Skip to content →

Ellie Pearson Posts

PAS 5: The Notebook Notes

To close out this blog, I sought it only right to watch an American classic, The Notebook. Adapted from the Nicholas Sparks novel in 2004, this movie tells the love story of rich schoolgirl and a poor lumbar worker in 1940s South Carolina. To fight cliche’s there is an added dimension to the plot: the love story is told by an old man, who is reading to his wife who has dementia. The end is bittersweet, but the type where everything falls exactly into place. Pure genius in my opinion, so hats off to you, Nicholas. However, despite his amazing writing skills, he does not deserve all the credit. The real showstoppers in this movie are none other than Ryan Gosling and Rachel McAdams.

Let’s start with Ryan (Noah) . Sure, it helps that he’s beautiful, but boy does that guy know how to FLIRT! I couldn’t stop imagining what I would do if someone ever risked their life on a ferris wheel for a date with me or told me they liked me the minute they saw me. He manages to be so incredibly intense in such a calm way, and it is captivating. A sinister part of me also adored when he was heartbroken. Once he found out that Allie was engaged he worked day in and day out to finish the house that he built for her. I think most men would have set it on fire.

Now on to Rachel (Allie), although I really wouldn’t mind devoting an entire post to swooning over Ryan. While Ryan balances intensity and tranquility, Allie balances grace and chaos. Because she comes from a wealthy family, she is a bit of a people pleaser and always does the right thing. But as she gets to know Noah, he challenges her and brings out her true self, which is pretty wild. I’m intrigued by Allie because I think that I am the opposite of her. I’d say I’m pretty wild as is, so I guess I’m looking for someone to calm me down, not rile me up. Or maybe a little bit of both.

The most fascinating part about this movie is something that I found out after the fact: Ryan and Rachel despised each other while filming. It is interesting because even if it was through hate, the passion definitely showed through in their acting. But my favorite part is that after the film wrapped, they started dating. It breaks my heart that they are not together anymore, but I guess not every true love is one that can last a lifetime! In my perfect fantasy world , their love was just so strong that it hurt and was unsustainable. But again, I am relating this to their on screen mid-1900s love, which looks very different to relationships today.

Anyways, I apologize for this blog being particularly gossipy but I think I wanted to give a flavor of how I think when I watch romantic dramas like this. What can I say, I’m a swooner and I’m nosey. Lethal combo. Unfortunately this is my last blog post, so thank you for coming along for the ride.

Comments closed

CI 5: Unpacking the Palestine-Israel Conflict

 

Since  its beginning in the end of the 19th century, the Palestine-Israel Conflict has become one of the most prominent issues of the Middle East. The conflict is mainly a multi-layered battle for the territory in Israel, which holds the holiest sites for the Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.) Over the years, there has been several plans made by the U.N. to try and resolve this issue, but as we can see today, there has yet to be a suitable solution and conflict continues. The main core issues that prevent peace in the region are regarding borders, refugees, security, settlements, water, and Jerusalem.

The issues that I think are the hardest to resolve are those regarding security. Although there was violence before their power, the the leaders of Israel and Palestine from the 1950s to the 2000s deepened the security issues in the region, perhaps to a point of no return. These leaders were Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Chairman of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) Yasir Arafat, who had a deep rivalry that showed through their politics. On Palestine’s side, Arafat was scrutinized for his inability and/or unwillingness to restrain militant groups opposed to peace. For Israel, Sharon had a tendency to make unilateral decisions that instigated violent events like the Second Intifada and the Gaza wars. Although both Israel and Palestine hold some responsibility, the most prominent stunt to peace is Hamas. Hamas is a Palestinian militant/social organization that arose from the First Intifada (uprising) in 1987. In 2004, Sharon removed its power from Gaza to concede to Hamas, who used its social org status to allude that they would help the Gaza region. However, instead of their occupation improving Gaza like they had promised, a power vacuum formed. With Hamas in power, political and economic development never materialized, proving Hamas to be nothing more than a terrorist organization. Later, Hamas made an agreement with Fatah (Palestinian nationalist and social democratic political party) but was reluctant to renounce terrorism. These actions reinforce that Hamas is not a social organization and that its main cause is really violence. This means that peace would end their justification to exist, so Hamas will most likely remain militant and worsen security issues in the region. 

