Category Archives: Event Recap

Valentine’s Day Cookie Decorating

By Kelly Marie Ness

The Huck Graduate Student Advisory Committee (HGSAC) hosted a cookie decorating event for Valentine’s Day. Students were encouraged to make themselves (or someone special) a sweet treat, to enjoy coffee, tea, or hot cocoa, and to socialize for a few minutes with friends from other Huck programs. This is the second holiday-themed coffee hour that the HGSAC has hosted. The last was just before Thanksgiving when students came out in large numbers for pie. Coffee hours with themes are more well-attended than those without, and the atmosphere is cheerful and upbeat. Next on the docket? St. Patrick’s Day/spring! We’re going to have an assortment of foods available to dip in some chocolate fondue, yum!

Graduate Student and Postdoctoral Career Day at Penn State Hershey

By Kelly Marie Ness

At 6:30 am on Saturday, October 21 a group of dedicated graduate students congregated at the cul-de-sac in front of the Huck Life Sciences building. The air was cold and clear; the sun still 45 minutes from rising. Groups of excited undergraduates passed the van, bedazzled in Penn State paraphernalia and loaded down with homemade signs, heading for ESPN’s College Game day by Old Main. As we headed out of State College and towards Penn State Hershey campus, we passed a never-ending stream of game-goers and tailgaters. I felt a tiny twinge of regret that the career day and the Michigan game had to coincide, but, having attended in the past, I knew the day was well worth it.

The graduate student and postdoctoral career day put on by Penn State Hershey is divided into four primary focus tracks: business, research, education, and alternative. Within each track the day was divided into four topic panels, for example, the alternative track had sessions on public health, science communication, international affairs, and science policy and law. Three to four panelists were brought in for each topic session- an enormous feat of organization, coordination, and planning!

I primarily attended the business career track, sitting in on the panels on consulting and finance, large pharmaceutical companies, and biotech firms. The speakers were diverse and the sessions engaging. Panels were moderated, but the discussion was primarily directed by audience questions and interest. Panelists shared their insights, based on their background and experience, and provided tips for students.

In industry, I learned, the turnaround time on job postings is quick (2-6 weeks). So unless you are applying for a fellowship or postdoctoral program which typically accept applications on the academic timescale, it’s best to apply to industry jobs only when you are ready to move into them, not with months of lead time. When you are reviewing the job posting, look at the desired skills for that position and write them into your cover letter. Your cover letter is used as a screening tool by human resources, so the closer your language matches the job posting, the more likely your application will be considered. Make sure to tailor your cover letter for each posting you apply to- do not use a generic cover letter- it will be overlooked and passed-over.

Industry job postings are skills-driven. The panelists explained that when they hire someone into a new role, they want someone who is ready to step into the responsibilities of that position immediately, or with minimal training, so making sure your skills are up-to-date is paramount. However, they encouraged students not to count themselves out if they are lacking a skill or two, instead, they recommended that students set up collaborations in order to learn new skills and expertise. As students reach their third and fourth years in graduate school, they should review job postings of positions they are interested in and use their remaining time in graduate school to develop the required skills. The skills in hot demand right now: systems biology, computation, data analytics.

Other options for honing your laboratory skills include joining a contract research organization (CRO) or applying for an internship/postdoctoral program in industry. These programs are very popular, however, and receive hundreds or thousands of applications for limited slots. Furthermore, companies typically do not hire from their internships and postdocs because they don’t want to create pipelines within the organization (i.e. each time a new position opens up, they want to hire the best applicant for that position, regardless of whether the application originated internally or externally). If you do land an industry postdoc position, you will enjoy a  unique position. The research you will do will be pre-approved for publication, and publication and presentation at conferences will be strongly encouraged.

If you enjoy producing manuscripts and publishing, you should consider clinical trials work. Clinical data is more transparent and publication more frequent. That said, even though most industry positions will not afford you publication opportunities, your publication record during graduate school (or your academic career prior to transitioning to industry) is critical. The panelists stressed that your publication record in academia is the evidence of your productivity. They agreed that an applicant without publications would not be considered for a position at their companies.

My favorite part of the day was the opportunity to have lunch in small group format with the speakers. This part of the day was so popular last time, that the organizers created a double lunch session this year. Panelists were assigned a lunch room and students chose a room to eat in. After 45 minutes, students switched to another room of their choosing to meet another set of panelists. It’s a fantastic way to get more one-on-one time with the speakers. You get to ask more nuanced questions about their work responsibilities and make connections that could help you enter that field in the future.

