Civic Issues-Multiculturalism

Culture and assimilation are two topics that America has struggled with for a long time.  Since its founding, the United States has been referred to as a “melting pot” for different cultures. People from different backgrounds, religions, regions and nationalities were supposed to be able to come to America and be accepted, regardless of their beliefs or individualities.  However, the often less talked about issue is the individualities of the people born here. What do we share or differ in as Americans? What is the American culture or the American tradition? Do these things even exist?

 

Throughout our education, we students have learned about the peoples of the world.  We have learned about the ancient civilizations such as the Greeks and the Romans. We have learned about Europe and the Renaissance. We have learned about Eastern Culture.  From this instruction, most people are able to associate certain characteristics, traditions or beliefs with countries and peoples of the world. Most people know about their family’s traditions and heritage.  You may celebrate holidays via conventional rituals. You may make meals based on the recipes of an old relative.  Many Americans know at least something about their family and past culture. But can the same be said for American culture?

 

Does American culture exist? Are there any traditions that bind our “melting pot” together? I struggle to think of many. Thanksgiving and the Fourth of July could be considered unifying cultural events, but they are just events. Those two holidays unite the country for two days of the year. What about the other 363 days?

 

Another bonding factor could be American ideology. Life. Liberty. The Pursuit of Happiness. Freedom. Family. Courage. Prosperity. These words have long been associated with the American dream. But that is part of the problem.  Despite their omnipresence throughout our nation’s history, none of these things are tangible.  You cannot see, wear, or eat any of these things. What binds our country together then?

 

Following the Thanksgiving idea, some people might think back to the colonies as a traditional American idea.  Images of black hats, silver shoe buckles, Native Americans and tobacco fields might fill one’s mind. But upon further investigation, this just can’t be a legitimate element either.  This country was founded by a number of different groups with extremely different goals. Puritans, Quakers, and planters cannot be categorized as a united people at the time of colonization. Their goals, values and beliefs were too diverse to be thought of collectively today.

 

So where does this leave present-day America? Does this lack of tradition contribute to the problems we face with the assimilation of others today? Do we reject the culture of immigrants because we are subconsciously envious of their traditions? Do we want immigrants to give up their cultures and languages because ours don’t unite us Americans?

Multiculturalism is supposed to mean “the unique cultural heritage of racial and ethnic groups, some of whom seek to preserve their native languages and lifestyles,” (Owen 2). Unfortunately, this starkly contrasts with the idea of “assimilation” that so many people tend to focus on in today’s debate. The term melting pot is incredibly vague. Does it mean that America is a place where everyone becomes one or is America a place where everyone is free to express their own culture and speak their own language? Should these be the only options or is there a middle ground?

The issue of multiculturalism is a complicated one. Hopefully as the semester goes on, I will be able to focus on specific aspects of the debate but for now, I started big and realized how much there is to discuss on this issue.

This article proved to be very interesting and really got me thinking about the range of issues available for discussion.

http://www.civiced.org/pdfs/germanPaper0905/DianaOwen2005.pdf

WIP Online Forum

Technology is constantly changing our world in ways we can’t even imagine. On the most influential advancements is the Internet. The Internet allows people around the world to communicate with the click of a button. It allows friends and families to share photos and videos with each other. It allows businesses to connect and expand with contacts around the world. The Internet also grants people access to unlimited resources and opportunities to voice their opinions. The benefits of this last ability are very hotly debated. Today, I will focus on one example of such an outlet: the ESPN website.

ESPN (or the Entertainment and Sports Programming Network because I definitely didn’t know what this stood for) acts as an online forum for everything relating to sports. The site is similar in layout to many other online news sources. Articles are posted and beneath, readers comment with opinions, insights and input. At least, that’s how it is supposed to work.

I feel like ESPN’s website is a perfect example of what not to do on the Internet. Name-calling, bullying, racial insensitivities, and ignorance fill the comment sections of most articles from golf to NASCAR to football to tennis. I cannot remember the last time I read a thread of comments on an ESPN article and actually felt enlightened when I came away from it.

I think this type of forum is ineffective for several reasons. First, I believe that most online forums are generally ineffective. The accessibility of these sites allows anyone with a computer to voice his opinion whether or not he has any knowledge about the subject at all. Second, the subject of the topic, sports, is problematic.

The sports world is an odd one. Many people are engrossed with it. Many people couldn’t care less about sports. Still other people enjoy watching sporting events but show little additional interest. Regardless of personal beliefs, most of us can agree that the sports world doesn’t exactly follow the laws of logic. People support teams and athletes to the death and passionately hate others. Sports superstition causes otherwise rational people to do ridiculous things and think nothing of it. Combine these factors and allow people to interact online? The consequence is chaos.