Another difficult issue to confront is the status of Jerusalem. Jerusalem has massive religious significance to Israel and Palestine, which is why both believe that it cannot be shared and use the excuse that it is indivisible so neither has to make concessions. However, in 2000, the Clinton parameters were introduced that proposed a shared capital. Unfortunately, they were introduced too late, but they still had high approval ratings with both Israel and Palestine. Also, the Trump administration’s 2017 recognition of Jerusalem as solely Israel’s capital stunted the development of a shared entity. However, because timing seemed to be the only thing wrong with the Clinton parameters, a solution for Jerusalem still seems very plausible. 

Although this barely scratched the surface on the issues that prevent peace in the Israel-Palestine conflict, it should explain the levels of values and repercussions that must be considered when attempting to solve one of the many problems in the region. Hopefully in the future different circumstances will allow policymakers to have more open minds, and there can be a way for both Palestinians and Israelis to live in harmony.

One Comment

RCL 5 – Advocacy Project

For my advocacy project, I will be building awareness about power-posing and encouraging my audience to add it to their routine. Power-posing, or postural feedback, is a self-improvement technique to stand in a posture that they mentally associate with being more powerful to foster positive life changes. The study is controversial, but there is a lot of research that proves it works.

Currently generation is doing an excellent job at advocating awareness for mental health problems, but sometimes the problem can be blown out of proportion. Presentation anxiety does not always require a pill, but people often get trapped in their mindset and believe there is no simple solution. I want to advocate for power-posing because it is a no-stakes way that could change your mindset and outlook on challenges. Although it is not guaranteed to work on everyone, it does not hurt to try and if it works it could change your life!

My target audience is young, driven adults who wish to strive academically in their careers. It is said that the decisions and actions you make between age of 20 and 30 dictate the rest of your life, and I believe power-posing during this time would make this time more successful and prosperous.

Three motivations/values that are reflected in power-posing

  1. Routine
  2. Success
  3. Mental Health
Comments closed

RCL 4: Dubious Advocacy Site: Monkey Helpers

https://monkeyhelpers.org/support-us/#giving-options

For my advocacy website, I chose Helping Hands: Monkey Helpers which is a group designed to train capuchin monkeys to assist people with spinal cord injuries and other mobility impairments. However, this is their past mission, and their current mission has transitioned toward developing technologies to make homes smarter for disabled people and helping medically challenged monkeys. I was confused as to why they stopped training the monkeys, because that was the whole purpose of their organization. Besides the weird title, that was my first red flag. Next, I went to the “Support Us” to find where to donate. Where it said “Why Give?” an interesting quote followed:

“While we can give you plenty of great reasons to support our organization, we think our recipients, supporters, and even some of our staff and monkeys do it better. So take a minute to view our videos and know these are just tiny pieces of the moving story your donation helps to create.”

This vagueness was my second red flag. But perhaps I just hadn’t searched hard enough, so, of course, I clicked on the videos tab! Upon arrival, there were multiple videos of monkeys playing, bathing, drawing, wrestling, etc. but none of them included them helping a human. I understand that they transitioned towards providing help for challenged monkeys but you’d think there would be some sort of dialogue to explain that. More red flags! Under another section it explained the approximate dollar amounts that donations would translate into purchases, like how $50 would provide food and treats. The problem with this is that it doesn’t say how long this would feed a monkey, so you don’t totally understand the weight of your donation. Also, all of the donations are towards the monkeys, not towards the people with disabilities that their mission is supposed to help.

