RSS Feed
  1. Long time, no me

    November 8, 2016 by Vicki Sloan Williams, Ph.D.

    Wow, it’s been a while since I posted. Been tied up in several projects assessing screen design the new Canvas LMS and a new videoconferencing system to replace Adobe Connect. Assessment has a new view here at Penn State, since we added a VP Office  for Assessment and Planning. Then, they added someone to oversee Learning Outcomes assessment and another for institutional data and assessment. It’s nice to watch it grow. I’d try switching into those offices if I weren’t so close to leaving.

    Anyway, there’s a Chronicle article today on  “Open Data Meets a Defining Test.”   Take a look at it at:

    http://www.chronicle.com/article/Open-Data-Meets-a-Defining/238250?cid=wc&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en&elqTrackId=2795cf13584b4234be6296c4dc9466ce&elq=4c4f04476e624f8fa21725da1a346c97&elqaid=11410&elqat=1&elqCampaignId=4448


  2. Research Today: ECAR survey of technology results are in

    July 14, 2015 by Vicki Sloan Williams, Ph.D.

    Picture of Vicki's smiling face

    I  recently received both the student and the faculty survey PSU data from the EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research (ECAR)  Surveys of Technology.  This year, we surveyed each campus separately so we could see better what is going on at the campuses, without  the obfuscation of University Park numbers. That is clearer, but makes for a lot more work with 24 individual datasets. We are in the process of analyzing the data, breaking it down by various demographic variables.

    We surveyed all the faculty and 20% of the undergraduate student population at each campus location.  If you want to know more, come see/email  me.


  3. Research Today: Harvard, Penn State Partner on Spatial Thinking Grant

    June 25, 2015 by Vicki Sloan Williams, Ph.D.

    We are constantly struggling with the question of how to help students think at a higher level. Here’s a research project from NSF that is close to home.

     

    Harvard, Penn State Partner on Spatial Thinking Grant

    Researchers from Harvard, Penn State’s College of Education and the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics have been awarded a $1.387 million grant from the National Science Foundation to develop labs designed to help middle school students understand spatial thinking in astronomy.

    Dubbed “Thinking Spatially about the Universe — A Physical and Virtual Laboratory for Middle School Science,” or ThinkSpace, the program will feature computer visualizations developed by educators at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics “using real astronomical data that will allow students to investigate important astronomical phenomena as well as designing lessons that support their ability to make sense of these phenomena through physical models and interaction with peers,” according to a news release.

    Julia Plummer, an associate professor in Penn State’s College of Education and co-principal investigator on the grant, will work on methods to analyze how students engaged in astronomy labs use spatial reasoning.

    “We are trying to understand the extent to which our labs can support students’ spatial thinking and thus we need methods to understand both the change in their spatial reasoning over time but also how they are reasoning in the moment — during the actual activities they are participating in that we have designed,” Plummer said in a prepared statement.

    ThinkSpace labs will aim to help students understand 3D astronomical phenomena such as moon phases and eclipses while supporting more general spatial abilities.

    Harvard Astronomer Alyssa Goodman is the principal investigator on the grant and Phil Sadler, science education researcher at the Smithsonian Institution Astrophysical Observatory is a second principal investigator.

     

    Read more at: http://campustechnology.com/articles/2015/06/23/harvard-penn-state-partner-on-spatial-thinking-grant.aspx


  4. Research Today: 6 in 10 Millennials Have ‘Low’ Technology Skills

    June 16, 2015 by Vicki Sloan Williams, Ph.D.

    Picture of Vicki's smiling face

     Although we’ve heard it in other places, here’s some data confirming that…


    6 in 10 Millennials Have ‘Low’ Technology Skills

    Campus Technology:

    • By Dian Schaffhauser
    • 06/11/15

    Digital natives aren’t as tech-savvy as they may think they are — at least, not according to their employers. American millennials (those between the ages of 16 and 34) may be the first generation that grew up with computers and Internet access, but all that time spent glued to a small screen hasn’t translated to technology competence. While they spend an average of 35 hours every week on digital media, nearly six out of 10 millennials can’t do basic tasks such as sorting, searching for and emailing data from a spreadsheet.

    Those are the findings of a research project that analyzed data from an assessment of adult competencies that tests cognitive and workplace skills. Change the Equation, a consortium of business and education organizations, hired the American Institutes for Research (AIR) to analyze raw data from the 2012 Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), a household study conducted by the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Read the article at:

    http://campustechnology.com/articles/2015/06/11/report-6-of-10-millennials-have-low-technology-skills.aspx

     


  5. Research Today: Pew Internet tests your Web IQ

    November 25, 2014 by Vicki Sloan Williams, Ph.D.

