Tag Archives: Advice

The Beginning of the End: Part 4 of 5

In this Beginning of the End five-part series, I have been breaking down important steps in the process of finishing up your PhD and offering advice for each of these steps. Just to quickly review… Part 1 discussed the importance of meeting with your thesis committee and what you should be talking about with them. Part 2 focused on drafting a thesis outline and going over this outline with your adviser. Finally, Part 3 was all about understanding the formatting guidelines for the thesis that are required by the Graduate School. That leads us to the fourth installment:

The Beginning of the End Part 4 of 5: WRITE WRITE WRITE! With some more on writing.

iloveyouthesisAt this point you’ve met with your committee, drafted an outline, set up a defined timeline of your defense and when your writing should be done with your adviser, and downloaded the thesis template from the Graduate School. So now all you have to do is write a 100+ page document describing your research in its entirety — that shouldn’t be too bad, right? Ha.

At this stage of a graduate student’s career, he/she has likely never written anything like a Ph.D. thesis before. For those who already have a masters degree and thus had to write a masters thesis, it might not seem as daunting, but for those who are like me, the largest documents I have had to write describing my research are grant proposals and manuscripts. Whatever your level of experience, odds are you have had at least SOME experience in science writing, so you shouldn’t feel totally helpless.

Like I have said in previous posts, I myself am just now going through this whole process, so I can only offer minor tidbits of advice. However, I have asked multiple graduate students and faculty for their thoughts, and here is the breakdown of advice for writing your thesis. I want to especially thank Dr. Sarah Owusu (Physiology), Dr. Josephine Garban (Molecular Medicine), and Dr. Liron Bendor (Genetics), all recent graduates from Huck Institutes’ programs, as well as Dr. Melissa Rolls, Chair of the MCIBS program, for their advice and help on these topics.

“Writing a thesis/dissertation is not all about having naturally good writing skills. Writing a thesis involves self-motivation, time management, finding your level of comfortability, and understanding that this is not an easy process that can be done alone.” –Dr. Sarah Owusu, recent graduate of the Physiology program

1. Carve out large chunks of time in your schedule to write

Writing your thesis isn’t something you can just do in your spare time between experiments. If you’re all done with your experiments, then this isn’t something you have to worry about, but for most of us, that won’t be the case. Schedule entire days or half days, depending on how your schedule looks, where you will be writing and let your adviser/labmates know that you will be unavailable during that time. If you don’t schedule in time to write, then you will likely find excuses to do something else because, let’s be honest, a lot of things are more fun than writing a thesis.

thesiswriting2. Figure out the best place for YOU to write

In order to help you stay focused on writing, you need to figure out the best place for you to be able to sit down and write without being interrupted. Generally speaking, your lab/office might not be the best place because people know they can find you there, and if you’re the most senior person in the lab, you probably already know that people come to find you multiple times a day. However, if that works for you, then do it! My personal favorite place to write is at home, but a lot of people might also find this distracting. At this point in your life, you probably already know what will work best for you, so find a place, and stick to it. Popular places to write include the library (on campus or downtown), a coffee shop, or Barnes and Noble.

3. Make deadlines for yourself

With a thesis defense date set, you know that your thesis has to be submitted to your thesis committee at least two weeks before that. However, coming up with smaller deadlines helps you to stay on track and stay motivated. Set up a schedule of when you will send your adviser certain chapters so that he/she is expecting them, which holds you accountable. This will also make getting edits back much easier rather than sending your adviser the entire thesis once you’re all done — trust me, I’m sure there will be LOTS of edits — so sending them different sections periodically will make both of your lives easier. Also, go over this schedule with your adviser ahead of time — he/she has a lot of other things to do other than reading your thesis chapters, so knowing their general schedule and having an idea of how long it will take for edits to come back will be useful. Finally, don’t be afraid to remind your adviser (via e-mail or in person) when you have sent him/her chapters so that your e-mail doesn’t get lost amongst the hundreds of e-mail he/she is getting every day.

phd040908s

4. Don’t forget to take breaks and find ways to reward yourself

In addition to setting deadlines/goals for yourself, find a way to self-motivate yourself by giving yourself a reward when you accomplish those goals. This could be watching a movie, hanging out with friends, eating your favorite treat, anything! Whatever it takes to make you work harder. You also need to be able to give yourself a break once in a while — taking a break to go for a walk/run, take a nap, or whatever it is that works best for you — will help clear your mind and allow you to work more efficiently. Just make sure your breaks/rewards don’t get in the way of you actually accomplishing your goals on time!