I ate lunch with the panelists from the science communication session and then moved to science policy and law. In the science communication session, I learned about a career I had never heard about before: grant and manuscript editing. I think it’s a brilliant career option, and may be something I pursue myself in the future: the excitement of innovative ideas, the pride of creating a beautiful product, the satisfaction of successful publication or funding, but without the pressure of academia where your career and your lab personnel’s careers are at stake each time your funding needs to be renewed.

The panelists in the science policy and law lunch discussion had all been AAAS fellows in Washington, D.C. They were placed in fellowships at different branches of the government, the State Department, the Department of Energy, the Department of Defense, so they had very different experiences in their roles as AAAS fellows. If you apply for a fellowship, be ready to be flexible: your assignment and duties will vary greatly on a day to day basis, and remember the core mission of the organization to which you are assigned because it will inform all of goals and experiences. If you are interested in a fellowship post graduation, you could also consider an ORISE, PMF, or Christine Mirzayan fellowship.

For the final session of the day, I attended the panel on science administration. The panelists highlighted the career opportunities in project management, starting your own consulting firm, and acting as a program director at the National Institutes of Health. Students were encouraged to seek opportunities to practice management skills, for example, performing pro-bono consulting for Compass consulting and Taproot consulting. Transitioning to a government role is good for job stability and benefits, however, you need to be able to interface with people from diverse backgrounds and find common ground with people who have very different viewpoints than your own.

The day came to a close at a networking social and happy hour. A couple of the panelists made an appearance at the event, and were popular with students. We, the University Park crew, stayed for an hour and then piled into the van for the journey home. Luckily, all the football-goers had long since completed their journeys to State College, so the drive was traffic-free. As I returned the van to the rental lot near the cattle barn, the stadium erupted in pre-game fireworks. It seemed a fitting close to a day well-spent.

R Workshop and Resources

Huck graduate students and postdocs participated in the hands-on R workshop organized by the HGSAC
By Hillary Figler

The Huck Graduate Student Advisory Committee has begun a new initiative: skills workshops! The HGSAC polled students to determine topics of interest and then held an open vote to select topics for the first couple of workshops. Last month we had our second one, this time focusing on the statistical language, R. Libby Benson, graduate student in Human Development and Family studies and president of the We R: Penn State R Users’ Group led the workshop.

The workshop focused on taking those with limited R experience through the basics of functions, objects and plotting. Libby also taught participants how to produce reproducible files with documentation in RMarkdown. The goal of the workshop was to introduce participants to R basics and connect them with resources for continuing their R education. The We R group has weekly meetings that are open to all. Email leb237@psu.edu if you are interested in joining! Some resources are listed below (courtesy of Libby).

Look out for future HGSAC-sponsored workshops! On the docket this semester: team building. Comment below if you have additional ideas or would like to see other topics covered.

 

Downloads

Learn R

R Markdown

Visualization

Blogs (a wealth of useful information contained in these)

Getting help

Competitions

RNAseq Analysis in R

Power Analysis in R

Physiological Adaptations to Stress Training Grant, What is it All About?

Clockwise from front row right: Adwitia Dey, Kelly Ness, Billie Alba, Zhi Chai, and James Hester. Not pictured: Paul Hsu (Hershey Campus).
Current Physiology Training Grant Students. Clockwise from front right: Adwitia Dey, Kelly Ness, Billie Alba, Zhi Chai, and James Hester. Not pictured: Paul Hsu (Hershey Campus).

In 2014, the Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Physiology secured one of the National Institutes of Health’s prestigious pre-doctoral training grants. Titled, “Physiological Adaptations to Stress,” the program provides students in the sciences with interdisciplinary training by exposing them to diverse but relevant fields of study such as law and business. The grant provides funding and access to unique coursework to two to four students per year for three years each.

Various research topics are covered by current trainees on the grant, including the role of mitochondrial dysfunction in aging and vascular stress, chronic and disease-mediated inflammatory effects on the central nervous system, intestinal epithelial response to microbial infection in a vitamin A deficient state, and the effects of sleep restriction on adipocyte function. I am a member of the second cohort to be added to the grant, so I thought I would ask my fellow trainees some questions about being members of an interdisciplinary training grant.

In the fall of 2014, the first cohort of four students took a course on entrepreneurship through the business school. I asked Paul Hsu, a joint MD-PhD student at Hershey Medical Center and a member of the initial cohort of trainees, about the course.