    Picture of Vicki's smiling face

    New today from Pew

     

    What Internet Users Know about Technology and the Web

    Test your own Web IQ! Before you read the report,take our new interactive knowledge quiz. The short quiz tests your knowledge of questions recently asked in a national poll. After completing the quiz, you can compare your score with the general public and with people like yourself.

    Web IQThree-quarters of online Americans know which is bigger, a megabyte or a kilobyte, but only 9% are able to correctly identify the first widely popular graphical web browser. How much do you know about the web and digital technology?

    A test of American internet users’ knowledge about digital technology and its concepts, history, leaders, and applications shows there are widely varying levels of awareness and accuracy in their answers:

    • 60% of internet users know Twitter’s character limit.
    • 36% of internet users know when Apple’s iPhone was first released.
    • 9% of internet users can identify the first widely popular graphical Web browser.

    Take the quiz: http://www.pewinternet.org/quiz/web-iq-quiz/
    Read or download the full report: http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/11/25/web-iq/


  6. Research Today: Pew Internet Project

    November 12, 2014 by Vicki Sloan Williams, Ph.D.

    Picture of Vicki's smiling face

    People who have read Orwell’s 1984 are seriously thinking about their privacy.  This study queries adults, but what would our youth answer? Have they read Orwell?  Where are we 30 years later?

     

    Public Perceptions of Privacy and Security

    Public Privacy PerceptionsA new survey finds Americans’ perceptions of privacy are varied and reflect a wide array of concerns connected to government surveillance and commercial use of personal data. A majority of adults feel their privacy is being challenged along such core dimensions as the security of their personal information and their ability to retain confidentiality.

    Key findings include:

    • 80% of adults “agree” or “strongly agree” that Americans should be concerned about the government’s monitoring of phone calls and internet communications.
    • 43% of adults in the survey have heard “a lot” about “the government collecting information about telephone calls, emails and other online communications as part of efforts to monitor terrorist activity,” and another 44% have heard “a little.”
    • Only 36% “agree” or “strongly agree” with the statement: “It is a good thing for society if people believe that someone is keeping an eye on the things that they do online.”

    At the same time, the survey finds a universal lack of confidence among adults in the
    security of everyday communications channels—particularly when it comes to the use of
    online tools.

    Read or download the full report: http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/11/12/public-privacy-perceptions/


  7. Research Today: Smartphones….Cell Phones, Social Media and Campaign 2014

    November 5, 2014 by Vicki Sloan Williams, Ph.D.

    Picture of Vicki's smiling face

    Elections can be fascinating to some people or painful to others. Smartphones and social media play an ever increasing role.

     

    Cell Phones, Social Media and Campaign 2014

    Smartphones and social networking sites are being increasingly used by a broad cross-section of voters to stay informed about election news, and to get involved with the candidates and campaigns that they support. 28% of registered voters have used their cell phone in this way during the 2014 campaign, up from 13% in 2010. Further, the number of Americans who follow candidates or other political figures on social media has also risen sharply: 16% of registered voters now do this, up from 6% in 2010.

    Participation in the digital campaign does not have a clear partisan slant. Republicans and Democrats engage in each of these behaviors at similar rates. At the same time, when asked about some reasons why they might follow political figures on social media, Republicans and Republican-leaning independents express a greater desire to be the first to find out about breaking political news, and to say that they use social media to get political information that has not passed through the traditional media “filter.”

    Read or download the full report: http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/11/03/cell-phones-social-media-and-campaign-2014/


  8. Learning: A Student’s Perspective

    November 3, 2014 by Vicki Sloan Williams, Ph.D.

    When I hear about instructors who ban technology from the classroom, it is refreshing to hear why  they are looking at their smartphone or tablet and thisnk how we could capture that attention…

    by  Nichole Short in the Chronicle

    Sept 24, 2014

    Don’t Ban Laptops in the Classroom

    “I get it,” the professor for my short-story course said, going over the syllabus on the first day of class. She was referring to her cellphone policy, which is basically a have-some-sort-of-decorum-I-beg-you rule. She asks us to be polite and use our good judgement.

    “This is second nature to you guys,” she said, holding an invisible phone in her hand. “When I was in college, I would daydream about that guy I’d been seeing,” picture him, “and I’d tune out the lecture to wonder if he’d be at coffeehouse after class or not. You have Candy Crush.”

    In high school, teachers used their sternest voices to give the “Put it away” command, confiscating smartphone after smartphone from students who did not—could not—abide by a cellphone ban. Everything a student is exposed to must go through a filter of distraction, the material taking a precarious path toward retention past Instagram and 2048.