19dfe64f8384778545ca907c9c1c5bf2

5. Find a writing buddy/group

Another way to help hold yourself accountable is to find a writing buddy or a group of writing buddies. Odds are you have friends or know of people who are writing their thesis at the same time as you, so set up times of when you will all meet up somewhere and write together. Another option would be to join the GPSA’s Thesis Dissertation Bootcamp they hold each semester.

 

Other important things to remember when writing your thesis:

1. Go back to your outline every so often to make sure you aren’t getting off-track — I imagine this is very easy to do, especially in the introduction!

2. When sending chapters to your adviser/anyone else who is reading your thesis for you, don’t just send them the first thing you wrote down. Take the time to self-edit your own work and at least check for spelling/grammatical errors. If you already have experience in science writing, chances are you already have experience in self-editing, too!

3. Make sure you are submitting a polished thesis to your committee — this means it includes all the necessary content that is written concisely and clearly, does not contain spelling/grammatical errors, and is in the correct format. The last thing you want to do is have your thesis committee walk into your oral defense thinking you are unprepared!

4. Remember that chapters can be a published or planned paper — this will save you a lot of time if the science/data has already been written! If you do this, make sure you clearly describe if the chapter is written from the paper verbatim, includes only part of the paper, or includes the paper plus more data. Also, if you did not write that published paper, you should not be copying it verbatim (that’s plagiarism).

5. That being said… DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. EVER.

phd050115s

 

Coming up next will be the last part of this series and will discuss the process of preparing for your oral defense.

Spring 2016: Career and Professional Events

Hoping to learn more about careers post graduation? Interested in building your professional skills?

The Huck Graduate Student Advisory Committee (HGSAC) aims to provide students with professional development opportunities and to promote exposure to all science careers, inside and outside of academia. We are a new organization that also collaborates extensively with other student organizations. A few of our goals for this semester include implementing a peer editing website, a meeting with the CEO of a life sciences recruitment firm, and joint happy hours with other GSAs. We’d love to hear about your events and offer assistance in increasing attendance — contact PSU.HGSAC@gmail.com.

I’ve complied a few of the HGSAC’s events for this semester and those from other organizations as well. For up to date information and to check out even more career and professional development related events, go here!

 

FEBRUARY

Saturday, February 27, 10am-1pm or 2:30-5:30pm: “How to be your own best mentor” workshop

Dr. Carolee Bull, Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology Department Head

Develop your own mission statement, make self assessments, and learn how to improve on your most needed skills.

 

MARCH

Friday, March 4, 1-2pm: HGSAC Seminar, Dr. Melissa Ho

Managing Director, Africa for Millennium Challenge Corporation

Learn about Melissa’s career history and the advice she has for graduate students, starting from her Ph.D. at Penn State in Plant Physiology to her previous post at USAID’s Bureau for Food Security as a Senior Policy Advisor.

 

Friday, March 4, 11am: BMMB Seminar, Dr. Kevin Lynch

Vice President, Scientific Assessment at AbbVie

Kevin leads the Business Development team at Abbvie, and as such, he is knowledgeable in topics such as venture investment, academic collaborations, licensing and acquisitions. He received his Ph.D. from Penn State in Molecular Virology… we are in similar boats as he once was!

 

Saturday, March 5, 9am-5pm: Graduate Student and Post-Doctoral Career Day

Penn State Hershey College of Medicine

Featuring careers in Science Communication and Education, Research, Government and Regulation, Business Development and Consulting, and Science Policy. There will be food provided!

