RSS Feed

Posts Tagged ‘RCL’

  1. Civic Issues: The Senate & Gun Control Legislation

    April 19, 2013 by Audrey Goldman

    For this week’s Civic Issues Blog, I will be discussing the recent gun control legislation that has been making it’s way through Congress.  The specifics of the bill is that it would require expanded background checks for those who wish to purchase a firearm.  This sentiment is echoed by 90% of the American public, who strongly believe that there should be thorough background checks in advance.  However, the bill failed to pass the Democratic majority held Senate.

    Obama issued some unusually strong words to Republican congressmen, stating that they were only doing the bidding of the NRA and that politicians such as PA’s own Pat Toomey and Joe Manchin of WV for deliberately spreading misinformation about the bill to garner a legion of citizens against it.  And in addition to that, there were even some politicians that were using the example of what just happened at the Boston Marathon as a time that if more people had been carrying firearms, it may have been prevented.  The logic in this, of course, is incredibly flawed and draws upon the intense emotions of an extremely recent tragedy to skew the argument in favor of less gun control.  Now we know that, in fact, the two culprits in Boston continually fired guns at officers while on the run, giving even more of a reason as to why there needs to be extensive background checks before selling firearms to individuals, because you just never know what they’re going to do with them otherwise.

    Over the past several months, since the Newtown school shooting, there has been a more urgent feeling amongst Americans when it comes to the need to pass harsher gun control legislation.  That was the event that spurred the creation of this bill, that only covered one aspect of gun control, not even a wide array of current problems associated with it.

    This issue of gun control is currently frozen in the Senate, meaning that they will pick back up with the legislation in a short while.  Until then, I hope that the American public, with what we’ve had to endure over the past several months relating to gun violence, will take a stronger stance with their representatives to hopefully pass some legislation.


  2. Applying for Retail Jobs

    March 12, 2013 by Audrey Goldman

    During our Spring Break, I spent the majority of my time doing something that I really needed to do: apply for jobs.  This process is hopefully somewhat familiar to most individuals by the time they reach college, and it’s one that I’ve had to do a few times in the past as well.  I started working at 14 at my local supermarket, and then at 15 started working at Rita’s Water Ice up until the end of this past summer.

    However, since most of the jobs that I hope to be eligible when I am finished college require several years of retail experience, I decided that I would start that process now, as early as I could.  So, I went to the King of Prussia mall (of which I have already written a blog on earlier this year) and applied to around 20 stores for full time positions this summer.

    My dream company to work for is Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessy, or LVMH for short.  LVMH is a luxury brand conglomerate, consisting of brands such as Louis Vuitton, Marc Jacobs, Puma, Fendi, Emilio Pucci, Donna Karen, and Givenchy (though there are many more).  Naturally, to demonstrate my obvious interest in the company, I applied to the Louis Vuitton and Puma in KOP, where I will hopefully get an offer from at least one of them.  In addition, I applied to work at several other big-name stores, such as Burberry, Bloomingdales, Michael Kors, Levi Strauss, Eddie Bauer, Gucci, Marciano, Armani Exchange, Nordstrom, Salvatore Ferragamo, Hermès, Free People, Coach, Victoria’s Secret, Kate Spade, Tory Burch, and Lord & Taylor.  Most of the applications were on paper, so it took quite a while to hand-write in all of my information.

    Over the next few weeks, I will probably either have to take a bus back to my area to interview with these stores, or have some interviews over Skype.  I’ve already gotten a call back from Eddie Bauer and have to interview this weekend, which I’m very excited for.

    I thought that this would be appropriate for my fashion-related blog since it has to do with how I hope to get into the fashion business.

    Additionally, I have recently made a separate fashion blog.  Feel free to check it out!  http://hhahc.tumblr.com


  3. Deliberation Forum

    February 1, 2013 by Audrey Goldman

    For my project on deliberation, I am choosing for the moment to use the forum reddit.com as the place in which I will take part in online deliberation.  I chose Reddit  for several reasons, namely the diversity in participating age groups, the way in which posts are structured and moderated, as well as the fact that it’s one of the most frequented sites on the internet.

