By Sophia Schuster, supervised by Steve Tracey📧 (Master Paper Supervisor)
Master Paper, Smeal College of Business, The Pennsylvania State University, April 2023.
In our globalized economy, multinational corporations (MNCs) often work with multiple tiers of suppliers, many of them located in developing nations with poor infrastructure and fewer government regulations. The multi-tiered nature of modern supply networks creates a complex network of producers responsible for the goods of a single firm which makes tracking production and managing disruption exceedingly difficult. Adding to that challenge is the increasing demand by the MNCs’ customers for ethically sourced products and a desire to understand where and how an item is made. With each passing year and especially in the face of COVID-19 pandemic and its multitude of challenges, MNCs have made efforts to improve practices and meet ever changing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards and expectations. Common practices for ESG standards implementation, where procurement takes a central role in communicating and working with the firms’ suppliers to achieve these standards, have been well documented in the literature. These common practices that have been shown to be effective in affecting change in supplier behavior, however, are not often considered when an ESG rating organization confers its grades. By outlining the current practices and detailing several common ESG rating indices, this paper highlights the misalignment between ESG procurement practices and the rating indices that reward firms for their ESG efforts.
View full paper here.