Transportation is also provided. Please RSVP here.

 

Friday, March 25: HGSAC Seminar, Dr. Josh Yoder

Medical Science Liaison at Sanofi Pasteur

A Medical Science Liaisons work in various capacities in the pharmaceutical, biotech, or other health care industries. They work to ensure products are used effectively, are scientific experts within the company, and can work with physicians. Learn about Josh’s journey before and after his postdoc at Penn State Hershey. His past employers include Thermalin Diabetes, I’m sure he has some advice for us!

 

Monday, March 28: Postdoc panel, hosted by the MCIBS GSA

Featuring postdocs, Dr. Robert McGinty (PSU), Dr. Lauren Chaby (Michigan), and Dr. Sarah Carnahan Craig (PSU)

Get advice from how to get a postdoc to how to leave a postdoc. This will be an informal event with food!

 

APRIL

Tuesday, April 12, 1-8pm: Novel Ecosystems Research Symposium

“An afternoon with Penn State Ecologists”

A great way to learn more about ecology in a fun setting with food, drinks and a poster reception.

 

Friday, April 22: BMMB Seminar, Dr. Jim Hershey

Director of Pharmacology at Merck

Jim leads research activities by setting program strategy to maximize growth opportunities in drug discovery. He has a long history at Merck and I’m sure is knowledgeable about the process of moving up in a company. Come learn about the Pennsylvania industry scene!

 

Monday, April 25: HGSAC Seminar, Lauren Celano

Lauren is the Founder and CEO of Propel Careers, and works to build relationships with life science students and companies. She would have some great insight on the career process after getting your PhD, as I’m sure she has helped others through it.

 

MAY

Friday, May 13 to Monday, May 16: Plant Biology Symposium

“Plant Stress-Omics in a Changing Climate”

Learn about the new ways Big Data is improving the plant biology field. Submit an abstract for a poster if you’d like.

 

Friday, May 20 & Saturday, May 21: Life Science Symposium

100 Life Science Building (Berg auditorium)

This symposium will include research talks, poster presentations and group activities to enhance the collaboration and communication between life science labs at Penn State. It’s free! There will be food, science and good company. Featuring two keynotes, including Dr. Jim Pawelczyk, a former NASA astronaut and current Penn State professor and Dr. Jonathan Sleeman, Director of the National Wildlife Health Center at U.S. Geological Survey.

 

Tuesday, May 24 & Wednesday, May 25 “Living with our Viromes” Symposium

Viral microbes, emerging viruses and vaccines are just a few topics that will be covered at this annual symposium.

 

 

Science presentation and job seeking skills assessment (anytime)

Want to improve for that conference talk or job interview? This is the time!

Contact Jeffrey Lovelace (jbl942@psu.edu)

 

Recap on Lunch with Jennifer Doudna

Navigating through grad school can be a daunting process in itself.  While you might find yourself busy with your research projects and teaching duties, making time to figure out how to make the best of your time as a graduate student, and how to make yourself an ideal candidate for your future career, is essential.  The Huck Graduate Student Advisory Committee (HGSAC) aims to help you along with this process, by providing career and professional development resources, and by letting graduate students meet with professionals in various STEM fields.

Dr. Jennifer Doudna came to Penn State and delivered to a full house.
Dr. Jennifer Doudna came to Penn State to deliver a seminar on the CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Last semester, Dr. Jennifer Doudna came to Penn State and gave a seminar on the CRISPR/Cas 9 system. She was gracious enough to also have lunch with graduate students for a Q & A session (co-hosted by the HGSAC and BMB department). Below are her (paraphrased) responses to our student questions.

Career advice or questions:

Which experience or opportunity during your education or early career contributed most to your success?

