Part A
When I work on my archive, the material I used is online resource. For examples, articles, literatures, musics and films about the real events and behaviors that the LGBT community had in the real world. However, some of my films and literatures’ contents are fiction, nevertheless they are made up based on the real attitudes and environment that the LGBT community had in the real society. For some items, I post current moments in the society, but most of my items are about the past around 18th century or earlier. The literatures I pick may not be a new and fresh one to the readers, but they are the critical ones and became the turning point in the society.
At this point, I don’t have any archive that captures one perspective on an event. But I would add one in my next item.
Part B
Most of the resources I used are having citations and clearly label the time and names that the articles were published. I tried to use sources that published in recent 6 years, however, some resources do not provide the data, so I do not know the exact time they published. The resources gave, mostly, in a third-person perspective to the events. But I could not say it does not have any bias, because my items are about countries, and in each country, the resources I found were written by the local writers. So I may overlook the other perspectives from outside the country. I choose a period of time, and post three resources that talk about the time period in each item. I tired to choose three resources that gave different approaches, such as one from the film, one from the historical event analysis, and the other from the society’s behaviors.
In most of my items, I started with the percentage of supporting LGBT community in each country. However, the data is came from 2013, which is a little bit old. So I’m afraid the resource of this statistics may no longer to be an effective resource over time.
Part C
I would add the primary resources with the first-person’ perspective, because in the early time, the technologies were not as developed as today, so it was hard to keep one’s literature and art works until today. If there is one in today’s online resources, I think the value of it is very high and reliable since it is a primary resource, which did not have any other people’s edit. So if I could discover a record of it, I would pay money for it to use in my archive.