Social Change Research comes in several different forms, but the general idea is that researchers are actively changing something in a social situation that they are a part of. it seeks to create meaningful change by exploring the root causes of social problems, such as inequality, and discrimmination. Participatory research is when the researchers are a part of the community or other social situation and are invested in trying to learn something about an issue in the community.
Social change research is grounded in the belief that research should not only generate knowledge but also inspire action. It included mixed approaches, such as case studies, ethnography, and surveys. The findings of social change research aims to inform policies and interventions, and influencing societal attitudes. Participatory research enhances social change efforts by engaging those that were directly affected by the issue that is being studied. it has effectiveness in addressing local challenges, such as public health crisis or environmental concerns. It also ensures that the interventions are culturally relevant, sustainable, and aligned with the community needs. This model not only empowers participants but also enriches the research with diverse perspectives.
Both of these create a powerful framework for handling issues, While social change research provides a more broad foundation, participatory research links between both theory and practice by directly involving communities. Its very evident in projects like community based participatory research which has been used several time to address issues such as housing inequality and healthcare disparities.
These are both sessional tools for creating a more equitable and inclusive society. By addressing systemic challenges and empowering communities, these approaches foster sustainable, community driven solutions which is a great thing for everyone.
References: Reason, Peter, and Hilary Bradbury. Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. SAGE Publications, 2008.
Gruman, J. A., Schneider, F. W., and Coutts, L. M. (Eds.) (2017). Applied Social Psychology: Understanding and Addressing Social and Practical Problems
Your post provides a compelling overview of social change and participatory research, highlighting their potential to address systemic challenges while empowering communities. I agree with your emphasis on the dual purpose of these approaches—to generate knowledge and inspire action. One of participatory research’s main advantages is the incorporation of community-driven and culturally appropriate solutions, which guarantees that interventions are successful and long-lasting. The difficulty of striking a balance between research and community involvement is one topic worth additional consideration. Participatory research can occasionally make objectivity more difficult, even though it enhances studies by adding a variety of viewpoints. For example, the in-group bias (Gruman, Schneider, & Coutts, 2017) may influence how researchers interpret findings when they are deeply embedded in the community. Addressing this requires transparency in methods and a commitment to ethical practices. I think you did a great job discussing the groundwork of social change and research.
Gruman, J. A., Schneider, F. W., & Coutts, L. M. (Eds.). (2017). Applied Social Psychology: Understanding and Addressing Social and Practical Problems.
Thanks, Manuela