Copyrights: A World of Loopholes and Lawsuits

First off, I would like to preface by stating that I believe copyright laws today are too strict. Sure, they are supposed to prevent one artist from stealing from another, but at some point a line was crossed. It seems that nowadays, all you hear about copyrights pertains to artists suing others for using their work in some way, or just people trying to generate some type of additional revenue off of their work.

Copyrights are everywhere in today’s society.

Now take a moment to imagine a world in which every work (music, movies, artwork, etc.) was placed into public domain by default. Public domain, as defined by Wikipedia, “consists of works that are publicly available; while according to the formal definition, it consists of works that are unavailable for private ownership or are available for public use.” In this scenario, all of these works are essentially created for the greater good and enjoyment of mankind, not for profiteering. Instead, we seem to be living in a world of loopholes and lawsuits.

I can remember back to my elementary school days, making a multimedia project in computer class. Our teacher told us to find a piece of music to use. She was sure to mention that we were allowed to use no more than 30 seconds of a song at a time because of copyright laws. This concept seemed so strange to me at the time. I loved music, I played music. I viewed it as something we all make to share for the joy of others to listen to. I was surprised that day to learn that if I was to use 31 seconds of a clip, I would be performing an illegal act. I would be breaking the law! Looking back on the situation as an adult, I can obviously understand the legal situation more clearly, but as a child, I simply could not understand how one extra second would make my video presentation illegal. Of course, I conformed to my teachers wishes despite the amusing prospect of going to court against Barry Manilow and the ghost of Frank Sinatra.

More recently in the news, there are still many struggles (on the music front). Believe it or not, the song “Happy Birthday” has lead to a lawsuit. An article in the New York Times explains how the original tune can be found in a 1924 songbook with the title “Good Morning To All”. As a classic song, a Manhattan filmmaker assumed the piece fell under public domain before using the song for a scene in the movie. She was surprised to receive a $1500 licensing agreement from the Warner Music Group, who owned the rights to the song. The article goes on to explain that the company makes close to 2 million dollars each year from simply owning the rights to the song. A quick YouTube search for happy birthday yields hundreds of thousands of results! It is truly sad to think that people are making money off a song a song that every two-year-old has sung form memory. A lawsuit was filed requesting that the tune be placed in public domain. It will definitely be interesting to hear the results in the near future!

Children singing Happy Birthday

In conclusion, although there are good reasons that copyright laws exist in the world today,they have proven in some cases to be a necessary evil. With new songs being produced every day, we are surrounded by copyrights and should not expect them to go away any time soon.

Reflections on a Bacterial Metropolis

“Think of your body as a big city apartment building.” This quote is from the beginning of a paragraph in “The Teeming Metropolis of You”, a short article found in The Best American Science and Nature Writing 2012. This particular article discusses the various types of bacteria that live within our body, and how they play an important role in many essential bodily functions.

As a student of the scientific and medical fields, I found this piece to be very interesting. The section pertaining to the quote above discussed how the bacteria found within your body functions as a form of protection. Normal bacteria in our digestive tracts can function to lower the pH, or acidity, of the environment. A lower pH makes it more difficult for dangerous bacteria to survive, while the healthy bacteria are used to it, and can thrive happily. As author Brendan Buhler puts it, “Just by maintaining building occupancy, [gut flora] keep bad elements from moving in as squatters, beating up the superintendent, ripping out the copper pipes, and turning the whole place into a crack den – a healthy biota makes the pH of our guts inhospitable and even toxic to many pathogens.”

I have encountered this subject of gut flora many times throughout my academic career. It is a much larger field of study than most people might think. It is not just one type of bacteria that live inside of us, but thousands of different species, many of which have yet to be discovered. The article discussed that the different types of bacteria between two people are never the same – even among identical twins! Buhler writes, “Two unrelated North Americans will share only 10 percent of their intestinal bacteria, and a North American and a South American will share only 5 percent.” These numbers are astounding, informing us that the diversity of these microscopic organisms is immense.

These various species play a number of roles in the body. Of the trillions of bacteria, they can be broken down into three categories: essential flora, opportunistic flora, and transitional flora. Essential flora makes up the bacterial family found in probiotics like yogurt. They are the primary “protectors” against harmful pathogens, or the opportunistic flora. These dangerous species, which may sound familiar, include E. coli, Streptococcus, and many others. The third category are transitional flora, which to many healthy individuals, will pass through their systems undetected. In a person with a deficiency of essential flora, however, these transitional bacteria types can cause a lot of damage. Basically, these types of pathogens are only dangerous to those with compromised or weakened immune systems.

The article discussed a study that I also found to be very interesting, which touches upon the “gut-brain axis”. In the experiment, groups mice were raised – both with and without gut flora. They found that those mice that did not have these essential bacteria died much easier when exposed to simple pathogens. They also noted that these deficient mice were also much more likely to take risks than their healthy counterparts. “If you take mice that are still growing and colonize them with the same bacteria, they will develop more typical fear responses. This suggests that our biota can influence brain development.” In summary, the study revealed that the bacteria of our gut are not only necessary for protection against pathogens, but also play a critical role in proper development of the brain.

I found this article fascinating. Each time this topic is discussed, there is always new information available. It will be very exciting to see how this field will continue to develop in the future as our technology improves. It is not a subject to be taken lightly. I have a feeling that we will begin to see many new medical advances emerge. This is only the tip of the biological iceberg!

