Forest for the Trees

Professor Howard B. Siegel, Ph.D., was a clinical psychologist who taught in the Department of Education at Baruch College, part of the City University of New York, in the latter half of the 20th century. Near the beginning of his career, in 1973, he published an article the Journal of Experimental Education that compared the effectiveness of “various mass media” in conveying a lesson in Gestalt theory to college students. Students in different conditions–some heard the lecture in a traditional classroom format, others received printed lectures notes, a third group watched it on video, and a fourth group listened to an audio recording–varied in terms of how well they did on a test of the material, both immediately after the lecture and in a follow-up test a few months later. The group with the printed notes did best and the audio group did the worst; the classroom and videotape groups fell in between, and each did about as well the other. “The general findings,” Siegel reported, “give no support to McLuhan’s theory that the medium is the message” (p. 68).

Did Siegel prove McLuhan wrong? Not exactly.

Continue reading “Forest for the Trees”

“Perfect! Delphic! Cryptic! Metaphorical! Epigrammatic!”: McLuhan as Scholar

Why bother with Marshall McLuhan? asks English professor Alan Jacobs in a journal called The New Atlantis, making the case both for his dismissal as a serious scholar of language, technology, and literature (friends like Neil Postman, Hugh Kenner, and Walter Ong do better scholarship in the same territory) and for his continued relevance to scholarship (he offers provocations that, handled correctly, continue to be valuable).

Continue reading ““Perfect! Delphic! Cryptic! Metaphorical! Epigrammatic!”: McLuhan as Scholar”