RCL 1: How Can We Change the Climate Surrounding Environmentalism

In an era where environmental concerns should unite us as stewards of the Earth, the state of discourse in American society regarding the environment is disappointingly divided and often takes on a religious fervor. The very essence of rational debate and pragmatic problem-solving has been overshadowed by impassioned dogmas and polarized viewpoints, leaving little room for productive discussions and comprehensive solutions. It’s time we recognize this alarming trend and work towards a more nuanced and inclusive conversation.

Environmental issues have become a topic where people cling to their beliefs with the passion of religious zealots. Instead of examining scientific evidence and engaging in thoughtful conversations, individuals often retreat to their ideological talking points, unwilling to entertain differing viewpoints. This dogmatic approach hinders any meaningful progress. Climate change denial, for instance, is often rooted in ideological stubbornness, dismissing a wealth of scientific consensus. However, blind support of the newest “green” technology or policy can have just as negative of an effect. Religious undertones have further exacerbated this issue. For some, environmentalism has taken on the role of a new-age religion, complete with its own dogmas, symbols, and moral imperatives. 

To combat this divisive and religious rhetoric, we must strive for a more inclusive and evidence-based conversation. It’s essential to recognize that environmental issues are intricate, with no one-size-fits-all solution. Embracing diverse perspectives, from climate scientists and economists to policymakers and everyday citizens, can pave the way for holistic solutions that balance ecological well-being with human needs.

Furthermore, fostering scientific literacy is crucial to bridging the gap between differing viewpoints. Encouraging education on climate change, environmental economics, and the potential benefits and drawbacks of various green technologies can empower individuals to make informed decisions rather than relying on preconceived notions or sensationalized narratives.

I believe that more and more in recent years this religious mindset on certain issues has definitely risen. It is not just present in environmentalism, but also with gun control, abortion, and many other issues. I believe this mindset is detrimental as it causes both sides to ignore reasonable facts and data in order to preserve the status of their ideology. Not only does this hinder our ability to find the best solutions to these problems, but it also leads to a very divisive culture in our society that is good for no one. There seems to be an overall mindset developing that if someone has ideas that are not the same as mine, they are wrong. Again, this is a dangerous way of thinking and furthers unnecessary divisiveness in our society.