Between an unclear mission, and unclear reason to donate, and an unclear destination for contributions, I don’t think I’d advise anyone to donate to Helping Hands: Monkey Helpers.

3 Comments

RCL 3: Persuasive Essay Pitch

Thesis: In the interest of the country and the people of Puerto Rico, the United States Congress should pass the Puerto Rico Statehood Admission Act.

I chose to discuss Puerto Rico’s statehood as my persuasive essay because it has been unresolved for a long period of time and involves some interesting circumstances. The likely reason why this debate has lasted so long is because since Puerto Rico is a territory, it has no voting rights and can’t vote for whether it becomes a state or not, it can just recommend it. For Puerto Rico, the majority is in favor of the territory becoming a state. Statehood would put the territory in a stronger economic position and would end legal inequalities between Puerto Rico and the States. Also, Puerto Ricans would earn the right to vote in US elections, making their citizenship more legitimate. To the U.S, statehood is scary because it is expensive. It would cost around $4.5 to $5.7 billion dollars to make Puerto Rico a state, but with residents now having to pay an income tax, the surge in population would help make this number go down. A third solution that has been suggested is Puerto Rican independence. To understand why that is not viable, we have to look back through U.S. history to previous territories such as Hawaii and the Philippines. The Philippines gained independence from the United States after the Spanish-American War in 1898. They claimed this to be a victory, but now Puerto Ricans earn 80% more than Filipinos and Filipinos have twice the infant mortality rate. Looking at the other side of this, Hawaii, which became a state in 1959. Hawaiians earns 8 times the income of Puerto Ricans, so out of the two previous territories, we can see which trajectory Puerto Rico desires.

The book I found is “Puerto Rico’s Future: A Time to Decide” by Dick Thornburgh. I thought it would be beneficial because Thornburgh was a former attorney general of the United States so I thought he would be a credible source. In the book, he goes over the importance of resolving the political status of Puerto Rico. He goes on to explain situations with other territories and ends with an action plan for U.S. Congress. I am excited to read more of this book because I think it will be a great source and provide a nice framework for my essay.

Research Questions

  1. Besides money, why wont the U.S. let Puerto Rico become a state?
  2. How would PR becoming a state benefit the United States economically?
  3. What are the potential consequences of PR becoming a state?
Comments closed

PAS 4: Whiplash: I’m WHIPPED.

A lot of movies could be books. A lot of movies are. Whiplash, however, is a movie that could never be a book, because it’s brilliance relies very little on its plot. On the surface, this movie is about a tense relationship between an ambitious student and a tyrannical music teacher. The director based this script on experiences he had with a high school band teacher, which honestly makes it sound even worse. Sure, they exaggerated the plot and added in a handful of punchy lines to the script. But this movie would be nothing without its editing, its soundtrack, and the work of its actors. The Academy agrees with me, because it won Oscars for best sound mixing and film editing!

The movie was shot in 19 days, probably for its limited location. The protagonist, Andrew Nieman (Miles Teller), is a student at the fictional Shaffer Conservatory, which is said to be based off of Julliard. While at school, he is plucked by Terrence Fletcher (JK Simmons), a legendary musician and conductor, to be a drummer in his studio jazz band, which is one of the best in the country. At first, he is elated at the opportunity, but quickly after his admittance he discovers that his teacher is the most terrifying and skillfully ruthless person he has ever met.

JK Simmons does an excellent job in his role, and again, the Academy recognized it and granted him Best Supporting Actor! Seriously some of the most brutal, deep cutting insults I have ever heard. They almost make you wince. But they would be nothing without Teller’s reaction to them, and how his drive for success is so obsessive that he can’t remove himself from the situation. This relationship is what makes this movie a psychological drama, and it will keep you on the edge of your seat. If there is anything this movie knows how to do it is create tension. Through the acting, editing, and even the tempo of a composition, this movie turned me into a ball of adrenalin.

