and writers, while shows reflecting less diversity in their credits attracted smaller audiences”(https://newsroom.ucla.edu). This is very understandable, considering people gravitate toward things that are familiar, and sometimes it even serves as an opportunity to learn about things that are not familiar.
Aside from the aforementioned variations, gender has woven itself into the television world in a very big way. With the new gender recognitions, people from all walks of life are discovering things about themselves no one anticipated. According to ABC News there are currently 58 genders which is far more than the two we are accustomed to knowing. With transgender individuals coming out in great numbers, its seems to be an obligation to cast transgender actors or at least depict them with actors on television. In fact, producers themselves are held to a certain standard when it comes to the casting process. It is always important for them to cast a wide variety of people in order to represent the underrepresented. Shows like Modern Family, Orange Is the New Black, Black Mirror etc all have diverse casts that represent the ocean of diversity we have today.
To speak to the contrary, producers should not always be obligated to diversify their casts. The whole job of the producer is to execute his vision. He/She shouldn’t have to meet certain standards when it’s his/her movie. As it (diversifying the cast) does help with relateability and most likely ratings, it’s not always necessary. Sometimes doing this can make the film contrived in a sense. There are plenty of instances when producers can be more liberal in their casting choices but other circumstances prevent this. Historical depictions, reenactments, biographies are some of the few genres that call for very specific casts and inadvertently eliminate the opportunity for diversity. Bottom line, diversity shouldn’t be an obligation for the producers. They should be trusted to make their own choices for their final visions. This may help or hurt actors from every descent- that’s the industry.
In the current industry, minorities and women are greatly impacted. In Hollywood, “Despite the fact that minority groups make up nearly 40% of America’s population, they were underrepresented by nearly 2 to 1 as film leads, film directors and cable scripted leads. They were also underrepresented by more than 6 to 1 as broadcast scripted leads and 3 to 1 as the creators of broadcast scripted shows” (www.mic.com). While these are alarming statistics, diverse incorporations of said minorities and women in TV and film are on the rise. As a whole, everybody wins when there is a diverse cast; ratings go up, actors get more exposure, and more money is generated by all involved. It shouldn’t be an absolute obligation to diversify every cast, but it should be a major consideration, which I think it is. I believe producers are making a conscious effort to be more open-minded. Despite the alarming statistics, change is happening. Equal opportunity is happening for film and television. It may be a slow start but at least it has begun.
https://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/study-finds-that-tv-shows-with-248757