    Since I’ll likely be discussing a political topic, like LGBT rights or congressional gridlock, I want to get the opinions from as many and as diverse of a people as possible.  Members on Reddit are between the ages, on average, of mid-teenagers to anywhere in their fifties or sixties.  I think that having a varying scope of opinions while deliberating is important, so that’s something that I think Reddit is great for.

    In addition, Reddit is structured in an upvote-downvote basis, so comments on a post that carry the most ethos or information get bumped to the top of the conversation, while those that are divergent from the topic get downvoted to the bottom.  This allows for people that have the most to say to make their thoughts and opinions heard slightly louder than those who do not.

    Lastly, with around 30 million unique visitors to the site per month from all over the world, there is a very good chance that many will take interest in my deliberations and join in the conversation.


  4. A Christmas Carol Political Cartoon

    December 7, 2012 by Audrey Goldman

    In this political cartoon, there is a revamping of the class Christmastime story A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens, just in terms of the economy and politics.  The 1% of Americans that make exorbitant amounts of money each year is represented by Ebenezer Scrooge, the wealthy businessman from the story.  The Ghost of Christmas Future is represented by a hooded figure, bearing the title “Taxes.”  Lastly, the elephant, representing the Republican party, is pleading to the Ghost not to harm Scrooge, or the 1%, but instead to go after the middle/lower class.

    The philosophy insinuated in this political cartoon is that the Republican party is more concerned with protecting the wealthy than the middle class/lower class/those who are suffering/those who are struggling.  Recently though, especially in the last year, with talks of the Fiscal Cliff ongoing, taxes have been one of the central topics of discussion.  However, Republican lawmakers have been inflexible in their position of not wanting to raise taxes on upper-income Americans, while having no problem with raising taxes on the middle class, thus putting the burden on those who are the most vulnerable.  Even while many of the country’s richest citizens have spoken out stating that they would gladly pay more taxes, policy has yet to move towards that direction in any real way.

    Taxes are portrayed as a foreboding character, since they are going to affect some group of people in the long run, and the majority of Americans feel that it is just fair that those who have more money pay more taxes on the dollar for every dollar over $250,000.  As a result, this political cartoon not only appeals to the reader’s pathos–if they are one of the people who feel that the rich should pay more–as well as logos, since it’s sort of a matter of logic, whether or not the rich should pay more since they have more.

    However, the logic of that can easily vary from person to person, depending on whether or not any given person holds “Robin Hood-esque” values of social welfare.


  5. Benghazi Political Cartoon

    November 30, 2012 by Audrey Goldman

    This weeks political cartoon is centered around the idea of the Benghazi ordeal that has been much talked about for the past several weeks and months.  While there have been politicians demanding answers of what exactly led to the death of the American officials in Benghazi, something that has been conspicuously left out of the conversation is the questions from the military itself.

    This political cartoon directly appeals to pathos and logos.  It appeals to pathos in that there are named statistics of the amount of people that have died in the wars int he past decade.  Through seeing these enormous numbers, it reminds us that there are many others that have died and that the soldiers in fact need answers so that they are better able to protect themselves in the future months, at least until we are withdrawn from the Middle East.  We feel for these soldiers and those that have died.

    However, at the same time it appeals to logos, since does it make logical sense that there is such an uproar over the death of 4 men when under Bush’s administration thousands died?  Why did the nation not call for intense investigations into the deaths of these men and the causes?  The current president has been, I feel, unfairly victimized by the media and the Republicans in Congress for something that happens whenever we are in a warzone.  It also makes more logical sense that the military should be more concerned with getting intelligence surrounding their deaths as opposed to Congress, especially since it affects the lives of the soldiers so much more.


  6. Obama’s Re-election Political Carton

    November 9, 2012 by Audrey Goldman

     

    In this political cartoon, we see several people both crowded into two distinct groups.  The first group of people, on the left, is led by President Obama and Michelle Obama, celebrating their victory from this past Tuesday’s election.  They are rejoicing that Obama has been elected for four more years.  However, on the right, the GOP is also singing a happy song that they’re going to put the country in a deadlock for another four more years. 

    This political cartoon appeals to ethos, pathos, and logos.  It appeals to ethos since it makes us question the morals of the Republican party, since it is their job to get things done for the country, but they are inhibiting progress by fillibustering and refusing to cooperate with Democrats.  It makes them seem like not only are they devoid of their morals as an elected representative of the people, but as people whose goal is to see Obama fail.