I will note that I think it is extremely important that Andrew played the drums instead of the flute or saxophone. When Andrew is playing the drums, there is a lot of imagery of blood, sweat, and tears, which is the necessary concoction for success. When all three of these stain his drum set, and when he continues to play and the vibrations send them beading off in slow motion, he is expelling all of his signs his body is giving him to quit, and it is an incredibly powerful image.

Director Damien Chazelle shot this movie in 19 days. That is impressive, yes, but its also pretty funny because it was nominated for Best Picture alongside Boyhood, which was shot on and off for 12 years. It was originally a short film, which Chazelle did not intend, but producers suggested it since the original script wasn’t getting funds. The short film casted JK Simmons again and Johnny Simmons (no relation) and it won a Jury Prize at the Sundance Film Festival. Once it was regarded highly by Sundance, it had no trouble receiving funding and J. Simmons was recast as Miles Teller. Teller was the perfect pick because he was a huge name in the 2010’s  (Divergent, Footloose, the Spectacular Now, etc.) and he had actually played the drums since he was 15. Still, he was no prodigy, so he took lessons 4 hours a day, 3 times a week to prepare. 40% of the official soundtrack is Teller on sticks, which showcases his immense instrumental talent.

Speaking of instrumental soundtracks, this movie was my introduction to Jazz as a genre. As someone who likes when music falls into a pattern, Jazz always unsettled me. As I’m writing this, I’m realizing how brilliant it was to make the band a jazz band. Like the drums, this movie would not be this movie if it was classical rather than jazz. Jazz is unpredictable and always leaves you anticipating, which again helps build tension in the movie. The movie ended with a 5 minute drum solo, and you’d think that would get old. But my eyes never left the screen. During this scene, the camera man panned back and forth between Andrew, Fletcher, and the band, and it gets quicker and quicker with tempo…giving you whiplash….GENIUS.

I’m getting excited just writing about this movie, and I can’t believe I just now watched it. It came out in 2014! I’m almost embarrassed. Anyways, I hope I didn’t give to much away, but even if I did, I hope I serve as the final push for readers to go watch this movie. This adrenalin high made me understand the meaning of “Chasing the Dragon.” I have never seen anything like Whiplash and I think I’ll spend the rest of my life trying to find something close.

One Comment

Lebanon’s Last Breath?

Now more than ever, Lebanon is in trouble. Recently, the Lebanese pound was converted at 15,000 to the US dollar, but as of March 14th, 2023, sources say it was trading at as low as 100,000. A plunge this drastic has massive effects on the Lebanese economy, which was already in crisis since 2019. The question that I asked, and that I assume you are also pondering right now, is how on earth did it get this bad? Short answer: it was a long time coming.

In the 1950s and 60s, Lebanon was quite a successful country, in relation to its size and location. It became the Switzerland of the East for its financial stability and its capital, Beirut, became a Paris for its tourism. However, due to the country’s poor planning, this progressive era was short lived. Lebanon is primarily split into three ethno-religious groups: Maronite Christians, Sunni Muslims, and Shia Muslims. They attempted to reflect this in the National Pact (their version of a constitution) but this agreement was never formally written and it did not reflect accurate demographics of the country. Because of this, socioeconomic tensions rose between the groups and in 1975, a civil war broke out that lasted 15 years.

After the civil war, the country started to rebuild through tourism, foreign aid, and donations from Arab Gulf states. Also, citizens received a lot income help from remittances, which are sums of money that family members send back when they leave the country. Unfortunately, Lebanon was not exception to the political instability caused by the Arab Spring, and hopes for restoring the country were lost.

Their weak government created a power vacuum, and Hezbollah, a Lebanon-based Shia terrorist group, came in to fill the hole. In consequence, Iran (also Shia) has more influence in the region, which caused Sunni Gulf states to hold back on their funding. This, accompanied by reduced remittances and financial mismanagement, sent Lebanon plunging into debt. Still, investors abroad tried to give them some grace, but by 2018, since no lasting political or economic reforms were made, foreign aid and investment to withheld their funds as well.

