HGSAC Welcomes New Co-Presidents: A Conversation

Outgoing co-presidents, Corrine Smolen and Alenka Hafner, welcome new co-presidents, Jessica Walnut and Avery Sicher

Image credit: Keith Hickey (Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences)

Do you have any advice for the incoming co-chairs? 

Corrine: Serving the Huck graduate community as HGSAC co-chairs is an incredibly rewarding experience and we know Avery and Jess will enjoy it just as much as we did. Our first big piece of advice is to listen to keep listening to the community so we can continue to provide workshops and seminars that will help Huck students as they progress through their graduate careers.

Alenka: Our second piece of advice would be to focus on their priorities. One of our priorities this past year was addressing justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion (JEDI) in the life sciences, so we brought new events to the HGSAC roster in the form of the Towards a More Inclusive Science (TaMIS) – Life Sciences initiative in collaboration with other ECoS departments. Corrine and I also made sure to highlight this point at existing HGSAC events with the inclusion of a “Breaking Barriers to Diversity in STEM” panel at HGSAC’s yearly Life Sciences Symposium, which had record-breaking attendance!

Corrine: While JEDI initiatives were our focus during the year, Alenka and I just want Jess and Avery to focus on the aspects of HGSAC that are the most important to them. HGSAC does a lot of incredible work, from the two aspects we already mentioned (TaMIS and the Life Sciences Symposium), to organizing career seminars to highlight the wide variety of career paths open to Huck graduate students, to our Skill Workshops which provide instruction on a range of career, professional, and academic skills, and to our social events which bring the Huck graduate student community together. You really can’t go wrong no matter what you want to focus on!

How have your previous roles in HGSAC prepared you for your new roles as co-chairs?

Jessica: My role as part of the social media committee was to maintain the website. I believe this experience provided useful insight into the importance of reaching Huck students through social media. During our tenure as Co-presidents, we would like to expand HGSAC’s social media presence to help better serve the Huck student body.

Avery: One particular strength of Jess and I is that we are very well-equipped to expand HGSAC’s online presence to reach even more Huck students this year. We want to capitalize on the momentum that Corrine and Alenka have started. We hope to see lots of Huck students at all of our events, including our career exposure seminars, workshops, and social events. Every year, our events have gotten bigger and more successful. To raise the bar even further this year, we are starting earlier than usual. I am grateful for them and for the hard work of the whole committee, and I am looking forward to a great year.

Do you plan to stay on HGSAC?

Corrine: I don’t think they could kick us out of HGSAC if they tried!

Alenka: We will definitely both be staying on the committee during the next year, but in a more supporting role. We really want to take a step back and let Avery and Jess run HGSAC their way. We know they will do a great job, taking on the challenge in their stride. They have both been a part of HGSAC for a while and we can’t wait to see them thrive in their new role!

Check-out the full Huck news story here

Presenting at the Life Sciences Symposium: Interview with Chinmay Sankhe

HGSAC member, Venky Zambare,  spoke with Chinmay Sankhe about his experience presenting at the Life Sciences Symposium. Chinmay is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Penn State whose work focuses on the epigenetic regulation of  Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT), a process involved in cancer progression.

Q1. What is your academic and research background?

 A1. I am a fifth-year graduate student in the Department of Chemical Engineering. My research is in the field of mechanobiology and cellular signaling. We study the mechanistic regulation of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and the role of nuclear epigenetics in modulating this process in pathological contexts of cancer and fibrosis.

 Q2. Why did you consider participating in the LSS?

 A2. I did not get a chance to participate and present my work in any in-person conferences due to the Covid-19 pandemic, so when I saw this opportunity of presenting in person in front of a real audience, I decided to participate in LSS. I believed that presenting in-person will help improve my confidence in public speaking and would also provide me with constructive feedback about my work from a diverse set of audience.

 Q3. What talk/presentation formats did you participate in? Did you have prior public

A3. My abstract was accepted for an oral presentation. In addition, I participated in the 3-min elevator pitch competition. Due to the pandemic, majorly, I was presenting over Zoom, but I did have my qualifying exam in person. So, I can say, I had prior experience presenting in the format of the oral presentation.

 Q4. How did LSS participation impact your science communication skills?

A4. Even though the members of the audience were from Life Sciences fields, it’s always a challenge to present your research so that everyone understands the key takeaways and have something they can remember your research with. I learned how to use less jargon words and describe my problem statement in simple terms. After my talk, I interacted with few of the audience members to get additional feedback on how to get better in my delivery of speech. The poster session was particularly helpful as I got to learn a lot more diverse life science research and also to observe on how the poster presenters give a perfect pitch to engage the audience.

 Q5. What advice would you give someone who is going to present at the LSS?

 A5. Just be calm and free. There is nothing to stress about as it’s a student-run event aimed for you to gain confidence in yourself and your research. Try to practice your talk or poster and be open to all kinds of feedback that you get. Presenting at LSS will help you in improving your communication skills and to better explain your research to other researchers.

 Q6. What did you enjoy about your time during the LSS? Was there anything you didn’t enjoy/wish was done differently?

 A6. The obvious part I enjoyed the most was presenting to a real audience instead of a virtual setting. The event was perfect, with nothing needed to be done differently.

Contact information  for Chinmay Sankhe

Email: css313@psu.edu

Linked in: linkedin.com/in/chinmay-sankhe-4b7140b0

Ph.D. thesis writing – tips from my own experience

Ph.D. thesis writing – tips from my own experience

Dr. Rupinder Kaur

It was a challenging task to perform. After finishing four years of research work in December 2016, I started writing the very first draft of my Ph.D. thesis and aimed to complete it in 3-4 months. Now, if you got the art of procrastination like me, it may take a couple of weeks to gather motivation and pen down the first few words. Trust me, these first words get you going and inspire you to keep writing!