There were two main experiences that I think contributed the most. I grew up in Hawaii, and when I first read “The Double Helix”, that was the first “spark” that got me interested in science. Then, in the 10th grade, there was a program where they had a scientist talk to students, including a biochemist working on cancer cell research, and that helped reinforce my interest.

How do you think the interactions with your previous advisers (Dr. Szostak and Dr. Cech) benefit your academic career?

With my first advisor, I learned that you need to be proactive. As a first year, my advisor asked me about this idea, and he actually trusted me to make decisions on the science, even as a novice–that made a big impression on me to have early success.

During my post doc, Tom Cech was insightful about making the best of your data and interpreting your results, which also benefited my career.

Could you recommend some ways to find a lab for a promising postdoc experience? Should the lab of a very well-known PI be preferred, or the lab of a new PI in a promising topic?

Whether the PI is well known or new, you should pursue what you are interested in first, and then consider the personality and environment of the lab, make sure it’s a stimulating environment.

Could you provide some insights on what helped you with first being a professor?

It was more like a fly by the seat of your pants experience. You have to be willing to do every job in your lab, initially. That means even fixing leaky faucets. It’s a great idea if you can hire a technician right away to help set up. This person would be able to help you initiate the culture you want in your lab. Science is about people working together.

Dr. Jennifer Doudna with HGSAC members during the Q & A lunch session.

Graduate student/research advice:

Do you have any advice for women who want to pursue an academic career?

Don’t put yourself down, try for positions even if you do not think you are likely to get them, and make sure you choose a supportive life partner.

How do you complete a project efficiently?

Delegate, rely on students and postdocs, and make sure that there are subgroups of the lab so that everyone is teaching one another. Then, meet regularly, and constantly ask the questions of “are we working on the most important question? Is there new literature?”

What kind of qualities do you look for in a candidate?

Honestly I think my job is to figure out what the students are best suited for. We need scientists trained in all sorts of methodologies, and my job is to help them figure out what they should focus on.

Work/life balance and gender adversity:

What have you found to be the most effective way to balance work/life?

Pick the right life partner. If you want to have kids, involve them in your work–bring them to your conferences and trips!

Have you been faced with any adversity as a woman in science? If so, how did you overcome it and do you have any tips or advice for graduate students in general?

I’ve generally worked with males and females who were very encouraging. I think it’s important to have a personality that can deal with delayed gratification.

CRISPR/Cas9 questions:

Did you have a moment where you had to consider the ethical considerations with CRISPR, like human genome editing?

There was an evolution in my way of thinking. Initially, there was so much excitement that this was possible, then it became clear it would work in any cells including embryos and germ cell line. It was when they genetically modified monkeys that it seemed like a profound topic to discuss this in the community. I have gotten involved in the call for a public discussion about gene editing, especially in the germ line. Tomorrow, I will be attending a summit at the International Academy of Science, for a global discussion of the matter. We need a transparent discussion about this, to not do that would be irresponsible.

How did you balance the research on new biotechnology and industrial development of a technique?

We’re still focusing on biology and the underlying molecular mechanisms-understanding this enables you to do many other things. By working on fundamental mechanisms, we can learn more about how to refine this process of gene editing, gene disruption and gene replacement. It’s not a transition but rather a natural progression.

What is your prediction of how CRISPR/Cas9 will be used 10 years from now?

Transcriptional control and live-cell imaging will be further developed. Eventually, this will be a tool in your molecular toolbox, like PCR.  Its’ an enabling technology, I am excited with the science that will be done with this.

Did you celebrate when you realized what you had with CRISPR?

There was definitely this moment of joy when I realized what we had.

Other questions:

Have you ever considered working in industry?

Yes, I worked at companies in Boston but I chose academia because I found it was the best way to pursue “pure” science. I worked for Genentech for a few months then came back because I wanted to have an applied direction to research. As the VP of research, there’s actually a lot more administrative and management duties than I expected. I missed actually doing the science. That’s why I went back into academia.

What do you think about the future of high-risk science funding?  With decreased funding, how do you move forward?

