The concept of the “minority tax” refers to the extra burden placed on underrepresented minority (URM) faculty and students in academia, particularly in STEM fields. This tax often manifests as disproportionate responsibility for leading and advocating for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, which can hinder their academic performance and career advancement. The dilemma for URM individuals is the struggle to balance this moral obligation with their own professional goals.
(more…)
The impact of implicit bias and microaggressions can be profound, contributing to feelings of alienation among marginalized individuals and perpetuating systemic inequalities. These issues hinder efforts to foster diverse and inclusive academic environments. In our discussion, we explored methods to better understand our own biases, recognize how these biases manifest, and take steps to prevent microaggressions at both individual and institutional levels.
(more…)
Our November meeting focused on how to encourage greater engagement and support for the LGBTQIA+ community within the sciences. Participants shared ideas and challenges around visibility, support, and fostering inclusive environments for queer scientists.
A note on language: LGBTQIA+ will be shortened to LGBT for the rest of this post for brevity. This is simply to keep the content concise, and it is not intended to exclude any identities within the community. We recognize and respect the full diversity of sexual orientations, gender identities, and expressions, and are committed to inclusivity in all discussions and initiatives.
(more…)