“The entrepreneurship class was a good, broad introduction into the issues encountered by start-up businesses and the major obstacles that are encountered as a company grows. The course provided an environment to learn how to plan and direct the development of a company into a variety of endpoints (rapid growth, lifestyle entrepreneur, etc.),” said Hsu.

I think it is especially important to highlight how unique of an opportunity it is for graduate students in the hard sciences to take business and law school classes. This year’s cohort had the chance to take a business school course called Team Process, which I found to be an incredible experience. It exposed me to an entirely different way of thinking and seeing the world and taught me how to communicate more effectively. My fellow cohort member, Adwitia Dey, agrees: “The curriculum has taught me to evaluate my personal skills candidly and learn to work on my weaknesses actively, particularly [when] working in a team setting. This training will most definitely impact my future as a career scientist whether I follow a path in academia or industry because being an effective team member is important in all capacities.”

This summer, all six current trainees will have the opportunity to partake in a two-week intensive course on science patent law, a topic far beyond most doctoral training programs, but a critical aspect of many scientists’ current and future careers. Other focuses of the training include effective scientific communication to diverse audiences and a capstone course taught by faculty from numerous departments, entitled Physiological Adaptations to Stress. I cannot overstate the importance or honor of being a part of this training grant as the interdisciplinary training it provides will allow us to more effectively navigate future careers in the sciences and in science-related fields. I highly recommend that students from a broad range of science fields and from throughout the Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences apply to be a part of this unique training opportunity.

 

For more information about the training grant see here: https://www.huck.psu.edu/content/graduate-programs/biomedical-stress-physiology

Huck Students Organize Forum on Diversity in Graduate Education

Coverage of protests over racism at colleges and universities across the country seem to have recently taken the news by storm, but the issues inciting these protests are hardly new. Last week, two Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences students, Stephanie Bora and Jamaal James, organized a Forum on Diversity in Graduate Education to give students, faculty, staff, and post docs a place to address and discuss these ongoing issues of diversity in the context of graduate school and academia.

Jamaal James (left) and Stephanie Bora (right), organized the Forum on Diversity in Graduate Education
Jamaal James (left) and Stephanie Bora (right), organized the Forum on Diversity in Graduate Education

According to Bora and James, the focus was on underrepresented minorities in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) as well as issues affecting women and international students.

“Jamaal and I got the idea to do this the way many cool ideas form: over drinks at a conference!” said Bora. “We were out in New Orleans and started talking about race relations in general and our different experiences in grad school. We thought that continuing that conversation in a broader sense and raising awareness about subtle biases underrepresented minorities, women, and international students face might be a useful conversation.”

“We hoped to have an open and honest conversation about common obstacles that women, minorities, and international students face while in graduate school,” added James.

Dr. Avery August, guest speaker at the Forum on Diversity in Graduate Education

The two hour forum started with a seminar and Q&A session with Dr. Avery August, Professor of Immunology and Chair of the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at Cornell University. Dr. August was a Distinguished Professor of Immunology in the Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences at Penn State before moving to Cornell in 2010. As part of his seminar, Dr. August presented the demographics of underrepresented minorities and women in STEM fields from education through employment as well as future projections.

“We chose Dr. August because of his close ties with Penn State. We were also aware of Dr. August’s vast knowledge of diversity challenges within the STEM fields and his continuous efforts to diversify academia,” said James.

 

“The data presented by Dr. August was eye opening, particularly the fact that inequalities exist in the processes beyond graduate school,” said Adwitia Dey, a physiology student who attended the forum. “It is important that we, as members of the Penn State community, continue to educate ourselves through such forums and encourage dialogue amongst our peers in order to shape and foster a more positive work environment.”

Dr. August’s talk was followed by  a student-led panel discussion with Josephine Garban, Yurika Matsui, and Sandeep Regmi on privilege, microaggressions that occur in the work environment of the lab/graduate school, and potential solutions to these problems. The biggest issues discussed were the lack of underrepresented minorities in the life sciences and the subconscious nature of privilege and microaggressions.

From L to R: Josephine Garban, Yurika Matsui, Sandeep Regmi, and Stephanie Bora

The main role of the panelists was to help start conversations about different issues and offer a student perspective on these issues.

“We hope that understanding these things [privilege, microaggressions, and empathies] will help us overcome some of the negative consequences that can arise from social privilege, especially with everyone already having to deal with pressures that come with graduate school and academia,” said James.