    It appeals to pathos b ecause what I have just described should make Americans feel extremely upset at the state of politicians in this election.  I thought that the election of 2010 and the nonsense in the House that followed would be a big enough cue for the American public that they had elected the wrong representatives to the House.  However, the Republicans still hold control of the House, while the Democrats hold control of the Senate.  Hopefully in 2014 the American people will have figured it out by then.

    It appeals to logos since it is illogical for people who are supposed to represent our best interests are failing to represent anything at all, and in doing so they are failing to let our country be as successful as it can by non-cooperation.


  7. Climate Change Political Cartoon

    October 26, 2012 by Audrey Goldman

    In this political cartoon, the main idea is that the presidential candidates for the election in just under 2 weeks have not talked about the environment at all in their campaigns.  The polar bear, something commonly recognized as related to climate change, is disgruntled, to say the least, that no one seems to be talking about this global issue.  As someone that has strictly followed these debates, this is something that I have been alarmed by, since energy for a while was Obama’s big push.  However, it has been shoved to the side by more “important/pressing” topics like the economy.

    This cartoon appeals to logos and pathos.  It appeals to logos in that it makes logical sense that climate change should be discussed during a debate, since it concerns all life on earth and the future of it’s existence.  However, it is illogical that it is not being discussed in any capacity.  While people may dispute the legitimacy of climate change, it is scientifically backed by pretty much every scientist on the planet.  We, as humans that probably want to survive a few hundred more years at least as a race should start thinking about making definitive policy changes and decisions regarding what we can do to inhibit the already occurring phenomena.

    In addition to logos, it appeals to pathos in that there is a pretty much helpless polar bear in the middle of an ocean that we, as empathetic beings, should want to help him.  We are often bombarded with images of swimming polar bears and their cubs in the oceans, or jumping from one tiny fragment of ice to another.  The WWF shows commercials during prime-time shows, we see them on the news every time a giant part of a glacier breaks off, and we see them in advertisements asking for donations to help save them.  While this cartoon does make an appeal to pathos, it could have been much stronger if the polar bear wasn’t in a boat; if it were helplessly swimming with a concerned expression on it’s face, we would probably feel worse for it than the grumpy, dissatisfied one in a boat with a radio.


  8. A College Education Pays Off

    October 19, 2012 by Audrey Goldman

    Instead of analyzing a political cartoon this week, I chose to analyze a cartoon that targets college-aged, all the way up to middle aged people that have attended or are attending college.  There are two men at a water cooler, clearly at work, discussing whether the older man is going to be retiring any time soon, to which he replies that he will retire as soon as he has paid off his student loan.  This is a topic that weighs heavily on the conscience of anyone that has had, or needs to, pay for their college education.  Usually college ends up costing around $175,000, maybe even up to $250,000 or more.  Student loans, with interest, pile up and often take until someone is middle aged or older to pay off, depending on their salaries coming out of school.

    I know that it took my parents, Ivy League university graduates, until their 40’s to pay off their loans, though my dad had more because he attended law school after getting his undergrad degree.

    This cartoon appeals strongly to the reader’s pathos and logos.  If the reader has to pay off loans, it directly appeals to their grief and frustration surrounding their repayment.  If people cannot pay their loans off quickly enough, they are ladened with heavy fines.  One of my biggest fears coming out of college is that I won’t be able to connect with a job that allows for me to quickly and efficiently pay off any loans that I may have.  It also appeals to the reader’s pathos because we feel horrible that this old man, probably still in his 80’s, will not be able to have a much-deserved retirement, not only because he probably won’t live to see it, but because if he’s still paying off his loans, he most certainly has not been able to save up enough money for retirement even if he wanted to, which just seems flat-out wrong.

    The cartoon appeals to the reader’s logos as well because it makes us question whether it is really logical to attend college for 4 years only to gain a basic skill set in a field of one’s choice then to just be burdened with massive debt that we won’t be able to repay for probably over a decade.  Is this a logical choice?  There are some careers that require more than one degree, for the most part, such as medical, business, or law professions.  Is it worth it to go through all of this schooling just to end up in a low-paying job straddled with debt?