Below are a few ‘how to’ tips for thesis writing that I followed-

Plan the timing in advance

If you’re sure you will complete your Ph.D. in four years, I recommend planning your agenda and starting writing in the 3rd year. If you already have a rough first draft ready during your 3rd year, think of how much easier and faster it will be to finalize your dissertation during your final year!
Also, keep an additional month or two as a buffer for your supervisor to make edits before the final submission. Remember, their schedule is way busier than yours, so respect their time.

Research your topic thoroughly before writing

Your thesis will be your own ‘masterpiece’ with limited input from your supervisor. Therefore, it is “your” job to invest adequate time researching the topic.

Communicate with your supervisor

Once you’ve planned the writing agenda, start communicating your ideas to your advisor. Do not hesitate to tell them your opinion about the thesis’s structure and content. Good communication is vital to a healthy and successful relationship with your mentors. Remember to ask for their feedback. Input from your supervisor will eventually make your thesis look, read, and sound better!

Mark your calendar

Designate time in in your calendar for strictly writing, this will prevent procrastination. Make it a goal to finish at least two pages per day. This way, you will build momentum, and your first thesis draft will be ready in a couple of months.

Keep a continuous flow

When you start writing, keep the flow going and do not pause to reread what you have written.  Write whatever comes to your mind about the topic. It does not matter if some things need to be clarified or edited. Once you finish writing the first draft, take a break and start working on it again after a couple of days. You will undoubtedly come back to it with a fresh set of eyes that will allow you to catch mistakes that were previously missed or add novel ideas that you did not think of during the first draft.

Control your social media feed

Social media has been one of the biggest distractors in recent years. You need to have self-control and avoid constantly checking social media. When writing, I suggest turning off the notifications, activating silent mode, and limiting the amount of times you allow yourself to check your phone.  This will help you focus and finish writing on time.

Keep your snacks handy

It sounds funny, but I munch on food around every hour. There are a lot of people like me out there. Hence, my best advice would be to keep your snacks handy while writing, so you won’t have to go into the kitchen and be distracted.

Final remarks
At last, I wish you good luck writing! I understand it can be daunting initially, but enjoying the process and not stressing about it will eventually pay off. Remember, a grand celebration is waiting for you when it is over!

 

Rupinder Kaur, PhD

PSU ID – rjk6018
Dr. Kaur’s Penn State webpage
Dr. Kaur’s Twitter page

November 15th: LGBTQA+ in STEM

Led by Isaac Dopp

Summary of discussion: Increasing visibility of queer experiences and connection of queer scientists

TaMIS met to discuss queer experiences in STEM and how we can improve queer experiences at Penn State. The meeting was attended by 9 participants and involved a discussion among students and faculty at Penn State about visibility and inclusivity for queer scientists in the life sciences.

Ideas discussed

  • Queer engagement in the sciences
    • Feeling safe and accepted
      • How to move away from “rainbow-washing”?
        • Participation in initiatives like the Rainbow Science Network can help show visible support
          • Awareness of programs like this are limited among graduate students
      • Relationship between personal identity and science identity
        • Hard to feel like a scientist when there appear to be no scientists like you
    • LGBTQA+ groups at Penn State
      • Mainly undergraduate student – focused
      • Graduate and older groups have become inactive
      • Is there space for an LGBT/DEI officer in existing organizations?
        • GWIS recently added a formal DEI committee to their organization
  • Retaining queer scientists
    • Visible support without “rainbow-washing”
    • Support is difficult in the face of student groups spreading hateful messaging at Penn State
      • “Pray the Gay Away” signs in the HUB
      • Yiannopoulos, Proud Boys, etc.
    • Combatting biases of those at Penn State
      • Data is not enough – experiences from women in STEM
      • How to evaluate our own biases?
      • Even if aware of the biases, some may not know what to do
        • What training is available?
    • Feeling of community
    • Mentorship
      • Connection with a mentor who is like you

Actionable items:

  • Raising awareness of programs like the Rainbow Science Network
  • Developing case study or role-play scenarios for faculty to discuss during faculty meetings
    • Possible scenarios
      • You overhear a student . . .
      • You are aware of a colleague who . . .
      • You recognize XX biases within yourself . . .
    • Already space for such activity within BMB faculty meetings – can space be created for other departments?

Effective PPT Workshop With Dr. Michael Alley Recap

On December 1st HGSAC held a workshop on how to make an effective ppt presentation. The workshop was led by Dr. Michael Alley. Dr. Alley is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at Penn State and has published a plethora of books and articles discussing what makes an effective science presentation. Dr. Alley is a proponent of the assertion-evidence approach, which has presenters center their talks around the message not the topic.  To begin the workshop he asked attendees what presentation impressed them the most and why. Two attributes were consistently mentioned,  the presentation was well organized with a strong introduction and the speaker showed excitement about the topic.  Alley emphasized the main goal of a scientific ppt presentation is to be “understood, remembered, and believed”. Keeping that goal in mind he used the analogy that a presentation is like climbing a mountain. The presenter needs to successfully guide the audience through the material, or in this analogy up the mountain.  Alley provided examples of effective presentations and explained how to incorporate those techniques into one’s own presentation. 

For more information about Dr. Alley, his publications, and presenting resources please follow the links below:

Huck Graduate Student Advisory Committee at Penn State