A commonly forgotten factor regarding Lebanon’s deterioration is its refugees. Located between two arenas for civil war, Lebanon has the highest number of refugees per capita in the world with over 1 million Syrian refugees and 270 thousand Palestinians. This places a giant financial burden on the infrastructure of the country, and effects the stability within its borders. Lebanon was having enough trouble as is with it’s irresponsible government, but it is crumbling under the weight of this population surplus.

In the aftermath of the Arab Spring, things just kept getting worse. In 2019, the Lebanese cabinet announced new tax measures to aid the financial crisis and were met with massive protests against the political elite. The cabinet members were replaced, but no changes were really made. In 2020, there was an explosion at the Port of Beirut that caused 218 deaths, 7,000 injuries, 15 billion USD in property damage, and left an estimated 300,000 people homeless. The pandemic was the grim cherry on top. After the explosion, Biden pledged 100 million USD in aid, which was on top of the 560 million they had already given the country in the two previous years. His only ask was that in return, the government would commit to reforming the economy and combating corruption. So far, Lebanon has done little about either.

Since last year, the country has had no president and only a caretaker government, due to deadlock between rival alliances in parliament. The country’s debt has caused severe hyperinflation, making necessities unaffordable. Since 2019, the Lebanese pound has lost more than 90% of its value, but the minimum wage has not changed. Food prices have rose by 400%, and there are electricity and fuel shortages. Most people live on a few hours of electricity a day. Drugs and medicine are subsidized by the government, but these industries face shortages as well. Currently, over half the country is below the poverty line. Lebanon is nearing the status of a failed state.

So what can be done? As of late, we have learned that throwing money at the problem has not done much to solve it. No amount of foreign aid can change the foundation of a government, but the political elite don’t seem to be budging. We know this transformation needs to come from within, therefore, by rule of elimination, the fate of Lebanon lies with the people. I wonder if we’re witnessing the eve of a revolution.

2 Comments

RCL2: Diversity in entertainment media

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/24/ucla-hollywood-diversity-report-shows-women-and-people-of-colors-film-industry-progress.html

 

Deconstructing Four Arguments Against Diversity in Media (That my Stupid Teenage Self was Guilty of Using)

I’m sort of breaking the rules here because only one of my sources is really “reputable” but I liked the other one way more than the reputable NBC article. The NBC article talked about the progress of the firm industry in terms of diversity, putting emphasis on the “ripple effect.” The ripple effect essentially means that if you get someone diverse in a top role like director or producer, everyone down the line in that production is more likely to be of color. Another way it is becoming more improving is through specific talent agencies tailored to diverse populations, which is helping more diverse people get jobs in the industry. I think both of these solutions/improvements are great, however they listed one that I am not on board with. The Academy has created representation and inclusion standards for films to qualify for the 2024 awards. I think putting restraints on movies and putting a focus on anything other than the movie itself and the quality of work is absurd, because that is the only thing that should be measured. I agree that the industry should work to be more diverse, but no film should be disqualified from winning an award because they had 8 people of color vs 9.

My second article was less of an article but more of a forum of a star wars aficionado. His blog was about all of his counter arguments to diversity in the media, all which he believed were good arguments at the time but has now seen the error of his ways. His final (wrong) argument is that the only thing that matters are good characters and stories. This creates the assumption that good characters and diverse characters are mutually exclusive, which I hadn’t really thought about. Now, I know it sounds like my first paragraph contradicts my second, so let me elaborate. I think that diversity is important in the media, but I do not think that it should be policed. I think when regulations are added, the quality goes down because people feel like they have lost their freedom to create.