The combination of sports passion/hate mixed with the ability to comment anonymously with no repercussions? Little good can come from this situation. People in America are already crazy about their sports. Given the chance to interact with equally obsessive fans, people create an atmosphere rich in ignorance, stubbornness and acidity. Personally, I would be afraid to voice my opinions because no doubt, others would refute whatever I said, and in a cruel way.

ESPN is a sad excuse for an online forum, yet people continue to participate.

Take A Stroll Down This “Avenue”

As everyone knows, THON is right around the corner. Most of us have been canning, THONveloping and THONline for months now in an effort to break last year’s record at THON 2013.  This year, a new fundraiser took place called Chords For A Cure.  This concert was held at Eisenhower Auditorium on Saturday. Tickets were a bit pricey ($35) but all proceeds went directly to the 2013 THON total.  The two bands featured were Walk the Moon (who’s single “Anna Sun” was featured in last semester’s blog highlighting singles) and this week’s feature, Boyce Avenue.

boyce-avenue

I first discovered Boyce Avenue two years ago during one of my usual adventures into the depths of YouTube.  Their videos consisted only of covers of popular songs but each video had millions of hits.  After watching a few, I realized why: these guys are incredibly talented!

Boyce Avenue was formed in Sarasota, Florida in 2004 by three brothers: Alejandro, Fabian and Daniel Manzano.  The name, “Boyce Avenue,” is a combination of two streets the brothers lived on growing up. Upon Daniel’s return to Florida from Massachusetts, the three began making music together.  Instead of promoting their work through tours, Boyce Avenue created a YouTube channel in 2007. The next year, the independent group released their first full-length album, “All You’re Meant To Be.”  After the record attained success, Boyce Avenue toured in North America and Europe and signed a record deal with Universal Republic in 2010.

Since then, Boyce Avenue has made a name for itself. More than half up the group’s uploaded YouTube videos have over 10 million views.  They are no longer signed with Universal and have put out two more albums on their own. Extensive tours have taken them around the world on 6 UK/Ireland tours, 6 continental Europe tours, 3 Canadian tours, a tour in Australia and one in Southeast Asia. The group has performed with Secondhand Serenade, Goo Goo Dolls and Switchfoot and recently opened for One Direction in the UK in Ireland. Don’t forget that despite this busy schedule, Boyce Avenue made a special trip to Happy Valley for Chords for a Cure!

Boyce Avenue’s style is unlike others’ I have heard. The group has a talent for stripping today’s popular music down to a basic acoustic sound behind smooth and ranging vocals. Beneath almost all of their videos, you can find comments where people praise the band for creating a track better than the original.  In many cases, I agree.

As much as I love Boyce Avenue’s covers, I am not a huge fan of their original work.  Don’t get me wrong; it’s definitely not bad. I would just hesitate to call it great. At the very least it’s average, but still a very ear-pleasing average. All of the song’s are easy to listen to. They just might be easy to skip over as well.

Overall, Boyce Avenue is very talented. Their renditions of popular songs are unmatched. Hopefully with time, the band will find its niche in the original music department. For now, we will just have to settle with fresh and new versions of our favorite songs!

P.S. I may have gone a little overboard in the link department. My bad.

 

YouTube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/boyceavenue/

Official Website: http://boyceavenue.com

“We Found Love” Cover: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6I3kgbBp6PY

“We Are Young” Cover: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdVW5722jrw&list=SP0BD69368AB943C89

“Glad You Came” Cover: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rojPMESoiAA&list=SP0BD69368AB943C89

“Just the Way You Are” Cover: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhFSgnvKqm4

“Dare to Believe”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SAF0Maa3q4

“Broken Angel”:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DE9YiFTxClU&list=SPBFD0FCD67BC3655E&index=2

 

 

 

RCL Week 2

From a nonpartisan point of view, the 2012 election campaign has been an interesting one, to say the least. The latest topic of discussion revolves around Mitt Romney’s comments regarding the “47% of people who do not pay income taxes” and those who take advantage of government benefits.

This most recent line is just one of the dozens of ridiculous statements made so far this year by both Romney and Obama.  The art of rhetoric is totally lost in this new age of ten second sounds bytes and social media campaigns.  But all the blame cannot be put on the candidates.  Modern technology, including Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, has changed Americans’ view of communication.  Politicians don’t have to be efficient communicators today.  In fact, they intentionally do not use much rhetoric because the complete thoughts, well-structured arguments and thorough discussions are not what the general public wants to hear.  The public wants emotionally driven one-liners that they can latch on to.  The public doesn’t want a calm, organized, civilized debate.  The public wants a slanderous advertising battle full of false claims.  This situation cannot be entirely blamed on the politicians.  However, they are at fault in the matter.

Is this what politics is ultimately about? Absolutely not. The public does not demand politicians to use rhetoric.  However, politicians have the power to restore rhetoric in today’s political world.  It is unnecessary and preposterous for politicians to simply say what donors want to hear.  Candidates should speak about their beliefs and what they truly want to do for the country, not what they think will generate the most income for the campaign.