We need to have a mechanism to enable scientists to be creative and explorative. Remember, a grant is not a contract.  Once you have the money, you should have some freedom to pursue “risky” science. You will likely be rewarded. Your judgement should come in here as to whether or not you think it will succeed. You can bootstrap ideas. In general, I think you don’t need huge resources to do good science.

 

For more information on future career and professional development events and seminars, visit our website here!

The Beginning of the End: Part 3 of 5

Last week, I posted Parts 1 and 2 of this five-part series that’s all about advice related to what you should be doing as you prepare to finish your Ph.D. Part 1 focused on the importance of meeting with your thesis committee, what you should be talking about with them, etc., and Part 2 focused on drafting a thesis outline and going over this outline with your adviser. As promised, this next post will focus on…

Part 3 of 5 in The Beginning of the End: Understand the formatting guidelines for your thesis required by the Graduate School at Penn State

Before getting started, I’m going to give the disclaimer that I have not personally taken part in the process of finishing a Ph.D. thesis and submitting it for format review to the Graduate School. As such, I am hardly an expert! However, I am in the process of doing this myself, so I’d like to think that I have somewhat of an idea of what I’m talking about. Also, I asked around for some advice on what I should discuss from students who actually have gone through this process, and that information is included in this post.

If you are someone who has gone through this process and has some personal insight to share, please do so in the comments section!!

First things first, why should you care about understanding the formatting guidelines for your thesis required by the Graduate School at Penn State?

  • EVERYONE’S thesis is reviewed by the Office of Theses and Dissertations for format review
  • You need to follow and meet ALL of these guidelines in order to get final approval of your thesis and thus graduate
  • Meeting the formatting guidelines ensures that should you decide to print/bind your thesis, it will look pretty

fef25ec110022892e411a6966f315550

Now, without further ado, here’s my advice…

1. Use the template provided by Penn State

If you’re someone who is at the point of getting ready to start writing or has already started writing your thesis, I’m hoping you didn’t just open up a blank Microsoft Word document and start going for it. If you are planning to do this/are currently doing this, STOP RIGHT NOW!

If you’re someone who is at the point of getting ready to start writing and has looked up the formatting guidelines provided by the Graduate School and are completely intimidated, have no fear!

YES! Penn State DOES provide a Microsoft Word template that contains all of the required formatting and explanations for different headings, etc. and where they should be used throughout the template. Awesome right!? You can find the templates HERE! All you have to do is download the file for the version of Microsoft Word on your computer and then start writing using this template so that all of the formatting is done for you.

You’ll see that there’s also a second download link for a user guide on how to use that template, which I also suggest reading through.

These templates make use of the “styles” feature in Microsoft Word, which allow formatting to be kept consistent throughout the entire document. Styles include: font name, font style, font size, font color, paragraph alignment, and spacing. If you aren’t familiar with this feature or how to apply a style to a line or paragraph of text, then read through that user guide I mentioned, which explains all of that for whatever version of Microsoft Word you are operating.

The user guide also explains how to insert figures or tables, manage footnotes and references, import text from other Word documents, edit front matter (table of contents, list of figures, and list of tables), add new sections, and change page numbering (only if needed), with all directions specific to the version of Microsoft Word you downloaded for your template.

In addition to these templates and user guides, the Graduate School also has a list of how to avoid the most common mistakes and a full thesis and dissertation guide that you should take the time to read through to double check that you are doing everything correctly.

2. If you’re not using the template, carefully read through the thesis and dissertation guide

Should you not want to conform to the styles in the thesis template or you just feel like the added challenge of doing all the formatting on your own, detailed instructions for the formatting guidelines can be found in the thesis and dissertation guide. This includes: type specifications, margins, page numbers, in-text citations, front matter formatting, back matter formatting, table/figure formatting, adding oversized materials, and formatting copyright/authorship/ProQuest/UMI.

Personally, I’m just going to use the template because writing a Ph.D. thesis is hard enough without having to worry about formatting everything from scratch.