    What do you think about this logical/illogical choice?  Are there better alternatives than going to college for what you want to do?


  9. October 11, 2012 by Audrey Goldman

    For this week’s RCL blog, I chose to do another political cartoon.  In this cartoon, there is a small boy asking his mom about the middle class and whether they constitute the middle class.  Then, on TV, Mitt Romney’s face is seen saying that the middle class income is from $200,000-$250,000.  To that, the mom grumbles is anger and disapproval of his statements, while the little boy assumes his mom’s reaction to be telling that according to those statements they are not members of the middle class.

    This cartoon strongly appeals to the audience’s emotions and logic, while attacking Romney’s personal ethics.

    It appeals to pathos since the majority of individuals who consider themselves to be members of the middle class make less than $200,000 a year, and believe that those who make that much money are members of the upper class.  So, this makes the viewer, if the viewer is in the income range under $200,000, feel angry by Mitt’s ignorance to the inequality in the country and to the “fact” that majority of Americans make $200,000-$250,000 a year.  In addition, it would make people in that income bracket feel less than, and frustrated by the fact that this argument is even going on in the country.

    Next, it appeals to logos because the middle income should, inherently be the average income of households in the country.  If that were true, which it logically makes sense to be, the middle income would be around $50,000, a far cry from $200,000!  In affect, this mathematical appeal to logos ultimately portrays Romney as out of touch with reality regarding this figure, and as a result with the majority of Americans.

    Finally, the cartoon appeals to Mitt’s ethics.  If Romney believes that the middle class constitutes of households making over $200,000 a year,


  10. Fashion Across The States

    October 11, 2012 by Audrey Goldman

    This week I will be blogging about fashion from cities across the United States.  I chose 5 cities- New York, San Diego, Philadelphia, Austin, and Portland.  Each city is very distinct in their tastes.  For each city, I scoped through lookbook.nu, obviously, and sorted by city so that I could see bloggers from each city and then picked looks from those that were the most cohesive to an overall theme.

    First, we’re going to look at New York City, one of the most prevalent fashion capitals in the world next to Paris, Milan, London, and Tokyo.  Below are some looks that I found.  If you click on the each photo, it will direct you to that blogger’s website so you can see more of their looks and maybe get some inspiration.

    One of the common threads throughout these photos (besides the fact that all three outfits are ridiculously adorable) is the fact that neutral colors dominate all of the clothes.  Besides a coral bag, mauve skirt, and denim jacket, almost every color in these outfits is either black, cream, beige, or camel.  New York fashion is probably most well-known for it’s consistently neutral color choices, giving it a very modern, European, and somber look as opposed to some other cities.  Another interesting thing about NYC fashion is that there are fashion subcultures throughout the city, depending on what district you’re in.  If you’re in the Village, you’re going to look much more urban and edgy than someone that lives in the Upper East Side, who would look very polished and classic.  In the pictures above, these girls are most likely from the Village, or maybe Mid-town, though that’s less likely.  I can tell this because they, first off, are far too young to be able to afford to live anywhere else in Manhattan.  They are also dressed much more indie and edgy than someone that would live in Kipp’s Bay, the Upper East or Upper West.  A final common thread for NYC fashion is that layering is a huge part of a New York girl’s fashion identity.  In the first photo, the girl is wearing a sheer sort of blouse under a heavy sweater.  In the second photo, the girl is wearing a t-shirt under a cardigan, under a leather jacket, as well as opaque tights under jean shorts.  And in the last picture, the girl is wearing a flouncy blouse under a denim jacket, as well as opaque black tights under a skirt.  One of the reasons for doing this is that NYC weather can get pretty cold and pretty warm all within the span of one day, so layering is essential to adapt to the frequently changing climate.

    Next, we’re going to look at San Diego styles.

    One of the first things that I noticed about these styles is obviously that there is much less clothing than the NYC fashions.  There is also a lot more color in these fashion choices than a lot of other cities.  California is a very bright colorful place, besides San Francisco when it’s foggy.  There is also a lot of floral pattern throughout the garments, like in the girls’ shirts in the second and third photos.  In addition, in these San Diego fashions, there tends to be much more accessorizing, noticeably the plethora of bangles on all 3 of the girls.  They’re also not strong proponents of layering, unlike cities like Philly and NYC in the North East.  Cali weather is much more temperate than the NE, so they don’t have to worry about sudden weather changes throughout the day.