Vaccinations – A New Controversy for an Age Old Cure

As a student in the field of Immunology and Infectious Disease, I have taken a keen interest in medicine, and vaccinations in particular. Viruses are very intriguing organisms; they contain no living cells, are too small to be seen even with the most powerful light microscopes, yet they have the genetic makeup to invade a host, essentially hijacking its living cells.

Vaccines are a mixture of proteins, cellular elements, and most importantly, a dead or severely impaired version of a dangerous virus. This mixture is delivered to us, the general population, in the form of an intravenous fluid, or even a nasal spray. The dead viral particles are then taken up by the body’s immune system, and that specific viral strain is remembered by your body. Should you ever encounter a similar pathogen again, your body will already have the blueprints to know how to defend itself properly. There can also be a lot of variation when it comes to viruses, even among the same strain. This is why there are new vaccines every year (sometimes even more frequently) for the flu, as well as other viral strains (HPV, H1N1).

Vaccinations are a hot topic in the medical field right now. Many people are under the impression that by getting vaccinated, you are going to increase your chances of catching the contagion. It’s a general mindset of “Why should I get the vaccination if its just going to give me the flu anyway?” As a student in the field, I  believe that every person should get vaccinated each year. These are mixtures created in a laboratory by the world’s top doctors and researchers, whose sole purpose is to prevent the spread of viral infection. There is a chance you may feel a bit under the weather following a vaccination – this is simply your body’s way of letting you know that it is working. The Boston Globe posted a short article online about the concerns that many patients share in the doctor’s office prior to receiving their vaccinations. In my opinion, I would much rather prefer 2-3 days of grogginess (if this happens at all) than 2 weeks of being bedridden with the newest strain of the flu.

The new vaccines each year are risky in some sense. There are teams of virologists that gather data at the start of each flu season and attempt to predict what the next strain will look like. Usually, this is a successful venture, but there are times when a new vaccine may only be 50% effective. As more information is discovered about a new strain, then updated vaccines can replace the old formulas. It is a continuous learning process that has gone on for many years. It’s also worth noting that even if an unexpected strain gets out, if I’ve had my 50%-efficient vaccine, I am still twice as likely to remain healthy compared to those who have not gotten the shot or spray.

On the other side of the argument, there have been brief studies conducted, such as that in Natural Life Magazine that have collected data in an attempt to prove that live-strain vaccines increase the risk of other illnesses, particularly in children. They found that the children in the study who received the whooping cough vaccination were more likely to develop asthma than the children who did not. Something that many people fail to understand about this (especially compared to flu vaccines) is that this was a live vaccine. This means that the viruses were not killed before being put into the vaccine, they were simply injured or “paralyzed” in a sense by heat treatment. These live vaccines have different side effects than those prepared from dead viral strains; they are often more likely to affect your immediate health.

Another topic worthy of discussion is the widespread fear that vaccinations cause autism. This myth bothers me deeply, as it is simply not true. The Huffington Post posted an online article about why many parents still fear vaccinations for this reason. Originally this claim was made by Andrew Wakefield in 1998 in a paper titled “The Lancet”. The data of the experiment was altered to his benefit in order to prove his hypothesis was correct. In reality, however, there are no links between autism and vaccinations. Scientists have tried to find connections between the two for years with no such luck. Parents should not be afraid to get their children vaccinated. It is encouraged. It is in their best interest. It is the smart thing to do.

Overall, there are pros and cons when it comes to vaccinations. However, as a student of the field, it is extremely clear to me that the pros far outweigh the cons. Every single man, woman, and child should be vaccinated for various pathogens throughout their lifetime. These are regulated and mass produced to be used by citizens such as yourselves. Unless you honestly believe that our government would approve, time and time again, of vaccines that will harm al healthy, and free of those nasty little bugs that creep up on us the instant that the weather gets cooler.

Link

Exploring Medical Breakthroughs Over the Web

In today’s world of rapidly expanding knowledge of science and modern medicine, there is now a quick and easy means of keeping up to date with daily medical breakthroughs across the globe in a blog known as medGadget. This professional web blog contains a collection of articles written by a team of medical doctors and biomedical engineers. The articles are all of a professional nature, consisting of a mixture of new  techniques or  means of improving the field of medicine across the  world.

MedGadget sets out to inform doctors, researchers, prospective medical students, and even patients of the most up-to-date advances in the field. With a quick blog search, one has access to a virtual library of advances with the ease of the click of a mouse. With their “categories” feature, browsers can view article pertaining to one particular medical field with dozens of options.

Each post, written by a different expert in the field, is only a few brief paragraphs describing the new procedure or device. The posts are brief and concise, providing accurate information in as few words as possible. The purpose of each entry is  to quickly inform the audience, rather than dive in depth about each new breakthrough. Many are also accompanied by a picture or short video clip to either demonstrate how a tool is used, or to just visually show off the technology. For example, a recent post about using drones to drop AED’s to citizens in need was discussed, along with a picture of the miniature flying vehicle. Links can also be found in the articles back to the original story, often times being from another medical blog containing more information on the matter.

All in all, medGadget serves as a quick means of learning of new medical breakthroughs. The brief articles and visuals make it easy for browsers to find a topic of interest, quickly learn the basics, and providing them with a link if they wish to learn more. I highly recommend this blog to virtually anybody who is interested in the medical field. Regardless of your preferred field, there is sure to be hundreds of articles to catch your eye.