3. Remember to submit your thesis for format review by the deadline

As I mentioned previously, every person needs to submit his/her thesis to be reviewed by the Office of Theses and Dissertations for formatting. This allows the staff to take a preliminary look and check for any formatting errors. The Graduate School has deadlines for this review, which are updated for each semester, and can be found here. Make sure you know this deadline!

To submit your thesis for format review, you need to go to the eTD (electronic thesis and dissertations) website. When uploading your thesis for format review, you actually don’t have to turn in the final, polished product. As stated on the Graduate School website, you should turn in as complete a draft as possible that includes the front matter (title page, committee page, abstract, etc.), several chapters, and the back matter (references, appendices, etc.). All the reviewers will do is check formatting – they won’t be checking for spelling/grammatical errors or whether your data is statistically significant.

After submitting your thesis for format review, you should get feedback of corrections and detailed instructions within two weeks via e-mail.

 

Coming up next in Part 4 of 5 in The Beginning of the End is write, write, write, WRITE! With some more on writing.

cdc821ecafa7434c0f15c28a62f02901

The Beginning of the End: Part 2 of 5

Earlier this week, I posted Part 1 of this series, which focused on the importance of meeting with your thesis committee as you near the end of your Ph.D. So at this point, you’ve met with your committee, they think you’re ready to defend, and you’ve decided collectively what you need to do before that defense date. In this post, I will be moving on to…

Part 2 of 5 in The Beginning of the End: Drafting a thesis outline, organizing references, and communicating with your adviser about expectations.

I decided to combine these three steps into one blog post because they all kind of go along with the same idea of PREPARE EARLY.

Before getting started, I just wanted to give special shout outs to Liron Bendor, a recent graduate of the Genetics Ph.D. program, and Dr. Melissa Rolls, Chair of the MCIBS program, for all of their advice that helped me to write this post. You can actually see even more advice from Dr. Rolls on writing your thesis by clicking here!

phd052206s

1. Drafting a thesis outline

A Ph.D. thesis is, from my understanding, on average 120-130 pages, so it’s not exactly a document you can just sit down and start writing without thinking ahead about it first. So what’s the easiest way to organize your thoughts before you write? Make an outline!

Based on the theses that have come out of my lab, it’s my understanding that a thesis contains six main parts: abstract, introduction, materials/methods, results, discussions/conclusions, and references. Depending on your lab/adviser’s style, these parts may be organized a bit differently, but you will certainly need all of them in one way or another.

Side note: Don’t take my advice on making an outline as the truth for any and every program. Make sure to check with your adviser/program chair/other students in your program/lab to see the way a thesis is usually organized for your discipline!!

 

Abstract: Now, an abstract isn’t something you can necessarily outline, so we’re going to skip that and come back to it in a later post about the actual process of writing

Introduction: The introduction is the section that students often find is one of the hardest parts of writing your thesis because it requires you to not only have a comprehensive background knowledge of your field but also to be able to concisely review that background knowledge. Here are some tips on what an introduction should entail and how you should be outlining/writing it:

  • Covers all the background information for someone to understand the field that your work is contributing to
  • Includes your key questions and hypotheses
  • Add figures/diagrams as needed to help illustrate key points
  • Ends with a paragraph that previews the rest of the thesis by describing chapters and how they relate to the published work as well as collaborations involved in the work
  • Outline topics you need to cover and then break those topics down into individual sections
    • Advice from Liron Bendor: “For each section, I wrote down everything I could remember about that topic then read ~10 review papers per topic, and supplemented my remembered information with essential information from the papers (citing all the way!).”
  • Can start outlining this chapter at any point after your comprehensive exam!!
  • DOES NOT include a list of anything and everything that closely relates to your research project(s) — remember, you want to be CONCISE!