    In the next photos, we’re going to look at Philly fashion, which is near and dear to my heart since I live about 45 minutes outside of the city.

    In Philly, there is a common thread that our fashion is very relaxed and laid back.  We tend to have an affinity for looser fitting garments, like the pants in the first photo, the cardigan and men’s t-shirt in the second, and the loose tank top in the third picture.  For the most part, Philly girls hold being comfortable at a higher priority than looking as polished or as glam as girls from other cities.  We’re in general a bit more down to earth than other girls, more willing to throw on a pair of leggings and a cute cardigan to go out than a blouse and pants.  However, there are parts of Philly and the suburbs that are a bit more polished, like Lower Merion, Bala Cynwyd, and Haverford, since that’s where most of the wealth of the suburbs resides.  We, like NYC girls, also dress with a strong consciousness of what the weather is going to be like, since there’s few things worse to us than being too hot or too cold.  For that reason also, we wear a lot of layers.

    Next, we’re going to look at Austin, Texas.

    In these photos, we see a few common threads.  Firstly, there is a trend for the most part of neutrals (browns and creams in particular) that appear in almost every garment.  In the first photo, the main color of the dress is a rich cream.  In the second photo, the girl’s blouse is cream and her saddle bag and belt are a rich mahogany, while her pants are a taupe-y grey.  In the last photo, the girl wears a chestnut brown suede jacket, cream pants, and rich brown ankle booties with a cherry-mahogany stacked wood heel.  Another characteristic of Austin fashion is that there is a general affinity for woven accessories, like the straw hat and wedges in the first photo and the ballet flats in the second photo.  There are two general types of Texas fashions: girly and western.  The first photo is clearly an example of the sort of debutante, girly Texas fashion that is prevalent amongst those who are old-money Texans.  These girly fashions are also more prevalent in cities like Dallas, where being glam is more common than western-inspired apparel.  However, the second and third photos clearly illustrate a much more western-inspired fashion sensibility.  The prevalence of rich leathers, especially in shoes and accessories permeates this type of Austin fashion.  And suedes and hides are also a greater part of southwestern fashions, so it’s no surprise that girls in Austin have these fabrics in their wardrobes.

    Lastly, we’re going to look at fashions from Portland, Oregon, the home of the “hipster.”

    There are also several connecting themes throughout these photos that pretty accurately depict Portland/hipster style.  First off, in the first and third photos, there is clearly a theme of plaid flannel that generally can be used to epitomize northwestern US style.  When we think of Oregon or Washington, generally people think of the dense forest and lumberjacks, and Portland style certainly has this lumberjack influence, even more-so than across the rest of the U.S., which is also a fan of the trend.  In addition, due to the consistently inclement weather in the northwest, layers and warmth are a big part of the fashion culture.  In the first photo, the girl is wearing a parka, sweater, and giant knit shawl, while the girl in the bottom photo is wearing a flannel shirt over a sweatshirt over a long sleeve t-shirt, as well as a skirt over pants.  Another trend is crazy hair, which further emphasizes the “hipster” mentality of Portland.  The girl in the top photo has her hair in a giant top-knot, which wasn’t really a trend until much later after this photo was put on lookbook.nu.  In the second photo, the girl has very retro straight-across bangs and her hair is dyed a bright cherry red.  And in the last photo, the girl’s hair almost looks natural, until you look closely and see that part of it is dyed a bright blue hue.  Lastly, another common thread amongst Portland-dwelling fashionistas is that they tend to look to the past and older generations for fashion inspirations.  For example, in the first photo, the girl is wearing tortoiseshell cat-eye sunglasses and a 1920’s-esque women’s overcoat.  In the second photo, the girl is wearing a very vintage-y, victorian-inspired lace top and shorts, pairing it with a 1960’s-inspired fringe bag and loads of vintage faded brass rings and wood bangles.  Finally, in the last photo, the girl has paired her relatively-modern clothing with 1980’s inspired Doc Marten shoes.

    I hope that you enjoyed my blog this week!  Let me know what you think of these fashions, including what city you think you most personally can relate to!

    xo


Skip to toolbar