Questions I will pose for class:

  1. Do diversity regulations foster or stifle creativity and talent in the media? Why?
  2. Is the media catering to certain individuals, or are they simply better at their job? Why?
Comments closed

RCL 1: Deliberation in Twilight Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/twilight/comments/mpc9iy/team_edward_or_team_jacob/

For my example I chose a reddit thread debating who the main character of the Twilight series, Bella, should end up with: Jacob (the werewolf) or Edward (the vampire). In terms of respecting various viewpoints, it depends on the user. Some are very polite in their agreements and disagreements, adding more information to clarify topics and further understanding of points. However, some are a bit more adamant about their opinions and refuse to see any other perspectives. Despite how informal it is, I think this could be considered deliberation because they are attempting to come to a consensus based on various perspectives, and individuals are creating those perspectives based on their values and personal experiences. Some value plot consistency over (fictional) boundaries, and others are interested in which actor is hotter! Also there are comments on top of comments going back and forth on the pros and cons of each character, so it fits the criteria of being conversational. It may be a topic with low legitimate stakes for those deliberating, but most seem to have an emotional investment in these characters, making it more credible to be considered deliberation.

3 Comments

PAS 3: Big Fan of Rain Man

On December 16th, 1988, a drama/roadie film with a couple A-list actors hit the big screen. I wonder if they knew then what a success it would be. This movie grossed between 350 and 415 million dollars on a 25 million dollar budget, becoming the highest grossing film of the year. It also ended up receiving 8 nominations at the 61st academy awards, and won four of those nominations: Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor, and Best Original Screenplay. In other words, it. was. a. hit. Any guesses on the flick? If you guessed Barry Levinson’s Rain Man, you would be correct.

This film stars Charlie Babbitt (Tom Cruise), a young, selfish wheeler dealer who believes he is coming into wealth after his estranged father’s death. However, when he returns home to collect, he discovers that his father’s multimillion dollar fortune was left to Charlie’s older brother, Raymond (Dustin Hoffman), who he knew nothing about. Raymond is an autistic savant, and has been living in a mental institution for over half of his life. In an attempt to get the money that he believes is “rightfully his,” Charlie abducts his brother and takes him back to his home in Los Angeles. On their road trip, Charlie learns more and more about Raymond and the ups and downs of his condition, and they end up forming a brotherly bond.

Although it would never fly in today’s social climate, Dustin Hoffman did an excellent job playing an autistic savant. The writers based the character off of Kim Peek, a real life savant, and Hoffman was able to spend some time with him to learn his mannerisms. Because it was the 1980s and a lot of social issues had yet to be spoken about, I think this movie was a good introduction to autism awareness, especially since it was a central plot line. I also believe that through his role, Hoffman did an amazing job educating on the range of autism and savant syndrome, and I liked that the story put an emphasis on how people with autism can still form connections. There were, obviously, still some scenes that had that sweet 1980s ignorance, but I think for the time period, it was very well done. I was mesmerized by Hoffman’s work.

Another mesmerizing part of this movie was just how 1980s it was. I’m every soundtrack piece was the work of a synth and every piece of woman’s clothing featured shoulder pads. I loved it. I wonder if I will live in a period as iconic as the ’80s, or who knows, maybe I already have. A frequent shoulder pad wearer was, of course, Tom Cruise’s very beautiful, very Italian girlfriend played by Valeria Golino. Obviously, a story about two men wouldn’t fill the theater seats, no matter how heart warming. But if you throw a tan, seductive woman with an Italian accent who flashes a nipple once in a while, you’ve got yourself a hit! I thought some of her scenes were unnecessary to the story line but hey, I get it…sex sells.

Rain Man serves as an excellent pop culture history lesson, and the screenplay is about as unique as the ’80s has to offer (cliches sell tickets!). I think it is an amazing classic film that is worth the watch and clearly, based on the stats I delivered at the beginning of this sermon, I’m not the only one who thinks it!

Comments closed
Skip to toolbar