Lesson 10, Blog reflects the nations of Asia, and China.
According to Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, specifically regarding the nation of China who accrued the score of 80 percent in regards to the power distance perspective, which fosters the following belief “ At 80 China sits in the higher rankings of PDI – i.e. a society that believes that inequalities amongst people are acceptable” Hofstede(2016).
The above statement would explain the inequalities that exist within the communist nation of China evening modern times.
However as time passes and especially within the younger generations of the population of china a more democratic form of governance is desired, resisting the age old, time tested methods currently used.
According to the information in our readings “collectivistic cultures, such as China, tend to put group needs ahead of individual ones so that the group processes in place already will be very group focused. Adding individualistic types of rewards (such as personal recognition) may be seen as inappropriate and may be resisted “(PSU,2016).
.
The above statement reflects the Chinese stance on their Authoritarian viewpoints as well as their in relation to control over its, citizens who are regarded as subservient, subordinates applied to society essentially to be “workers “ enlisted to the government for use towards the common good of the nation.
However, again within younger generations of their society, hints of democratization are noticeable as students protest against the government’s application of authoritarianism controlling its citizens.
As protests continue to occur in China towards a more egalitarianism style of civilization, which is relatively far away from occurring, while across continents the nation of India is having far less issues in controlling their citizens due to their varied ideals on how to govern their society.
Regarding Hofstede’s cultural information dimensions model as concerned with masculinity, in which the nation of China scored a sixty-six in comparison to the world average of 49.53.
According to the following quote from Hofstede’s cultural dimensions model “At 66 China is a Masculine society –success oriented and driven. The need to ensure success can be exemplified by the fact that many Chinese will sacrifice family and leisure priorities to work”(Hofstede, 2016).
This is due to the fact that successful business ventures and or just simply earning enough money to support their families is a matter of utmost importance to the Chinese family as well as their society, and the Chinese culture in general. Following is yet another quote from Hofstede’s stating that” The migrated farmer workers will leave their families behind in faraway places in order to obtain better work and pay in the cities”(Hofstede, 2016).
This incredible sacrifice to uphold one’s family has become commonplace in Chinese society. Family members often move away from their family to seek work across the nation where they live in difficult conditions in order to secure a better salary in hopes of obtaining a better quality of life.
Again in relationship to Hofstede’s cultural dimension of uncertainty avoidance China has earned a score of “ 30 China has a low score on Uncertainty Avoidance. Truth may be relative though in the immediate social circles there is concern for Truth with a capital T and rules (but not necessarily laws) abound”(Hofstede, 2016).
Again according to this quote from Hofstede” The Chinese are comfortable with ambiguity; the Chinese language is full of ambiguous meanings that can be difficult for Western people to follow”(Hofstede, 2016).
In reference to long-term orientation, and according to information found online in the module in lesson 10 “China’s defining cultural dimension, meaning that they tend to have a very extended view of time, in particular, with regard to future-oriented behaviors, such as saving and adapting to new circumstances”(PSU,2016).
With our long-term orientation score of 87, there are records dating back as far back into history as four thousand years ago regarding the Chinese culture, so it is no surprise that adaptation, hard work, perseverance and strategic planning for future endeavors has been solidified into the Chinese society as well as their culture.
”This fact isn’t surprising considering how long China has been around (it is one of the earliest human cultures, dating back over 4,000 years) and has had to plan for circumstances that led to that successful existence”(PSU,2016).
In regards to Hofstede’s dimensions of indulgence verses restraint, and the low scores that both China (24), and India (26) placed displaying a mindset stemming from the beliefs of unwavering personal sacrifices in efforts to reap benefits in the future.
“Remember that countries that have a lot of restraint have a lot of social norms to regulate behavior. In particular, they will be good at controlling immediate gratification and instead will be able to delay rewards and stay focused on task until a project is completed “(PSU,2016). These factors have been previously well engrained into the Chinese culture, which is a win – win situation for the Nation of China.
Nation containing societies that possess these abilities are key to focus upon as a nation such a china has been doing which is essentially creating a massive manufacturing infrastructure attempting to create a strategic plan incorporating long term goals to enhance their economic position. This has been working quite well for China, although while the nation has had incredible success in this venture, the nation has several hurdles that it needs to conquer within their boarders.
One being the fact that the dream of home ownerships is quite out of reach for the average Chinese family, even those who have university backgrounds and have secured well paying jobs. Even the monthly fee for rents for a small one-bedroom apartment in any of the major cities in China has risen to an alarming height. This situation presents a real problem for the Chinese society.
Regarding the limitations within the current Chinese culture is such that their people are brought up by society to believe in a self limiting behavior, which is in general one should not look to achieve positions beyond the level of their birthrights.
This limiting thought process is unfortunately perpetrated within the Chinese culture; according to the information presented in the lesson ten module “People should not have aspirations beyond their rank “(PSU, 2016).
However, in gathering thoughts based upon the information that I have read in our textbook as well as the information found within this module, it is my belief that the nations of India and China will do quite well in business ventures in the future.
The following quote from our readings in module ten addresses the issue quite well “Remember that countries that have a lot of restraint have a lot of social norms to regulate behavior. In particular, they will be good at controlling immediate gratification and instead will be able to delay rewards and stay focused on task until a project is completed “(PSU,2016).
Especially China with their exceptionally low score of twenty four in regard to indulgence versus restraint, a score such as this displays that they are quite used to refusing the temptations of immediate satisfaction, while holding firm to their beliefs that hard work, perseverance, and good planning will bring about a future overflowing with the fruits of their labor.
The following quote supports the above statement in that “The similarities of the scores indicate that on this cultural dimension an overall Asian strategy is likely to be successful “(PSU,2016).
With all due respect to the authors of our textbook, as positive of a picture as is painted by managing cultural differences, as well as the information in the modules in relationship to the citizens of China , and their authoritarian government who in their extraordinary entrepreneurial mannerisms, all is not as pristine and rosy as one is led to believe.
Although, it is my belief that overall China is well placed to achieve success in their future endeavors.
References:
Moran, R. T.,Abramson, N.R., & Moran, S.V.(2014). Managing cultural differences: New York: Routledge.
PSU, Olead course, lesson 10, Asia focus on China, India , 2016.
Retrieved from: https://psu.instructure.com/courses/1802572/modules/items/21179122
Hofstedes, 6D model of cultural dimensions, China, 2016.
Retrieved from: https:/geert-hofstede.com/china.html