    My short-story professor realized this and perhaps thought, If my students can’t control themselves, what hope do I have?

    I’m typing this article on my Macbook Pro, which is essentially a large flip iPhone. Under the Pages window is a syllabus, along with four other syllabi in their own windows. Under those: Spotify, a music player, Messages, a texting extension for iMessage, and Google Chrome, with no fewer than eight tabs up—some scholarly, some asinine. I eke out a sentence or two before I have to scroll through Facebook, change the song that’s playing, and reply to a few texts. It’s a compulsion. It does slow things down.

    I guess I could close everything else, stopping Nick Cave’s voice mid-lyric, ignoring the “sup” text I just received, and abandoning the mindless scroll therapy, the thought-numbing act of skimming Facebook or Tumblr that I use to get through my work. But why?

    Some would look upon my writing ritual with scorn and pity, perhaps remembering a time when typing was done on a typewriter, messages sent via telegraph, and distractions fewer. But that golden age is an illusion.

    Read the rest at: http://chronicle.com/blogs/conversation/2014/09/23/dont-ban-laptops-in-the-classroom/?cid=wc&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en

     


  9. Research Today: The MOOC Where Everybody Learned

    September 17, 2014 by Vicki Sloan Williams, Ph.D.

    Picture of Vicki's smiling face

    Here’s a study that determined that time-on-task may be a very big factor in learning.

     

    The Chronicles’ Wired Campus
    September 16, 2014 by

    The MOOC Where Everybody Learned

    Some MOOC skeptics believe that the only students fit to learn in massive open online courses are those who are already well educated. Without coaching and the support system of a traditional program, the thinking goes, ill-prepared students will not learn a thing.

    Not so, according to researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    The researchers analyzed data from a physics course that MIT offered on the edX platform in the summer of 2013. They found that students who had spent significant time on the course showed evidence of learning no matter what their educational background.

    “There was no evidence that cohorts with low initial ability learned less than the other cohorts,” wrote the researchers in a paper published this month by The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning.

    Not only that, but the MOOC students learned at a similar rate as did MIT students who had taken the on-campus version of a similar course. That finding surprised the researchers because the on-campus MIT students studied together in small groups for four hours every week and had regular access to their professors and other campus resources.

    “This certainly should allay concerns that less-well-prepared students cannot learn in MOOCs,” the researchers wrote.

    But that’s not to say that the less-well-prepared students did well. Many of them scored significantly lower than did students with more schooling. Some would have earned failing grades.

    The point is that even the students who got bad grades in the course came away knowing more than they did at the outset, says David E. Pritchard, a researcher on the study, and that their progress matched that of their better-prepared classmates over the same period.

    “If they stuck it out,” says Mr. Pritchard, “they learned.”

    See the article at http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/the-mooc-where-everybody-learned/54571?cid=wc&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en

    See the journal article at http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1902/3009

     


  10. Research Today: Are kids ready for college?

    September 16, 2014 by Vicki Sloan Williams, Ph.D.

    Picture of Vicki's smiling face

    Are today’s first-yea students really prepared for college. A recent study by ACT says maybe not. How does this affect the way we develop courses?

     

    Incoming freshmen: Are they ready for college?

    http://educationtechnews.com/incoming-freshman-are-they-ready-for-college/?pulb=1

    September 3, 2014 by Claire Knight

    More than one half (57%) of the 2014 graduating class across the U.S. took the ACT college readiness assessment test.

    Now the results are in.

    The ACT’s full report The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2014 is available for download.

    Here’s the gist of the 2014 report:

    • 86% of test takers aspired to enroll at a postsecondary educational institution
    • 26% met all four ACT College Readiness benchmarks (which are science, math, reading and English)
    • 13% met three ACT College Readiness benchmarks
    • 14% met two ACT College Readiness benchmarks
    • 16% met only one ACT College Readiness benchmark, and
    • 31% didn’t mean any of the ACT College Readiness benchmarks.

    Broken down by benchmarks:

    • 37% met the ACT science benchmark
    • 47% met the ACT math benchmark
    • 44% met the ACT reading bookmark, and
    • 64% met the ACT English bookmark.

    All told, the average 2014 ACT score was 21 on a scale from 1 to 36.

    Where the 2014 grads plan to land this fall

    While the vast majority of test takers hadn’t yet declared a major, here are the top 10 choices for freshmen who’ve got a specific college plan:

    1. Nursing (BS/RN)
    2. Pre-Med
    3. Business Administration and Management, General
    4. Mechanical Engineering
    5. Biology, General
    6. Criminology
    7. Pre-Law
    8. Physical Therapy
    9. Accounting, and
    10. Psychology, Clinical and Counseling.

Skip to toolbar