Bora and James had organized this event with graduate students in mind and addressing day-to-day issues, but were happy to find that many faculty, staff, and administrators came to better learn how to address systematic problems and better mentor their students. These conversations were great to have Dr. August around for and also gave students and faculty a place to have a discussion about what students would like to see from their advisers.

“This was a great opportunity to learn about the state of minority faculty in the U.S. and an opportunity to discuss experiences of underrepresented and female students in our labs and classrooms,” said Dr. Patreese Ingram, Assistant Dean for Multicultural Affairs in the College of Agricultural Sciences, who also attended the forum. “I think it opened up eyes and hopefully hearts. It was great to see so much support for a welcoming climate from those who attended this session.”

A packed room listening to Dr. Avery August

Most people who attended this forum agreed that this sort of event shouldn’t be just a one time thing but rather should be something that occurs on a regular basis to keep up the discussion of issues of diversity in graduate education. Bora and James, both nearing the end of their Ph.D. programs, highly encourage younger students to make sure these events continue.

According to Matsui, other “next steps” discussed at the forum included: organizing a course on issues related to diversity that graduate students and faculty members are required to take, having a set place/person that students can talk to about issues specifically related to diversity, and encouraging graduate students to serve as mentors for high school/college students who are underrepresented minorities to encourage them to pursue college and advanced degrees.

 

If you weren’t able to attend the Forum on Diversity in Graduate Education, Stephanie Bora had these words of advice to give after attending the forum: “try to be aware of your privilege, of other people’s lack thereof, learn and talk about racism and sexism, and be empathetic to the experiences of others.”

The Forum on Diversity in Graduate Education was hosted by CMIID and the CSA.

Science Writing 101

Breaking from the usual format for the “Career Highlights” section of our blog, which mainly features interviews with seminar speakers from outside academia, today I come to you with some plain old career advice.

While there are many career paths to follow after graduation, one in particular is growing at a pretty fast rate. That field is science writing. Don’t know what it is? Well look no further, my friend. Welcome to Science Writing 101.

What is science writing?

If you couldn’t guess from the name, science writing is well, writing about science. More specifically, it’s about disseminating scientific research to the world. Science writers are responsible for translating newly published research into something that the general public can understand. Science writers don’t simply “dumb things down”; rather their job is to convey scientific research in a way that doesn’t use scientific jargon.

While science writing is closely related to medical writing, the two fields are NOT the same. In fact, medical/scientific writers write for a completely different audience. Typically, medical writers are responsible for research articles, grant proposals, regulatory documents, and patient education pamphlets. If such things interest you more, I highly recommend checking out the American Medical Writer’s Association (AMWA) website.

What kind of jobs do science writers fulfill?

There are two main routes one can take to become a science writer. The first way is through freelance work. Websites, newspapers, and other media outlets (like Popular Science and Scientific American) are always looking for freelance science writers to compose interesting stories for them. This is the most popular route that people take. However, some people simply write entire books for a living. However you do it, the greatest appeal to freelancing is of course the flexibility. You can work as much or as little as you want, whenever you want, from wherever you want.

For those who like more job security and the benefits of working for a company (e.g. medical, dental, vision, and 401K), then they should look for jobs as staff writers. Types of companies that have science writing staff include major publishers (e.g. ScienceNature, Cell) and research universities like Penn State. Such enterprises are always looking for science writers to compose press releases, maintain blogs, and perform scientific outreach.

How do I get started? 

The best way to break into science writing is to of course, start writing. A great way of doing this is to start your own blog (I can attest to that). If you’re still a student, you can contribute to local student publications and/or find an internship at your University’s news office. If you want to dive straight into the deep end, you can even send your best writing samples to magazines or online news outlets for publishing consideration. These articles can be about anything really, as long as they’re well-written. Finally, there are some freelancing websites you can sign-up for that help connect writers to the employers that need them. One such site is Upwork.com.

Additional Resources

If science writing sounds like your life’s calling, then the first resource you should check out is the National Association of Science Writers (NASW). While you can pay your way in as a student, professionals will need to submit writing samples and obtain personal references to become a member. Even if you don’t go for membership, there’s a lot of good free resources to check out too. A similar group calls themselves the “Council for the Advancement of Science Writing (CASW).

If you’re on LinkedIn, then check out the group “Science Writers“. This is a great place to seek advice about science writing, and a good place to show off your skills too.

Finally, there are plenty of sites that offer all sorts of advice for newcomers to the science writing industry. Simply googling “Science Writing Resources” will direct to a few. To help you get started here’s one of them.