Unfortunately, that is not how the political world works today.  Until one politician, or group or politicians is willing to take the risk and restore the use of rhetoric, nothing will change.  The change has to be initiated by the people at the top. Obama and Romney are both extremely intelligent, educated men.  They are more than fully capable of communicating effectively and with diction.  They, along with everyone in Washington must bring about the change. Otherwise, before we know it, debates will be held over Skype and press releases will be distributed through Twitter. Rhetoric needs to find its way back into politics.

 

“Kings of Convenience” Rule

If you’ve ever spent any amount of time with me, you’ve probably encountered me listening to Pandora, singing too loudly with headphones on, or jamming out driving down the road.  I constantly have music on.  Unfortunately, for the longest time, I couldn’t find music to listen to while studying.  I would just end of listening to the lyrics and singing along.  So I began listening to instrumentals. Thankfully, my friend introduced me to this week’s band, the Kings of Convenience.

Kings of Convenience is an indie folk pop duo from Norway. Members Erlend Øye and Eirik Glanbek Bøe were childhood friends whose music career began by making a comedic rap about a teacher. KOC is known for its “delicate tunes, calming voices, and intricate and subtle guitar melodies.  Both Øye and Bøe write and provide vocals for their songs.  KOC was first signed in 1999 and has debuted its first album in 2001. “Quiet is the New Loud” was produced by Coldplay and was inspired by Simon & Garfunkel, Elliot Smith, and Belle & Sebastian.  KOC has released two other albums, “Riot on an Empty Street” in 2004 and “Declaration of Dependence” in 2009. Due to the large period of inactivity, there was speculation that the duo had split up.  However, between March of 2007 and January of 2008, they played a few concerts, putting an end to the rumors.

Despite being a lesser-known group, KOC has had some big success.  The duo toured quite extensively in 2008, including stops in Boston, New York, Toronto, Mexico, Brazil, Chile, Argentina, Switzerland, Italy and Spain. Off the album ROAES, “I’d Rather Dance With You” was MTV’s Best European Music Video in 2004.

My favorite thing about KOC is how simple, mellow and ear pleasing the music is.  Whether I am driving, walking across campus, sitting in my dorm, studying or working out, KOC instantly makes me happy.  I feel that a big problem with “chill” music is that a lot of the time it is slow because it’s sad. With KOC, the majority of their songs are uplifting in a soothing way.

In my opinion, the best tracks are “Homesick,” “Misread,” “Cayman Islands,” (all from ROAES) “Boat Behind,” and “Mrs. Cold,” (both from DOD).  Each offer different rhythms, feelings and techniques.

My criticism of KOC would be lyrically, they are not always as fluid and meaningful as I would like.  Often, lyrics have an unbalanced feeling to them, seeming to throw off the flow of the instruments.  Frequently though, I get so caught up in the overall sound of the song, I don’t even listen to the lyrics as words, but as sounds.

So why should you look up this band? You can listen to it anytime. It is mellow and excellent for drowning out the world.  The sound is new, refreshing and a nice change up pace from today’s music. Kings of Convenience is an extremely talented and unique group I am so fortunate to have found.

 

“Boats Behind”:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kO4Qs9Ch0uo&feature=related

“Cayman Islands”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-ppARtcQfo

“Homesick”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oll6UfK6iUg&feature=related

“Misread”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOxE7IRizjI&feature=relmfu

“Mrs. Cold”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBtjik6uYrY

Civic Engagement Speech

Monday September 18, I presented my civic engagement speech.  I was not particularly excited about giving my speech on the first day, but now I am glad that it is over!

Overall, I was pleased with the execution of my speech.  My preparations went well! I practiced in the music rooms downstairs in my building several times.  Then I practiced in front of a few people on my floor.  Although it was very awkward at first, in the long run, I found it to be very beneficial. I got some positive feedback and tips from my listeners.  They also made me aware of some habits I have when speaking that I would not have been aware of otherwise.

As far as the actual presentation, I was satisfied.  I used my visual aid well and I prevented myself from looking at it too often.  I don’t usually struggle with eye contact, and it wasn’t a problem on Monday either.  Also, my timing was very accurate.  During practice, I had consistently been getting a time of three minutes and fifty seconds.  My actual presentation time was three minutes and forty-four seconds.

The rest of the speeches given Monday by my classmates were very good.  Most students spoke about artifacts.  However, the artifacts varied drastically, from volunteer work to a campaign against smoking to Kony 2012.  For the most part, I was unfamiliar with the artifacts presented, so I was able to look at them completely unbiased.  There was only one other interview speech given.  I felt like we both organized our speeches the same way, so that was encouraging right before I got up to present.

I would have to say I am looking forward to hearing the rest of the speeches in my class. But I will definitely enjoy them a lot more now that I am finished!