1. My first possible topic I thought of was the GEICO “hump day commercial” being as possesses a memorable quality yet at the same time a slightly over-memorable quality–the memory of the humorous camel makes one forget the name of the company. I remembered this advertisement almost vividly, quoting it frequently even–as many people do–, but I had to look up what company it was for; maybe it’s just me, I believe this commercial contains not only positive rhetoric within it, but some negative and/or wrongly used rhetoric which lower the effectiveness of the add. Unlike some ads which contain a catchy jingle incorporating the company’s name into it, their ad focuses on the pathos filled humor of the camel and what he says as opposed to emphasizing the barely noticeable slogan of “get happy, get GEICO”. As well, aside from pointing out the fact that this will make us happy, there are minimal facts ( barely any logos or ethos) to support their stance, though they use kairos well in timing the humor. I could examine the positive and negative aspects of this ad.
2.
Or another advertisement–also a commercial– I could analyse is the dove “real beauty “sketch” which is about a true experiment (gains ethos here) where a artist had ransom people sit behind a sheet so he couldn’t (he had no clue what they looked like) see them and asked them to describe themselves to him; he drew a drawing of them based off of this. Then he got the same people and had them sit without a sheet there and drew them as he saw them. When the pictures were compared, the ones where the people described themselves appeared uglier than the ones drawn from actual life. The point made here–one endorse by Dove–is that everyone is more beautiful than they think they are; this majorly appeals to pathos. I think it would be also fun to write my essay on this on just because it’s very unique for a commercial and captures a true essence to sell the product. I also could try to go against the positive flow of rhetoric and find some instances where the rhetoric could be better and more factual. Either way I will be happy with my topic, though I’m leaning toward the first just because I think it will be the more fun out of the two.