BPj7r9YCEAESdRoMaterials & Methods: Since you had to write your first lab report back in high school or maybe even your freshman year of college, you’ve always had to include a materials and methods section. I can’t tell you how many times I have gone to past lab members’ theses in order to figure out how they did an experiment, so just like you’ve always learned, this section is meant to allow someone to repeat exactly what you did. This section is also something you can start working on simply by organizing the different reagents and protocols you use — trust me, this will be a LIFE SAVER down the road because you won’t be rummaging through freezers and your notebooks trying to figure out where a reagent came from or how much 1X PBS you used to wash your cells. This section will obviously differ based on different labs, but make sure you include items like antibodies, chemicals, kits, primer sequences, etc. for materials and ALL of your protocols!

Also, depending on how you’ve decided to organize your thesis, you can either have this section separately or you can include a materials and methods chapter within specific results chapters if you have multiple projects that are pretty different from each other. Once you get your outline set up, you can better see which would make more sense for you.

Results: The results section can also be pretty difficult, especially if you don’t have much experience in science writing. However, if you’ve already been writing up manuscripts, then you should have a pretty good idea of how to do this. Results sections are often framed around your figures, so getting your figures/tables organized is the first step in writing a results section. If you can’t see the figures/results in front of you, how are you going to describe them!? However, a results section is so much more than just describing what a bar graph shows you, so remember these important tips:

  • Set up the question/reasoning as to WHY you did each experiment, which includes your hypothesis
  • Have a summary sentence/paragraph at the end of each section to wrap everything up
  • Write out the titles of figure legends — this will help you to outline your results section as a whole!

Depending on how you’ve decided to organize your thesis and if you’ve already published papers/are in the process of writing them up (and you’re the first author!), you can actually make each chapter one of those papers! As long as it’s okay with your adviser, of course. Just make sure to include if that chapter is the published paper word-for-word, if it’s the paper plus some additional data, or if it’s only part of the paper. Also, if you’re using results that you yourself did not obtain, make sure to acknowledge him/her specifically and exactly what he/she did!!

Discussions/Conclusions: In my opinion, this is the real meat of any piece of scientific writing as it describes what your results really mean not only to your hypotheses/experimental questions but to the field as a whole. When outlining this section, be sure to include:

  • The main conclusions from each major question
  • How these conclusions have advanced the field
  • What questions still need to be answered
  • If you can, a model that summarizes your findings
2. Organizing your references

Throughout your entire thesis, you will accumulate HUNDREDS of references. If you haven’t already started to organize your references throughout graduate school, I highly suggest making use of a reference manager. Don’t know how? Check out this blog post that Molly wrote!

3. Communicating with your adviser about expectationsunnamed

Once you’ve got a solid outline of your thesis drafted, sit down with your adviser and go over this outline to see if you’re missing anything major and also to see if he/she likes the way you’ve organized it. This is also a good opportunity to start talking about expectations:

  • How many pages/words should the thesis be?
  • How many chapters should there be?
  • How long should each section (introduction, results, etc.) be? You might be thinking a 40-page introduction section is perfect while he/she thinks 20 is plenty.

If you don’t have access to theses from previous lab members, you can ask your adviser for them to see as a reference. Also during this meeting would be a good idea to talk about a timeline. Your thesis is due to your committee two weeks before your defense, but your adviser will likely want to see it before then, but how much earlier than then? If this is your first major writing experience, my guess is at least a month before your defense. However, a 120-130 page document is a lot to edit at once, so you should try setting up a timeline of when you will get specific chapters to your adviser. Working on deadlines like this will likely also keep you motivated to keep writing!

 

Coming up next in Part 3 of 5 of The Beginning of the End is understanding the formatting guidelines required by the Graduate School! I’ve heard from quite a few sources that they can be confusing, so I’m going to try to break this down into a more simplified format. Stay tuned!

