As a High School Volleyball coach, I have a small checklist of requirements that should be accomplished in the event that our team wants to be successful for the upcoming season. One of those categories is Team Cohesion, which I’ve defined as “the ability to produce high-level results as a team by maximizing each players strengths in a selfless pursuit to achieve our goal(s).” While teaching the X’s and O’s of a game is not easy, I’ve found that getting groups of young men and women to work together is significantly tougher, yet far more satisfying to observe the learning process and final outcome. The sport itself will be a game played by my players at a recreational level for as long as their bodies can hold up physically, but teaching players how to work together as a group with sometimes very little common ground outside of an attempt to be successful as a team together; that’s a life skill.
In Lesson 6, we were introduced to the concept of Synergy. According to Moran, Abramson, & Moran, “Synergy is a cooperative or combined action, and occurs when diverse or disparate individuals or groups collaborate for a common cause. The objective is to increase effectiveness by sharing perceptions and experiences, insights, and knowledge. (Moran, Abramson, & Moran, 2014, p . 266). Our Lesson material goes on to further define synergy as “the synthesis of what each individual in the group has to offer.” (PSU WC, L6, 2020). As I continued through the lesson, I realized that my definition of Team Cohesion was very close to how synergy was being discussed in our lesson. This led to a deeper alteration of how I will go about achieving Team Cohesion AND Synergy for my teams going forward.
In my first year with the school I currently work for, I had three weeks to familiarize myself with the 32 players in our Girls Volleyball program prior to our first match. This three week period gave us less than 15 practices to prepare for competition… yikes! While our coaching staff was trying to determine who the best players were, I assigned the task of identifying players exhibiting strong leadership and team work qualities to another coach on staff. After a few sessions, we realized we had three categories of players; talented, less talented and not talented. From those three categories, we spent the next session evaluating whether these players showed strong leadership skills, an awareness of empathy when players around them weren’t performing well, and whether they showed support for others in situations where both positive and negative outcomes took place. The results of our eye test were somewhat disappointing; most of our better athletes with the high level of overall talent were falling into the behavior patterns of not being a good teammate. Those who were somewhere between the less talented and not talented were overall better teammates, and showed support for the higher level players, while also trying to support the players who had no idea what was going on on the court.
As you could imagine, this led to a long conversation among the coaching staff that led to a daunting decision that would shape how our program would move forward under my leadership. Would we put together the most talented teams with the players we had available, teach them the game, and try to get them to support each other as teammates? Or, would we place more value on being what we defined as “being a good teammate”; someone who served as the glue between those who lacked the empathy for lesser players and the players who didn’t quite have the short-term results the older players had.
The decision was made to allow the older, and in some cases more talented and experienced players remain on the Varsity team. With the less experienced, but not so much less talented group, we put them with our most experienced coaches on a Junior Varsity team. While in most programs, the importance of being successful at the Varsity level is the highest priority. For this group, we realized we had a significant culture issue centered around what our lesson would define as an issue with synergy. We had older kids who were not supportive of the younger players simply because they weren’t in the program as long, which I had to manage on the back end with one on one discussions among players.
Throughout the season, we had numerous talks as a team before and after competitions about the lack of cohesion, or synergy, that was felt on the court during times of great success, or times when the outcome was not good. Each and every time, the conversation would begin with a Senior stating that the team needs to work together more, and communicate better; followed by calling out a younger player who didn’t do what an older player said to do. No empathy for a lack of experience, and no flexibility to discuss with that player why we should do what they were suggesting. What we as a coaching staff eventually concluded was that the Seniors on the team weren’t getting the support from their teammates, or in their opinion “respect”, that they felt the “deserved as seniors on the team”. So, with this group feeling slighted by the younger, less experienced, yet more talented group, they refused to work with them and “lead” them unless they received the credit they felt they deserved by being older.
As a result, we had many of our sophomore players ask to play on the JV team. This was something I had never experienced before; younger players turning down opportunities to play up at the Varsity level. While I did not think our team would be successful without their participation, I allowed those players to play at the JV level, and moved forward with our less talented, more experienced players for most of the season. By the time playoffs began, our Varsity team was just above .500, and qualifying for playoffs with the group of seniors that refused to work with the younger players. Meanwhile, our JV team, with a combination of young, talented players and players who shared empathetic qualities, found themselves with only one loss on the season. Shocking, right?!
As a staff, we decided for our playoff matches that if we wanted to be successful, we had to build for the future. We asked that all of the JV players move up for playoffs, and we met with the Seniors whose playing time would be affected. At this point, they realized that the younger players were more talented, and they needed them in order to win games in the playoffs. Yet I still didn’t feel the buy-in from a few seniors who assumed leadership positions on the Varsity team. For the first time in 25 seasons, our program won a playoff game; with the young players all playing a role in the match wins. In fact, our season-ending loss by four points (in the fifth game) in the Section Quarterfinals (to a team we had no business competing with) was due to the older, more experienced players not performing to the standards we needed to be successful, and our younger players didn’t quite have the experience on a stage that significant.
As a coach, I was faced with the task of reviewing the season in order to best prepare for what we needed to improve going into the next season. Among the list of areas we needed to improve, Team Cohesion was what I kept coming back to. Throughout our spring training sessions, we’ve applied principles of synergy to our practices, which require teammates of different background, skill level, levels of empathy, and positive energy to work together. We’ve also incorporated self-evaluation assessments for our players to initiate conversation about how well they performed, but also how well they helped a teammate improve or raise their level. Going into next season, I believe our synergy and cohesion will be one of our best strengths based on the results so far. Will that translate into wins…maybe not. But as a life skill, these players will have learned the steps it takes to be a good teammate who can maximize the results of themselves and the people around them to achieve a common goal.
References:
Moran, R. T., Abramson, N. R., & Moran, S. V. (2014). Managing cultural differences: Leadership skills and strategies for working in a global world. New York: Elsevier.
PSU World Campus Lesson 6: Cultural Synergy. (2020). Retrieved March 2, 2020, from https://psu.instructure.com/courses/2041071/modules/items/27977849