The Beginning of the End: Part 1 of 5

As a Ph.D. student that is about halfway through my fifth year in the in the Molecular, Cellular, and Integrative Biosciences program, I started to understand the “beginning of the end” feeling about six months ago.

downloadWhen you tell someone that you’re a first-year Ph.D. student, you’re looked at as one of the babies. You’re bright-eyed and bushy-tailed, rotating through different labs trying to figure out where you will call “home” for the next few years. As you move on to become a second- and third-year, you start teaching, worrying about your candidacy and comprehensive exams, and of course learning firsthand all of the things that can go wrong during any given experiment. You then get to your fourth-year where you’re really focusing on your research, maybe still doing some teaching. But then once you start saying “Oh, I’m a fifth year!” or anything after that, you start to get the response: “You should be finishing up soon then, right?”

This is how I knew I was at the beginning of the end.

I recall being a first- and second-year student and looking up to the senior graduate students in my lab and the labs around me who were defending, graduating, and getting jobs, and thinking, “Wow, that seems so far away for me.” And yet here I am, a fifth-year, looking back on graduate school wondering where all the time went.

I’m not going to lie, getting closer to the end of graduate school is both exciting and terrifying. Exciting for the obvious reasons of earning my Ph.D., getting a job, etc., but also terrifying because the end of your Ph.D. is hardly a walk in the park.

So, for my fellow senior graduate students, I thought I would write a series of advice on finishing up your Ph.D. I’m in the process of experiencing a lot of these things right now, so while I can offer some of my own advice, some of these I am just now learning myself. Therefore, I also asked for some advice from friends who have already defended and graduated.

With this, I begin Part 1 of 5 in The Beginning of the End: Meet with your thesis committee.

phd111612s

If you’re one of those students who doesn’t meet with their thesis committee regularly, whether that be formally or informally, then I highly suggest you change that.

Your thesis committee is made up of 4-5 faculty members that you and your adviser felt would best guide you through the process of earning a Ph.D., and you should be utilizing them more than just for your comprehensive exam and your thesis defense. That doesn’t mean that you have to schedule a formal meeting every six months. Students are encouraged to go talk to members of their thesis committee individually, whether that be to discuss with them results/interpretations from an experiment that he/she might be an expert on or just to give them an update of what you’ve been up to.

You and your adviser should ultimately decide together when to have a committee meeting, but if you haven’t talked to your committee in over two years, then it would be a good idea to schedule a formal meeting. Some helpful advice from Liron Bendor, a recent graduate of the Genetics Ph.D. program, was to meet with your thesis committee as often as possible so that formal meetings are more relaxed and feel less like you are re-living your comprehensive exam.

When you and your adviser have decided that you are getting close to being ready to defend, you should schedule a formal thesis committee meeting 6-12 months before you want to have your defense. Remember that faculty members have busy schedules, and just getting 4-5 of them to all be available at the same time can be a struggle, so schedule that as soon as possible as it may take a few tries to find a time they can all agree on.

Whenever you have a thesis committee meeting, generally the first thing they will ask you is what you are hoping to get out of that meeting. If it’s just to check in and update them, tell them. But if you want to discuss a timeline of finishing up, be straightforward about that from the beginning and HAVE A PLAN. Of course, be sure to discuss this plan with your adviser before the committee meeting so that you are both on the same page. I myself had this meeting with my thesis committee last November, and I did the following:

  1. Went over my projects and the different research questions I had been working on
  2. Discussed overall conclusions from my results
  3. Explained what experiments/questions are still remaining (that I plan to address)
  4. Gave them a timeline of when I planned to submit papers, finish experiments, and start writing my thesis

While I had been meeting with some of my committee members individually on an informal basis, having this formal meeting with them all together really helped me to narrow down my timeline and prioritize what experiments I needed to complete. It also helped me to realize what a realistic timeline actually looked like. This is obviously the first time going through the process of finishing a Ph.D. for any of us, but for your committee members, they have not only gone through this process themselves as a student but also with countless other graduate students, so they have a pretty good idea of how timelines should look.

As is true with most things in life, having a plan for what I need to do and when I need to do it by has made things a little less stressful.

 

Stay tuned for The Beginning of the End: Part 2 – Drafting a thesis outline, organizing references, and communicating with your adviser about expectations!